On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote:


wrote in message
...
Get a Mac.

Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter.

snip......

Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat
all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and
their aiders& abettors.
It would be mind boggling!


Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't
imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted
nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally
bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and
HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one
of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah.


Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something
any spoofer might say?

Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is.

I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself
enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to
name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point.




Here's a suggestion, John. Spend the next week attempting to harass
those you enable, and then report back here.

On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, HarryK wrote:

On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote:


wrote in message
...
Get a Mac.

Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter.

snip......

Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat
all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and
their aiders& abettors.
It would be mind boggling!


Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't
imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted
nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally
bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and
HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one
of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah.


Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something
any spoofer might say?

Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is.

I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself
enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to
name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point.

On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote:


wrote in message
...
Get a Mac.

Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter.

snip......

Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat
all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and
their aiders& abettors.
It would be mind boggling!


Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't
imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted
nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally
bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and
HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one
of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah.


Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something
any spoofer might say?

Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is.

I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself
enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to
name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point.


John, your poor skills with the English language are showing again.

Ziggy *is* a classic little right-wing snot flinger. His posts, those of
his I've read, prove it. The posts of his camp followers are no different.

I'm not *accusing* him of nitwitted nonwitticisms. His words speak for
themselves. They *are* nitwitted nonwitticisms.

The rest of the post is not "unfounded accusations," as you claim, but
speculation. There's a difference, and it isn't subtle.

Once again, I suggest you spend the next week attempting to harass those
you enable, and then report back here. The idea was to *stop* the id
spoofing, the "taunts," and the rest of the moronic nonsense that plague
this newsgroup.

By enabling the trash and by engaging in harassment yourself, you are
part of the problem.

On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:22:02 -0500, HarryK wrote:

On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote:


wrote in message
...
Get a Mac.

Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter.

snip......

Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat
all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and
their aiders& abettors.
It would be mind boggling!


Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't
imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted
nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally
bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and
HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one
of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah.


Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something
any spoofer might say?

Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is.

I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself
enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to
name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point.




Here's a suggestion, John. Spend the next week attempting to harass
those you enable, and then report back here.

I'm not ditzy enough to attempt addressing the spoofers. I don't know who they
are, and I've made my position on the matter well known.

On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:39:52 -0500, HarryK wrote:

On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote:


wrote in message
...
Get a Mac.

Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter.

snip......

Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat
all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and
their aiders& abettors.
It would be mind boggling!


Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't
imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted
nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally
bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and
HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one
of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah.


Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something
any spoofer might say?

Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is.

I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself
enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to
name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point.


John, your poor skills with the English language are showing again.

Ziggy *is* a classic little right-wing snot flinger. His posts, those of
his I've read, prove it. The posts of his camp followers are no different.

I'm not *accusing* him of nitwitted nonwitticisms. His words speak for
themselves. They *are* nitwitted nonwitticisms.

The rest of the post is not "unfounded accusations," as you claim, but
speculation. There's a difference, and it isn't subtle.

Once again, I suggest you spend the next week attempting to harass those
you enable, and then report back here. The idea was to *stop* the id
spoofing, the "taunts," and the rest of the moronic nonsense that plague
this newsgroup.

By enabling the trash and by engaging in harassment yourself, you are
part of the problem.


Oh. There's a big difference between your accusatory 'speculation' and
'unfounded accusations'.

I'll never get over what a master of the English language you think you are.

You are, in your own opinion, *the man*.

Kudos, Harry.

On 12/13/10 4:47 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:39:52 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote:


wrote in message
...
Get a Mac.

Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter.

snip......

Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat
all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and
their aiders& abettors.
It would be mind boggling!


Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't
imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted
nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally
bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and
HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one
of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah.


Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something
any spoofer might say?

Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is.

I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself
enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to
name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point.


John, your poor skills with the English language are showing again.

Ziggy *is* a classic little right-wing snot flinger. His posts, those of
his I've read, prove it. The posts of his camp followers are no different.

I'm not *accusing* him of nitwitted nonwitticisms. His words speak for
themselves. They *are* nitwitted nonwitticisms.

The rest of the post is not "unfounded accusations," as you claim, but
speculation. There's a difference, and it isn't subtle.

Once again, I suggest you spend the next week attempting to harass those
you enable, and then report back here. The idea was to *stop* the id
spoofing, the "taunts," and the rest of the moronic nonsense that plague
this newsgroup.

By enabling the trash and by engaging in harassment yourself, you are
part of the problem.


Oh. There's a big difference between your accusatory 'speculation' and
'unfounded accusations'.


There is a difference between speculation and unfounded accusation. It
isn't my fault you cannot discern the difference.

"HarryK" wrote in message ...
On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote:


wrote in message
...
Get a Mac.

Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter.

snip......

Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat
all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and
their aiders& abettors.
It would be mind boggling!


Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't
imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted
nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally
bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and
HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one
of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah.


Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something
any spoofer might say?

Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is.


Would you like a little breather so you can get off the ropes?

--
Ziggy®

"HarryK" wrote in message ...
On 12/13/10 3:48 PM, HarryK wrote:
On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote:


wrote in message
...
Get a Mac.

Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter.

snip......

Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat
all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and
their aiders& abettors.
It would be mind boggling!


Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't
imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted
nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally
bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and
HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one
of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah.


Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than
something
any spoofer might say?

Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is.

When people ridicule me, none of it is true, so there. They lie and
they know it. You and a few others of the righties just enable them.

JohnH, if you don't "get some religion" and stop this crap, I will put
you in bozo bin and only comment on your posts indirectly. Don't say
you weren't warned.


Ziggy deserves an apology. Don't you think, Harry ;-)

--
Ziggy®

"John H" wrote in message ...
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, HarryK wrote:

On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote:


wrote in message
...
Get a Mac.

Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter.

snip......

Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat
all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and
their aiders& abettors.
It would be mind boggling!


Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't
imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted
nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally
bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and
HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one
of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah.


Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something
any spoofer might say?

Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is.

I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself
enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to
name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point.


The result of too many basket weaving courses and not enough logic and critical thinking.

--
Ziggy®

"HarryK" wrote in message news
On 12/13/10 4:22 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:48:00 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 3:29 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:18:52 -0500, wrote:

On 12/13/10 11:12 AM, YukonBound wrote:


wrote in message
...
Get a Mac.

Just what you'd expect from a Fifth Grade Back Row Farter.

snip......

Just imagine the bandwidth wasted if someone wanted to actually repeat
all the garbage uttered by the spoofers, agitators, instigators and
their aiders& abettors.
It would be mind boggling!


Ziggy is a classic little right-wing snot flinger, though I can't
imagine anyone taking the time to collect and repost his nitwitted
nonwitticisms. He presents as what might happen if someone accidentally
bred flajim, loogy, and scotty and, of course, his CrotchRotted Don and
HarryK personas here are even worse, sort of if Loogy was bred with one
of the Palin girls, and I include Sarah.


Harry, would you say the post above is more valuable to the group than something
any spoofer might say?

Of course. It points out precisely what ziggy is.

I says a lot about the author also. It says the author can't control himself
enough to ignore the taunts coming his way, and that he must resort to
name-calling and unfounded accusations to make his point.


John, your poor skills with the English language are showing again.

Ziggy *is* a classic little right-wing snot flinger. His posts, those of
his I've read, prove it. The posts of his camp followers are no different.

I'm not *accusing* him of nitwitted nonwitticisms. His words speak for
themselves. They *are* nitwitted nonwitticisms.

The rest of the post is not "unfounded accusations," as you claim, but
speculation. There's a difference, and it isn't subtle.

Once again, I suggest you spend the next week attempting to harass those
you enable, and then report back here. The idea was to *stop* the id
spoofing, the "taunts," and the rest of the moronic nonsense that plague
this newsgroup.

By enabling the trash and by engaging in harassment yourself, you are
part of the problem.





A little silence on the line folks while we hear some non caustic witticisms from our dear friend Harry Krause.
SILENCE PLEASE!
Go ahead Harry. You have the floor.

--
Ziggy®