| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Deck Project, continuing saga
On 12/20/10 7:46 PM, L G wrote:
HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 8:44 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 7:55 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 9:45 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 12/17/10 8:46 PM, HarryK wrote: On 12/17/10 6:23 PM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Well, not a bad day. Got the rear doubled beam up, got the four posts that support it up, got the ledger board fastened properly to the house's structure. I was informed by my helper that the screws we used weren't actually called lag screws/bolts, but something else. They're galvanized, a little thinner, not tapered, with lots of wide threads, and are about 4" long. They are what are used instead of traditional lag screws/bolts for attaching the ledger board to house structure, and the posts to the beams. I'll have to find what what they are called. We've got two attached through the ledger board to structure every 16" O/C now. The beams are heavy. They were assembled from 2x10 lumber, glued and nailed to double them up. The pressure treated lumber looks a little different than what I had expected, in that it is far less "green" in color than the pressure treated lumber I had messed with in the past. Apparently there are several formulas extant now for producing pressure treated lumber, and each renders the final product a different color. Different lumber yards sell pressure treated lumber from different vendors, obviously. I think I will consider building a traditionally planked wood rowboat next year, just for the hell of it, and maybe include sail gear, too. Can you invite Scotty down for a bit and teach him a thing or three? Ok, Don, here is a Snotty for you. Another "Snotty" for the Harry spoofer. Yup, right back to your old tricks.. Hopefully the spoofers have the time to make you irrelevant again since you can't play nice...  Another "Snotty" for Scottie. I'm playing nice. I'm simply keeping track of how many "Snotty" comments your side makes here, Scott. At the moment, you are tied with LG, three each. This will be enlightening. My theory is that most of the snotty comments made in this newsgroup come from your side. So far, and it is early, the theory is correct. I think your study is tainted by the fact that you ignore "your side's" participation. Paul would be critical of your lack of rational, scientific,unbiased,and comprehensive statistical analysis. You are entitled to your thoughts. I am keeping an unofficial count on "my side's" Snotty comments. So far, "your side" is way way ahead on the totaliser. You'll note that I am not making any snotty comments. This, of course, will have no impact on those on your side who do and still claim that *my* comments are the reason they make snotty comments. You're already earned two Snotties today for a couple of your comments. Do you have any desire to stop making those sorts of posts about other posters here? I'm only counting snotty remarks made about other active posters here, not about those who do not post here. You need to post your snotty rules in order to level the snotty playing field. You seem quite protective of your team's scoring. Why is that? The fix is on. You've rigged the game to produce the result you desire. The rules are simple. If you make an insulting comment about another poster here, you get a snotty. There are no other rules except for the Harry ID spoofer, whose every post earns him a Snotty because he is ID spoofing and that is intrinsically an insult. If you don't make insulting comments about other posters here, you don't get snotties. Simple. Who's rules? Yours? You are a documented liar. This qualifies you for a snotty |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Deck Project, continuing saga
In article ,
says... HarryK wrote: On 12/18/10 8:44 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/18/10 7:55 AM, Ziggy® wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/17/10 9:45 PM, I am Tosk wrote: In , says... On 12/17/10 8:46 PM, HarryK wrote: On 12/17/10 6:23 PM, YukonBound wrote: wrote in message ... Well, not a bad day. Got the rear doubled beam up, got the four posts that support it up, got the ledger board fastened properly to the house's structure. I was informed by my helper that the screws we used weren't actually called lag screws/bolts, but something else. They're galvanized, a little thinner, not tapered, with lots of wide threads, and are about 4" long. They are what are used instead of traditional lag screws/bolts for attaching the ledger board to house structure, and the posts to the beams. I'll have to find what what they are called. We've got two attached through the ledger board to structure every 16" O/C now. The beams are heavy. They were assembled from 2x10 lumber, glued and nailed to double them up. The pressure treated lumber looks a little different than what I had expected, in that it is far less "green" in color than the pressure treated lumber I had messed with in the past. Apparently there are several formulas extant now for producing pressure treated lumber, and each renders the final product a different color. Different lumber yards sell pressure treated lumber from different vendors, obviously. I think I will consider building a traditionally planked wood rowboat next year, just for the hell of it, and maybe include sail gear, too. Can you invite Scotty down for a bit and teach him a thing or three? Ok, Don, here is a Snotty for you. Another "Snotty" for the Harry spoofer. Yup, right back to your old tricks.. Hopefully the spoofers have the time to make you irrelevant again since you can't play nice... Another "Snotty" for Scottie. I'm playing nice. I'm simply keeping track of how many "Snotty" comments your side makes here, Scott. At the moment, you are tied with LG, three each. This will be enlightening. My theory is that most of the snotty comments made in this newsgroup come from your side. So far, and it is early, the theory is correct. I think your study is tainted by the fact that you ignore "your side's" participation. Paul would be critical of your lack of rational, scientific,unbiased,and comprehensive statistical analysis. You are entitled to your thoughts. I am keeping an unofficial count on "my side's" Snotty comments. So far, "your side" is way way ahead on the totaliser. You'll note that I am not making any snotty comments. This, of course, will have no impact on those on your side who do and still claim that *my* comments are the reason they make snotty comments. You're already earned two Snotties today for a couple of your comments. Do you have any desire to stop making those sorts of posts about other posters here? I'm only counting snotty remarks made about other active posters here, not about those who do not post here. You need to post your snotty rules in order to level the snotty playing field. You seem quite protective of your team's scoring. Why is that? The fix is on. You've rigged the game to produce the result you desire. The rules are simple. If you make an insulting comment about another poster here, you get a snotty. There are no other rules except for the Harry ID spoofer, whose every post earns him a Snotty because he is ID spoofing and that is intrinsically an insult. If you don't make insulting comments about other posters here, you don't get snotties. Simple. Who's rules? Yours? You are a documented liar. Yes, I do lie alot but still, here's your Snotty for bringing that to everyone's attention. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Deck Project, continuing saga
|
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Windlass project for my aluminum b oat is complete! (With photos ofthe project.) | General | |||
| Continuing 'problems' for the GOP | General | |||
| The Continuing Saga of Repairing Cruis'n Rulz! | General | |||
| Continuing the cruise | Cruising | |||
| Continuing Saga of Far Cove's Engine | General | |||
![L G[_11_] is offline](https://www.boatbanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Linear Mode
