Those on the far left, and those on the far right will both become
unhinged after Obama's state of the union address last night. The left
will claim that it was the best thing ever (not bad, but not great in my
opinion) and the right will think there were subliminal messages, etc.
that means that Obama wants to "shred the constitution", ruin the
country, wants the world to become Muslim, etc.

On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:08:11 -0500, Spooker wrote:



Those on the far left, and those on the far right will both become
unhinged after Obama's state of the union address last night. The left
will claim that it was the best thing ever (not bad, but not great in my
opinion) and the right will think there were subliminal messages, etc.
that means that Obama wants to "shred the constitution", ruin the
country, wants the world to become Muslim, etc.

I'm on the far left (by rec.boats standards) and I thought it was
boring. Not nearly as boring as Bush, though.

On 1/26/11 11:08 AM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:08:11 -0500, wrote:



Those on the far left, and those on the far right will both become
unhinged after Obama's state of the union address last night. The left
will claim that it was the best thing ever (not bad, but not great in my
opinion) and the right will think there were subliminal messages, etc.
that means that Obama wants to "shred the constitution", ruin the
country, wants the world to become Muslim, etc.

I'm on the far left (by rec.boats standards) and I thought it was
boring. Not nearly as boring as Bush, though.

I missed the Republican response and, sadly, Michele Bachmann's
response. I went to bed right after Obama finished. Obama's speech had
the right tone for the occasion. I thought Boehner looked as if he were
in a self-induced coma, except when Obama mentioned the speaker's father.

On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:08:11 -0500, Spooker wrote:



Those on the far left, and those on the far right will both become
unhinged after Obama's state of the union address last night. The left
will claim that it was the best thing ever (not bad, but not great in my
opinion) and the right will think there were subliminal messages, etc.
that means that Obama wants to "shred the constitution", ruin the
country, wants the world to become Muslim, etc.

And, as usual, the right is right.

On 1/26/11 11:39 AM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:08:11 -0500, wrote:



Those on the far left, and those on the far right will both become
unhinged after Obama's state of the union address last night. The left
will claim that it was the best thing ever (not bad, but not great in my
opinion) and the right will think there were subliminal messages, etc.
that means that Obama wants to "shred the constitution", ruin the
country, wants the world to become Muslim, etc.

And, as usual, the right isreich.

Fixed it for ya!

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:08:11 -0500, Spooker wrote:



Those on the far left, and those on the far right will both become
unhinged after Obama's state of the union address last night. The left
will claim that it was the best thing ever (not bad, but not great in my
opinion) and the right will think there were subliminal messages, etc.
that means that Obama wants to "shred the constitution", ruin the
country, wants the world to become Muslim, etc.

And, as usual, the right is right.

I rest my case.....

On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 11:22:34 -0500, Harryk
wrote:

On 1/26/11 11:08 AM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:08:11 -0500, wrote:



Those on the far left, and those on the far right will both become
unhinged after Obama's state of the union address last night. The left
will claim that it was the best thing ever (not bad, but not great in my
opinion) and the right will think there were subliminal messages, etc.
that means that Obama wants to "shred the constitution", ruin the
country, wants the world to become Muslim, etc.

I'm on the far left (by rec.boats standards) and I thought it was
boring. Not nearly as boring as Bush, though.

I missed the Republican response and, sadly, Michele Bachmann's
response. I went to bed right after Obama finished. Obama's speech had
the right tone for the occasion. I thought Boehner looked as if he were
in a self-induced coma, except when Obama mentioned the speaker's father.

I was having a good laugh watching for what messages he supported.
Anything that was good for american public that Boner thought his
constituents (insurance companies) might not like was ignored.

No support of any health care progress, no support of repealing DADT,
no support of repealing tax cuts for wealthiest, no support of
anything that could be considered anti-business, including closing
loopholes in tax policy.

Bachmann looked like she was high on something. Her pupils were
dialated to the size of a dime. Spooky looking. I wouldn't doubt she
did it on purpose in the interest of throwing a hex on the simple.

On Jan 26, 12:03*pm, jps wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 11:22:34 -0500, Harryk
wrote:





On 1/26/11 11:08 AM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:08:11 -0500, *wrote:

Those on the far left, and those on the far right will both become
unhinged after Obama's state of the union address last night. The left
will claim that it was the best thing ever (not bad, but not great in my
opinion) and the right will think there were subliminal messages, etc..
that means that Obama wants to "shred the constitution", ruin the
country, wants the world to become Muslim, etc.

I'm on the far left (by rec.boats standards) and I thought it was
boring. *Not nearly as boring as Bush, though.

I missed the Republican response and, sadly, Michele Bachmann's
response. I went to bed right after Obama finished. Obama's speech had
the right tone for the occasion. I thought Boehner looked as if he were
in a self-induced coma, except when Obama mentioned the speaker's father..

I was having a good laugh watching for what messages he supported.
Anything that was good for american public that Boner thought his
constituents (insurance companies) might not like was ignored.

No support of any health care progress, no support of repealing DADT,
no support of repealing tax cuts for wealthiest, no support of
anything that could be considered anti-business, including closing
loopholes in tax policy.

Bachmann looked like she was high on something. *Her pupils were
dialated to the size of a dime. *Spooky looking. *I wouldn't doubt she
did it on purpose in the interest of throwing a hex on the simple.

It obviously worked on you. ;-)

On 1/26/11 1:49 PM, Jack. wrote:
On Jan 26, 12:03 pm, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 11:22:34 -0500,
wrote:





On 1/26/11 11:08 AM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:08:11 -0500, wrote:

Those on the far left, and those on the far right will both become
unhinged after Obama's state of the union address last night. The left
will claim that it was the best thing ever (not bad, but not great in my
opinion) and the right will think there were subliminal messages, etc.
that means that Obama wants to "shred the constitution", ruin the
country, wants the world to become Muslim, etc.

I'm on the far left (by rec.boats standards) and I thought it was
boring. Not nearly as boring as Bush, though.

I missed the Republican response and, sadly, Michele Bachmann's
response. I went to bed right after Obama finished. Obama's speech had
the right tone for the occasion. I thought Boehner looked as if he were
in a self-induced coma, except when Obama mentioned the speaker's father.

I was having a good laugh watching for what messages he supported.
Anything that was good for american public that Boner thought his
constituents (insurance companies) might not like was ignored.

No support of any health care progress, no support of repealing DADT,
no support of repealing tax cuts for wealthiest, no support of
anything that could be considered anti-business, including closing
loopholes in tax policy.

Bachmann looked like she was high on something. Her pupils were
dialated to the size of a dime. Spooky looking. I wouldn't doubt she
did it on purpose in the interest of throwing a hex on the simple.

It obviously worked on you. ;-)


Where are the jobs, Boehner?

On 1/26/2011 1:49 PM, Jack. wrote:
On Jan 26, 12:03 pm, wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 11:22:34 -0500,
wrote:





On 1/26/11 11:08 AM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:08:11 -0500, wrote:

Those on the far left, and those on the far right will both become
unhinged after Obama's state of the union address last night. The left
will claim that it was the best thing ever (not bad, but not great in my
opinion) and the right will think there were subliminal messages, etc.
that means that Obama wants to "shred the constitution", ruin the
country, wants the world to become Muslim, etc.

I'm on the far left (by rec.boats standards) and I thought it was
boring. Not nearly as boring as Bush, though.

I missed the Republican response and, sadly, Michele Bachmann's
response. I went to bed right after Obama finished. Obama's speech had
the right tone for the occasion. I thought Boehner looked as if he were
in a self-induced coma, except when Obama mentioned the speaker's father.

I was having a good laugh watching for what messages he supported.
Anything that was good for american public that Boner thought his
constituents (insurance companies) might not like was ignored.

No support of any health care progress, no support of repealing DADT,
no support of repealing tax cuts for wealthiest, no support of
anything that could be considered anti-business, including closing
loopholes in tax policy.

Bachmann looked like she was high on something. Her pupils were
dialated to the size of a dime. Spooky looking. I wouldn't doubt she
did it on purpose in the interest of throwing a hex on the simple.

It obviously worked on you. ;-)


Boehner looked more pale than usual.