On 2/9/11 10:15 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/9/11 8:43 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:11:46 -0800, wrote:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0..._n_738007.html

Yikes! I wonder if it's true.

Has there ever been an allegation of an affair by a congressman that
wasn't true? ;-)

That seems to be where democrats and republicans all coincide.

The Republicans seem to prefer same sex relationships, or relationships
with underaged boys.

Really Harry, with your statements suggesting that old men should be
able to rape girls as young as 10 years old (progressives call this
"loving" the children) and ferry them off for an abortion with
absolutely no parental consent at all to cover up their crimes... you
really have no place to morally judge anybody s sexual endeavors.

Sorry.


You are fantasizing again, little ****. I made no such statements.
BTW, what *does* happen when you spend the night in that tent with your
underaged kid?

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/9/11 10:15 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/9/11 8:43 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:11:46 -0800, wrote:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0..._n_738007.html

Yikes! I wonder if it's true.

Has there ever been an allegation of an affair by a congressman that
wasn't true? ;-)

That seems to be where democrats and republicans all coincide.

The Republicans seem to prefer same sex relationships, or relationships
with underaged boys.

Really Harry, with your statements suggesting that old men should be
able to rape girls as young as 10 years old (progressives call this
"loving" the children) and ferry them off for an abortion with
absolutely no parental consent at all to cover up their crimes... you
really have no place to morally judge anybody s sexual endeavors.

Sorry.


You are fantasizing again, little ****. I made no such statements.
BTW, what *does* happen when you spend the night in that tent with your
underaged kid?

You certainly did..

I asked about parental consent, you said no. I asked how young and you
refused to answer. I said it 10 to young to have an abortion without
parental consent, you said no, even at ten at best you might consider
parental notification, after the abortion.. It's all there Harry, you
said it...

On 2/10/11 6:30 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/9/11 10:15 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/9/11 8:43 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:11:46 -0800, wrote:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0..._n_738007.html

Yikes! I wonder if it's true.

Has there ever been an allegation of an affair by a congressman that
wasn't true? ;-)

That seems to be where democrats and republicans all coincide.

The Republicans seem to prefer same sex relationships, or relationships
with underaged boys.

Really Harry, with your statements suggesting that old men should be
able to rape girls as young as 10 years old (progressives call this
"loving" the children) and ferry them off for an abortion with
absolutely no parental consent at all to cover up their crimes... you
really have no place to morally judge anybody s sexual endeavors.

Sorry.


You are fantasizing again, little ****. I made no such statements.
BTW, what *does* happen when you spend the night in that tent with your
underaged kid?

You certainly did..

I asked about parental consent, you said no. I asked how young and you
refused to answer. I said it 10 to young to have an abortion without
parental consent, you said no, even at ten at best you might consider
parental notification, after the abortion.. It's all there Harry, you
said it...



You have often repeated your lie that I think "old men should be able to
rape girls as young as 10." I've never said that nor have I implied it.
It's just fantasy on your part. I do believe that any female of any age
who finds herself pregnant ought to be able to get a safe, medical
abortion if *she* wants one. The problem with prior parental
notification is that some right-wing parents will force the underaged
female to carry to term because of ignorant, superstitious religious
belief or, in the case of Sarah Palin, political ambitions or, in your
case, the inability to come up with the bucks for the procedure.

You prove yourself on a daily basis to be ill-educated and incapable of
understanding what you read. You know nothing about the law, about
morality, about decency or about anything else of substance and value.

Instead of wasting your time here, you should be out looking for a job.
But, if I recall, you didn't have what it takes to hang onto a job
sweeping out a horse barn.

In article ,
says...

On 2/10/11 6:30 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/9/11 10:15 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/9/11 8:43 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:11:46 -0800, wrote:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0..._n_738007.html

Yikes! I wonder if it's true.

Has there ever been an allegation of an affair by a congressman that
wasn't true? ;-)

That seems to be where democrats and republicans all coincide.

The Republicans seem to prefer same sex relationships, or relationships
with underaged boys.

Really Harry, with your statements suggesting that old men should be
able to rape girls as young as 10 years old (progressives call this
"loving" the children) and ferry them off for an abortion with
absolutely no parental consent at all to cover up their crimes... you
really have no place to morally judge anybody s sexual endeavors.

Sorry.


You are fantasizing again, little ****. I made no such statements.
BTW, what *does* happen when you spend the night in that tent with your
underaged kid?

You certainly did..

I asked about parental consent, you said no. I asked how young and you
refused to answer. I said it 10 to young to have an abortion without
parental consent, you said no, even at ten at best you might consider
parental notification, after the abortion.. It's all there Harry, you
said it...



You have often repeated your lie that I think "old men should be able to
rape girls as young as 10." I've never said that nor have I implied it.
It's just fantasy on your part.

Fantasy nothing. If a ten year old girl is pregnant, she *has been
raped, period*. And if the "rapist" sneaks her out for an abortion, it's
to cover up a crime of "rape". What is so difficult about that? You are
protecting rapists, that is a clear fact...

In article ,
says...


Instead of wasting your time here, you should be out looking for a job.
But, if I recall, you didn't have what it takes to hang onto a job
sweeping out a horse barn.

At least I have a job. You have not had one since 1976 that you can show
anybody evidence of...

On Feb 10, 2:20*am, wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 01:01:02 -0500, wrote:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 21:00:14 -0800, wrote:

On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:43:01 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:11:46 -0800, wrote:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0...ffair-lisbeth-....

Yikes! I wonder if it's true.

Has there ever been an allegation of an affair by a congressman that
wasn't true? *;-)

That seems to be where democrats and republicans all coincide.

The only difference is the level of hypocrisy. The Republicans win
every time!

It is probably just more a reflection of the values of the people
who's votes they court. Democratic voters rush to the side of
candidates who cheat on their wives, screw their pages and cheat on
their taxes.

Huh? Let's assume that the sex scandals are equally distributed
between Dems and Reps. The Dems are not the hypocritical "family
value" spouting ones.

Please show us some hard evidence that suggests Dem voters tend to
embrace that kind of behavior.

Personally I still respect the ones who tell the truth more than the
ones who lie no matter what they did, but I am not really a D or an R.

So, then it would be ok with you that Gov. Sanford finally admitted he
was having an affair and spending government funds to do it. Or,
perhaps you think it's ok for Gingrich to cheat on his wife while
she's in the hospital, all the while pushing for Clinton's
impeachment. Or, how about Henry Hyde... that paragon of virtue (at
least in his own mind).- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The problem here is the DNC actively looks into the bedrooms of
Republicans (of course they want you to stay our of theirs) for
election results. I guess if you can't win on the issues, it's a great
way to cheat...

On 2/10/11 6:44 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On 2/10/11 6:30 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/9/11 10:15 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/9/11 8:43 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:11:46 -0800, wrote:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0..._n_738007.html

Yikes! I wonder if it's true.

Has there ever been an allegation of an affair by a congressman that
wasn't true? ;-)

That seems to be where democrats and republicans all coincide.

The Republicans seem to prefer same sex relationships, or relationships
with underaged boys.

Really Harry, with your statements suggesting that old men should be
able to rape girls as young as 10 years old (progressives call this
"loving" the children) and ferry them off for an abortion with
absolutely no parental consent at all to cover up their crimes... you
really have no place to morally judge anybody s sexual endeavors.

Sorry.


You are fantasizing again, little ****. I made no such statements.
BTW, what *does* happen when you spend the night in that tent with your
underaged kid?

You certainly did..

I asked about parental consent, you said no. I asked how young and you
refused to answer. I said it 10 to young to have an abortion without
parental consent, you said no, even at ten at best you might consider
parental notification, after the abortion.. It's all there Harry, you
said it...



You have often repeated your lie that I think "old men should be able to
rape girls as young as 10." I've never said that nor have I implied it.
It's just fantasy on your part.

Fantasy nothing. If a ten year old girl is pregnant, she *has been
raped, period*. And if the "rapist" sneaks her out for an abortion, it's
to cover up a crime of "rape". What is so difficult about that? You are
protecting rapists, that is a clear fact...


A perfect example...of what I never said. You have built my belief that
abortion should be up to the pregnant female into your belief that I
somehow support rape. Again, it is just another example of your
inability to comprehend what you read.

On 2/10/11 6:45 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...


Instead of wasting your time here, you should be out looking for a job.
But, if I recall, you didn't have what it takes to hang onto a job
sweeping out a horse barn.

At least I have a job. You have not had one since 1976 that you can show
anybody evidence of...



Hehehe. You really are incapable of understanding what you read.

Babysitting a teen-aged girl is a job for a teen-ager, Snotty. I meant
you had no real job. And don't try selling that bull**** about your
commercial website. That site has more fraud on it than the Republican
recovery plan.

On Feb 9, 11:00*pm, wrote:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:43:01 -0500, wrote:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:11:46 -0800, wrote:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0...ffair-lisbeth-....

Yikes! I wonder if it's true.

Has there ever been an allegation of an affair by a congressman that
wasn't true? *;-)

That seems to be where democrats and republicans all coincide.

The only difference is the level of hypocrisy. The Republicans win
every time!

Correct D'Plume. You will always get an occasional shocker from the
Republicans. But the Democrats are no dishonest hypocrites.

They are all losers of whom you can expect no better from.

On 2/10/11 6:51 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On Feb 10, 2:20 am, wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 01:01:02 -0500, wrote:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 21:00:14 -0800, wrote:

On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:43:01 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:11:46 -0800, wrote:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0...ffair-lisbeth-...

Yikes! I wonder if it's true.

Has there ever been an allegation of an affair by a congressman that
wasn't true? ;-)

That seems to be where democrats and republicans all coincide.

The only difference is the level of hypocrisy. The Republicans win
every time!

It is probably just more a reflection of the values of the people
who's votes they court. Democratic voters rush to the side of
candidates who cheat on their wives, screw their pages and cheat on
their taxes.

Huh? Let's assume that the sex scandals are equally distributed
between Dems and Reps. The Dems are not the hypocritical "family
value" spouting ones.

Please show us some hard evidence that suggests Dem voters tend to
embrace that kind of behavior.

Personally I still respect the ones who tell the truth more than the
ones who lie no matter what they did, but I am not really a D or an R.

So, then it would be ok with you that Gov. Sanford finally admitted he
was having an affair and spending government funds to do it. Or,
perhaps you think it's ok for Gingrich to cheat on his wife while
she's in the hospital, all the while pushing for Clinton's
impeachment. Or, how about Henry Hyde... that paragon of virtue (at
least in his own mind).- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The problem here is the DNC actively looks into the bedrooms of
Republicans (of course they want you to stay our of theirs) for
election results. I guess if you can't win on the issues, it's a great
way to cheat...


Hypocrisy, thy name is elected GOP officeholder.