In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/10/11 9:20 AM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:43:01 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:11:46 -0800, wrote:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0..._n_738007.html

Yikes! I wonder if it's true.

Has there ever been an allegation of an affair by a congressman that
wasn't true? ;-)

That seems to be where democrats and republicans all coincide.

And maybe someone got their stories mixed up.


Boner, er, Boehner, is Herring's new hero. A few years ago, Herring was
touting Glenn Beck.

It's amazing how these right-wing ****s rise to the surface, isn't it?

Five years ago, Beck was right on just about everything he said. If you
looked to other than George Soros media for your news, you would know
that...

On 2/10/11 9:41 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In articleLLGdnQKVhbMoac7QnZ2dnUVZ_hydnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/10/11 9:20 AM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:43:01 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:11:46 -0800, wrote:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0..._n_738007.html

Yikes! I wonder if it's true.

Has there ever been an allegation of an affair by a congressman that
wasn't true? ;-)

That seems to be where democrats and republicans all coincide.

And maybe someone got their stories mixed up.


Boner, er, Boehner, is Herring's new hero. A few years ago, Herring was
touting Glenn Beck.

It's amazing how these right-wing ****s rise to the surface, isn't it?

Five years ago, Beck was right on just about everything he said. If you
looked to other than George Soros media for your news, you would know
that...

"Five years ago, Beck was right on just about everything he said."

Well, that explains a lot about you.

On 2/10/11 12:25 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 23:20:49 -0800, wrote:

On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 01:01:02 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 21:00:14 -0800, wrote:

On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:43:01 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:11:46 -0800, wrote:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0..._n_738007.html

Yikes! I wonder if it's true.

Has there ever been an allegation of an affair by a congressman that
wasn't true? ;-)

That seems to be where democrats and republicans all coincide.

The only difference is the level of hypocrisy. The Republicans win
every time!

It is probably just more a reflection of the values of the people
who's votes they court. Democratic voters rush to the side of
candidates who cheat on their wives, screw their pages and cheat on
their taxes.

Huh? Let's assume that the sex scandals are equally distributed
between Dems and Reps. The Dems are not the hypocritical "family
value" spouting ones.

Please show us some hard evidence that suggests Dem voters tend to
embrace that kind of behavior.

You folks leaped to the defense of Clinton, Studds, Frank, and
Edwards.(the list goes on)
Sanford, Gingrich and Craig were pushed out.


It's the conservatives and Repubs, mostly, who try to own "family
values," and it's the conservatives and Repubs, mostly, who get caught
with their dicks in little boys.

We were at a party a few weeks ago when the subject of President Bill
came up. One of the younger women, a gal in her early 30s, said she
thought Clinton was one of the sexiest men alive, and that she'd hop
into the sack with him at the drop of a shoe. Many of the other women
there agreed. It wasn't a party where the invitees represented only one
side of the political fence.

I'm still waiting for Penelope Cruz to return my calls.

On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 03:51:53 -0800 (PST), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote:

On Feb 10, 2:20*am, wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 01:01:02 -0500, wrote:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 21:00:14 -0800, wrote:

On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:43:01 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:11:46 -0800, wrote:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0...ffair-lisbeth-...

Yikes! I wonder if it's true.

Has there ever been an allegation of an affair by a congressman that
wasn't true? *;-)

That seems to be where democrats and republicans all coincide.

The only difference is the level of hypocrisy. The Republicans win
every time!

It is probably just more a reflection of the values of the people
who's votes they court. Democratic voters rush to the side of
candidates who cheat on their wives, screw their pages and cheat on
their taxes.

Huh? Let's assume that the sex scandals are equally distributed
between Dems and Reps. The Dems are not the hypocritical "family
value" spouting ones.

Please show us some hard evidence that suggests Dem voters tend to
embrace that kind of behavior.

Personally I still respect the ones who tell the truth more than the
ones who lie no matter what they did, but I am not really a D or an R.

So, then it would be ok with you that Gov. Sanford finally admitted he
was having an affair and spending government funds to do it. Or,
perhaps you think it's ok for Gingrich to cheat on his wife while
she's in the hospital, all the while pushing for Clinton's
impeachment. Or, how about Henry Hyde... that paragon of virtue (at
least in his own mind).- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The problem here is the DNC actively looks into the bedrooms of
Republicans (of course they want you to stay our of theirs) for
election results. I guess if you can't win on the issues, it's a great
way to cheat...

Huh? They have a spy cam? They give them money to molest boys? Wow.
Amazing news.

On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:25:29 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 23:20:49 -0800, wrote:

On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 01:01:02 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 21:00:14 -0800, wrote:

On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:43:01 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:11:46 -0800, wrote:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0..._n_738007.html

Yikes! I wonder if it's true.

Has there ever been an allegation of an affair by a congressman that
wasn't true? ;-)

That seems to be where democrats and republicans all coincide.

The only difference is the level of hypocrisy. The Republicans win
every time!

It is probably just more a reflection of the values of the people
who's votes they court. Democratic voters rush to the side of
candidates who cheat on their wives, screw their pages and cheat on
their taxes.

Huh? Let's assume that the sex scandals are equally distributed
between Dems and Reps. The Dems are not the hypocritical "family
value" spouting ones.

Please show us some hard evidence that suggests Dem voters tend to
embrace that kind of behavior.

You folks leaped to the defense of Clinton, Studds, Frank, and
Edwards.(the list goes on)
Sanford, Gingrich and Craig were pushed out.

Which folks? Not I. Clinton was impeached. It was nonsense and he
deserved to be outed not impeached. Studds was from 1983 and was
reelected five times. Frank is not lying about his lifestyle. Edwards
was a sh*t.

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 03:51:53 -0800 (PST), "JustWaitAFrekinMinute!"
wrote:

On Feb 10, 2:20*am, wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 01:01:02 -0500, wrote:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 21:00:14 -0800, wrote:

On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:43:01 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:11:46 -0800, wrote:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0...ffair-lisbeth-...

Yikes! I wonder if it's true.

Has there ever been an allegation of an affair by a congressman that
wasn't true? *;-)

That seems to be where democrats and republicans all coincide.

The only difference is the level of hypocrisy. The Republicans win
every time!

It is probably just more a reflection of the values of the people
who's votes they court. Democratic voters rush to the side of
candidates who cheat on their wives, screw their pages and cheat on
their taxes.

Huh? Let's assume that the sex scandals are equally distributed
between Dems and Reps. The Dems are not the hypocritical "family
value" spouting ones.

Please show us some hard evidence that suggests Dem voters tend to
embrace that kind of behavior.

Personally I still respect the ones who tell the truth more than the
ones who lie no matter what they did, but I am not really a D or an R.

So, then it would be ok with you that Gov. Sanford finally admitted he
was having an affair and spending government funds to do it. Or,
perhaps you think it's ok for Gingrich to cheat on his wife while
she's in the hospital, all the while pushing for Clinton's
impeachment. Or, how about Henry Hyde... that paragon of virtue (at
least in his own mind).- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The problem here is the DNC actively looks into the bedrooms of
Republicans (of course they want you to stay our of theirs) for
election results. I guess if you can't win on the issues, it's a great
way to cheat...

Huh? They have a spy cam? They give them money to molest boys? Wow.
Amazing news.

Your narrowmindedness would make it impossible to discuss the
significance of the phrase "looking into our bedrooms"... It is based in
the history of the gay rights movement. Either way, the double standard,
is all too obvious, not even worth your time trying to twist my words...

On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:38:25 -0500, Harryk
wrote:

On 2/10/11 12:25 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 23:20:49 -0800, wrote:

On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 01:01:02 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 21:00:14 -0800, wrote:

On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:43:01 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:11:46 -0800, wrote:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0..._n_738007.html

Yikes! I wonder if it's true.

Has there ever been an allegation of an affair by a congressman that
wasn't true? ;-)

That seems to be where democrats and republicans all coincide.

The only difference is the level of hypocrisy. The Republicans win
every time!

It is probably just more a reflection of the values of the people
who's votes they court. Democratic voters rush to the side of
candidates who cheat on their wives, screw their pages and cheat on
their taxes.

Huh? Let's assume that the sex scandals are equally distributed
between Dems and Reps. The Dems are not the hypocritical "family
value" spouting ones.

Please show us some hard evidence that suggests Dem voters tend to
embrace that kind of behavior.

You folks leaped to the defense of Clinton, Studds, Frank, and
Edwards.(the list goes on)
Sanford, Gingrich and Craig were pushed out.


It's the conservatives and Repubs, mostly, who try to own "family
values," and it's the conservatives and Repubs, mostly, who get caught
with their dicks in little boys.

We were at a party a few weeks ago when the subject of President Bill
came up. One of the younger women, a gal in her early 30s, said she
thought Clinton was one of the sexiest men alive, and that she'd hop
into the sack with him at the drop of a shoe. Many of the other women
there agreed. It wasn't a party where the invitees represented only one
side of the political fence.

I'm still waiting for Penelope Cruz to return my calls.

Greg is playing the false equivalency game, except that the
Republicans are trying to own the "family values" notion, but they
can't quite live up to it.

I agree.. Bill is Hella hot!

In article ,
says...

Edwards was a sh*t.

But you would have voted for him anyway if he made the ticket, right?

On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:47:35 -0500, Harryk
wrote:

On 2/10/11 9:41 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In articleLLGdnQKVhbMoac7QnZ2dnUVZ_hydnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/10/11 9:20 AM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:43:01 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:11:46 -0800, wrote:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0..._n_738007.html

Yikes! I wonder if it's true.

Has there ever been an allegation of an affair by a congressman that
wasn't true? ;-)

That seems to be where democrats and republicans all coincide.

And maybe someone got their stories mixed up.


Boner, er, Boehner, is Herring's new hero. A few years ago, Herring was
touting Glenn Beck.

It's amazing how these right-wing ****s rise to the surface, isn't it?

Five years ago, Beck was right on just about everything he said. If you
looked to other than George Soros media for your news, you would know
that...

"Five years ago, Beck was right on just about everything he said."

Well, that explains a lot about you.

Whoa.... that was TMI. Tosky needs to think before he types.

On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:23:49 -0500, "paul@byc"
wrote:

On 2/9/2011 11:34 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In article0d652207-b889-47d1-8f0f-d71f76b82608
@k9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com, says...

On Feb 9, 7:11 pm, wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0...ffair-lisbeth-...

Yikes! I wonder if it's true.

Certainly I hope the affair was on a boat like the Gary Hart had with
his wench Donna Rice.

I hope his wife isn't dying of cancer in front of his kids...


You mean, like Newt Gingrich did?

As I've said, the split is pretty even. In fact, the Dems might even
get caught more. The difference is the hypocrisy factor. The Reps win
wide stance down!