Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://enews.earthlink.net/article/u...5-ef95f7b033c7
A sad fishing accident. Hey, at least it is boating so lets discuss it instead of spoofing. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 12, 8:37*pm, Frogwatch wrote:
Hey, at least it is boating so lets discuss it instead of spoofing. Yes-s-s-s-s! |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gene wrote:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:37:04 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch wrote: http://enews.earthlink.net/article/u...5-ef95f7b033c7 A sad fishing accident. Hey, at least it is boating so lets discuss it instead of spoofing. "...their twin-engine boat's motor went out an hour later..." Huh? They took on water. Both were probably submerged. Perfect reason to have an EPIRB (if you can afford one) or at least a submersible VHF handheld. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 22:42:13 -0500, L G wrote:
Gene wrote: On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:37:04 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch wrote: http://enews.earthlink.net/article/u...5-ef95f7b033c7 A sad fishing accident. Hey, at least it is boating so lets discuss it instead of spoofing. "...their twin-engine boat's motor went out an hour later..." Huh? They took on water. Both were probably submerged. Perfect reason to have an EPIRB (if you can afford one) or at least a submersible VHF handheld. There's something in the news report that doesn't make sense regarding the twin engines. It's possible that they did have twins but both failed due to bad fuel, lack of fuel or a clogged filter. You really need separate tanks and filters to get the full reliability of twin engines. A hand held VHF radio has a very short range, especially if being used in the water. My estimate would a maximum of 3 miles, most likely less. EPIRBs are good but have several issues. Cost is coming down but still in the $600 range. They also require federal registration and periodic renewal/update. The big issue however is response time. It will take at least an hour or two before search assets are deployed, probably longer. That is too long if you're in cold water offshore. Last but not least are sea conditions and boat handling. Were they out in unsuitable conditions for the boat? Given the outcome, almost certainly. There was no mention of boat size so we can only guess. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/13/11 9:04 AM, Gene wrote:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 22:42:13 -0500, L wrote: Gene wrote: On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:37:04 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch wrote: http://enews.earthlink.net/article/u...5-ef95f7b033c7 A sad fishing accident. Hey, at least it is boating so lets discuss it instead of spoofing. "...their twin-engine boat's motor went out an hour later..." Huh? They took on water. Both were probably submerged. That is kinda, my point.... It appears that they were as little as three miles off shore and that the waves and wind were negligible. Losing multiple engines usually means fuel, but in this case, since they took on water and sank without appreciable wave action.... I don't think they lost engines then took on water, I think just the opposite occurred... Perfect reason to have an EPIRB (if you can afford one) or at least a submersible VHF handheld. I was surprised by the water temperature... looks to be no better than the mid 40's. Personally, I'd like to have some sort of clothing to fight the cold (water) in that case... Personal EPIRBs are, now, under $200..... you almost can't afford to be without one.... I would never discourage anyone from carrying a VHS radio... but due to their line-of-sight method of communication, if you are in the water you have a VERY limited transmission radio. There are exceptions. I am lucky enough to have a USCG station radio antenna at about 200' height in the sand over the river, AICW, and ocean... exactly where I boat. If you have a similar circumstance, it makes the VHS a lot more reliable... Within the last two weeks, several guys on a 21-footer died when their boat capsized in four foot waves maybe 200 yards offshore, near the Calvert Nuke Plant. The water temp was just above freezing. You have to be really stupid to go out in a boat that small when the wind is kicking up four footers, especially so in the middle of winter. We don't typically have "sudden-onset tostitos" here. It probably was pretty choppy when they set out and got worse. When it did, they could have easily ran the boat to shore. The bottom there is sandy and they could have beached their boat and waited it out. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne.B wrote:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 22:42:13 -0500, L wrote: Gene wrote: On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:37:04 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch wrote: http://enews.earthlink.net/article/u...5-ef95f7b033c7 A sad fishing accident. Hey, at least it is boating so lets discuss it instead of spoofing. "...their twin-engine boat's motor went out an hour later..." Huh? They took on water. Both were probably submerged. Perfect reason to have an EPIRB (if you can afford one) or at least a submersible VHF handheld. There's something in the news report that doesn't make sense regarding the twin engines. It's possible that they did have twins but both failed due to bad fuel, lack of fuel or a clogged filter. You really need separate tanks and filters to get the full reliability of twin engines. A hand held VHF radio has a very short range, especially if being used in the water. My estimate would a maximum of 3 miles, most likely less. EPIRBs are good but have several issues. Cost is coming down but still in the $600 range. They also require federal registration and periodic renewal/update. The big issue however is response time. It will take at least an hour or two before search assets are deployed, probably longer. That is too long if you're in cold water offshore. Last but not least are sea conditions and boat handling. Were they out in unsuitable conditions for the boat? Given the outcome, almost certainly. There was no mention of boat size so we can only guess. Good points but an EPIRB can be rented from Boat US, and others I'm sure. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gene wrote:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 22:42:13 -0500, L wrote: Gene wrote: On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:37:04 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch wrote: http://enews.earthlink.net/article/u...5-ef95f7b033c7 A sad fishing accident. Hey, at least it is boating so lets discuss it instead of spoofing. "...their twin-engine boat's motor went out an hour later..." Huh? They took on water. Both were probably submerged. That is kinda, my point.... It appears that they were as little as three miles off shore and that the waves and wind were negligible. Losing multiple engines usually means fuel, but in this case, since they took on water and sank without appreciable wave action.... I don't think they lost engines then took on water, I think just the opposite occurred... Perfect reason to have an EPIRB (if you can afford one) or at least a submersible VHF handheld. I was surprised by the water temperature... looks to be no better than the mid 40's. Personally, I'd like to have some sort of clothing to fight the cold (water) in that case... Personal EPIRBs are, now, under $200..... you almost can't afford to be without one.... I would never discourage anyone from carrying a VHS radio... but due to their line-of-sight method of communication, if you are in the water you have a VERY limited transmission radio. There are exceptions. I am lucky enough to have a USCG station radio antenna at about 200' height in the sand over the river, AICW, and ocean... exactly where I boat. If you have a similar circumstance, it makes the VHS a lot more reliable... I looked this one up before. It's surprising how short the effective distance of VHF is before the horizon is a factor. Your 200' antenna will reach only 17 miles. Two eight-foot antennae will only transmit about miles. http://www.ringbell.co.uk/info/hdist.htm |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 20:24:16 -0500, L G wrote:
EPIRBs are good but have several issues. Cost is coming down but still in the $600 range. They also require federal registration and periodic renewal/update. The big issue however is response time. It will take at least an hour or two before search assets are deployed, probably longer. That is too long if you're in cold water offshore. Last but not least are sea conditions and boat handling. Were they out in unsuitable conditions for the boat? Given the outcome, almost certainly. There was no mention of boat size so we can only guess. Good points but an EPIRB can be rented from Boat US, and others I'm sure. How many of your fishing buddies will go down to Boat US and rent an EPIRB everytime they want to go fishing a few miles out? An even bigger issue is response time. There is a whole chain of procedures that are followed when an EPIRB alert is received. This is done to verify ownership and registration of the unit, and attempt to ascertain if the alert is likely to be genuine. If you are lucky, the unit is properly registered, and if a USCG rescue asset is nearby, they might get to you in an hour or two. That's OK if you're sitting in a life raft or dressed in an immersion suit but not if you are in cold water with no protection. The real problem is that guys get in over their head with conditions not suitable for the boat, or in a boat that is not well prepared/operated. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:46:45 -0500, Gene
wrote: I looked this one up before. It's surprising how short the effective distance of VHF is before the horizon is a factor. Your 200' antenna will reach only 17 miles. Two eight-foot antennae will only transmit about miles. http://www.ringbell.co.uk/info/hdist.htm Hmmmm.... depends. Assuming I haven't sunk, I should be able to get out about 25 miles.... to the local USCG station. Two 8' antennae will transmit about 8 miles. One sea level antenna transmitting to my boat would reach about 5 miles... None of those are particularly inspiring with respect to a solid sense of safety.... Here is a better calculator... My personal experience with a variety of VHF hand held radios is that they are rarely good for more than a couple of miles except under ideal conditions. Those little rubber ducky antennas are *very* inefficient. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 14, 9:46*pm, Gene wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 20:29:46 -0500, L G wrote: Gene wrote: On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 22:42:13 -0500, L *wrote: Gene wrote: On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:37:04 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch * wrote: http://enews.earthlink.net/article/u...10156-2b74-459... A sad fishing accident. Hey, at least it is boating so lets discuss it instead of spoofing. "...their twin-engine boat's motor went out an hour later..." Huh? They took on water. *Both were probably submerged. That is kinda, my point.... It appears that they were as little as three miles off shore and that the waves and wind were negligible. Losing multiple engines usually means fuel, but in this case, since they took on water and sank without appreciable wave action.... *I don't think they lost engines then took on water, I think just the opposite occurred... Perfect reason to have an EPIRB (if you can afford one) or at least a submersible VHF handheld. I was surprised by the water temperature... looks to be no better than the mid 40's. Personally, I'd like to have some sort of clothing to fight the cold (water) in that case... Personal EPIRBs are, now, under $200..... you almost can't afford to be without one.... I would never discourage anyone from carrying a VHS radio... but due to their line-of-sight method of communication, if you are in the water you have a VERY limited transmission radio. There are exceptions. I am lucky enough to have a USCG station radio antenna at about 200' height in the sand over the river, AICW, and ocean... exactly where I boat. If you have a similar circumstance, it makes the VHS a lot more reliable... I looked this one up before. *It's surprising how short the effective distance of VHF is before the horizon is a factor. *Your 200' antenna will reach only 17 miles. *Two eight-foot antennae will only transmit about *miles. http://www.ringbell.co.uk/info/hdist.htm Hmmmm.... depends. Assuming I haven't sunk, I should be able to get out about 25 miles.... to the local USCG station. Two 8' antennae will transmit about 8 miles. One sea level antenna transmitting to my boat would reach about 5 miles... None of those are particularly inspiring with respect to a solid sense of safety.... Here is a better calculator... http://www.qsl.net/kd4sai/distance.html -- It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance. *-Thomas Sowell Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepage *http://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm Forté Agent 6.00 Build 1186 Two 8' antennae will transmit about 8 miles. I have ONE 8 footer on the Boat, and can transmit a lot farther than that. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Here's something you guys can probably figure out a way to blame | General | |||
Figure this one out.... | General | |||
modified figure 8 for MOB | Cruising | |||
What do you figure.......... | General | |||
OT - Are we safer? Go figure.... | General |