In article ,
says...

On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:04:45 -0500, New Giant Boat wrote:

In article ,
says...

On 2/16/11 8:47 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:34:36 -0500, John
wrote:

It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et
al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my
opinion.

Harry is way beyond liberal, giving them a bad name in fact. Very
few liberals advocate over throw of the free enterprise system and
nationalization of corporations the way he does. Basically he has
some sort of personality disorder which causes him to strike out at
anything that reminds him of his tormented youth.


Lil W'hine has thrown in with Scott Ingersoll and Loogy.

Why must you always bring loogy into discussion? Are you that infatuated
with someone that you must post about him even though he's not posted
here in a long, long time?

Actually, that's the reason he does so. He knows Loogy isn't responding, so he
doesn't need to worry about being harshly put down.

Kind of like Harry trying to say his school system was "top in the
state", it's a lie. It was never the "top school in the state". Harry
just made that up because he knows my system/town was voted best school
system in the country twice in the late 60s to early 70s with one year
the town of Manchester took the title between those two years and Harry
figured he cold run with it, as he assumed I was not here anymore. As to
why, you hit it on the head, he post this bull because he thinks he can
get away with it, but that bull **** is just enough to bring me back out
for one post

On 2/16/11 4:06 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:04:45 -0500, New Giant wrote:

In ,
says...

On 2/16/11 8:47 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:34:36 -0500, John
wrote:

It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et
al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my
opinion.

Harry is way beyond liberal, giving them a bad name in fact. Very
few liberals advocate over throw of the free enterprise system and
nationalization of corporations the way he does. Basically he has
some sort of personality disorder which causes him to strike out at
anything that reminds him of his tormented youth.


Lil W'hine has thrown in with Scott Ingersoll and Loogy.

Why must you always bring loogy into discussion? Are you that infatuated
with someone that you must post about him even though he's not posted
here in a long, long time?

Actually, that's the reason he does so. He knows Loogy isn't responding, so he
doesn't need to worry about being harshly put down.

Kind of like Harry trying to say his school system was "top in the
state", it's a lie. It was never the "top school in the state". Harry
just made that up because he knows my system/town was voted best school
system in the country twice in the late 60s to early 70s with one year
the town of Manchester took the title between those two years and Harry
figured he cold run with it, as he assumed I was not here anymore. As to
why, you hit it on the head, he post this bull because he thinks he can
get away with it, but that bull **** is just enough to bring me back out
for one post


1. You said you were through here, or words to that effect. More of your
buill****, I guess.

2. I don't know anything about your town in the late 1960's to early
1970s, or, in fact, any other time. I graduated high school in the early
1960s.

Harryk wrote:
On 2/16/11 9:13 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:41:44 -0500,
wrote:

You are a birther. Ergo, you are a racist.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur

Logic police, please take note.



D'oh. What do *you* think is behind the birthers, dip****? Hint: it is
Obama's skin color.


He's half black. So what? That has nothing to do with his place of birth.

Harryk wrote:
On 2/16/11 9:58 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:20:59 -0500,
wrote:

On 2/16/11 9:13 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:41:44 -0500,
wrote:

You are a birther. Ergo, you are a racist.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur

Logic police, please take note.


D'oh. What do *you* think is behind the birthers, dip****? Hint: it is
Obama's skin color.


There are quite a few people who legitimately don't care for him
regardless of race. That's what makes your statement a non sequitur
not to mention an ad hominem attack.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

Logic police, please take note.



You're talking about those who don't like Obama for reasons other than
race. Sure. Lots of those.

I'm talking about birthers. They don't like Obama because of his race.
Bertie is a birther.
That's pure bull****, WAFA.

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

On 2/16/11 8:29 AM, BAR wrote:
In articlewNGdnfz0EPsuocbQnZ2dnUVZ_s2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Just as I thought. You can't think past your biases.



Actually, I had a much higher opinion of the military until I
encountered you, Herring and flajim here. I've known a few retired
military guys in my lifetime and all of them seemed quite honorable to
me. I suppose the military lowered its standards significantly to let
you boys in, eh?


You really like that line, eh? Try for some originality next time.

It's OK. I had a pretty good opinion of liberals, until I encountered Harry, et
al, here. So, I guess we're even, except that I've got a valid rationale for my
opinion.

You are a racist. There is no valid rationale for your opinions.



The knee jerk liberal strikes again. If you don't agree with me your are
a racist response.

It is getting very tiresome to always hear the same thing coming from
you Harry.

Why don't you and Paul get together and come up with some new material.




You are a birther. Ergo, you are a racist.

You are a one trick pony.