"Elections have consequences"??

Obama said that before he cut the republicans out of any negotiations
and started steamrolling us with his "punishments for those who are
against us and rewards for those who support us".

Now when the shoe is on the other foot, they are refusing to earn their
pay.

I was watching a news broadcast last night and the reporter noted that
not one paper or organization in Wi. is polling on the issue of the
walkout, obviously because they don't want the folks there to see the
results. BTW, for the record, the national polls say 67% do not support
the unions there, only 25% do. Now I know the libs here will come back
and say the opposite, but those numbers are clearly beyond any margin of
error. Yup, that's why the media won't ask the question

In article ,
says...

"Elections have consequences"??

Obama said that before he cut the republicans out of any negotiations
and started steamrolling us with his "punishments for those who are
against us and rewards for those who support us".

Now when the shoe is on the other foot, they are refusing to earn their
pay.

I was watching a news broadcast last night and the reporter noted that
not one paper or organization in Wi. is polling on the issue of the
walkout, obviously because they don't want the folks there to see the
results. BTW, for the record, the national polls say 67% do not support
the unions there, only 25% do. Now I know the libs here will come back
and say the opposite, but those numbers are clearly beyond any margin of
error. Yup, that's why the media won't ask the question

So Harry has pretty much stopped the political bull**** so you pick it
up? Figures.

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

"Elections have consequences"??

Obama said that before he cut the republicans out of any negotiations
and started steamrolling us with his "punishments for those who are
against us and rewards for those who support us".

Now when the shoe is on the other foot, they are refusing to earn their
pay.

I was watching a news broadcast last night and the reporter noted that
not one paper or organization in Wi. is polling on the issue of the
walkout, obviously because they don't want the folks there to see the
results. BTW, for the record, the national polls say 67% do not support
the unions there, only 25% do. Now I know the libs here will come back
and say the opposite, but those numbers are clearly beyond any margin of
error. Yup, that's why the media won't ask the question

So Harry has pretty much stopped the political bull**** so you pick it
up? Figures.

Well Harry, you have no credibility on any level here..

On 25/02/2011 7:06 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:


"Elections have consequences"??

Obama said that before he cut the republicans out of any negotiations
and started steamrolling us with his "punishments for those who are
against us and rewards for those who support us".

Now when the shoe is on the other foot, they are refusing to earn their
pay.

I was watching a news broadcast last night and the reporter noted that
not one paper or organization in Wi. is polling on the issue of the
walkout, obviously because they don't want the folks there to see the
results. BTW, for the record, the national polls say 67% do not support
the unions there, only 25% do. Now I know the libs here will come back
and say the opposite, but those numbers are clearly beyond any margin of
error. Yup, that's why the media won't ask the question

Maybe taxpayers should pick up some bats and do a protest of their own?
Run the unions off.
--
Socialism is a great ideal as long as someone else pays for it. And when
no one is left to pay for it, they all can share nothing.

HarryisPaul wrote:
In ,
says...

"Elections have consequences"??

Obama said that before he cut the republicans out of any negotiations
and started steamrolling us with his "punishments for those who are
against us and rewards for those who support us".

Now when the shoe is on the other foot, they are refusing to earn their
pay.

I was watching a news broadcast last night and the reporter noted that
not one paper or organization in Wi. is polling on the issue of the
walkout, obviously because they don't want the folks there to see the
results. BTW, for the record, the national polls say 67% do not support
the unions there, only 25% do. Now I know the libs here will come back
and say the opposite, but those numbers are clearly beyond any margin of
error. Yup, that's why the media won't ask the question

So Harry has pretty much stopped the political bull**** so you pick it
up? Figures.

He has? Really?

On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:43:31 -0700, Canuck57 wrote:

On 25/02/2011 7:06 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:


"Elections have consequences"??

Obama said that before he cut the republicans out of any negotiations
and started steamrolling us with his "punishments for those who are
against us and rewards for those who support us".

Now when the shoe is on the other foot, they are refusing to earn their
pay.

I was watching a news broadcast last night and the reporter noted that
not one paper or organization in Wi. is polling on the issue of the
walkout, obviously because they don't want the folks there to see the
results. BTW, for the record, the national polls say 67% do not support
the unions there, only 25% do. Now I know the libs here will come back
and say the opposite, but those numbers are clearly beyond any margin
of error. Yup, that's why the media won't ask the question

Maybe taxpayers should pick up some bats and do a protest of their own?
Run the unions off.

Well paid workers pay more taxes than those that aren't. We have the same
shortfalls in NC, but have the lowest union membership. Those geographic
regions doing the best (regrettably) have large population of ex union
workers with money to spend.

I think the bottom line is that our economy has become like an enormous
Monopoly game. All of the money is concentrated in the hands of very few.
The fewer the points that trickle down, the less available money.

Maybe you see some connection that busting the unions will put those
trillions of static wealth back into circulation. I don't see it.....

--
C:\Program Files\Pan\Signatures\boating.txt

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:43:31 -0700, Canuck57 wrote:

On 25/02/2011 7:06 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:


"Elections have consequences"??

Obama said that before he cut the republicans out of any negotiations
and started steamrolling us with his "punishments for those who are
against us and rewards for those who support us".

Now when the shoe is on the other foot, they are refusing to earn their
pay.

I was watching a news broadcast last night and the reporter noted that
not one paper or organization in Wi. is polling on the issue of the
walkout, obviously because they don't want the folks there to see the
results. BTW, for the record, the national polls say 67% do not support
the unions there, only 25% do. Now I know the libs here will come back
and say the opposite, but those numbers are clearly beyond any margin
of error. Yup, that's why the media won't ask the question

Maybe taxpayers should pick up some bats and do a protest of their own?
Run the unions off.

Well paid workers pay more taxes than those that aren't. We have the same
shortfalls in NC, but have the lowest union membership. Those geographic
regions doing the best (regrettably) have large population of ex union
workers with money to spend.

I think the bottom line is that our economy has become like an enormous
Monopoly game. All of the money is concentrated in the hands of very few.
The fewer the points that trickle down, the less available money.

Maybe you see some connection that busting the unions will put those
trillions of static wealth back into circulation. I don't see it.....

The source of the problem is that government requires too much money to
operate. Reduce government and there need for taxes is reduced and those
retired union people can keep more of their pension money.

On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 17:17:03 GMT, Gene
wrote:

On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:43:31 -0700, Canuck57 wrote:

On 25/02/2011 7:06 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:


"Elections have consequences"??

Obama said that before he cut the republicans out of any negotiations
and started steamrolling us with his "punishments for those who are
against us and rewards for those who support us".

Now when the shoe is on the other foot, they are refusing to earn their
pay.

I was watching a news broadcast last night and the reporter noted that
not one paper or organization in Wi. is polling on the issue of the
walkout, obviously because they don't want the folks there to see the
results. BTW, for the record, the national polls say 67% do not support
the unions there, only 25% do. Now I know the libs here will come back
and say the opposite, but those numbers are clearly beyond any margin
of error. Yup, that's why the media won't ask the question

Maybe taxpayers should pick up some bats and do a protest of their own?
Run the unions off.

Well paid workers pay more taxes than those that aren't. We have the same
shortfalls in NC, but have the lowest union membership. Those geographic
regions doing the best (regrettably) have large population of ex union
workers with money to spend.

I think the bottom line is that our economy has become like an enormous
Monopoly game. All of the money is concentrated in the hands of very few.
The fewer the points that trickle down, the less available money.

Maybe you see some connection that busting the unions will put those
trillions of static wealth back into circulation. I don't see it.....

Well said.

The slats in these types of window coverings are normally 2 inches, but they can be as niggardly as 1 inch, or as severe as 2 and half inches. The selfsame group of ladder riviere methodology you overhaul rare of on a venetian sort out holds all the slats and there’s normally a run-of-the-mill valance affianced to receive elsewhere to revive mounting on the advantaged of a window classifying, but they can also be installed at an terminate a window as well.
Wood window tanie rolety lay hold of a trifling more than faux wood blinds, but with basswood blinds they are bleeding empty-headed, and are uncooperative impervious to to warping. Innumerable resellers promote moral warranties to mingle with with them because of this fact.