Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,111
Default Pirates and Preachers

On Feb 27, 3:35*pm, Gene wrote:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:31:50 -0500, Harryk
wrote:



I think the U.S. Navy acted appropriately in the tragic incident
that resulted in the deaths of Dr. Bob Riggle, Phyllis Macay and Jean
and Scott Adam at the hands of Somali pirates. Caution has to be Job One
so long as there is a chance at least some hostages might be freed. The
Navy was watching and it was cautious.


From what I have read, we don't know what event(s) precipitated the
shooting of the hostages by the pirates. Whatever penalties they were
facing surely weren't as severe as what happened after they murdered
their hostages.


The areas in which these pirates operate is enormous. Obviously, more
countries need to participate in patrol and interdiction.


No.... that would be playing into their hands. The best solution would
be narrow corridors which would be more easily defended.

Travel outside a secured corridor would be at the individual vessel's
peril....

--
It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are
enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.
*-Thomas Sowell

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepage
*http://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm

Fort Agent 6.00 Build 1186


you got a point there Vene.

narrow them down to 5 miles.
  #22   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,909
Default Pirates and Preachers

On 2/27/11 4:40 PM, Tim wrote:
On Feb 27, 3:35 pm, wrote:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:31:50 -0500,
wrote:



I think the U.S. Navy acted appropriately in the tragic incident
that resulted in the deaths of Dr. Bob Riggle, Phyllis Macay and Jean
and Scott Adam at the hands of Somali pirates. Caution has to be Job One
so long as there is a chance at least some hostages might be freed. The
Navy was watching and it was cautious.


From what I have read, we don't know what event(s) precipitated the
shooting of the hostages by the pirates. Whatever penalties they were
facing surely weren't as severe as what happened after they murdered
their hostages.


The areas in which these pirates operate is enormous. Obviously, more
countries need to participate in patrol and interdiction.


No.... that would be playing into their hands. The best solution would
be narrow corridors which would be more easily defended.

Travel outside a secured corridor would be at the individual vessel's
peril....

--
It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are
enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.
-Thomas Sowell

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepage
http://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm

Fort Agent 6.00 Build 1186


you got a point there Vene.

narrow them down to 5 miles.


Don't freighters/tankers stay within shipping lanes?
  #23   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,111
Default Pirates and Preachers

On Feb 27, 3:50*pm, Harryk wrote:
On 2/27/11 4:40 PM, Tim wrote:



On Feb 27, 3:35 pm, *wrote:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:31:50 -0500,
wrote:


I think the U.S. Navy acted appropriately in the tragic incident
that resulted in the deaths of Dr. Bob Riggle, Phyllis Macay and Jean
and Scott Adam at the hands of Somali pirates. Caution has to be Job One
so long as there is a chance at least some hostages might be freed. The
Navy was watching and it was cautious.


*From what I have read, we don't know what event(s) precipitated the
shooting of the hostages by the pirates. Whatever penalties they were
facing surely weren't as severe as what happened after they murdered
their hostages.


The areas in which these pirates operate is enormous. Obviously, more
countries need to participate in patrol and interdiction.


No.... that would be playing into their hands. The best solution would
be narrow corridors which would be more easily defended.


Travel outside a secured corridor would be at the individual vessel's
peril....


--
It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are
enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.
* -Thomas Sowell


Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.


Homepage
* http://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm


Fort Agent 6.00 Build 1186


you got a point there Gene.


narrow them down to 5 miles.


Don't freighters/tankers stay within shipping lanes?


I'm sure they do, but if they were moved closer to the shore, then it
would be easier to control the pirates, and the freighters wouldn't
have to travel so far out in the ocean.

  #24   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Tim Tim is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,111
Default Pirates and Preachers

On Feb 27, 5:23*pm, Tim wrote:
On Feb 27, 3:50*pm, Harryk wrote:



On 2/27/11 4:40 PM, Tim wrote:


On Feb 27, 3:35 pm, *wrote:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:31:50 -0500,
wrote:


I think the U.S. Navy acted appropriately in the tragic incident
that resulted in the deaths of Dr. Bob Riggle, Phyllis Macay and Jean
and Scott Adam at the hands of Somali pirates. Caution has to be Job One
so long as there is a chance at least some hostages might be freed. The
Navy was watching and it was cautious.


*From what I have read, we don't know what event(s) precipitated the
shooting of the hostages by the pirates. Whatever penalties they were
facing surely weren't as severe as what happened after they murdered
their hostages.


The areas in which these pirates operate is enormous. Obviously, more
countries need to participate in patrol and interdiction.


No.... that would be playing into their hands. The best solution would
be narrow corridors which would be more easily defended.


Travel outside a secured corridor would be at the individual vessel's
peril....


--
It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are
enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.
* -Thomas Sowell


Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.


Homepage
* http://pamandgene.tranquilrefuge.net/boating/the_boat/my_boat.htm


Fort Agent 6.00 Build 1186


you got a point there Gene.


narrow them down to 5 miles.


Don't freighters/tankers stay within shipping lanes?


I'm sure they do, but if they were moved closer to the shore, then it
would be easier to control the pirates, and the freighters wouldn't
have to travel so far out in *the ocean.


At least that's my view...
  #25   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 10,492
Default Pirates and Preachers

On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 16:50:03 -0500, Harryk
wrote:

Don't freighters/tankers stay within shipping lanes?


Only in specially designated coastal areas.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Those whacky Southern preachers Don White General 62 September 29th 07 02:27 PM
Pirates again.... [email protected] General 0 July 4th 06 02:33 PM
pirates jlrogers ASA 1 November 27th 05 02:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017