On 3/20/2011 12:26 AM, jps wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:30:51 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 08:58:15 -0400, John
wrote:

...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

Why not help people that want to help themselves? I didn't see that in
Iraq.... except by the Kurds.

The Libyans people seem to need help and the world community
*including* The Arab League is on board.

I don't see ANY similarities between that and the Iraq debacle....
we're certainly not looking for imaginary weapons of mass destruction.
Are we?

This is far too complex for the simpletons on the right to figure out
on their own. Attacking a country on juiced up intelligence vs.
taking out military installations of a dictator actively killing his
own countrymen in open warfare.

They don't get the difference.

What was Saddam's body count vs Muammar's?

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 10:36 AM, BAR wrote:
In articleZsKdnVZuaezWRBnQnZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 6:58 AM, John H wrote:
...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where
is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

Gaddafi must have ****ed of someone in high power somewhere.

If it were about justice, how come for 3 decades the power that be did
nothing? I don't like him, he should have had his neck stretched years
ago, but why now? Our corrupt leaders say so? What is the real motive
for this?

Come now, pretty obvious some alliance exists with US-UN-France
where in
about 1/2 dozen countries the UN backed man is trying to replace the
local dictators or even democratically elected. Remeber the people of
Libya wanted Gaddafi and still do, BBC news showed protesters in
Gaddafi's support.

Because US-UN-France is fighting for a minority of gun toting rebel
criminals.

If an armed minority marched on DC, and another country came in to
support them -- that is what the US is doing!

Basically US-UN-France is the drivin force with Europe and Arab rich
calling the shots.

The new world order at work.

Thank you for the insights into your brain. It's a scary place, what
with your endless conspiracy theories.

I don't like Muammer el-Qaddafi either, but...as bad as he is, he is a
piker when you add up his murders and compare that number to the
hundreds of thousands of innocents our troops killed in Southeast Asia,
Iraq, and Afghanistan.

Iceland might be to your liking.

I was thinking Costa Rica. They got rid of the national army on the last
copue d'etat attempt. They don't miss the army either.

We war mongers in the west spend far too much on WAR, and little on much
else.

Peaceful place too Costa Rica is. War mongers get dismissed pretty quick.

Three of my retired union buddies have moved to Costa Rica, and another
is thinking about it. They have national health care that even
"furriners" can buy into at a reasonable price. Imported manufactured
goods are very, very expensive, because of import taxes. There have been
some problems with kidnapping of Americans, and its neighbors to the
north and south wander across the border from time to time to start
trouble. But, mostly, it is a peaceful place with many assets to attract
U.S. citizens. Pretty country, too, with mountains and seashores and
excellent fishing. Almost every Costa Rican I encountered on my trip
there spoke pretty good English. And for the bachelors, the chica ticas
are...well, fabulous.

All of the chicas are "fabulous". That's a racist statement.

On 3/20/2011 8:28 AM, HarryisPaul wrote:
In articleDLGdnfcWfdMsZxnQnZ2dnUVZ_jWdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 10:36 AM, BAR wrote:
In articleZsKdnVZuaezWRBnQnZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 6:58 AM, John H wrote:
...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where
is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

Gaddafi must have ****ed of someone in high power somewhere.

If it were about justice, how come for 3 decades the power that be did
nothing? I don't like him, he should have had his neck stretched years
ago, but why now? Our corrupt leaders say so? What is the real motive
for this?

Come now, pretty obvious some alliance exists with US-UN-France
where in
about 1/2 dozen countries the UN backed man is trying to replace the
local dictators or even democratically elected. Remeber the people of
Libya wanted Gaddafi and still do, BBC news showed protesters in
Gaddafi's support.

Because US-UN-France is fighting for a minority of gun toting rebel
criminals.

If an armed minority marched on DC, and another country came in to
support them -- that is what the US is doing!

Basically US-UN-France is the drivin force with Europe and Arab rich
calling the shots.

The new world order at work.

Thank you for the insights into your brain. It's a scary place, what
with your endless conspiracy theories.

I don't like Muammer el-Qaddafi either, but...as bad as he is, he is a
piker when you add up his murders and compare that number to the
hundreds of thousands of innocents our troops killed in Southeast Asia,
Iraq, and Afghanistan.

Iceland might be to your liking.

I was thinking Costa Rica. They got rid of the national army on the last
copue d'etat attempt. They don't miss the army either.

We war mongers in the west spend far too much on WAR, and little on much
else.

Peaceful place too Costa Rica is. War mongers get dismissed pretty quick.

Three of my retired union buddies have moved to Costa Rica, and another
is thinking about it. They have national health care that even
"furriners" can buy into at a reasonable price. Imported manufactured
goods are very, very expensive, because of import taxes. There have been
some problems with kidnapping of Americans, and its neighbors to the
north and south wander across the border from time to time to start
trouble. But, mostly, it is a peaceful place with many assets to attract
U.S. citizens. Pretty country, too, with mountains and seashores and
excellent fishing. Almost every Costa Rican I encountered on my trip
there spoke pretty good English. And for the bachelors, the chica ticas
are...well, fabulous.

All of the chicas are "fabulous". That's a racist statement.

Harry is partial to those buxom white chicks. Sorry Plume.

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
There are many differences, including these:

No one in the Obama administration is lying about why we might get
involved in a limited way in Libya. The Bush administration lied us into
Iraq.

Nobody in the administration has laid out our national interests in
Libya.

I haven't seen any statements that would commit U.S. ground troops to Libya.

The fact that you haven't seen the statements doesn't mean that they
don't exist.

What may take place in Libya is an incursion to remove the dictator
there. How many *years* has Bush's war in Iraq been going on?

The war in Iraq is over we have no combat troops in Iraq.

You are an idiot, Herring. With your help, we lost in Southeast Asia.

The Democrats ensured our loss in SEA. Johnson's Tuesday pick a target
lunches. McNamara running the war as an accounting exercise.

Tet '68 could have been a turning point. The VC and NVA got their asses
handed to them and if we had loosed the dogs of war we could have taken
the war to Hanoi.

In article ,
says...

jps wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:30:51 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 08:58:15 -0400, John
wrote:

...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.
Why not help people that want to help themselves? I didn't see that in
Iraq.... except by the Kurds.

The Libyans people seem to need help and the world community
*including* The Arab League is on board.

I don't see ANY similarities between that and the Iraq debacle....
we're certainly not looking for imaginary weapons of mass destruction.
Are we?

This is far too complex for the simpletons on the right to figure out
on their own. Attacking a country on juiced up intelligence vs.
taking out military installations of a dictator actively killing his
own countrymen in open warfare.

They don't get the difference.

Let's be real here. What sort of intellectually and logically based
commentary would you anticipate coming from the racist birthers here?
Are you expecting that a glimmer of enlightenment might strike Herring,
Ingersoll, Frogwatch, Canuck, et al? Why?

On the other hand, we do know what sort of intellectual dishonesty is
going to come from the pedophile Harry Krause of Huntington Maryland...
He is a Fleabagger to the gills...

In article ,
says...

In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 10:36 AM, BAR wrote:
In articleZsKdnVZuaezWRBnQnZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...

Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 6:58 AM, John H wrote:
...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where
is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.

Gaddafi must have ****ed of someone in high power somewhere.

If it were about justice, how come for 3 decades the power that be did
nothing? I don't like him, he should have had his neck stretched years
ago, but why now? Our corrupt leaders say so? What is the real motive
for this?

Come now, pretty obvious some alliance exists with US-UN-France
where in
about 1/2 dozen countries the UN backed man is trying to replace the
local dictators or even democratically elected. Remeber the people of
Libya wanted Gaddafi and still do, BBC news showed protesters in
Gaddafi's support.

Because US-UN-France is fighting for a minority of gun toting rebel
criminals.

If an armed minority marched on DC, and another country came in to
support them -- that is what the US is doing!

Basically US-UN-France is the drivin force with Europe and Arab rich
calling the shots.

The new world order at work.

Thank you for the insights into your brain. It's a scary place, what
with your endless conspiracy theories.

I don't like Muammer el-Qaddafi either, but...as bad as he is, he is a
piker when you add up his murders and compare that number to the
hundreds of thousands of innocents our troops killed in Southeast Asia,
Iraq, and Afghanistan.

Iceland might be to your liking.

I was thinking Costa Rica. They got rid of the national army on the last
copue d'etat attempt. They don't miss the army either.

We war mongers in the west spend far too much on WAR, and little on much
else.

Peaceful place too Costa Rica is. War mongers get dismissed pretty quick.

Three of my retired union buddies have moved to Costa Rica, and another
is thinking about it. They have national health care that even
"furriners" can buy into at a reasonable price. Imported manufactured
goods are very, very expensive, because of import taxes. There have been
some problems with kidnapping of Americans, and its neighbors to the
north and south wander across the border from time to time to start
trouble. But, mostly, it is a peaceful place with many assets to attract
U.S. citizens. Pretty country, too, with mountains and seashores and
excellent fishing. Almost every Costa Rican I encountered on my trip
there spoke pretty good English. And for the bachelors, the chica ticas
are...well, fabulous.

All of the chicas are "fabulous". That's a racist statement.

Harry Krause is the resident Pedophile Racist, child abuser, women
stalker, etc in the group.. He is a sick man...

I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...
jps wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:30:51 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 08:58:15 -0400, John
wrote:

...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.
Why not help people that want to help themselves? I didn't see that in
Iraq.... except by the Kurds.

The Libyans people seem to need help and the world community
*including* The Arab League is on board.

I don't see ANY similarities between that and the Iraq debacle....
we're certainly not looking for imaginary weapons of mass destruction.
Are we?
This is far too complex for the simpletons on the right to figure out
on their own. Attacking a country on juiced up intelligence vs.
taking out military installations of a dictator actively killing his
own countrymen in open warfare.

They don't get the difference.
Let's be real here. What sort of intellectually and logically based
commentary would you anticipate coming from the racist birthers here?
Are you expecting that a glimmer of enlightenment might strike Herring,
Ingersoll, Frogwatch, Canuck, et al? Why?

On the other hand, we do know what sort of intellectual dishonesty is
going to come from the pedophile Harry Krause of Huntington Maryland...
He is a Fleabagger to the gills...

Scott Ingersoll, demonstrating his intellectual prowess...

I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...
In articleDLGdnfcWfdMsZxnQnZ2dnUVZ_jWdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 10:36 AM, BAR wrote:
In articleZsKdnVZuaezWRBnQnZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 6:58 AM, John H wrote:
...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where
is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.
Gaddafi must have ****ed of someone in high power somewhere.

If it were about justice, how come for 3 decades the power that be did
nothing? I don't like him, he should have had his neck stretched years
ago, but why now? Our corrupt leaders say so? What is the real motive
for this?

Come now, pretty obvious some alliance exists with US-UN-France
where in
about 1/2 dozen countries the UN backed man is trying to replace the
local dictators or even democratically elected. Remeber the people of
Libya wanted Gaddafi and still do, BBC news showed protesters in
Gaddafi's support.

Because US-UN-France is fighting for a minority of gun toting rebel
criminals.

If an armed minority marched on DC, and another country came in to
support them -- that is what the US is doing!

Basically US-UN-France is the drivin force with Europe and Arab rich
calling the shots.

The new world order at work.
Thank you for the insights into your brain. It's a scary place, what
with your endless conspiracy theories.

I don't like Muammer el-Qaddafi either, but...as bad as he is, he is a
piker when you add up his murders and compare that number to the
hundreds of thousands of innocents our troops killed in Southeast Asia,
Iraq, and Afghanistan.
Iceland might be to your liking.
I was thinking Costa Rica. They got rid of the national army on the last
copue d'etat attempt. They don't miss the army either.

We war mongers in the west spend far too much on WAR, and little on much
else.

Peaceful place too Costa Rica is. War mongers get dismissed pretty quick.
Three of my retired union buddies have moved to Costa Rica, and another
is thinking about it. They have national health care that even
"furriners" can buy into at a reasonable price. Imported manufactured
goods are very, very expensive, because of import taxes. There have been
some problems with kidnapping of Americans, and its neighbors to the
north and south wander across the border from time to time to start
trouble. But, mostly, it is a peaceful place with many assets to attract
U.S. citizens. Pretty country, too, with mountains and seashores and
excellent fishing. Almost every Costa Rican I encountered on my trip
there spoke pretty good English. And for the bachelors, the chica ticas
are...well, fabulous.
All of the chicas are "fabulous". That's a racist statement.

Harry Krause is the resident Pedophile Racist, child abuser, women
stalker, etc in the group.. He is a sick man...


D'oh. You two are outdoing yourselves in utter stupidity. Do you even
know what a chica tica is?

Chica tica is the colloquial phrase for an attractive woman of Costa
Rican descent. It is not a pejorative.

Tico is the word that references Costa Rican males.

Had you two assholes been anywhere in Latin America, you might have a
wider view of the world.

On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 08:01:35 -0400, Harryk
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:30:51 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 08:58:15 -0400, John
wrote:

...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.
Why not help people that want to help themselves? I didn't see that in
Iraq.... except by the Kurds.

The Libyans people seem to need help and the world community
*including* The Arab League is on board.

I don't see ANY similarities between that and the Iraq debacle....
we're certainly not looking for imaginary weapons of mass destruction.
Are we?

This is far too complex for the simpletons on the right to figure out
on their own. Attacking a country on juiced up intelligence vs.
taking out military installations of a dictator actively killing his
own countrymen in open warfare.

They don't get the difference.

Let's be real here. What sort of intellectually and logically based
commentary would you anticipate coming from the racist birthers here?
Are you expecting that a glimmer of enlightenment might strike Herring,
Ingersoll, Frogwatch, Canuck, et al? Why?

None.
No.
NA.

On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 11:00:52 -0400, Harryk
wrote:

I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...
In articleDLGdnfcWfdMsZxnQnZ2dnUVZ_jWdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 10:36 AM, BAR wrote:
In articleZsKdnVZuaezWRBnQnZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer3389
@mypacks.net says...
Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 6:58 AM, John H wrote:
...doing that is much worse than what Sadam was doing.

Now 'Bama wants to attack Libya. Where's all the liberal uproar? Where
is the
threat to the US from Libya?

This man has gone off the deep end.
Gaddafi must have ****ed of someone in high power somewhere.

If it were about justice, how come for 3 decades the power that be did
nothing? I don't like him, he should have had his neck stretched years
ago, but why now? Our corrupt leaders say so? What is the real motive
for this?

Come now, pretty obvious some alliance exists with US-UN-France
where in
about 1/2 dozen countries the UN backed man is trying to replace the
local dictators or even democratically elected. Remeber the people of
Libya wanted Gaddafi and still do, BBC news showed protesters in
Gaddafi's support.

Because US-UN-France is fighting for a minority of gun toting rebel
criminals.

If an armed minority marched on DC, and another country came in to
support them -- that is what the US is doing!

Basically US-UN-France is the drivin force with Europe and Arab rich
calling the shots.

The new world order at work.
Thank you for the insights into your brain. It's a scary place, what
with your endless conspiracy theories.

I don't like Muammer el-Qaddafi either, but...as bad as he is, he is a
piker when you add up his murders and compare that number to the
hundreds of thousands of innocents our troops killed in Southeast Asia,
Iraq, and Afghanistan.
Iceland might be to your liking.
I was thinking Costa Rica. They got rid of the national army on the last
copue d'etat attempt. They don't miss the army either.

We war mongers in the west spend far too much on WAR, and little on much
else.

Peaceful place too Costa Rica is. War mongers get dismissed pretty quick.
Three of my retired union buddies have moved to Costa Rica, and another
is thinking about it. They have national health care that even
"furriners" can buy into at a reasonable price. Imported manufactured
goods are very, very expensive, because of import taxes. There have been
some problems with kidnapping of Americans, and its neighbors to the
north and south wander across the border from time to time to start
trouble. But, mostly, it is a peaceful place with many assets to attract
U.S. citizens. Pretty country, too, with mountains and seashores and
excellent fishing. Almost every Costa Rican I encountered on my trip
there spoke pretty good English. And for the bachelors, the chica ticas
are...well, fabulous.
All of the chicas are "fabulous". That's a racist statement.

Harry Krause is the resident Pedophile Racist, child abuser, women
stalker, etc in the group.. He is a sick man...


D'oh. You two are outdoing yourselves in utter stupidity. Do you even
know what a chica tica is?

Chica tica is the colloquial phrase for an attractive woman of Costa
Rican descent. It is not a pejorative.

Tico is the word that references Costa Rican males.

Had you two assholes been anywhere in Latin America, you might have a
wider view of the world.


It probably won't matter to Chuckles, since they probably won't let
him in there either. Costa Ricans are not stupid.