On 19/03/2011 3:31 PM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 3:06 PM, Harryk wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Mar 19, 4:40 pm, wrote:
On 19/03/2011 2:21 PM, wrote:



On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:27:04 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:
On Mar 19, 2:59 pm,
wrote:
In ,
says...
On 19/03/2011 11:35 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make
sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to
attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi
Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and
most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK
IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC
issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.
Gaddafi ticked off the wrong people.
Lets face it, they drag out crimes for the ast 4 decades yet do
not
explain why they didn't do anything until now but do business
with him.
Not even Loberbie was enough and that is old history.
Nope, Gaddafi must have told the French prime minister and
Obama to
stuff it. So this is their revenge. These power hungry mogals....
Obama will stop short as he has to go to congress and they are not
looking for more expensive wars.
Meanwhile the Obama hypocrite is ignoring Yemen and Behrain's
shooting
of peaceful unarmed protestors while backing a violent armed
minority in
Liba....makes no sense but it is the way it is.
Gaddafi probably called Obama a name. He is a thin skinned dude for
sure...
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh, Now I see the difference. Obama is president now
and
Bush was president then.
Yes, Obama is president. Get over it.
Tick-tock-Obama-be-on-a-rock -- 2012 is a coming.

Did "boating All out" support the war in Iraq, if not, he has no
business calling anyone a traitor.
Of course, all you libs have to do is to say "Bush was right and we
were wrong" so I can believe you are in this for the right reasons and
not just to get Libya's oil for George Soros. If you do that, then I
will support you, otherwise, "NO".


You right-wing crackpots - you, canuck, herring, snotty = are really up
in arms over this. Warms my heart. Of course, there isn't an ounce of
logic or sense in any of your pronouncements.

No money to pay the bills but plenty for war. Makes Obama a war monger.


Bush started two serious wars and lowered taxes.

Actually, my memory is not short like a democrat-liberal. If I recall
correctly Bush went to a congress and from both sides of the house got
ful supprt for thse wars and taxes.

Time for Obama to realize he has been in office well over two years and
now faces a total currency collapse. An economic melt down, hyper
inflation.

Say about this time next year lets chat again. Your food prices are
aobut to take a 12% jump in one year. Hold me to it in one year. It
might be more but not less than 12%

You can't keep printing/creating money faster than Americans consume
toilet paper or the currency itself will become toilet paper.

On 19/03/2011 3:31 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Mar 19, 5:22 pm, wrote:
On 19/03/2011 3:15 PM, Boating All Out wrote:



In articlea20edf12-591f-4e9f-bbe9-e5b8bbdc3492
@n2g2000prj.googlegroups.com, says...

Did "boating All out" support the war in Iraq, if not, he has no
business calling anyone a traitor.
Of course, all you libs have to do is to say "Bush was right and we
were wrong" so I can believe you are in this for the right reasons and
not just to get Libya's oil for George Soros. If you do that, then I
will support you, otherwise, "NO".

Although the French are in the lead, our men and women are in danger.
Our American sons, daughters, fathers, mothers, brothers and sisters.
You've said you don't support them.
I don't give a **** about your infantile politics.
A traitor is a traitor. Easy to spot.
No decent American can take you seriously.
Now get back in your cracker swamp with them big roaches.
We don't need the likes of you in the company of Patriots.
There are still some here who have served Freedom's call.
And that ain't you.

Funny, then how come US isn't invading Yemen, Behrain, Tunisia or
putting a leash on the Hamas?

I guess that means that "Boater all Out" was a traitor during the IRaq
war.
No blood for Soros Oil!

Myth: America needs to be in the middle east for oil.

Truth: If we want oil, get Canada and the US to band together for food
export controls. If corn, wheat, barley, oats all had oil for food, you
would get $20 barrel over night. And not one drop of blood.

We can turn food into ethanol much easier than they can drink oil for food.

On 19/03/2011 3:17 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:30:21 -0600,
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 2:20 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:58:38 -0600,
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 12:53 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:51:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 12:03 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In articlef17450d8-b84a-4ac4-ac5c-549b238af374
@z20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, says...

So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.

The United States of America doesn't seek agreement from traitor Florida
crackers or Virginia ex-military.
The French can handle Gaddafi with a little off-site help from our
patriots serving in the armed forces.
So go kill some of those big roaches of yours and leave decent people
be.
After your state trained the 9/11 terrorists and elected a crook as
governor, it's been decided your opinion doesn't count for anything.

Too bad there wasn't a country big enough to interfere with the US civil
war. The outcome could have been quite a bit different.

Too bad you don't know anything about history.

So fleabagger when are you buying your jack boots? I will say,
politiicans do like good little sheeples like you. Lead by the nose types.

You've already got them in your closet, along with your SS uniform.

You would follow Obama to hell.

Last I check acts of war required congressional approval. Well Obama
does not think so, he just launched cruise missles into Libya. Yet
ignores unarmed non-violent protesters getting shot to death in Yemen
and Behrain....

Hypocritical president of yours needs an impeachment.

You're so stupid, even Hell wouldn't let you in, no less the US.

Don't worry. No plans to be in the US unless it is to board a cruise
ship.

In article ,
says...

Funny, then how come US isn't invading Yemen, Behrain, Tunisia or
putting a leash on the Hamas?

This kind of stupid talk is why traitors like O'hara, Ingersoll and
Herring, and foreign America-haters like you get no respect here.
The U.S. is not invading Libya.
All the dumb-ass invading happened when GWB was President.
I supported that, because I always support our troops.
I'm an American, a vet, and a Patriot.
What's got y'all confused is Obama ain't a dumb-ass like y'all.
You don't know how to act or talk because of that.
You're just plain confused. Like you been rope-a-doped.
So you turned traitor. No surprise, since you're scum.
Pretty much like cornered possums.
All hissin' and droolin'.
But possums don't stink as much and are prettier than traitors.
Let me explain it to you.
Obama's worked it out so the French, English, Italians and A-rabs
will take care of Qadaffi. Maybe Canadians too.
Our boys will provide "unique" assets, which is cruise missiles,
satellite surveillance, electronic jamming, etc.
We already got plenty of fighting business elsewhere.
We ain't invading anybody, and if things go as expected we won't lose
any of our brave fighting men, and the Libyans will depose Qadaffi.
I support our troops, unlike the confused traitors who have spoken up
here. No matter what war.
How many times do you jack-asses have to be hit with a 2x4 to understand
that?
I might understand your confusion if this was complicated, or you had
behaved like decent men.
But it ain't complicated, and you haven't acted decently.
So my only answer to you is calling you out as traitors, and a stain on
America.
A stain on Canada from you. They should deport you to Somalia.

On 19/03/2011 5:10 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In ,
says...

Funny, then how come US isn't invading Yemen, Behrain, Tunisia or
putting a leash on the Hamas?

This kind of stupid talk is why traitors like O'hara, Ingersoll and
Herring, and foreign America-haters like you get no respect here.
The U.S. is not invading Libya.

Oh, just bombing the hell out of them for one man. Why not just go for
Gadafi? Why drop fighters onto civilians and blow up military that in
fact believe they are trying to put order in their country?

Why not just go for Gadafi directly? Why make the whole nation pay for
a political grudge match?

Oh, big bully showing them how cruise missles work... ya... real cowards
in Washington.

A stain on Canada from you. They should deport you to Somalia.

Hey, I am no lover of Islam. But I can say, with the way the US gets
into wars, they might have a point. But I don't agree with terrorism, I
believe terrorists should be simply shot. Take Omar Khadr, Canadian in
Gitmo -- why do you pander to him? Take him out and shoot him.

Trouble is these wars...always get the civilians eathingt he shrapnel
when the big power idiots want to play war.

In article ,
says...

On 19/03/2011 5:10 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In ,
says...

Funny, then how come US isn't invading Yemen, Behrain, Tunisia or
putting a leash on the Hamas?

This kind of stupid talk is why traitors like O'hara, Ingersoll and
Herring, and foreign America-haters like you get no respect here.
The U.S. is not invading Libya.

Oh, just bombing the hell out of them for one man. Why not just go for
Gadafi? Why drop fighters onto civilians and blow up military that in
fact believe they are trying to put order in their country?


So you support Qadaffi. Figures.
Puts you right in there with the American traitors of this newsgroup.
Buzz off. I'm done with you.

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 16:27:38 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 3:17 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:30:21 -0600,
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 2:20 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:58:38 -0600,
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 12:53 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:51:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 12:03 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In articlef17450d8-b84a-4ac4-ac5c-549b238af374
@z20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, says...

So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.

The United States of America doesn't seek agreement from traitor Florida
crackers or Virginia ex-military.
The French can handle Gaddafi with a little off-site help from our
patriots serving in the armed forces.
So go kill some of those big roaches of yours and leave decent people
be.
After your state trained the 9/11 terrorists and elected a crook as
governor, it's been decided your opinion doesn't count for anything.

Too bad there wasn't a country big enough to interfere with the US civil
war. The outcome could have been quite a bit different.

Too bad you don't know anything about history.

So fleabagger when are you buying your jack boots? I will say,
politiicans do like good little sheeples like you. Lead by the nose types.

You've already got them in your closet, along with your SS uniform.

You would follow Obama to hell.

Last I check acts of war required congressional approval. Well Obama
does not think so, he just launched cruise missles into Libya. Yet
ignores unarmed non-violent protesters getting shot to death in Yemen
and Behrain....

Hypocritical president of yours needs an impeachment.

You're so stupid, even Hell wouldn't let you in, no less the US.

Don't worry. No plans to be in the US unless it is to board a cruise
ship.

Don't worry, it's doubtful they would even let you board a cruise
ship.

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 15:39:50 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 3:31 PM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 3:06 PM, Harryk wrote:
Frogwatch wrote:
On Mar 19, 4:40 pm, wrote:
On 19/03/2011 2:21 PM, wrote:



On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:27:04 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:
On Mar 19, 2:59 pm,
wrote:
In ,
says...
On 19/03/2011 11:35 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make
sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to
attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi
Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and
most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK
IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC
issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.
Gaddafi ticked off the wrong people.
Lets face it, they drag out crimes for the ast 4 decades yet do
not
explain why they didn't do anything until now but do business
with him.
Not even Loberbie was enough and that is old history.
Nope, Gaddafi must have told the French prime minister and
Obama to
stuff it. So this is their revenge. These power hungry mogals....
Obama will stop short as he has to go to congress and they are not
looking for more expensive wars.
Meanwhile the Obama hypocrite is ignoring Yemen and Behrain's
shooting
of peaceful unarmed protestors while backing a violent armed
minority in
Liba....makes no sense but it is the way it is.
Gaddafi probably called Obama a name. He is a thin skinned dude for
sure...
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh, Now I see the difference. Obama is president now
and
Bush was president then.
Yes, Obama is president. Get over it.
Tick-tock-Obama-be-on-a-rock -- 2012 is a coming.

Did "boating All out" support the war in Iraq, if not, he has no
business calling anyone a traitor.
Of course, all you libs have to do is to say "Bush was right and we
were wrong" so I can believe you are in this for the right reasons and
not just to get Libya's oil for George Soros. If you do that, then I
will support you, otherwise, "NO".


You right-wing crackpots - you, canuck, herring, snotty = are really up
in arms over this. Warms my heart. Of course, there isn't an ounce of
logic or sense in any of your pronouncements.

No money to pay the bills but plenty for war. Makes Obama a war monger.


Bush started two serious wars and lowered taxes.

Actually, my memory is not short like a democrat-liberal. If I recall
correctly Bush went to a congress and from both sides of the house got
ful supprt for thse wars and taxes.

Time for Obama to realize he has been in office well over two years and
now faces a total currency collapse. An economic melt down, hyper
inflation.

Say about this time next year lets chat again. Your food prices are
aobut to take a 12% jump in one year. Hold me to it in one year. It
might be more but not less than 12%

You can't keep printing/creating money faster than Americans consume
toilet paper or the currency itself will become toilet paper.

Yeah after lying to Congress and faking intel, sure he got approval.

wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 16:27:38 -0600,
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 3:17 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:30:21 -0600,
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 2:20 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:58:38 -0600,
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 12:53 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:51:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 12:03 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In articlef17450d8-b84a-4ac4-ac5c-549b238af374
@z20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, says...
So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.
The United States of America doesn't seek agreement from traitor Florida
crackers or Virginia ex-military.
The French can handle Gaddafi with a little off-site help from our
patriots serving in the armed forces.
So go kill some of those big roaches of yours and leave decent people
be.
After your state trained the 9/11 terrorists and elected a crook as
governor, it's been decided your opinion doesn't count for anything.
Too bad there wasn't a country big enough to interfere with the US civil
war. The outcome could have been quite a bit different.
Too bad you don't know anything about history.
So fleabagger when are you buying your jack boots? I will say,
politiicans do like good little sheeples like you. Lead by the nose types.
You've already got them in your closet, along with your SS uniform.
You would follow Obama to hell.

Last I check acts of war required congressional approval. Well Obama
does not think so, he just launched cruise missles into Libya. Yet
ignores unarmed non-violent protesters getting shot to death in Yemen
and Behrain....

Hypocritical president of yours needs an impeachment.
You're so stupid, even Hell wouldn't let you in, no less the US.
Don't worry. No plans to be in the US unless it is to board a cruise
ship.

Don't worry, it's doubtful they would even let you board a cruise
ship.

Not unless Herring gave him a body cavity search, which I bet both of
them would enjoy.

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

Funny, then how come US isn't invading Yemen, Behrain, Tunisia or
putting a leash on the Hamas?

This kind of stupid talk is why traitors like

You can call us traitors all you want, simply because we don't toe the
looney line you toe, but it only shows how ignorant and intolerant you
as a progressive are and how much YOU hate the United States and the way
we live and rule here...