![]() |
Hypocrisy
So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack. Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ. Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless ninnies. |
Hypocrisy
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 10:35:53 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack. Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ. Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless ninnies. That's the question being asked in the "Please tell me what Gaddafi is..." thread. But, you're welcome to ask it again. Maybe you'll get something other than bull**** deflections. |
Hypocrisy
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 10:35:53 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack. Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ. Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless ninnies. You are an ideological idiot or a deliberate liar. Bush was the one who lifted the sanctions on Gaddafi. "We" are not attacking him. We're mostly running awacs in support of NATO forces. Obama specifically said "no ground troops." You're really disgusting. |
Hypocrisy
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 13:39:46 -0400, John H
wrote: On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 10:35:53 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack. Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ. Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless ninnies. That's the question being asked in the "Please tell me what Gaddafi is..." thread. But, you're welcome to ask it again. Maybe you'll get something other than bull**** deflections. Or you and Frog will continue lying.. |
Hypocrisy
|
Hypocrisy
On 19/03/2011 11:35 AM, Frogwatch wrote:
So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack. Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ. Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless ninnies. Gaddafi ticked off the wrong people. Lets face it, they drag out crimes for the ast 4 decades yet do not explain why they didn't do anything until now but do business with him. Not even Loberbie was enough and that is old history. Nope, Gaddafi must have told the French prime minister and Obama to stuff it. So this is their revenge. These power hungry mogals.... Obama will stop short as he has to go to congress and they are not looking for more expensive wars. Meanwhile the Obama hypocrite is ignoring Yemen and Behrain's shooting of peaceful unarmed protestors while backing a violent armed minority in Liba....makes no sense but it is the way it is. |
Hypocrisy
On Mar 19, 1:39*pm, John H wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 10:35:53 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense to attack Saddam. *So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack. Do you see them helping? *With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and many other nations were on the side of the USA. *Even Hillary and most Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ. Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they *are mindless ninnies. That's the question being asked in the "Please tell me what Gaddafi is..." thread. But, you're welcome to ask it again. Maybe you'll get something other than bull**** deflections. Have you written that letter to the man who pays your living yet? You know, to complain about the " ****ty " job he's doing? Only a ****ing idiot like you, Herring, could shoot himself in the foot. |
Hypocrisy
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:51:31 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 19/03/2011 12:03 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In articlef17450d8-b84a-4ac4-ac5c-549b238af374 @z20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, says... So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack. Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ. Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless ninnies. The United States of America doesn't seek agreement from traitor Florida crackers or Virginia ex-military. The French can handle Gaddafi with a little off-site help from our patriots serving in the armed forces. So go kill some of those big roaches of yours and leave decent people be. After your state trained the 9/11 terrorists and elected a crook as governor, it's been decided your opinion doesn't count for anything. Too bad there wasn't a country big enough to interfere with the US civil war. The outcome could have been quite a bit different. Too bad you don't know anything about history. |
Hypocrisy
In article ,
says... In article f17450d8-b84a-4ac4-ac5c-549b238af374 @z20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, says... So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack. Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ. Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless ninnies. The United States of America doesn't seek agreement from traitor Florida crackers or Virginia ex-military. The French can handle Gaddafi with a little off-site help from our patriots serving in the armed forces. So go kill some of those big roaches of yours and leave decent people be. After your state trained the 9/11 terrorists and elected a crook as governor, it's been decided your opinion doesn't count for anything. Apparently you can't answer the question either.. It is a tough one for a liberal... |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com