Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,525
Default Hypocrisy

So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,637
Default Hypocrisy

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 10:35:53 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.


That's the question being asked in the "Please tell me what Gaddafi is..."
thread. But, you're welcome to ask it again. Maybe you'll get something other
than bull**** deflections.
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,021
Default Hypocrisy

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 13:39:46 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 10:35:53 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.


That's the question being asked in the "Please tell me what Gaddafi is..."
thread. But, you're welcome to ask it again. Maybe you'll get something other
than bull**** deflections.


Or you and Frog will continue lying..
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,267
Default Hypocrisy

On Mar 19, 1:39*pm, John H wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 10:35:53 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. *So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? *With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. *Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they *are mindless
ninnies.


That's the question being asked in the "Please tell me what Gaddafi is..."
thread. But, you're welcome to ask it again. Maybe you'll get something other
than bull**** deflections.


Have you written that letter to the man who pays your living yet? You
know, to complain about the " ****ty " job he's doing?
Only a ****ing idiot like you, Herring, could shoot himself in the
foot.
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,021
Default Hypocrisy

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 10:35:53 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.


You are an ideological idiot or a deliberate liar.

Bush was the one who lifted the sanctions on Gaddafi.

"We" are not attacking him. We're mostly running awacs in support of
NATO forces. Obama specifically said "no ground troops."

You're really disgusting.


  #9   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,596
Default Hypocrisy

On 19/03/2011 12:53 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:51:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 12:03 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In articlef17450d8-b84a-4ac4-ac5c-549b238af374
@z20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com,
says...

So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.

The United States of America doesn't seek agreement from traitor Florida
crackers or Virginia ex-military.
The French can handle Gaddafi with a little off-site help from our
patriots serving in the armed forces.
So go kill some of those big roaches of yours and leave decent people
be.
After your state trained the 9/11 terrorists and elected a crook as
governor, it's been decided your opinion doesn't count for anything.


Too bad there wasn't a country big enough to interfere with the US civil
war. The outcome could have been quite a bit different.


Too bad you don't know anything about history.


So fleabagger when are you buying your jack boots? I will say,
politiicans do like good little sheeples like you. Lead by the nose types.
  #10   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,021
Default Hypocrisy

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:58:38 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 12:53 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:51:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 19/03/2011 12:03 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In articlef17450d8-b84a-4ac4-ac5c-549b238af374
@z20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com,
says...

So, why does it make sense to attack Gaddafi and it did not make sense
to attack Saddam. So what if the "Arab LEague" wants us to attack.
Do you see them helping? With Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and
many other nations were on the side of the USA. Even Hillary and most
Dems thought there were WMD in Iraq and THEY VOTED TO ATTACK IRAQ.
Now, I will support the US in attacking GAddafi if the DNC issues an
apology to Bush saying he was correct and that they are mindless
ninnies.

The United States of America doesn't seek agreement from traitor Florida
crackers or Virginia ex-military.
The French can handle Gaddafi with a little off-site help from our
patriots serving in the armed forces.
So go kill some of those big roaches of yours and leave decent people
be.
After your state trained the 9/11 terrorists and elected a crook as
governor, it's been decided your opinion doesn't count for anything.

Too bad there wasn't a country big enough to interfere with the US civil
war. The outcome could have been quite a bit different.


Too bad you don't know anything about history.


So fleabagger when are you buying your jack boots? I will say,
politiicans do like good little sheeples like you. Lead by the nose types.


You've already got them in your closet, along with your SS uniform.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Oh the hypocrisy!!!! Kapt Krunch ASA 1 June 22nd 08 07:07 PM
Race, IQ, and liberal hypocrisy. Ted General 2 July 26th 07 04:17 AM
OT the newest hypocrisy Jonathan Ganz ASA 0 October 11th 04 05:41 AM
OT--Hypocrisy is contagious NOYB General 8 February 29th 04 05:19 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017