Is Obama about to attack Libya simply to steal their oil for George
Soros? It makes sense considering that Obama gave US taxpayer money
to Soros for drilling offshore Brazil. Remember, this is an admin
that thinks the Egyptian dictator Mubarek was a good guy (Remember
what Biden said about Mubarek not being a dictator). France is just
doing what they always do, backing whoever will supply them with oil
as most of Libya’s oil goes thru France.

On 19/03/2011 1:39 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
Is Obama about to attack Libya simply to steal their oil for George
Soros? It makes sense considering that Obama gave US taxpayer money
to Soros for drilling offshore Brazil. Remember, this is an admin
that thinks the Egyptian dictator Mubarek was a good guy (Remember
what Biden said about Mubarek not being a dictator). France is just
doing what they always do, backing whoever will supply them with oil
as most of Libya’s oil goes thru France.

Nope, Libya does not produce enough oil for this. Brazil could easily
make up for the loss of Libya oil. Canada could too.

Nope, the real problem here is some kind of alliance between Euro elite
(mostly french war industrialists) and powerful, Saudi and the American
war machine.

Even French Giuana is getting into trouble. Rwanda may start up, a
UN-Frech installed rgime. Ivory Coast, local guy fights with UN-puppet
for control.

And the UN is majority controled by dictators, arabs and muslims. More
like someone is trying to engineer a united Africa and a united Middle
East. Under UN, US and Frech control of course, with the Saudi money
buddies pulling the strings.

As for todays good guy, just don't want to tick off the wrong people or
you become tommowows tyrant and evil person to oust.

Looks like congress is sitting on the sidelines with this too. If I was
a congress person I would be livid right now, a prsident going to war
without congress? Whee is democracy? I was thinking it is in the
toilet and flushing...

On Mar 19, 4:51*pm, Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 1:39 PM, Frogwatch wrote:

Is Obama about to attack Libya simply to steal their oil for George
Soros? *It makes sense considering that Obama gave US taxpayer money
to Soros for drilling offshore Brazil. *Remember, this is an admin
that thinks the Egyptian dictator Mubarek was a good guy (Remember
what Biden said about Mubarek not being a dictator). *France is just
doing what they always do, backing whoever will supply them with oil
as most of Libya’s oil goes thru France.

Nope, Libya does not produce enough oil for this. *Brazil could easily
make up for the loss of Libya oil. *Canada could too.

Nope, the real problem here is some kind of alliance between Euro elite
(mostly french war industrialists) and powerful, Saudi and the American
war machine.

Even French Giuana is getting into trouble. *Rwanda may start up, a
UN-Frech installed rgime. *Ivory Coast, local guy fights with UN-puppet
for control.

And the UN is majority controled by dictators, arabs and muslims. *More
like someone is trying to engineer a united Africa and a united Middle
East. *Under UN, US and Frech control of course, with the Saudi money
buddies pulling the strings.

As for todays good guy, just don't want to tick off the wrong people or
you become tommowows tyrant and evil person to oust.

Looks like congress is sitting on the sidelines with this too. *If I was
a congress person I would be livid right now, a prsident going to war
without congress? *Whee is democracy? *I was thinking it is in the
toilet and flushing...

You notice that Obama did nothing until the Libyan oil stopped flowing
and then he goes to war? No, no relationship there.

On 19/03/2011 3:50 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Mar 19, 4:51 pm, wrote:
On 19/03/2011 1:39 PM, Frogwatch wrote:

Is Obama about to attack Libya simply to steal their oil for George
Soros? It makes sense considering that Obama gave US taxpayer money
to Soros for drilling offshore Brazil. Remember, this is an admin
that thinks the Egyptian dictator Mubarek was a good guy (Remember
what Biden said about Mubarek not being a dictator). France is just
doing what they always do, backing whoever will supply them with oil
as most of Libya’s oil goes thru France.

Nope, Libya does not produce enough oil for this. Brazil could easily
make up for the loss of Libya oil. Canada could too.

Nope, the real problem here is some kind of alliance between Euro elite
(mostly french war industrialists) and powerful, Saudi and the American
war machine.

Even French Giuana is getting into trouble. Rwanda may start up, a
UN-Frech installed rgime. Ivory Coast, local guy fights with UN-puppet
for control.

And the UN is majority controled by dictators, arabs and muslims. More
like someone is trying to engineer a united Africa and a united Middle
East. Under UN, US and Frech control of course, with the Saudi money
buddies pulling the strings.

As for todays good guy, just don't want to tick off the wrong people or
you become tommowows tyrant and evil person to oust.

Looks like congress is sitting on the sidelines with this too. If I was
a congress person I would be livid right now, a prsident going to war
without congress? Whee is democracy? I was thinking it is in the
toilet and flushing...

You notice that Obama did nothing until the Libyan oil stopped flowing
and then he goes to war? No, no relationship there.

US does not use much if any Lybian oil. Niger is in an uproar has oil
too. Yemen, Bahrain... Nope, this definitly has more to do with
politics than just oil.

Maybe Gadafi told an Imam to go to hell. Now that I would believe.
Hey, it does not take US, UK, France, US and others to pounce on one
little desert country like Libya.

Sort of like a gang of bullies feeling tough as they are kicking the
crap out of someone in a school yard. Ya, big tough men are fighting
this war. /sarcasm

More to this than oil, Libya is oil, but in the big picture a small
player. Like I said, if Libya just **** down, Canada could pick up the
slack in a hear beat. So could Brazil, Venezuela. Even if the Saudis
are tapped out.

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:50:05 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Mar 19, 4:51*pm, Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 1:39 PM, Frogwatch wrote:

Is Obama about to attack Libya simply to steal their oil for George
Soros? *It makes sense considering that Obama gave US taxpayer money
to Soros for drilling offshore Brazil. *Remember, this is an admin
that thinks the Egyptian dictator Mubarek was a good guy (Remember
what Biden said about Mubarek not being a dictator). *France is just
doing what they always do, backing whoever will supply them with oil
as most of Libya’s oil goes thru France.

Nope, Libya does not produce enough oil for this. *Brazil could easily
make up for the loss of Libya oil. *Canada could too.

Nope, the real problem here is some kind of alliance between Euro elite
(mostly french war industrialists) and powerful, Saudi and the American
war machine.

Even French Giuana is getting into trouble. *Rwanda may start up, a
UN-Frech installed rgime. *Ivory Coast, local guy fights with UN-puppet
for control.

And the UN is majority controled by dictators, arabs and muslims. *More
like someone is trying to engineer a united Africa and a united Middle
East. *Under UN, US and Frech control of course, with the Saudi money
buddies pulling the strings.

As for todays good guy, just don't want to tick off the wrong people or
you become tommowows tyrant and evil person to oust.

Looks like congress is sitting on the sidelines with this too. *If I was
a congress person I would be livid right now, a prsident going to war
without congress? *Whee is democracy? *I was thinking it is in the
toilet and flushing...

You notice that Obama did nothing until the Libyan oil stopped flowing
and then he goes to war? No, no relationship there.

You notice that Obama didn't go in front of the UN to get a resolution
to attack a country that didn't have anything to do with us.

On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 08:56:05 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:39:06 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Is Obama about to attack Libya simply to steal their oil for George
Soros? It makes sense considering that Obama gave US taxpayer money
to Soros for drilling offshore Brazil. Remember, this is an admin
that thinks the Egyptian dictator Mubarek was a good guy (Remember
what Biden said about Mubarek not being a dictator). France is just
doing what they always do, backing whoever will supply them with oil
as most of Libya’s oil goes thru France.

Let's take the first question. Is Obama attacking Libya?

Yes. Maybe you've been out fishing for the last couple days.

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/u-s...fense-targets/

Of course, if you define 'attack' in certain ways, you could say that Bush
didn't attack Iraq either.

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:39:06 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Is Obama about to attack Libya simply to steal their oil for George
Soros? It makes sense considering that Obama gave US taxpayer money
to Soros for drilling offshore Brazil. Remember, this is an admin
that thinks the Egyptian dictator Mubarek was a good guy (Remember
what Biden said about Mubarek not being a dictator). France is just
doing what they always do, backing whoever will supply them with oil
as most of Libya?s oil goes thru France.

Let's take the first question. Is Obama attacking Libya?

Yes, 120 missiles and three B2 bombers from Wisconsin all the way there
to Bomb, yes Obama is attacking Libya...

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:39:06 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Is Obama about to attack Libya simply to steal their oil for George
Soros? It makes sense considering that Obama gave US taxpayer money
to Soros for drilling offshore Brazil. Remember, this is an admin
that thinks the Egyptian dictator Mubarek was a good guy (Remember
what Biden said about Mubarek not being a dictator). France is just
doing what they always do, backing whoever will supply them with oil
as most of Libya?s oil goes thru France.

Let's take the first question. Is Obama attacking Libya?

Yes. Obama gave the order to shoot around 100 Tomahawk cruise missiles
at targets in Libya. Therefore Obama attacked Libya. You may say that
the UN gave Obama permission to shoot the cruise missiles but that is
just political cover for Obama attacking Libya.

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:39:06 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Is Obama about to attack Libya simply to steal their oil for George
Soros? It makes sense considering that Obama gave US taxpayer money
to Soros for drilling offshore Brazil. Remember, this is an admin
that thinks the Egyptian dictator Mubarek was a good guy (Remember
what Biden said about Mubarek not being a dictator). France is just
doing what they always do, backing whoever will supply them with oil
as most of Libya’s oil goes thru France.

wonder if he knows we dont buy libyan oil

oh well...

On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 20:02:46 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 14:44:57 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:39:06 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Is Obama about to attack Libya simply to steal their oil for George
Soros? It makes sense considering that Obama gave US taxpayer money
to Soros for drilling offshore Brazil. Remember, this is an admin
that thinks the Egyptian dictator Mubarek was a good guy (Remember
what Biden said about Mubarek not being a dictator). France is just
doing what they always do, backing whoever will supply them with oil
as most of Libya?s oil goes thru France.

Let's take the first question. Is Obama attacking Libya?

Yes. Obama gave the order to shoot around 100 Tomahawk cruise missiles
at targets in Libya. Therefore Obama attacked Libya. You may say that
the UN gave Obama permission to shoot the cruise missiles but that is
just political cover for Obama attacking Libya.


Point well taken. You are correct, yet we have no troops on the
ground. Sense any difference from Bush????

Obama didn't lie to the UN or the US about WMDs.