Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #43   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,021
Default No blood for oil

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:55:52 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 21/03/2011 4:33 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:59:02 -0700,
wrote:

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 15:31:48 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In ,
says...


They are now saying the main source, a British asset who never talked
to the US, was a fraud. It is interesting that Blair is not getting
more of the blame.
All of the things Powell was saying at the UN (mobile weapons labs and
WMD accidents that killed a number of workers) came from the Brits.


The main "source" for mobile weapons labs "intelligence" was Curveball.
Curveball was a German "asset."
An embezzler, possibly alcoholic, looking for a green card.
He was discredited totally by UN weapons inspectors before the war was
launched.

We can't let facts get in the way of blaming Bush for everything tho.

This is some of the most hilarious bull**** I've see in a long time.
Bush/Cheney/Tenet/Powell had nothing to do with it.
It's all Tony Blairs's fault!


Blair certainly has blood on his hands, but for this country,
Bush/Cheney/Tenet/Powell (in a lesser role) promoted this "intel" as
the excuse to go to war, with no actual corroborating evidence.

They have equal if not a greater amount of blood on their hands.


That is getting closer to the truth. You also had people in congress,
including plenty of Democrats beating the war drum


Democrats are stupid, they still think they can debt spend their way out
of a debt problem. Between the lot they don't have half a brain.


Which would make them twice as smart as you.
  #44   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,021
Default No blood for oil

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:19:24 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:37:14 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...


The Brits were still parroting his stories and fed the information to
Powell.


A lot of this "independent confirmation" was the same false info making
the rounds through the intel agencies of different countries.

We can't let facts get in the way of blaming Bush for everything tho.

This is some of the most hilarious bull**** I've see in a long time.
Bush/Cheney/Tenet/Powell had nothing to do with it.
It's all Tony Blairs's fault!

I never said Bush et al were not at fault. That is the part you all
miss. I think the whole ****up in Iraq was unnecessary.
We should have left in 1991. Every president since then shares some of
the blame.


Got news for you. GW Bush invaded Iraq.
Nobody else.
You sure want to blame everybody else for the Iraq war.

Obama said he would stop both wars yet he clings to the same schedule
"the idiot" came up with. It makes you wonder who the idiot (or the
liar) really is.


So Obama "lied" about his 16 month campaign withdrawal plan.
He decided to listen to military advisers like Petraeus instead of the
likes of Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, et al.


They still came up with the same plan

Afghanistan is pretty much all Obama when he expanded the war instead
of winding it down. The lie there is that we are still "going after
Bin Laden" and it is as egregious as the WMD lie, (that I
acknowledge).


Saying the same thing over and over doesn't give it any more
legitimacy.


You and Plume can't seem to accept that I was against BOTH wars.
You assume that if I think Obama is wrong that I must think Bush was
right. They were BOTH wrong, along with Clinton and the elder Bush.
When Saddam withdrew from Kuwait, our job was done there.


The Afg. war wasn't wrong and you know it. We had a legitimate reason
for going in. Just because Bush did so stupidly didn't make it wrong.

The idea that we have any business in any country's civil war keeps
biting us on the ass and we never learn.


Yeah, according to you human rights don't matter. That'll be a great
way of leading by example.
  #45   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,312
Default No blood for oil

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:06:25 -0700,
wrote:

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:33:47 -0400,
wrote:

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:59:02 -0700,
wrote:

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 15:31:48 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...


They are now saying the main source, a British asset who never talked
to the US, was a fraud. It is interesting that Blair is not getting
more of the blame.
All of the things Powell was saying at the UN (mobile weapons labs and
WMD accidents that killed a number of workers) came from the Brits.


The main "source" for mobile weapons labs "intelligence" was Curveball.
Curveball was a German "asset."
An embezzler, possibly alcoholic, looking for a green card.
He was discredited totally by UN weapons inspectors before the war was
launched.

We can't let facts get in the way of blaming Bush for everything tho.

This is some of the most hilarious bull**** I've see in a long time.
Bush/Cheney/Tenet/Powell had nothing to do with it.
It's all Tony Blairs's fault!


Blair certainly has blood on his hands, but for this country,
Bush/Cheney/Tenet/Powell (in a lesser role) promoted this "intel" as
the excuse to go to war, with no actual corroborating evidence.

They have equal if not a greater amount of blood on their hands.

That is getting closer to the truth. You also had people in congress,
including plenty of Democrats beating the war drum


After having been fed lies from Bush/Cheney... sure.


That begs the question, how stupid were the Democrats?
Why would they listen to a guy they were calling an idiot?


They all heard the same intelligence briefings and they all had the
chance to challenge the information. You can't ignore the input of
Schumer and Lieberman. I have already told you many times why they
wanted Saddam gone, pretty much at any cost.
You act like this was Bush's decision, alone and congress did not go
along.


I could go get the vote if you like. I could also get the sponsors of
the resolution and what they wrote.


It would be a waste of time for you to do that. These ideologues will
never admit any of it anyway.


  #47   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,596
Default No blood for oil

On 21/03/2011 10:11 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:47:58 -0700,
wrote:

On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:19:24 -0400,
wrote:


You and Plume can't seem to accept that I was against BOTH wars.
You assume that if I think Obama is wrong that I must think Bush was
right. They were BOTH wrong, along with Clinton and the elder Bush.
When Saddam withdrew from Kuwait, our job was done there.


The Afg. war wasn't wrong and you know it. We had a legitimate reason
for going in. Just because Bush did so stupidly didn't make it wrong.


Wait ... are you saying Bush was right about something? I disagree but
it is interesting.
Afghanistan was always stupid. Sending in a few Deltas to try to
assassinate OBL was a good idea but when we missed him we should have
backed off and waited for him to pop up again.
Invading Afghanistan in force was simply stupid.

The idea that we have any business in any country's civil war keeps
biting us on the ass and we never learn.


Yeah, according to you human rights don't matter. That'll be a great
way of leading by example.


Why do we have the right to decide what "human rights" mean in a
foreign country? In real life we are using human rights to mask an
economic or political mission anyway.

Right now we are backing the "rebels" in Libya but we do not have a
clue who they really are. It is significant that this region is an
alleged Al Queda strong hold. We may end up replacing a guy that we
had "contained" to use your words, with a gang that we have no
influence over at all.

You have still not given me an example of a success story in all of
our post WWII military adventures. The best that you can point at is a
stalemate in the Bulkans where we have 124,000 blue helmets standing
between feuding factions.
BTW when I went looking for that number I was overwhelmed by reports
of the UN "peacekeepers" engaged in human trafficking and rape.
Put this on your google bar

"Bosnia peace keepers 2010"

You can see what wonderful people the UN is putting in there to help
out the population.


UN has had that problem in Africa too. UN is turning out to be a
mecenary army for politicians to bypass their own war conventions and
pull stuff that would be illegal in their own countries. Even used to
supply money and arms to insurgents to undermine the local government.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Smell of Blood HK General 0 June 25th 09 07:50 PM
A little something to get the blood moving... Tom Francis - SWSports General 1 October 24th 08 02:50 PM
Blood on my mast Joe ASA 58 November 27th 06 04:13 AM
Kira draw blood yet? Joe ASA 13 December 31st 05 02:44 PM
O/T Any French blood out there? Don White General 0 July 16th 04 02:36 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017