|
No blood for oil
Is Obama about to attack Libya simply to steal their oil for George
Soros? It makes sense considering that Obama gave US taxpayer money to Soros for drilling offshore Brazil. Remember, this is an admin that thinks the Egyptian dictator Mubarek was a good guy (Remember what Biden said about Mubarek not being a dictator). France is just doing what they always do, backing whoever will supply them with oil as most of Libya’s oil goes thru France. |
No blood for oil
On 19/03/2011 1:39 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
Is Obama about to attack Libya simply to steal their oil for George Soros? It makes sense considering that Obama gave US taxpayer money to Soros for drilling offshore Brazil. Remember, this is an admin that thinks the Egyptian dictator Mubarek was a good guy (Remember what Biden said about Mubarek not being a dictator). France is just doing what they always do, backing whoever will supply them with oil as most of Libya’s oil goes thru France. Nope, Libya does not produce enough oil for this. Brazil could easily make up for the loss of Libya oil. Canada could too. Nope, the real problem here is some kind of alliance between Euro elite (mostly french war industrialists) and powerful, Saudi and the American war machine. Even French Giuana is getting into trouble. Rwanda may start up, a UN-Frech installed rgime. Ivory Coast, local guy fights with UN-puppet for control. And the UN is majority controled by dictators, arabs and muslims. More like someone is trying to engineer a united Africa and a united Middle East. Under UN, US and Frech control of course, with the Saudi money buddies pulling the strings. As for todays good guy, just don't want to tick off the wrong people or you become tommowows tyrant and evil person to oust. Looks like congress is sitting on the sidelines with this too. If I was a congress person I would be livid right now, a prsident going to war without congress? Whee is democracy? I was thinking it is in the toilet and flushing... |
No blood for oil
On Mar 19, 4:51*pm, Canuck57 wrote:
On 19/03/2011 1:39 PM, Frogwatch wrote: Is Obama about to attack Libya simply to steal their oil for George Soros? *It makes sense considering that Obama gave US taxpayer money to Soros for drilling offshore Brazil. *Remember, this is an admin that thinks the Egyptian dictator Mubarek was a good guy (Remember what Biden said about Mubarek not being a dictator). *France is just doing what they always do, backing whoever will supply them with oil as most of Libya’s oil goes thru France. Nope, Libya does not produce enough oil for this. *Brazil could easily make up for the loss of Libya oil. *Canada could too. Nope, the real problem here is some kind of alliance between Euro elite (mostly french war industrialists) and powerful, Saudi and the American war machine. Even French Giuana is getting into trouble. *Rwanda may start up, a UN-Frech installed rgime. *Ivory Coast, local guy fights with UN-puppet for control. And the UN is majority controled by dictators, arabs and muslims. *More like someone is trying to engineer a united Africa and a united Middle East. *Under UN, US and Frech control of course, with the Saudi money buddies pulling the strings. As for todays good guy, just don't want to tick off the wrong people or you become tommowows tyrant and evil person to oust. Looks like congress is sitting on the sidelines with this too. *If I was a congress person I would be livid right now, a prsident going to war without congress? *Whee is democracy? *I was thinking it is in the toilet and flushing... You notice that Obama did nothing until the Libyan oil stopped flowing and then he goes to war? No, no relationship there. |
No blood for oil
On 19/03/2011 3:50 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Mar 19, 4:51 pm, wrote: On 19/03/2011 1:39 PM, Frogwatch wrote: Is Obama about to attack Libya simply to steal their oil for George Soros? It makes sense considering that Obama gave US taxpayer money to Soros for drilling offshore Brazil. Remember, this is an admin that thinks the Egyptian dictator Mubarek was a good guy (Remember what Biden said about Mubarek not being a dictator). France is just doing what they always do, backing whoever will supply them with oil as most of Libya’s oil goes thru France. Nope, Libya does not produce enough oil for this. Brazil could easily make up for the loss of Libya oil. Canada could too. Nope, the real problem here is some kind of alliance between Euro elite (mostly french war industrialists) and powerful, Saudi and the American war machine. Even French Giuana is getting into trouble. Rwanda may start up, a UN-Frech installed rgime. Ivory Coast, local guy fights with UN-puppet for control. And the UN is majority controled by dictators, arabs and muslims. More like someone is trying to engineer a united Africa and a united Middle East. Under UN, US and Frech control of course, with the Saudi money buddies pulling the strings. As for todays good guy, just don't want to tick off the wrong people or you become tommowows tyrant and evil person to oust. Looks like congress is sitting on the sidelines with this too. If I was a congress person I would be livid right now, a prsident going to war without congress? Whee is democracy? I was thinking it is in the toilet and flushing... You notice that Obama did nothing until the Libyan oil stopped flowing and then he goes to war? No, no relationship there. US does not use much if any Lybian oil. Niger is in an uproar has oil too. Yemen, Bahrain... Nope, this definitly has more to do with politics than just oil. Maybe Gadafi told an Imam to go to hell. Now that I would believe. Hey, it does not take US, UK, France, US and others to pounce on one little desert country like Libya. Sort of like a gang of bullies feeling tough as they are kicking the crap out of someone in a school yard. Ya, big tough men are fighting this war. /sarcasm More to this than oil, Libya is oil, but in the big picture a small player. Like I said, if Libya just **** down, Canada could pick up the slack in a hear beat. So could Brazil, Venezuela. Even if the Saudis are tapped out. |
No blood for oil
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:50:05 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: On Mar 19, 4:51*pm, Canuck57 wrote: On 19/03/2011 1:39 PM, Frogwatch wrote: Is Obama about to attack Libya simply to steal their oil for George Soros? *It makes sense considering that Obama gave US taxpayer money to Soros for drilling offshore Brazil. *Remember, this is an admin that thinks the Egyptian dictator Mubarek was a good guy (Remember what Biden said about Mubarek not being a dictator). *France is just doing what they always do, backing whoever will supply them with oil as most of Libya’s oil goes thru France. Nope, Libya does not produce enough oil for this. *Brazil could easily make up for the loss of Libya oil. *Canada could too. Nope, the real problem here is some kind of alliance between Euro elite (mostly french war industrialists) and powerful, Saudi and the American war machine. Even French Giuana is getting into trouble. *Rwanda may start up, a UN-Frech installed rgime. *Ivory Coast, local guy fights with UN-puppet for control. And the UN is majority controled by dictators, arabs and muslims. *More like someone is trying to engineer a united Africa and a united Middle East. *Under UN, US and Frech control of course, with the Saudi money buddies pulling the strings. As for todays good guy, just don't want to tick off the wrong people or you become tommowows tyrant and evil person to oust. Looks like congress is sitting on the sidelines with this too. *If I was a congress person I would be livid right now, a prsident going to war without congress? *Whee is democracy? *I was thinking it is in the toilet and flushing... You notice that Obama did nothing until the Libyan oil stopped flowing and then he goes to war? No, no relationship there. You notice that Obama didn't go in front of the UN to get a resolution to attack a country that didn't have anything to do with us. |
No blood for oil
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 08:56:05 -0400, Gene
wrote: On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:39:06 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Is Obama about to attack Libya simply to steal their oil for George Soros? It makes sense considering that Obama gave US taxpayer money to Soros for drilling offshore Brazil. Remember, this is an admin that thinks the Egyptian dictator Mubarek was a good guy (Remember what Biden said about Mubarek not being a dictator). France is just doing what they always do, backing whoever will supply them with oil as most of Libya’s oil goes thru France. Let's take the first question. Is Obama attacking Libya? Yes. Maybe you've been out fishing for the last couple days. http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/u-s...fense-targets/ Of course, if you define 'attack' in certain ways, you could say that Bush didn't attack Iraq either. |
No blood for oil
|
No blood for oil
|
No blood for oil
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:39:06 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote: Is Obama about to attack Libya simply to steal their oil for George Soros? It makes sense considering that Obama gave US taxpayer money to Soros for drilling offshore Brazil. Remember, this is an admin that thinks the Egyptian dictator Mubarek was a good guy (Remember what Biden said about Mubarek not being a dictator). France is just doing what they always do, backing whoever will supply them with oil as most of Libya’s oil goes thru France. wonder if he knows we dont buy libyan oil oh well... |
No blood for oil
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 20:02:46 -0400, Gene
wrote: On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 14:44:57 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:39:06 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch wrote: Is Obama about to attack Libya simply to steal their oil for George Soros? It makes sense considering that Obama gave US taxpayer money to Soros for drilling offshore Brazil. Remember, this is an admin that thinks the Egyptian dictator Mubarek was a good guy (Remember what Biden said about Mubarek not being a dictator). France is just doing what they always do, backing whoever will supply them with oil as most of Libya?s oil goes thru France. Let's take the first question. Is Obama attacking Libya? Yes. Obama gave the order to shoot around 100 Tomahawk cruise missiles at targets in Libya. Therefore Obama attacked Libya. You may say that the UN gave Obama permission to shoot the cruise missiles but that is just political cover for Obama attacking Libya. Point well taken. You are correct, yet we have no troops on the ground. Sense any difference from Bush???? Obama didn't lie to the UN or the US about WMDs. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com