On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:32:54 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 30/03/2011 4:05 PM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote:
...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed:

"The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after
the breakup
of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national
security
policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a
series of ad
hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North
Korea or
Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to
use force
wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and
if so, how
long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone
inside the
White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and
for that
matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More
important,
neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy
that the
public supports and the world understands, America will lack the
legitimacy -
and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is
today."

--Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302.




'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make
decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or
precedent."

- Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011

Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust.
Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find him
consistent.

Any number of important world leaders and polls indicate just the
opposite, that since the Dunce left office, the esteem in which the USA
is held has risen. thanks to the Obama Administration.

Funny, you would support Obama if he sprouted two horns and breathed fire.

Left usually can't justify their position.

Funny, you're ignorant. You hate Obama because he's black. He doesn't
look like you or sound like you.

On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:44:20 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 30/03/2011 4:19 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:36:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote:
...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed:

"The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup
of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security
policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad
hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or
Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force
wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and if so, how
long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the
White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that
matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More important,
neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the
public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy -
and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today."

--Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302.




'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make
decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent."

- Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011

Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust.
Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find
him consistent.

You're delusional? If you substitute Bush for Obama in your nonsense,
it would almost make sense.

Not at all. Bush went to Congress before making acts of war. Came back
with Democriter and Republican support. Further, Bush had provocation
-- Libya had no provocation pure and simple. Just probably told Obama to
shove it up his ass. Mubarack kissed Obama's ass but Qaddafi told Obma
where to stuff it.

He lied to Congress and the world. Bush had no "provocation" other
than what he made up to suit him.

Bush normalized relations with Libya/Qadaffi the PanAm bomber in
chief. Bush was interested in oil and big business.

Obama is fishing this war on political egos, back room deals and for
UN-France colonialism and money.

Fishing? What the heck point are you trying to make? You keep saying
the same thing over and over, as though you expect your nonsense to
eventually make sense.

If Obama ever had to face a honest court devoid of political distortions
he would be tried for an assassination attempt and war without provocation.

Put a leash on Obama or better yet, impeach him.

You're an idiot.

On 3/30/2011 11:07 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:34:36 -0600,
wrote:

On 30/03/2011 4:20 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:05:40 -0400,
wrote:

Canuck57 wrote:
On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote:
...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed:

"The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after
the breakup
of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national
security
policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a
series of ad
hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North
Korea or
Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to
use force
wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and
if so, how
long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone
inside the
White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and
for that
matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More
important,
neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy
that the
public supports and the world understands, America will lack the
legitimacy -
and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is
today."

--Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302.




'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make
decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or
precedent."

- Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011

Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust.
Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find him
consistent.

Any number of important world leaders and polls indicate just the
opposite, that since the Dunce left office, the esteem in which the USA
is held has risen. thanks to the Obama Administration.

Doesn't matter to Knuckles what anyone else thinks. They're all WRONG.

Truth is getting out. Rebel forces are tops, 1500 rag tag mostly you
males aspiring al Qaeda types.

Obama is backing the enemy!!! Priceless. Arrogant Obama screwed up
again and you lefties can't admit he screwed up.

The truth has already gotten out... you're an idiot.

You can't defend Obama so you lash out at his detractors. Brilliant
strategy De Plume. You are so childlike in your constant name calling.
You're as bad as Harry in that respect.

On 30/03/2011 9:08 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:32:54 -0600,
wrote:

On 30/03/2011 4:05 PM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote:
...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed:

"The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after
the breakup
of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national
security
policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a
series of ad
hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North
Korea or
Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to
use force
wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and
if so, how
long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone
inside the
White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and
for that
matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More
important,
neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy
that the
public supports and the world understands, America will lack the
legitimacy -
and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is
today."

--Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302.




'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make
decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or
precedent."

- Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011

Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust.
Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find him
consistent.

Any number of important world leaders and polls indicate just the
opposite, that since the Dunce left office, the esteem in which the USA
is held has risen. thanks to the Obama Administration.

Funny, you would support Obama if he sprouted two horns and breathed fire.

Left usually can't justify their position.

Funny, you're ignorant. You hate Obama because he's black. He doesn't
look like you or sound like you.

Screw your racism, he is half white!

On 30/03/2011 8:25 PM, OmDeFlume wrote:
On 3/30/2011 6:05 PM, Harryk wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote:
...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed:

"The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after
the breakup
of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national
security
policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a
series of ad
hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North
Korea or
Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to
use force
wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and
if so, how
long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone
inside the
White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and
for that
matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More
important,
neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy
that the
public supports and the world understands, America will lack the
legitimacy -
and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is
today."

--Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302.




'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make
decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or
precedent."

- Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011

Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust.
Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find him
consistent.

Any number of important world leaders and polls indicate just the
opposite, that since the Dunce left office, the esteem in which the USA
is held has risen. thanks to the Obama Administration.


One year ago in your huffington post

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/wajaha..._b_460900.html


And the news is even more grim today

http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/...-Time-Low.html


Sorry Obama. You are on the way out.

Yep, skid marks and all. One term botch job.

On 30/03/2011 9:13 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:44:20 -0600,
wrote:

On 30/03/2011 4:19 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:36:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote:
...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed:

"The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup
of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security
policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad
hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or
Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force
wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and if so, how
long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the
White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that
matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More important,
neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the
public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy -
and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today."

--Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302.




'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make
decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent."

- Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011

Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust.
Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find
him consistent.

You're delusional? If you substitute Bush for Obama in your nonsense,
it would almost make sense.

Not at all. Bush went to Congress before making acts of war. Came back
with Democriter and Republican support. Further, Bush had provocation
-- Libya had no provocation pure and simple. Just probably told Obama to
shove it up his ass. Mubarack kissed Obama's ass but Qaddafi told Obma
where to stuff it.

He lied to Congress and the world. Bush had no "provocation" other
than what he made up to suit him.

Bush normalized relations with Libya/Qadaffi the PanAm bomber in
chief. Bush was interested in oil and big business.

Obama is fishing this war on political egos, back room deals and for
UN-France colonialism and money.

Fishing? What the heck point are you trying to make? You keep saying
the same thing over and over, as though you expect your nonsense to
eventually make sense.

If Obama ever had to face a honest court devoid of political distortions
he would be tried for an assassination attempt and war without provocation.

Put a leash on Obama or better yet, impeach him.

You're an idiot.

Dream on, normalized relations with Libya are approaching 4 decades.

As for Bush, still think it is all Bush's fault? My god, your robably
60 years old and blaming your mother too. Suck it up, it is now Obama's
issue of his own making. Obama couldn't even get the assassination
attempt right.

On 30/03/2011 9:07 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 19:34:36 -0600,
wrote:

On 30/03/2011 4:20 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:05:40 -0400,
wrote:

Canuck57 wrote:
On 30/03/2011 1:33 PM, John H wrote:
...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed:

"The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after
the breakup
of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national
security
policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a
series of ad
hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North
Korea or
Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to
use force
wherever there’s a despotic regime that’s terrorizing its people—and
if so, how
long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone
inside the
White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and
for that
matter our enemies-certainly don’t know what the answers are. More
important,
neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy
that the
public supports and the world understands, America will lack the
legitimacy -
and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is
today."

--Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302.




'We don’t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don’t make
decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or
precedent."

- Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011

Obama has a foreign policy, destroy international relations and trust.
Help Al-Qaeda affiliates in Libya. I don't agree with it but do find him
consistent.

Any number of important world leaders and polls indicate just the
opposite, that since the Dunce left office, the esteem in which the USA
is held has risen. thanks to the Obama Administration.

Doesn't matter to Knuckles what anyone else thinks. They're all WRONG.

Truth is getting out. Rebel forces are tops, 1500 rag tag mostly you
males aspiring al Qaeda types.

Obama is backing the enemy!!! Priceless. Arrogant Obama screwed up
again and you lefties can't admit he screwed up.

The truth has already gotten out... you're an idiot.

You are so stupid, you don't realize how stupid you really are. Just an
Obama bend over butt kiss.

On Mar 30, 4:13*pm, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:33:20 -0400, John H
wrote:



...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed:

"The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup
of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security
policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad
hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or
Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force
wherever there s a despotic regime that s terrorizing its people and if so, how
long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the
White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that
matter our enemies-certainly don t know what the answers are. More important,
neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the
public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy -
and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today."

--Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302.

'We don t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don t make
decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent."

- Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011

So, when Obama gives a speech then goes on the news and explains why
we're doing what we're doing, you believe he never said anything. Yet,
you have no problem following Bush without question.

Who said anything about Bush? He's gone. Have you not yet realized
that?

WAFDS!

John H wrote:
On Mar 30, 4:13 pm, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:33:20 -0400, John
wrote:



...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed:
"The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup
of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security
policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad
hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or
Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force
wherever there s a despotic regime that s terrorizing its people and if so, how
long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the
White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that
matter our enemies-certainly don t know what the answers are. More important,
neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the
public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy -
and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today."
--Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302.
'We don t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don t make
decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent."
- Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011
So, when Obama gives a speech then goes on the news and explains why
we're doing what we're doing, you believe he never said anything. Yet,
you have no problem following Bush without question.

Who said anything about Bush? He's gone. Have you not yet realized
that?

WAFDS!

We'll be cleaning up after moron Bush for generations.

On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:32:39 -0700 (PDT), John H
wrote:

On Mar 30, 4:13*pm, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:33:20 -0400, John H
wrote:



...that the liberals here probably don't want noticed:

"The fact is, close to five years after 9/11 and fifteen years after the breakup
of the Soviet Union, the United States still lacks a coherent national security
policy. Instead of guiding principles, we have what appear to be a series of ad
hoc decisions, with dubious results. Why invade Iraq and not North Korea or
Burma? Why intervene in Bosnia and not Darfur? ...Are we committed to use force
wherever there s a despotic regime that s terrorizing its people and if so, how
long do we stay to ensure democracy takes root? ...Perhaps someone inside the
White House has clear answers to these questions. But our allies - and for that
matter our enemies-certainly don t know what the answers are. More important,
neither do the American people. Without a well-articulated strategy that the
public supports and the world understands, America will lack the legitimacy -
and ultimately the power - it needs to make the world safer than it is today."

--Barack Obama. "The Audacity of Hope" (2006), page 302.

'We don t get very hung up on this question of precedent. We don t make
decisions about questions like intervention based on consistency or precedent."

- Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, March 28, 2011

So, when Obama gives a speech then goes on the news and explains why
we're doing what we're doing, you believe he never said anything. Yet,
you have no problem following Bush without question.

Who said anything about Bush? He's gone. Have you not yet realized
that?

WAFDS!

His gone, but his legacy remains. Have you not yet realized that?