Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Get the F off this newsgroup!
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim and Becky" wrote in message
. .. Get the F off this newsgroup! Becky, the "F" word is of no use here. We're all desensitized. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim and Becky" wrote in message ...
Get the F off this newsgroup! What's an "F"? Fluff? Foam? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Get the F off this newsgroup!
What's an "F"? Fluff? Foam? "F" stands for facts. Too many of them distract from the political rheotric. :-) |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
GO AWAY! THIS GROUP IS ABOUT BOATS, YA STUPID CRUSTATION.
MadDogDave wrote: Thank Bush and Jesus that we Republicans are putting more distance between "us" and "them." So long as there are more poor people, there's more for us rich people. We need the lower class to help us be superior. Two years in a row, more in poverty By Peronet Despeignes, USA TODAY More than a million Americans sank into poverty last year, an annual Census report is expected to show today. It would be the first time in nearly a decade that the number of poor rose two years in a row. Experts at the University of Michigan, the conservative-leaning Heritage Foundation and the liberal-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities said they expected official figures to show the U.S. poverty rate growing from 11.7% in 2001 to around 12.3% in 2002. Their predictions generally are accurate within a few decimal points. The figures were previewed three weeks ago by a Census survey testing a new methodology. Today's figures are considered more authoritative and comprehensive. They're the ones used by the government in calculating unemployment and setting policies. Although the economy is showing signs of improvement, poverty rates lag behind economic shifts. Today's report will give Democrats ammunition to attack President Bush's stewardship of the economy. The official definition of poverty varies by family size and age and can change annually with the cost of living. In 2001, a family of two parents under 65 and two children younger than 18 were considered poor with a household income below $12,207. That year, 32.9 million people were defined as poor. David Wyss, chief economist at Standard & Poor's, said, "Clearly, with a hiring slump going on, you'd expect poverty to get worse." The economy was stagnant in 2002 amid layoffs and spending cuts by employers and state governments. More people were unemployed for longer periods, and more saw their jobless benefits run out. But Robert Rector, who studies poverty at the Heritage Foundation, says the 2002 poverty rate reported today is still likely to be close to a 40-year low. The recession, job losses and slumping income of the past few years have not completely erased the gains of the 1990s boom, he said. And fresher indicators suggest the economy is staging a comeback: Retail sales are rising, corporate profits are rebounding, investing is picking up, and the stock market has rallied. But a hiring rebound remains little more than a forecast — and a shaky prospect that has proven elusive for nearly three years. Even if economic growth continues to accelerate, it might be too uncertain and subpar to encourage a quick hiring revival, or to stop the rise in unemployment and poverty. For the first time in 15 years, the poverty report is being released on a Friday. That has prompted charges by Democrats such as Reps. Carolyn Maloney of New York and William Lacy Clay of Missouri that the White House hopes to see the bad news buried in little-seen Friday night and Saturday news coverage. Census officials strongly deny the accusation. "The news conference was moved from Sept. 23 to Sept. 26 because the professional staff asked for extra time to process this round of data," Census spokesman Lawrence Neal said. "The Sunday public affairs shows will make a meal of the data and spit them back into the news cycle on Monday. ... The notion that we should, could or would suppress these numbers doesn't pass the laugh test." |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey come on now captain, I've got friends that are crustaceans, and they'd
be insulted to be compared to these guys. :-) Paul "Capt. Frank Hopkins" wrote in message k.net... GO AWAY! THIS GROUP IS ABOUT BOATS, YA STUPID CRUSTATION. Text deleted |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What about mollusks?
-W "Paul Schilter" paulschilter@comcast,dot,net wrote in message ... Hey come on now captain, I've got friends that are crustaceans, and they'd be insulted to be compared to these guys. :-) Paul "Capt. Frank Hopkins" wrote in message k.net... GO AWAY! THIS GROUP IS ABOUT BOATS, YA STUPID CRUSTATION. Text deleted |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fungus? Flame Arrestor?
basskisser wrote: "Jim and Becky" wrote in message ... Get the F off this newsgroup! What's an "F"? Fluff? Foam? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bush Drops to 49%? Arrest the Pollsters | General | |||
Just How Safe Do You Feel? | General |