Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well I think I got to the bottom of my fuel problems. My boat had been
intermittently cutting out at cruising speeds. I pulled the anti-siphon valve and found quite a bit of brown, sand like particles, which I'm assuming are varnish. I also drained my Racor and had quite a bit of this as well. The first couple of times this happened I did not notice any of this in the Racor. I hooked up a hand pump and was able to get some of this out of the bottom of my tank, but I wasn't happy with the ability to get to the bottom of the tank where I'm sure most of this lies. I'm going to try a fig up a better way to clean out the bottom of the tank to see if I can get the rest of this out. The boat did sit for nearly two years with the same tank of gas and no Stabil so it did have ample time to get mucky. What other steps can I take to rid the system of this stuff? Is there an alternative to the anti-siphon that would be easier to monitor the accumulation and clean? Thanks. linus |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is there an alternative to the anti-siphon
that would be easier to monitor the accumulation and clean? Thanks. Assuming you have the mechanical ball and spring type anti-siphon valve, there is an alternative. I switched from mechanical valves to electrically operated anti-siphon valves, to help resolve a vapor locking problem. In terms of your issue, I don't think the electric valves would be any easier to monitor or clean, but they might be less likely to get fouled in the first place. The problem with the mechanical valves is that they are always in the business of restricting fuel flow, due to the constant resistance of the spring. Ideally, you would like to have flow restriction only when the engine is not running, but the spring the mechanical valves is constantly delivering resistance to the fuel flow. The fuel pump must always overcome that spring resistance, as well as generate the vacuum required to draw the fuel from the tank. I can see where heavily varnished fuel could easily muck up a mechanical valve, perhaps restricting its ability to be fully opened by the fuel pump. The electric valves open and close the fuel line by way of a solenoid operated valve. When the engine is running, the valve is fully open, and when not, the valve is fully closed. Since the valve is operated electrically. the fuel pump never has to generate the vacuum necessary to overcome any spring resistance, as in the case with the mechanical valves. Perhaps this type of anti-siphon valve would be less likely to gummed up by fuel varnish. Maybe not. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "RG" wrote in message news:KRGQa.6503$Bp2.4178@fed1read07... Is there an alternative to the anti-siphon that would be easier to monitor the accumulation and clean? Thanks. Assuming you have the mechanical ball and spring type anti-siphon valve, there is an alternative. I switched from mechanical valves to electrically operated anti-siphon valves, to help resolve a vapor locking problem. In terms of your issue, I don't think the electric valves would be any easier to monitor or clean, but they might be less likely to get fouled in the first place. The problem with the mechanical valves is that they are always in the business of restricting fuel flow, due to the constant resistance of the spring. Ideally, you would like to have flow restriction only when the engine is not running, but the spring the mechanical valves is constantly delivering resistance to the fuel flow. The fuel pump must always overcome that spring resistance, as well as generate the vacuum required to draw the fuel from the tank. I can see where heavily varnished fuel could easily muck up a mechanical valve, perhaps restricting its ability to be fully opened by the fuel pump. The electric valves open and close the fuel line by way of a solenoid operated valve. When the engine is running, the valve is fully open, and when not, the valve is fully closed. Since the valve is operated electrically. the fuel pump never has to generate the vacuum necessary to overcome any spring resistance, as in the case with the mechanical valves. Perhaps this type of anti-siphon valve would be less likely to gummed up by fuel varnish. Maybe not. Do you have an online reference where I can look at one of these electronic devices? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Do you have an online reference where I can look at one of these electronic devices? Unfortunately, no. I did my best to Google up a website for a manufacturer or dealer for marine electric anti-siphon valves yesterday. Came up empty, and I can't remember the name of the manufacturer of the three that I have installed on my boat. Sea Ray uses these valves as OEM equipment in all their late model cruisers. Sea Ray started using them as OEM equipment in model year 2000, one year later than mine. I worked out a deal to retrofit my boat where they sent me the valves at no charge, and I took care of the labor to install them. The valves were worth $100-$150 each, if I recall. If you really want a lead to the source, call Sea Ray customer service at 800-648-8535. I'm sure the guys in customer service could easily tell you who their supplier of the valves is. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|