Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#61
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:38:02 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 29/06/2011 11:34 AM, Harryk wrote: On 6/29/11 1:18 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 29/06/2011 11:12 AM, Harryk wrote: On 6/29/11 1:05 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 29/06/2011 4:40 AM, Harryk wrote: Bachmann, like her BFF, Sarah Palin, is intellectually unfit for high political office. But...she's sure to get the cretin vote. You'd vote for her. Tell me, but you worship Polusi? LMAO. 10 Polusi does not have the IQ of one Bachmann. And if IQ maters, how about talking about Hank Johnson? He certainly is the dumbest, more stupid jack ass representative I have ever seen in my day. A. I don't "worship" Nancy Pelosi. B. If Pelosi were unconscious, she'd have a higher IQ than Bachmann. I'm waiting for the media to really start vetting Bachmann. I suspect there are all many of financial shenanigans awaiting disclosure, and I still want to know if her hubby, with his diploma mill degrees, is a licensed therapist in Minnesota. Just say it harry, you would not vote Bachmann because she is not a man, she if not a fleabagger, and she is not black. I would not vote for Bachmann for a number of reasons, including, but not limited to, these: She is not very bright or well-informed on history or civics or current events or the Constitution, and she has a really simple-minded view of the world She is a conservative christian who lets her rigid religious beliefs strongly influence her politics She is a demagogue She is a Republican Her gender and skin color are not relevant to me. I have voted for female candidates my entire life, and I have also voted for whites, blacks, latinos, asians, and I don't even remember who else, in terms of race or ethnicity. I'd have no hesitation voting for a gay person if I thought that person was the most qualified running for a particular office. If Hillary Clinton had been the presidential candidate in 2008, I would have voted for her. She is female and white. In 2006, I was pleased to vote for Barbara Ann Mikulski for U.S. Senate. She is female and white. So, as you can see, you once again are completely incorrect. At least you are consistent, eh? Funny, Clinton was in the democritier convensions and selection process. What really happened is the back room boys figured she would not win against McCain so they pull up Obama....to get the black racist vote. How do you explain Hank Johnson getting elected and then re-elected after Guam was tipping? A lot of very stupid people in Georgia's 4th congressional district that is for sure. Everything is a conspiracy in your little mind. We get it. |
#62
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , payer3389
@mypacks.net says... On 6/29/2011 6:50 AM, Harryk wrote: It's humorous how you toss around words you don't understand. My preferred candidate in the 2008 presidential primary season was Hillary Clinton. If I were a misogynist, that wouldn't have been the case. Oh yea, you are one. You've single-handedly been the cause for almost every woman who has come to rec.boats to leave. You've lied about Karen's credentials so that, in your misogynist eyes, it elevates her somewhat to make her more acceptable to you. You've boasted that Karen is much younger than you, another clue to your misogyny. When you had the opportunity to meet Peggy Hall from rec.boats in-person, you gawked at her from a distance but never introduced yourself. You've stated that you lock the head on your boat when women are aboard. We hear a lot of your tales about your father, but mother tales are almost non-existent. Seems that the experts think misogyny can be traced back to the mother. Oh yea, you are a misogynist, without a doubt. More than that, you're a very unhappy individual. Take that political bull**** to your own group, and stay there, asshat. |
#64
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 29/06/2011 9:40 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:29:35 -0600, wrote: On 29/06/2011 12:08 PM, wrote: On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:14:48 -0600, wrote: On 29/06/2011 10:10 AM, Harryk wrote: On 6/28/11 7:55 PM, Canuck57 wrote: So are we going to make rape and polygamy legal too? After all, Obama's dad was a polygamist for a green card. Believe it or not, I don't care if the LGBT want marriage as a social contract and even get it via JP, but asking for a church blessing is infringement of rights of the church. Idiots should be happy Islam Sharia does not deal with it. No where in a religious marriage is a homosexual marriage condoned. Because next the gays will want 3 partners in the marriage, maybe 4 or more. And we know how the gays play the gay card. So where does it end as we loose morality and discipline as a society? But more fleabaggers than ever telling someone else how to do things or saddling others with debt. And yet another in the never-ending attempt of Canuck to prove to everyone he is a bigoted, ignorant asshole. Hey harry, why don't you and wtf3 and deplume just say it... you would not vote for her because she is a not a fleabag, not a man and not black.... Huh? I would not vote for Bachmann because she espouses everything that I'm opposed to politically. She's not stupid or a flake, but she has a propensity to make things up to suit her agenda. She's strident in her beliefs, which would be fine, except that I don't agree with her on anything politically. But conveniently misses the 7 or 8 others...got it...they were not wearing panties. Huh??? You're so stupid that even the excuse of being blind doesn't explain it. Now I know your desperate. Just shows what kind of selfish loser fat slug you really are. After all, someone with less eyesight has better vision and a life than you do. Wow, you must have really messed up your life. -- Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem. |
#65
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/30/11 1:03 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
Now I know your desperate. Just shows what kind of selfish loser fat slug you really are. After all, someone with less eyesight has better vision and a life than you do. Wow, you must have really messed up your life. Do you think that in one out of 10 of your incessant insulting posts, you might try to use standard English and say something clever? Not all the time, not most of the time, just once in a while? Surprise us. -- Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where personal insults are not allowed? http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing |
#66
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 30/06/2011 11:12 AM, Harryk wrote:
On 6/30/11 1:03 PM, Canuck57 wrote: Now I know your desperate. Just shows what kind of selfish loser fat slug you really are. After all, someone with less eyesight has better vision and a life than you do. Wow, you must have really messed up your life. Do you think that in one out of 10 of your incessant insulting posts, you might try to use standard English and say something clever? Not all the time, not most of the time, just once in a while? Surprise us. You should marry defumer. -- Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem. |
#67
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/30/11 3:16 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 30/06/2011 11:12 AM, Harryk wrote: On 6/30/11 1:03 PM, Canuck57 wrote: Now I know your desperate. Just shows what kind of selfish loser fat slug you really are. After all, someone with less eyesight has better vision and a life than you do. Wow, you must have really messed up your life. Do you think that in one out of 10 of your incessant insulting posts, you might try to use standard English and say something clever? Not all the time, not most of the time, just once in a while? Surprise us. You should marry defumer. Oh, well, *that* was clever. -- Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where personal insults are not allowed? http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing |
#68
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:03:47 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 29/06/2011 9:40 PM, wrote: On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:29:35 -0600, wrote: On 29/06/2011 12:08 PM, wrote: On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:14:48 -0600, wrote: On 29/06/2011 10:10 AM, Harryk wrote: On 6/28/11 7:55 PM, Canuck57 wrote: So are we going to make rape and polygamy legal too? After all, Obama's dad was a polygamist for a green card. Believe it or not, I don't care if the LGBT want marriage as a social contract and even get it via JP, but asking for a church blessing is infringement of rights of the church. Idiots should be happy Islam Sharia does not deal with it. No where in a religious marriage is a homosexual marriage condoned. Because next the gays will want 3 partners in the marriage, maybe 4 or more. And we know how the gays play the gay card. So where does it end as we loose morality and discipline as a society? But more fleabaggers than ever telling someone else how to do things or saddling others with debt. And yet another in the never-ending attempt of Canuck to prove to everyone he is a bigoted, ignorant asshole. Hey harry, why don't you and wtf3 and deplume just say it... you would not vote for her because she is a not a fleabag, not a man and not black.... Huh? I would not vote for Bachmann because she espouses everything that I'm opposed to politically. She's not stupid or a flake, but she has a propensity to make things up to suit her agenda. She's strident in her beliefs, which would be fine, except that I don't agree with her on anything politically. But conveniently misses the 7 or 8 others...got it...they were not wearing panties. Huh??? You're so stupid that even the excuse of being blind doesn't explain it. Now I know your desperate. Just shows what kind of selfish loser fat slug you really are. After all, someone with less eyesight has better vision and a life than you do. Wow, you must have really messed up your life. You sound like the most desperate person here. You foam at the mouth at any Dem, middle of the road or not, you have no testicles, and a tiny penis, and you make up for the latter two by making moronic statements and refuse to acknowledge facts. You're really a pitiful little man. |
#69
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:16:13 -0600, Canuck57
wrote: On 30/06/2011 11:12 AM, Harryk wrote: On 6/30/11 1:03 PM, Canuck57 wrote: Now I know your desperate. Just shows what kind of selfish loser fat slug you really are. After all, someone with less eyesight has better vision and a life than you do. Wow, you must have really messed up your life. Do you think that in one out of 10 of your incessant insulting posts, you might try to use standard English and say something clever? Not all the time, not most of the time, just once in a while? Surprise us. You should marry defumer. You should talk to your wife (assuming you're actually married, which I've come to doubt) about your physical problems. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What makes the GOP so great... | General | |||
A little great white action | General | |||
If you see a Great White Shark, try saying..... | General | |||
Great White Spotted | ASA | |||
Great White | ASA |