Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,524
Default New Rule for Corporate Execs...

There should be a limit on how many times a corporate executive is
allowed to say "I have no knowledge of that."

Once the limit is exceeded, they should be sent directly to jail.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2011
Posts: 104
Default New Rule for Corporate Execs...

In article , naled24511
@mypacks.net says...

There should be a limit on how many times a corporate executive is
allowed to say "I have no knowledge of that."

Once the limit is exceeded, they should be sent directly to jail.


With rules like that, we'd be just like China! While I don't like to buy
Chinese goods, I do like that style of government.
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
jps jps is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,720
Default New Rule for Corporate Execs...

On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:42:12 -0400, Harryk
wrote:

There should be a limit on how many times a corporate executive is
allowed to say "I have no knowledge of that."

Once the limit is exceeded, they should be sent directly to jail.


Ronny Raygun used the same, dottering-old-fool tactic when he
testified. It's standard practice for scumbags over 80.
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: May 2011
Posts: 358
Default New Rule for Corporate Execs...

On 7/20/2011 2:13 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:42:12 -0400,
wrote:

There should be a limit on how many times a corporate executive is
allowed to say "I have no knowledge of that."

Once the limit is exceeded, they should be sent directly to jail.

Ronny Raygun used the same, dottering-old-fool tactic when he
testified. It's standard practice for scumbags over 80.

He had a debilitating illness. What's your excuse?
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
jps jps is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,720
Default New Rule for Corporate Execs...

On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:05:10 -0400, Florida Jim
wrote:

On 7/20/2011 2:13 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:42:12 -0400,
wrote:

There should be a limit on how many times a corporate executive is
allowed to say "I have no knowledge of that."

Once the limit is exceeded, they should be sent directly to jail.

Ronny Raygun used the same, dottering-old-fool tactic when he
testified. It's standard practice for scumbags over 80.


He had a debilitating illness. What's your excuse?


He used it as a tool to escape scrutiny. What's your excuse?


  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,524
Default New Rule for Corporate Execs...

On 7/20/11 4:23 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:05:10 -0400, Florida
wrote:

On 7/20/2011 2:13 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:42:12 -0400,
wrote:

There should be a limit on how many times a corporate executive is
allowed to say "I have no knowledge of that."

Once the limit is exceeded, they should be sent directly to jail.
Ronny Raygun used the same, dottering-old-fool tactic when he
testified. It's standard practice for scumbags over 80.


He had a debilitating illness. What's your excuse?


He used it as a tool to escape scrutiny. What's your excuse?



Flajim couldn't get past the open admissions test* at Orlando Community
College so he joined the navy and became a skilled shower boy.



* The test consisted of fogging a mirror.
  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,132
Default New Rule for Corporate Execs...

"Harryk" wrote in message
...

There should be a limit on how many times a corporate executive is
allowed to say "I have no knowledge of that."

Once the limit is exceeded, they should be sent directly to jail.


Reply:
You want Obama jailed?

  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: May 2011
Posts: 358
Default New Rule for Corporate Execs...

On 7/20/2011 4:23 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:05:10 -0400, Florida
wrote:

On 7/20/2011 2:13 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:42:12 -0400,
wrote:

There should be a limit on how many times a corporate executive is
allowed to say "I have no knowledge of that."

Once the limit is exceeded, they should be sent directly to jail.
Ronny Raygun used the same, dottering-old-fool tactic when he
testified. It's standard practice for scumbags over 80.

He had a debilitating illness. What's your excuse?

He used it as a tool to escape scrutiny. What's your excuse?

Screwdriver boy thinks he has all the answers.
  #9   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,021
Default New Rule for Corporate Execs...

On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:50:40 -0700, "Califbill"
wrote:

"Harryk" wrote in message
...

There should be a limit on how many times a corporate executive is
allowed to say "I have no knowledge of that."

Once the limit is exceeded, they should be sent directly to jail.


Reply:
You want Obama jailed?


Please show us when Obama said as a corporate exec or in any other
capacity. Oh wait, you're right wing freak... never mind.
  #10   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,524
Default New Rule for Corporate Execs...

On 7/20/11 4:55 PM, Florida Jim wrote:
On 7/20/2011 4:23 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:05:10 -0400, Florida
wrote:

On 7/20/2011 2:13 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:42:12 -0400,
wrote:

There should be a limit on how many times a corporate executive is
allowed to say "I have no knowledge of that."

Once the limit is exceeded, they should be sent directly to jail.
Ronny Raygun used the same, dottering-old-fool tactic when he
testified. It's standard practice for scumbags over 80.
He had a debilitating illness. What's your excuse?

He used it as a tool to escape scrutiny. What's your excuse?

Screwdriver boy thinks he has all the answers.



More correct answers than you and your gang of conservatrash here have,
for sure.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Krause Rule... John H[_2_] General 2 May 29th 09 04:19 AM
It's govern - not rule... Tom Francis - SWSports General 36 November 13th 08 01:48 AM
Help me with Rule 30 of the colregs please Ellen MacArthur ASA 28 September 16th 06 02:06 AM
Rule 12 - Sailing Rule Capt. Neal® ASA 94 February 8th 05 05:49 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017