On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:18:59 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 22/08/2011 6:17 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 15:50:22 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

It didn't take me a lot of time to come up with this Interesting
comments too:

http://yachtpals.com/yacht-crash-9423

Small problem... "Yes the smaller vessel is under sail, yes it is
starboard of the ship (and thus the "STAR" of the meeting, as some
learned it), and both those things might tend to give a small boat
skipper the sense that they have right of way... Then of course
there's common sense, which often gets left at the dock."

Of course, none of that matters, since the rules clearly state
restricted in ability to maneuver is the key item.

You finally got it. here is hope for you yet.

Finally, you're still stupid. You've demonstrated your inability to
read, spell, or comprehend. You drool over Palin/Bachmann/Fox
News/Beck and anyone else with a lot of flash and no substance. You're
a drain on humanity and certainly on Canada. I feel sorry for you.

X ~ Man wrote in news:9bfkivFsugU1
@mid.individual.net:

On 8/22/11 12:11 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:


More of these please... He isn't helping his case any here..


Case? What case? I'm mostly here on the sidelines, watching you and the
rest of the right-wing vermin destroy rec.boats. I'm *not* here to
encourage you to reform your obnoxious behavior. The crazier you act
here, the quicker rec.boats will die.


This, I see is an all too common discussion between "weekend warrior
wannabee's" on a subject they know nothing about..... sorry for
interupting.

otn

On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 19:45:47 -0500, otnmbrd
wrote:

This, I see is an all too common discussion between "weekend warrior
wannabee's" on a subject they know nothing about..... sorry for
interupting.

=====================

No need to be sorry.

I for one would value your professional opinion since I know you are a
professional mariner.

On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 21:16:19 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 19:45:47 -0500, otnmbrd
wrote:

This, I see is an all too common discussion between "weekend warrior
wannabee's" on a subject they know nothing about..... sorry for
interupting.

=====================

No need to be sorry.

I for one would value your professional opinion since I know you are a
professional mariner.

That is unless you happen to believe in equal rights for all, then
forget it.

On 22/08/2011 6:37 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:18:59 -0600,
wrote:

On 22/08/2011 6:17 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 15:50:22 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

It didn't take me a lot of time to come up with this Interesting
comments too:

http://yachtpals.com/yacht-crash-9423

Small problem... "Yes the smaller vessel is under sail, yes it is
starboard of the ship (and thus the "STAR" of the meeting, as some
learned it), and both those things might tend to give a small boat
skipper the sense that they have right of way... Then of course
there's common sense, which often gets left at the dock."

Of course, none of that matters, since the rules clearly state
restricted in ability to maneuver is the key item.

You finally got it. here is hope for you yet.

Finally, you're still stupid. You've demonstrated your inability to
read, spell, or comprehend. You drool over Palin/Bachmann/Fox
News/Beck and anyone else with a lot of flash and no substance. You're
a drain on humanity and certainly on Canada. I feel sorry for you.

So did thy kick you off of welfare? Looks like you were not on line for
a bit today. /snicker.
--
We have the most expensive governments no one can afford.
And wonder why the economy is doing so poorly?

On 8/22/2011 10:10 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 21:16:19 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 19:45:47 -0500,
wrote:

This, I see is an all too common discussion between "weekend warrior
wannabee's" on a subject they know nothing about..... sorry for
interupting.

=====================

No need to be sorry.

I for one would value your professional opinion since I know you are a
professional mariner.

I am curious why there isn't an exclusion zone around such a high
value terror target as a tanker anyway. Didn't anyone see the hole in
the side of the USS Cole?
Even if there was no fire, poking a big hole in a ship carrying over
800,000 barrels of oil is going to leave a mark on the beach.

Apparently there is in that jurisdiction..

On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 20:30:48 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 22/08/2011 6:37 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:18:59 -0600,
wrote:

On 22/08/2011 6:17 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 15:50:22 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

It didn't take me a lot of time to come up with this Interesting
comments too:

http://yachtpals.com/yacht-crash-9423

Small problem... "Yes the smaller vessel is under sail, yes it is
starboard of the ship (and thus the "STAR" of the meeting, as some
learned it), and both those things might tend to give a small boat
skipper the sense that they have right of way... Then of course
there's common sense, which often gets left at the dock."

Of course, none of that matters, since the rules clearly state
restricted in ability to maneuver is the key item.

You finally got it. here is hope for you yet.

Finally, you're still stupid. You've demonstrated your inability to
read, spell, or comprehend. You drool over Palin/Bachmann/Fox
News/Beck and anyone else with a lot of flash and no substance. You're
a drain on humanity and certainly on Canada. I feel sorry for you.

So did thy kick you off of welfare? Looks like you were not on line for
a bit today. /snicker.

As I said, you're illiterate and stupid. That's a bad combination.

On 8/22/11 10:30 PM, Canuck57 wrote:


So did thy kick you off of welfare? Looks like you were not on line for
a bit today. /snicker.


So, Canuckles, what time Tuesday will you start your endless string of
nonsense posts about "the economy"? I want to be sure to miss as many as
possible.

--
Don't forget to leave a bit of beef for rec.boat's right-wing
conservatrashers and ID spoofers to feed upon. The more they feed, the
quicker rec.boats will fall into the black hole of cyberspace and disappear.

http://www.gocomics.com/nonsequitur/2011/08/20

On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:26:10 -0400, John Reber wrote:

http://www.gocomics.com/nonsequitur/2011/08/20

Yup...that's funny.