http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...471223268.html

This **** is getting old.

On 8/26/2011 9:48 AM, JustWait wrote:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...471223268.html


This **** is getting old.

Switch to jungle drums and they won't bother you.

In article ,
says...

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...471223268.html

This **** is getting old.

Do you think we should be able to rape the environment and pollute at
will? Have you seen how the rain forests are decimated and will never
return to what they were? What about poisons in your drinking water, are
you okay with that?

On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:09:06 -0400, X ~ Man wrote:

In article ,
says...

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...471223268.html

This **** is getting old.

Do you think we should be able to rape the environment and pollute at
will?

This is rhetorical question, right?

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...471223268.html

This **** is getting old.

Do you think we should be able to rape the environment and pollute at
will? Have you seen how the rain forests are decimated and will never
return to what they were? What about poisons in your drinking water, are
you okay with that?

Yes.

On 8/26/11 11:38 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:09:06 -0400, X ~ wrote:

In ,
says...

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...471223268.html

This **** is getting old.

Do you think we should be able to rape the environment and pollute at
will?

This is rhetorical question, right?


Not in the Perry campaign, which would word it:

Shouldn't we be able to rape the environment and pollute at will?


--
I'd much rather be a champion of the powerless than a lickspittle of the
powerful.

In article ,
says...

On 8/26/11 11:38 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:09:06 -0400, X ~ wrote:

In ,
says...

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...471223268.html

This **** is getting old.

Do you think we should be able to rape the environment and pollute at
will?

This is rhetorical question, right?


Not in the Perry campaign, which would word it:

Shouldn't we be able to rape the environment and pollute at will?

Sure, Kevin.

On Aug 26, 1:11*pm, iBoatMore wrote:
In article ,
says...





On 8/26/11 11:38 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:09:06 -0400, X ~ *wrote:

In ,
says...

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...57653052047122...

This **** is getting old.

Do you think we should be able to rape the environment and pollute at
will?

This is rhetorical question, right?

Not in the Perry campaign, which would word it:

Shouldn't we be able to rape the environment and pollute at will?

Sure, Kevin.

What carbon footprint did the agents raiding Gibson produce? Was the
actual environmental effect considerably worse than anything Gibson
may have done? The answer is obviously "Yes".

In article 095eac6b-2fe5-4607-8152-
,
says...

On Aug 26, 1:11*pm, iBoatMore wrote:
In article ,
says...





On 8/26/11 11:38 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:09:06 -0400, X ~ *wrote:

In ,
says...

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...57653052047122...

This **** is getting old.

Do you think we should be able to rape the environment and pollute at
will?

This is rhetorical question, right?

Not in the Perry campaign, which would word it:

Shouldn't we be able to rape the environment and pollute at will?

Sure, Kevin.

What carbon footprint did the agents raiding Gibson produce? Was the
actual environmental effect considerably worse than anything Gibson
may have done? The answer is obviously "Yes".

Horse****.

On Aug 26, 2:08*pm, iBoatMore wrote:
In article 095eac6b-2fe5-4607-8152-
,
says...





On Aug 26, 1:11*pm, iBoatMore wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 8/26/11 11:38 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:09:06 -0400, X ~ *wrote:

In ,
says...

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...57653052047122...

This **** is getting old.

Do you think we should be able to rape the environment and pollute at
will?

This is rhetorical question, right?

Not in the Perry campaign, which would word it:

Shouldn't we be able to rape the environment and pollute at will?

Sure, Kevin.

What carbon footprint did the agents raiding Gibson produce? *Was the
actual environmental effect considerably worse than anything Gibson
may have done? *The answer is obviously "Yes".

Horse****.

This is the same sort of governmental insanity that is causing kids
lemonaide stands to be shut down:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain...monade-stands/
It is very clear that govt is waaaaaaaay overfunded if they have time
to worry about such things. The solution is lower taxes. If you vote
for higher taxes, they will not be used to solve problems but will be
used to CAUSE problems like this.