Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro-
armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be
inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering
from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it
up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on
fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The
effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be
able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and
eaten by critters to nearly nothing.
The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil
industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill.
Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has
dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually
happens in the Gulf. There is still some heavy oil on the botom but
even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. The Gulf of
Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh
Exxon Valdez is still seen. We have more than 3X the UV flux and the
amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by
factors of thousands. Much of this life evolved in the presence of
natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up.

In article cb133bc9-3f62-44ed-a2d6-1d92e0261b99
@n11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...

Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro-
armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be
inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering
from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it
up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on
fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The
effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be
able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and
eaten by critters to nearly nothing.

Sure hoss. We believe you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPm8l8LXSIs

On 28/08/2011 6:15 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In articlecb133bc9-3f62-44ed-a2d6-1d92e0261b99
@n11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...

Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro-
armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be
inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering
from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it
up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on
fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The
effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be
able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and
eaten by critters to nearly nothing.

Sure hoss. We believe you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPm8l8LXSIs

FUD sells.

Ask yourself why the eco nuts were not livid for Japan's deliberate
washing nuclear residue into the Pacific? Where was Green Peace?

Here is a hit, it is all about politics and taxes. Sell th herd on
taxes they don't otherwise support, under the "green" label. That is
what carbon credits are, just more taxation that you and your family
will never benefit from. Kyoto was a liberal-tax-me more farce.

But desperate Obama with BP victimization for political gain...now that
sells with fleabaggers.
--
If it is all Bush's fault, then how come Obama is doing much more of the
same and expecting different results?

On 8/28/2011 7:49 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro-
armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be
inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering
from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it
up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on
fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The
effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be
able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and
eaten by critters to nearly nothing.
The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil
industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill.
Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has
dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually
happens in the Gulf. There is still some heavy oil on the botom but
even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. The Gulf of
Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh
Exxon Valdez is still seen. We have more than 3X the UV flux and the
amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by
factors of thousands. Much of this life evolved in the presence of
natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up.

Yup, all part of the plan... Remember, Obama said he would raise the gas
prices to ten dollars a gallon if it would help General Electri.. ooops,
I mean, the "green" movement...

History will not be kind to President Obama.. the worst President in US
history...

On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:49:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro-
armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be
inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering
from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it
up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on
fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The
effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be
able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and
eaten by critters to nearly nothing.

i love it. he knew **** about oil or chemistry

but he's right wing so the destruction of fishing jobs is OK because
BP got rich

On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 21:18:33 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

On 8/28/2011 7:49 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro-
armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be
inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering
from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it
up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on
fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The
effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be
able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and
eaten by critters to nearly nothing.
The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil
industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill.
Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has
dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually
happens in the Gulf. There is still some heavy oil on the botom but
even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. The Gulf of
Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh
Exxon Valdez is still seen. We have more than 3X the UV flux and the
amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by
factors of thousands. Much of this life evolved in the presence of
natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up.

Yup, all part of the plan... Remember, Obama said he would raise the gas
prices to ten dollars a gallon if it would help General Electri.. ooops,
I mean, the "green" movement...

History will not be kind to President Obama.. the worst President in US
history...

and he's BLACK!!

On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 19:15:02 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article cb133bc9-3f62-44ed-a2d6-1d92e0261b99
, says...

Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro-
armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be
inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering
from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it
up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on
fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The
effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be
able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and
eaten by critters to nearly nothing.

Sure hoss. We believe you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPm8l8LXSIs

Idiots like Froggy and Knuckles only believe in what Palin says. Or,
if they've got their radios on, Rush.

On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 18:58:56 -0600,
wrote:

On 28/08/2011 6:15 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In articlecb133bc9-3f62-44ed-a2d6-1d92e0261b99
@n11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...

Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro-
armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be
inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering
from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it
up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on
fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The
effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be
able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and
eaten by critters to nearly nothing.

Sure hoss. We believe you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPm8l8LXSIs

FUD sells.

Yes, it does. and Faux news in the premier disseminator.

Ask yourself why the eco nuts were not livid for Japan's deliberate
washing nuclear residue into the Pacific? Where was Green Peace?

They were, but, what do you do? The Japs **** where they eat and being
great conservatives, enjoy it because that is the way things are (at
least for them). What is Greenpeace going to do, ram the goddam
island? Are you nuts?

Here is a hit, it is all about politics and taxes. Sell th herd on
taxes they don't otherwise support, under the "green" label. That is
what carbon credits are, just more taxation that you and your family
will never benefit from. Kyoto was a liberal-tax-me more farce.

Kyoto liberal. Right. That is sort of like saying Rushbo is more
liberal than Beck or whatever. What a nonsense statement you made.

But desperate Obama with BP victimization for political gain...now that
sells with fleabaggers.

Obama is probably toast and should be, too. Your feeble attempt to
associate him with BP is lame.

Funny, compare how BP was handled to Exxon and tell me why the
difference? Might I suggest one was an American company and one was not?

Plus if your out to destroy a nation like Obama is, why not curtail a
main source of energy development making USA weaker and more dependent
on Saudi oil? I am sure the Saudi like that.

Lets hope people wake up nd toast Obama in 2012.

--
If it is all Bush's fault, then how come Obama is doing much more of the
same and expecting different results?

On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 21:18:33 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

On 8/28/2011 7:49 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro-
armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be
inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering
from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it
up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on
fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The
effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be
able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and
eaten by critters to nearly nothing.
The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil
industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill.
Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has
dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually
happens in the Gulf. There is still some heavy oil on the botom but
even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. The Gulf of
Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh
Exxon Valdez is still seen. We have more than 3X the UV flux and the
amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by
factors of thousands. Much of this life evolved in the presence of
natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up.

Yup, all part of the plan... Remember, Obama said he would raise the gas
prices to ten dollars a gallon if it would help General Electri.. ooops,
I mean, the "green" movement...

History will not be kind to President Obama.. the worst President in US
history...

You really don't get it. "...to ten dollars a gallon if it would help
General Electri..." you mean HITACHI.

GE is no longer an American Company.

True in the exclusive sense. But GE is USA, NYSE and all. At least for
now.

--
If it is all Bush's fault, then how come Obama is doing much more of the
same and expecting different results?

On 30/08/2011 5:21 AM, wrote:
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:49:15 -0700 (PDT), Frogwatch
wrote:

Enviro-whackos told us the Gulf oil spill would be a sort of enviro-
armageddon destroying fisheries forever. I said the effects would be
inconsequential in a couple of years due to the extreme weathering
from the amount of ultra-violet light and micro-bio critters eating it
up. I was correct. Two years after the spill and the effect on
fisheries is very low and will be nearly nothing a year from now. The
effects on beaches is almost nothing. Within 5 years, you will not be
able to find any of the oil on beaches as it will be weathered and
eaten by critters to nearly nothing.
The only major effect the spill has had is the elimination of oil
industry jobs by the Obama admin in response to the spill.
Scientists have all been surprised at how fast the oil has
dissappeared meaning most of them know nothing of what actually
happens in the Gulf. There is still some heavy oil on the botom but
even it is rapidly being consummed by oil eating life. The Gulf of
Mexico is complately dif from prince William Sound where oil from teh
Exxon Valdez is still seen. We have more than 3X the UV flux and the
amount of life in the Gulf that eats oil is probably greater by
factors of thousands. Much of this life evolved in the presence of
natural oil seeps so given the oil spill they ate it up.

Don't pat yourself on the back with misinformation.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0..._n_812398.html

http://oilspill.skytruth.org/

http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/201...ear_later.html

and about a million others. I can explain Google to you, if necessary.

One huge logic flaw here. Do they drink seawater? How did it really
get in their system? I mean really get there? How does it compare to
an auto mechanic?

As for Xylene can cause dizziness, headaches, skin irritation,
confusion, and a whole slew of other ailments, isn' that the norm for
1/2 the population before BP?

Want bad? Look at the plutonium, tritium, uranium that Japan washed to
the Pacific Ocean. But since it doesn't sell taxes, green knobs ignore it.

I was also reading how in quakes and fishers, often oil spills out
naturally. Oil isn't unnatural folks, it isn't like DDT, enriched
uranium, great lakes GM chromium and the like, it is out there. Oil
sands same thing, been leeching naturally for a million years. Tehy
even find bones carbon dating before man.

La Brea Tar Pits, right in CA,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Brea_Tar_Pits and the sky didn't fall.

--
If it is all Bush's fault, then how come Obama is doing much more of the
same and expecting different results?