![]() |
Just for the record
On 9/24/2011 8:39 PM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 18:08:28 -0400, Wayne wrote: On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 09:57:46 -0400, wrote: So answer his question. Just when does a fertilized egg become a human? At conception. === That's a religious view not supportable by any logic or science. It even fails the common sense test. You are entitled to your beliefs as long as you don't try to legislate them for everyone else. Wayne, are you feeling legislated against? The only legislation related to religion in this country is restrictive law... |
Just for the record
North Star wrote:
Just wondering... did you ever go by the name.. 'Tuuk'?? He liked to say "ya" a lot. If I was unemployed like you, I would be boating during the day and not posting to usenet, you silly man! -HB |
Just for the record
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 20:39:48 -0400, John H
wrote: On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 18:08:28 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 09:57:46 -0400, BAR wrote: So answer his question. Just when does a fertilized egg become a human? At conception. === That's a religious view not supportable by any logic or science. It even fails the common sense test. You are entitled to your beliefs as long as you don't try to legislate them for everyone else. Wayne, are you feeling legislated against? ======= Not at all but I'm concerned by the single issue zealousness surrounding all of this. The country faces more important challenges and if the Republican party can not find a more centrist position on women's rights, they run the risk of reelecting the current administration. Think about that. |
Just for the record
On 9/25/11 12:37 AM, Wayne B wrote:
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 20:39:48 -0400, John wrote: On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 18:08:28 -0400, Wayne wrote: On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 09:57:46 -0400, wrote: So answer his question. Just when does a fertilized egg become a human? At conception. === That's a religious view not supportable by any logic or science. It even fails the common sense test. You are entitled to your beliefs as long as you don't try to legislate them for everyone else. Wayne, are you feeling legislated against? ======= Not at all but I'm concerned by the single issue zealousness surrounding all of this. The country faces more important challenges and if the Republican party can not find a more centrist position on women's rights, they run the risk of reelecting the current administration. Think about that. I hope the GOP maintains its prejudice against women, blacks, Latinos, government, and all the other groups it hates. In fact, I hope it adds groups. The last thing this country needs is a GOP administration that is hell-bent on destroying what little is left of the social safety network. |
Just for the record
On 9/24/11 12:47 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 9/24/2011 12:39 PM, wrote: On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 11:13:41 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 09:08:42 -0400, wrote: In , says... On 9/24/2011 2:51 AM, Canuck57 wrote: On 23/09/2011 6:54 PM, John H wrote: When your wife asked you to feel the baby kicking, did you argue that it was only a fetus? So if at 7 months, the woman miscarries, you beat her up for murder with the bible in hand? Your tag line is stupid and annoying. And that doesn't start until 20+ weeks or so. Well, I dare say you have a lot of nerve going after John for a sig file when you are by far the very most prolific poster on the group and spend much more time and many more paragraphs promoting your own personal views on others... But then you go after those of us who pretty much keep our beliefs to ourselves... So, why don't YOU give answers to Wayne's questions? Holier than thou John won't. There are still several unanswered questions out there. I wholeheartedly agree! BUT, when someone acts like they are absolutely SURE that a fetus is a human, then he must know when a fertilized egg becomes a human. I don't have a puppy in that fight. ;-) ... nor should the government. But they did get involved. Rowe vs Wade. It's settled law according to the Supreme Court, the govt. is involved. D'uh. What about the conservative states working overtime to outlaw abortion or to make it nearly impossible to get one? Or are you not aware of those developments, either? |
Just for the record
|
Just for the record
In article ,
says... On 9/25/11 12:37 AM, Wayne B wrote: On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 20:39:48 -0400, John wrote: On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 18:08:28 -0400, Wayne wrote: On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 09:57:46 -0400, wrote: So answer his question. Just when does a fertilized egg become a human? At conception. === That's a religious view not supportable by any logic or science. It even fails the common sense test. You are entitled to your beliefs as long as you don't try to legislate them for everyone else. Wayne, are you feeling legislated against? ======= Not at all but I'm concerned by the single issue zealousness surrounding all of this. The country faces more important challenges and if the Republican party can not find a more centrist position on women's rights, they run the risk of reelecting the current administration. Think about that. I hope the GOP maintains its prejudice against women, blacks, Latinos, government, and all the other groups it hates. In fact, I hope it adds groups. The last thing this country needs is a GOP administration that is hell-bent on destroying what little is left of the social safety network. So much for Republican racism. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...ain-wins-cpac- florida-straw-poll/ |
Just for the record
In article ,
says... On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 20:49:00 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 14:58:45 -0400, JustWait wrote: On 9/24/2011 2:05 PM, wrote: On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 12:47:56 -0400, JustWait wrote: I wholeheartedly agree! BUT, when someone acts like they are absolutely SURE that a fetus is a human, then he must know when a fertilized egg becomes a human. I don't have a puppy in that fight. ;-) ... nor should the government. But they did get involved. Rowe vs Wade. It's settled law according to the Supreme Court, the govt. is involved. If the government had not become involved before that there would be no need for R v W. Ok, my timeline was off, but when the SCOTUS got involved, they owned it.. R v W was a political compromise. Neither side was completely satisfied and still aren't. I could argue both sides effectively but I come down on the side that women have the freedom to decide what they do with their body. (as do men) That is drugs, prostitution, gambling, riding without a helmet or abortion. It is none of the government's business. If God cares about her aborting her baby, she will have to deal with that herself and if she burns in everlasting hell, It is still her business, not mine. Should men have to pay child support when they wanted the fetus aborted? Yes, Why? They didn't want the fetus carried to term. |
Just for the record
In article , X ` Man
says... On 9/24/11 12:47 PM, JustWait wrote: On 9/24/2011 12:39 PM, wrote: On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 11:13:41 -0400, wrote: In , says... On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 09:08:42 -0400, wrote: In , says... On 9/24/2011 2:51 AM, Canuck57 wrote: On 23/09/2011 6:54 PM, John H wrote: When your wife asked you to feel the baby kicking, did you argue that it was only a fetus? So if at 7 months, the woman miscarries, you beat her up for murder with the bible in hand? Your tag line is stupid and annoying. And that doesn't start until 20+ weeks or so. Well, I dare say you have a lot of nerve going after John for a sig file when you are by far the very most prolific poster on the group and spend much more time and many more paragraphs promoting your own personal views on others... But then you go after those of us who pretty much keep our beliefs to ourselves... So, why don't YOU give answers to Wayne's questions? Holier than thou John won't. There are still several unanswered questions out there. I wholeheartedly agree! BUT, when someone acts like they are absolutely SURE that a fetus is a human, then he must know when a fertilized egg becomes a human. I don't have a puppy in that fight. ;-) ... nor should the government. But they did get involved. Rowe vs Wade. It's settled law according to the Supreme Court, the govt. is involved. D'uh. What about the conservative states working overtime to outlaw abortion or to make it nearly impossible to get one? Or are you not aware of those developments, either? Move to a liberal state. Remember it is a choice, your choice to live in a conservative state. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:19 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com