Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, I'm sure nano will completely rewrite the laws of physics.
I'm waiting for the 27 mph, easy-to-paddle kayak, myself. ;^) On Thu, 06 May 2004 04:27:05 GMT, (Eric) wrote: I can't help but to think that our increasing ability to manipulate individual atoms will offer significant improvements in all manufacturing processes. But, if you and others wish to believe that it is impossible to offer a waterproof, digital camera with a good 10x zoom, I cannot stop you - I simply won't believe you. Mind if I take special note of this post for potential use in the future? |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Nystrom wrote in message ...
Eric wrote: Brian Nystrom wrote: So you have a choice; you can have a 10X zoom in semi-bulky, semi-expensive, not waterproof package, or you can have a lower zoom in a small, inexpensive waterproof package. Or you can wait for your "Holy Grail". I have already stated I will wait for the 'essentially impossible'. I don't consider not spending money on a product I really don't want to be a bad thing. If you know that what you want doesn't exist, why are you wasting our time? If I new it did not exist before I posted the question, I wouldn't have asked the question. I have kept my eye out for such a camera, but left open the possibility that I missed something. I now know (or am sufficiently confident) it still does not exist since the knowledgeable people here haven't been able to point me to one. People have merely wasted their time attempting me to convince me to purchase a product I have time and time again clearly stated I am not interested in. I do not know why they have done this and personally find it rather weird, but then USENET is a strange place. Most likely, sometime at the start of next season I will again ask the same question in case someone has come across something that I have not. If I happen across a camera that fits my stated parameters, I will likely post a reference to it here. Why don't you email camera manufacturers instead of wasting bandwidth here? I have done that as well for the ones I am familiar with...however, I would not claim to be aware of every camera manufacturer. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
waterproof shaft seal? | Boat Building | |||
digital chart questions | Cruising | |||
Canon WP-DC800 waterproof case for PowerShot 400 camera | General | |||
waterproof digital cameras | General |