Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,638
Default There is commonality..

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 23:54:10 -0400, wrote:

My only question is when will we know this war is over?
When we are too broke to fight it anymore?


====

That's what happened to the Soviets.

  #22   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,868
Default There is commonality..

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 22:39:12 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

On 10/1/2011 10:28 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:51:57 -0400, wrote:

The drone murders were "executions". That's what it's called when the
gubmint does it.

=======

In war they are called enemy casualties, and there is no mistaking the
fact that Al-Qaeda has declared war on the United States.

So what is the problem exactly?


Problem is folks like him don't want to admit we are at war... Well,
unless they need to make up a fake terror alert a couple days before
9/11 to bury a rather nasty news story... Wonder how many millions
that little piece of theater cost the US taxpayer?



Good question. The attack killed about 3000 people and did $100
billion in damage.

The 10 year revenge has cost 6000 American lives and cost over $3
trillion.
We may have killed a quarter of a million innocent civilians in
several countries and we are guessing we have killed about 100 senior
operators in Al Qaeda at about 30 BILLION dollars each.

We are living under a crushing debt we don't seem to be anything
about, security is oppressive and our freedoms here are severely
restricted now.

We really got even with them didn't we.

My only question is when will we know this war is over?
When we are too broke to fight it anymore?


The war has been going on since the Crusades. The war is far from over.
  #23   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,588
Default There is commonality..

In article ,
says...

On 10/1/2011 4:11 PM, Drifter wrote:
On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/1/11 11:28 AM,
wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X `
wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:


*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan ? A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician
early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one
with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)


Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.


Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in
South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen?

Your hypocrisy is showing.



Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period.

Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's
ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing.


And even if he did, he wouldn't give a ****. He is too busy raiding the
treasury for himself and his cronies...


You keep saying that bull****, yet you have NO FACTS what so ever to
back that up. Do you not think Bush and everybody before him got
contributions??? Do you not think that Bush and everybody before him
didn't offer up or promise something to all of those special interest
groups?
  #25   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,581
Default There is commonality..

On 10/2/2011 10:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/1/2011 4:11 PM, Drifter wrote:
On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/1/11 11:28 AM,
wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X `
wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:


*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan ? A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician
early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one
with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)


Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.


Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in
South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen?

Your hypocrisy is showing.



Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period.

Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's
ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing.


And even if he did, he wouldn't give a ****. He is too busy raiding the
treasury for himself and his cronies...


You keep saying that bull****, yet you have NO FACTS what so ever to
back that up. Do you not think Bush and everybody before him got
contributions??? Do you not think that Bush and everybody before him
didn't offer up or promise something to all of those special interest
groups?


Solara, GE, the Unions.... he has been doing nothing but paying off
cronies since the day he got elected..


  #27   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,588
Default There is commonality..

In article ,
says...

On 10/2/2011 10:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,

says...

On 10/1/2011 4:11 PM, Drifter wrote:
On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/1/11 11:28 AM,
wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X `
wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:


*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan ? A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician
early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one
with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)


Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.


Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in
South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen?

Your hypocrisy is showing.



Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period.

Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's
ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing.

And even if he did, he wouldn't give a ****. He is too busy raiding the
treasury for himself and his cronies...


You keep saying that bull****, yet you have NO FACTS what so ever to
back that up. Do you not think Bush and everybody before him got
contributions??? Do you not think that Bush and everybody before him
didn't offer up or promise something to all of those special interest
groups?


Solara, GE, the Unions.... he has been doing nothing but paying off
cronies since the day he got elected..


And no other president bailed out any companies? Is that what you are
saying?
  #28   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,581
Default There is commonality..

On 10/2/2011 11:43 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/2/2011 10:08 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,

says...

On 10/1/2011 4:11 PM, Drifter wrote:
On 10/1/2011 11:36 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/1/11 11:28 AM,
wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 10:53:30 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 10/1/11 10:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:53:24 -0400, X `
wrote:

...between the United States and Pakistan:


*Death Sentence* in Slaying of Pakistani Governor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan ? A court on Saturday convicted and sentenced to
death a police guard who had killed a prominent secular politician
early
this year, a slaying that sent shockwaves throughout Pakistan and was
seen as another example of the growing religious intolerance and
extremism in the country.

Obama kills a 'guilty' person without trial, and Pakistan kills one
with a trial.

Who was wrong?

(Let's see some hypocrisy shine!)


Executions are wrong, dumbo, no matter who commits them.


Even if the executioner is a corporal sitting at a computer screen in
South Dakota and the accused is in a car in Yemen?

Your hypocrisy is showing.



Hypocrisy? I'm against executions, period.

Well then. You go give Obama a piece of your mind. I'll bet he's
ignorant of the fact that you object to what he's doing.

And even if he did, he wouldn't give a ****. He is too busy raiding the
treasury for himself and his cronies...

You keep saying that bull****, yet you have NO FACTS what so ever to
back that up. Do you not think Bush and everybody before him got
contributions??? Do you not think that Bush and everybody before him
didn't offer up or promise something to all of those special interest
groups?


Solara, GE, the Unions.... he has been doing nothing but paying off
cronies since the day he got elected..


And no other president bailed out any companies? Is that what you are
saying?


Not talking about Bush, but Obama has taken it to another level.. Bundle
a hundred thousand to Obama, and you get back a half a billion... pretty
good investment of others money, don't 'cha think?
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017