On 8-Oct-2011, Canuck57 wrote:

And Google for the stories the US-Euro Regime wants burried. Sometimes
rt.com can be good but often they are too far the other way but can lead
to better truths.

But the bottom like is we are saturated with government regime

For 50 + years. That's precisely what has led to the long ongoing demise.
Government made people lazy - once lazy they're at the trough and
in-your-face, "News" is 95% deficient or downright lies, fed by lackeys in
government. The lazy (feasibly 60+%), being unable to independently think,
believe what they hear on television which is solely a medium for
entertainment and the spread of corrupt, defective philosophy. The results
are the demise of ALL core, base economic activity, which causes the lazy
masses to "demand" even more from the corrupt government. The circle is
complete. No economic core, persecution of the productive, coddling of the
non-productive, now turning to violence. The final stage of a demise is
tyranny, easily seen being implemented every day. Following tyranny is
revolution. Then all over again, whatever country becomes the "governor" of
the remaining U.S., will decide what it might be in the future. If lucky, it
may look like Bulgaria, but more likely, more of a blend of Mexico, Uganda,
Cuba and definitely a workers "paradise." It should be given up for dead -
the future is Asia, has been for 25 years.

On 08/10/2011 3:13 PM, Haywood Jablomie wrote:
On 8-Oct-2011, wrote:

And Google for the stories the US-Euro Regime wants burried. Sometimes
rt.com can be good but often they are too far the other way but can lead
to better truths.

But the bottom like is we are saturated with government regime

For 50 + years. That's precisely what has led to the long ongoing demise.
Government made people lazy - once lazy they're at the trough and
in-your-face, "News" is 95% deficient or downright lies, fed by lackeys in
government. The lazy (feasibly 60+%), being unable to independently think,
believe what they hear on television which is solely a medium for
entertainment and the spread of corrupt, defective philosophy. The results
are the demise of ALL core, base economic activity, which causes the lazy
masses to "demand" even more from the corrupt government. The circle is
complete. No economic core, persecution of the productive, coddling of the
non-productive, now turning to violence. The final stage of a demise is
tyranny, easily seen being implemented every day. Following tyranny is
revolution. Then all over again, whatever country becomes the "governor" of
the remaining U.S., will decide what it might be in the future. If lucky, it
may look like Bulgaria, but more likely, more of a blend of Mexico, Uganda,
Cuba and definitely a workers "paradise." It should be given up for dead -
the future is Asia, has been for 25 years.

I would not count out India or South America or Russia. Australia looks
pretty good too.

But with $15 trillion in debt, a corrupt government the people cannot
afford, USA is toast for at least 2 decades. USA will come back when
the political and banking criminals are long gone and the system cleaned
up or disbanded for something better.
--
Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. But
we have big huge government we can't afford...
-- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude

On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 13:36:04 GMT, "Haywood Jablomie"
wrote:


On 8-Oct-2011, JustWait wrote:

Doesn't your idiot box have any channels other than MSDNC?

Cheney was the only honest, competent person to hold office in the past
25
years.

Why do you think progressives hate him so much?

All inferior people become jealous and feel bad about their ineptitude,
especially when that condition is exposed. Same reason that ragheads want
you dead.

Yeah, it's got nothing to do with lying us into a trillion dollar,
5000 US dead fiasco that netted us jack ****.

The guy is pure, ****ing, evil. Doesn't surprise me that you and your
compatriots think he's a saint.

On 10/8/2011 10:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/7/2011 5:11 PM, Haywood Jablomie wrote:
On 5-Oct-2011, X ` wrote:

Jackson was just a little more popular than you, Mr Racist Pig.

To say nothing of the war-mongering liar, Dick Cheney, who is
much-admired by all the right-wing pigs.

Doesn't your idiot box have any channels other than MSDNC?

Cheney was the only honest, competent person to hold office in the past 25
years.

Why do you think progressives hate him so much?

Are you really asserting that Cheney was "honest"??

Sure, just like you said for years about Clinton, "has he been convicted
of anything" NO! So he didn't do anything illegal in your mind of
course... Right?

In article ,
says...

On 10/8/2011 10:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/7/2011 5:11 PM, Haywood Jablomie wrote:
On 5-Oct-2011, X ` wrote:

Jackson was just a little more popular than you, Mr Racist Pig.

To say nothing of the war-mongering liar, Dick Cheney, who is
much-admired by all the right-wing pigs.

Doesn't your idiot box have any channels other than MSDNC?

Cheney was the only honest, competent person to hold office in the past 25
years.

Why do you think progressives hate him so much?

Are you really asserting that Cheney was "honest"??

Sure, just like you said for years about Clinton, "has he been convicted
of anything" NO! So he didn't do anything illegal in your mind of
course... Right?

I'm sorry, where did I ever say that Clinton was honest???

On 10/9/2011 9:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/8/2011 10:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/7/2011 5:11 PM, Haywood Jablomie wrote:
On 5-Oct-2011, X ` wrote:

Jackson was just a little more popular than you, Mr Racist Pig.

To say nothing of the war-mongering liar, Dick Cheney, who is
much-admired by all the right-wing pigs.

Doesn't your idiot box have any channels other than MSDNC?

Cheney was the only honest, competent person to hold office in the past 25
years.

Why do you think progressives hate him so much?

Are you really asserting that Cheney was "honest"??

Sure, just like you said for years about Clinton, "has he been convicted
of anything" NO! So he didn't do anything illegal in your mind of
course... Right?

I'm sorry, where did I ever say that Clinton was honest???

admit who you are here and I will show you...

On 10/9/11 10:27 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/9/2011 9:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/8/2011 10:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/7/2011 5:11 PM, Haywood Jablomie wrote:
On 5-Oct-2011, X ` wrote:

Jackson was just a little more popular than you, Mr Racist Pig.

To say nothing of the war-mongering liar, Dick Cheney, who is
much-admired by all the right-wing pigs.

Doesn't your idiot box have any channels other than MSDNC?

Cheney was the only honest, competent person to hold office in the
past 25
years.

Why do you think progressives hate him so much?

Are you really asserting that Cheney was "honest"??

Sure, just like you said for years about Clinton, "has he been convicted
of anything" NO! So he didn't do anything illegal in your mind of
course... Right?

I'm sorry, where did I ever say that Clinton was honest???

admit who you are here and I will show you...


He's iLoogy...everyone knows that.

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

In article ,
says...

On 10/9/2011 9:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/8/2011 10:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/7/2011 5:11 PM, Haywood Jablomie wrote:
On 5-Oct-2011, X ` wrote:

Jackson was just a little more popular than you, Mr Racist Pig.

To say nothing of the war-mongering liar, Dick Cheney, who is
much-admired by all the right-wing pigs.

Doesn't your idiot box have any channels other than MSDNC?

Cheney was the only honest, competent person to hold office in the past 25
years.

Why do you think progressives hate him so much?

Are you really asserting that Cheney was "honest"??

Sure, just like you said for years about Clinton, "has he been convicted
of anything" NO! So he didn't do anything illegal in your mind of
course... Right?

I'm sorry, where did I ever say that Clinton was honest???

admit who you are here and I will show you...

Why would that have any bearing on anything relevant to this discussion?

In article ,
says...

On 10/9/11 10:27 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/9/2011 9:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/8/2011 10:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/7/2011 5:11 PM, Haywood Jablomie wrote:
On 5-Oct-2011, X ` wrote:

Jackson was just a little more popular than you, Mr Racist Pig.

To say nothing of the war-mongering liar, Dick Cheney, who is
much-admired by all the right-wing pigs.

Doesn't your idiot box have any channels other than MSDNC?

Cheney was the only honest, competent person to hold office in the
past 25
years.

Why do you think progressives hate him so much?

Are you really asserting that Cheney was "honest"??

Sure, just like you said for years about Clinton, "has he been convicted
of anything" NO! So he didn't do anything illegal in your mind of
course... Right?

I'm sorry, where did I ever say that Clinton was honest???

admit who you are here and I will show you...


He's iLoogy...everyone knows that.

Cool!! Now I'm Loogy again!!!

On 10/9/2011 11:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/9/2011 9:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/8/2011 10:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On 10/7/2011 5:11 PM, Haywood Jablomie wrote:
On 5-Oct-2011, X ` wrote:

Jackson was just a little more popular than you, Mr Racist Pig.

To say nothing of the war-mongering liar, Dick Cheney, who is
much-admired by all the right-wing pigs.

Doesn't your idiot box have any channels other than MSDNC?

Cheney was the only honest, competent person to hold office in the past 25
years.

Why do you think progressives hate him so much?

Are you really asserting that Cheney was "honest"??

Sure, just like you said for years about Clinton, "has he been convicted
of anything" NO! So he didn't do anything illegal in your mind of
course... Right?

I'm sorry, where did I ever say that Clinton was honest???

admit who you are here and I will show you...

Why would that have any bearing on anything relevant to this discussion?

Because you asked me to say where you ever said that, and I want to go
back to our discussions about that about a year ago, before you changed
your handle... Simple.. really...