On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 18:36:39 -0400, Jimmy wrote:

On 10/7/2011 5:54 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...
It's past the time that people should have woken up but it's not
happening. Too bad for the USA.

The only thing between you and slavery is a gun.

And therein is the hidden agenda. It's not about the guns at all, it's
about control.

There are laws against slavery, you might have heard.

It's all about fear. You Pubs have were born with it. You're a bunch
of fraidy cats who scare easy.

Tim wrote:
On Oct 6, 10:07 am, wrote:
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:22:13 -0400, X `
wrote:









On 10/6/11 8:13 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:12:22 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:28:05 -0700, wrote:
Do you carry your sidearm at work? They were all at work in a quary.
Company policy prevents me from carrying a firearm at work. Since we
have a security force at work personal firearms are deemed not
necessary.
What? Your company doesn't think your safety is at the top of the list?
What would that security force do if a disgruntled worker got to your
floor, started shooting and killed 20 people before they could get to
him? Get body bags? And how would you be transporting that firearm in
Maryland? You know the rules here.
merican skull?
If someone was carrying a concealed weapon for their own protection they
could have taken out the guy before he got to 2, 3 or 4 or more peoples.
If, if, if, if. And you're assuming the guy with the firearm wouldn't be
the first one shot or would actually have the balls to shoot back or was
a good enough aim. If, if, if, if...
The guy who justifies carrying a weapon for self-defense is more
likely to use it in the commission of a crime, mistaken circumstances,
vigilante justice or domestic abuse.

Arming everybody in hopes of reducing violence is insane logic.
Mexico has some of the strictest gun laws in the world, I think we all
know how that is working out. Those who intend to do harm will always
find a way to get a gun. Restricting others from being able to protect
themselves is why Chicago has had to take another look at their strict
gun laws as they left innocent people too vulnerable. The old saying
that "guns don't kill people, people do" is true, the fork and spoon
didn't make oprah fat and the pen didn't misspell the word. It's
called being responsible for your actions.
Government needs respect the 2nd amendment and concentrate on learning
and following the constitution and bill of rights as they are sworn to
uphold when they take office. They are suppose to be working for us
not the other way around. Gun control is one of the last steps before
complete tyranny, check out history.

Well said!

-HB (As seen on TV!)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-e4vu_wL-M

On Oct 8, 6:43*pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 06:02:21 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:









On Oct 6, 10:07 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:22:13 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 10/6/11 8:13 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:12:22 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:28:05 -0700, wrote:

Do you carry your sidearm at work? They were all at work in a quary.

Company policy prevents me from carrying a firearm at work. Since we
have a security force at work personal firearms are deemed not
necessary.

What? Your company doesn't think your safety is at the top of the list?
What would that security force do if a disgruntled worker got to your
floor, started shooting and killed 20 people before they could get to
him? Get body bags? And how would you be transporting that firearm in
Maryland? You know the rules here.

merican skull?

If someone was carrying a concealed weapon for their own protection they
could have taken out the guy before he got to 2, 3 or 4 or more peoples.

If, if, if, if. And you're assuming the guy with the firearm wouldn't be
the first one shot or would actually have the balls to shoot back or was
a good enough aim. If, if, if, if...

The guy who justifies carrying a weapon for self-defense is more
likely to use it in the commission of a crime, mistaken circumstances,
vigilante justice or domestic abuse.

Arming everybody in hopes of reducing violence is insane logic.

Mexico has some of the strictest gun laws in the world, I think we all
know how that is working out. Those who intend to do harm will always
find a way to get a gun. Restricting others from being able to protect
themselves is why Chicago has had to take another look at their strict
gun laws as they left innocent people too vulnerable. The old saying
that "guns don't kill people, people do" is true, the fork and spoon
didn't make oprah fat and the pen didn't misspell the word. It's
called being responsible for your actions.
Government needs respect the 2nd amendment and concentrate on learning
and following the constitution and bill of rights as they are sworn to
uphold when they take office. They are suppose to be working for us
not the other way around. Gun control is one of the last steps before
complete tyranny, check out history.

Mexico is run by drug cartels who are armed, nearly exclusively, by
the USA.

hmmm, tie-ins with fast and furious?

On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 18:18:02 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:

On Oct 5, 3:28*pm, jps wrote:
Hell yeah!



You bet! last week, I bagged my 9th groundhog of the year. That's the
one who has been burrowing under my tool shed and causing the
foundation blocks to lean in the South West corner. Now I gotta lift
the corner with a back hoe and repair the foundation. Glad I got it
before the edge collapsed.

Got any more???.

Got any good groundhog recipes. We tried roasting one when I was a kid. Pretty tough. Maybe should
have marinated it in some good red wine for a couple months.

Anyway, let me know if you've got that recipe. I know where a whole herd is located. Golf ball
stealing sons'a bitches, if you ask me.

Theres a lot more to the story other than presented. The story was
written as to portray anyone that owns a gun might become slightly upset
and start shooting people.
The story is something extreme really got someone out of whack and he
killed some fellow Employees.

On 10/5/2011 4:28 PM, jps wrote:

Hell yeah!

All it takes is to get disgruntled, go get your completely legal cache
of firearms and start shootin' at anything that moves or looks human!

Hey, he was perfectly normal until the safety meeting this morning.


CUPERTINO, Calif. —

Authorities went door to door with guns drawn Wednesday in search of a
disgruntled employee they say opened fire at a Northern California
limestone quarry, killing three and wounding six, before possibly
wounding another woman in an attempted carjacking.

Schools were on lockdown or closed in the Silicon Valley city of
Cupertino and nearby Los Gatos as SWAT teams sought Shareef Allman,
47.

Allman was at a routine safety meeting at the quarry at about 4:30
a.m. when he became disgruntled and left, Santa Clara County Sheriff's
Lt. Rick Sung said. He then returned with a handgun and rifle and
started shooting people, Sung said.

Sheriff Laurie Smith said two people were pronounced dead at
Permanente Quarry in Cupertino, and a third person died later at the
hospital.

Six others at the quarry were wounded and taken to area hospitals,
Smith said. Some of them remained in critical condition, she said.

On 10/6/2011 1:10 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/6/11 1:08 PM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 13:03:53 -0400, wrote:

On 10/6/2011 3:42 AM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:31:16 -0400, wrote:

On 10/5/2011 5:51 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

Hell yeah!

All it takes is to get disgruntled, go get your completely legal
cache
of firearms and start shootin' at anything that moves or looks
human!

Hey, he was perfectly normal until the safety meeting this morning.

Just think, if the government was not suppressing the peoples
right to
keep and bear arms or carry concealed weapons somebody could have
shot
they guy before he killed anyone.

We've already established that JPS would stand by and watch his
wife and
daughter raped, rather than intervene.

He's scared of guns.

You're a stupid **** and you say stupid things that have no bearing in
reality.

Forgot that thread already, eh?

What man would sit and watch his wife and child harmed without doing
something? You think a gun is the only weapon a man has against
another man, which shows the weakness of your brain.

It's like saying you'd watch your boat sink for lack of a bildge pump.

****ing simpleton, you are.


Morons like "Jimmy" can't pass the instant check. If he got his hands on
a firearm, he'd shoot himself in the knee by accident.


It seems a lot of you are or have adopted the socialist theme that
Citizens can't be trusted with anything even a rusty nail.
their propaganda fear mongering have Soccer Moms and a bunch of others
scared to death of even a picture of a gun. God forbid their children
play Cowboys and Indians and own a cap gun or air rifle or bb gun.
I think all the socialist need to move to California or Chicago or NY
where they are protected from themselves.

On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 19:04:02 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 8, 6:43*pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 06:02:21 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:









On Oct 6, 10:07 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:22:13 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 10/6/11 8:13 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:12:22 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:28:05 -0700, wrote:

Do you carry your sidearm at work? They were all at work in a quary.

Company policy prevents me from carrying a firearm at work. Since we
have a security force at work personal firearms are deemed not
necessary.

What? Your company doesn't think your safety is at the top of the list?
What would that security force do if a disgruntled worker got to your
floor, started shooting and killed 20 people before they could get to
him? Get body bags? And how would you be transporting that firearm in
Maryland? You know the rules here.

merican skull?

If someone was carrying a concealed weapon for their own protection they
could have taken out the guy before he got to 2, 3 or 4 or more peoples.

If, if, if, if. And you're assuming the guy with the firearm wouldn't be
the first one shot or would actually have the balls to shoot back or was
a good enough aim. If, if, if, if...

The guy who justifies carrying a weapon for self-defense is more
likely to use it in the commission of a crime, mistaken circumstances,
vigilante justice or domestic abuse.

Arming everybody in hopes of reducing violence is insane logic.

Mexico has some of the strictest gun laws in the world, I think we all
know how that is working out. Those who intend to do harm will always
find a way to get a gun. Restricting others from being able to protect
themselves is why Chicago has had to take another look at their strict
gun laws as they left innocent people too vulnerable. The old saying
that "guns don't kill people, people do" is true, the fork and spoon
didn't make oprah fat and the pen didn't misspell the word. It's
called being responsible for your actions.
Government needs respect the 2nd amendment and concentrate on learning
and following the constitution and bill of rights as they are sworn to
uphold when they take office. They are suppose to be working for us
not the other way around. Gun control is one of the last steps before
complete tyranny, check out history.

Mexico is run by drug cartels who are armed, nearly exclusively, by
the USA.

hmmm, tie-ins with fast and furious?

Uh, it's been going on a long time. Do you remember hearing anything
about mass murders in Mexico before Obama was elected? Or are you
another who doesn't see blame all around?

On 10/9/2011 1:37 PM, Fred wrote:
Theres a lot more to the story other than presented. The story was
written as to portray anyone that owns a gun might become slightly upset
and start shooting people.
The story is something extreme really got someone out of whack and he
killed some fellow Employees.

JPS works for the anti gun lobby. You can pretty much dismiss his
bull****, as that's what most of it is... Remember too, he has been
caught here several times, making it up as he goes along to support his
dishonest point of view...

On 10/9/11 6:54 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/9/2011 1:37 PM, Fred wrote:
Theres a lot more to the story other than presented. The story was
written as to portray anyone that owns a gun might become slightly upset
and start shooting people.
The story is something extreme really got someone out of whack and he
killed some fellow Employees.

JPS works for the anti gun lobby. You can pretty much dismiss his
bull****, as that's what most of it is... Remember too, he has been
caught here several times, making it up as he goes along to support his
dishonest point of view...




Another fantasy of yours. JP doesn't work for the gun lobby or any other
lobby.

Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you . . . (Mt 5:44f)

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

On 10/9/2011 6:59 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/9/11 6:54 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/9/2011 1:37 PM, Fred wrote:
Theres a lot more to the story other than presented. The story was
written as to portray anyone that owns a gun might become slightly upset
and start shooting people.
The story is something extreme really got someone out of whack and he
killed some fellow Employees.

JPS works for the anti gun lobby. You can pretty much dismiss his
bull****, as that's what most of it is... Remember too, he has been
caught here several times, making it up as he goes along to support his
dishonest point of view...




Another fantasy of yours. JP doesn't work for the gun lobby or any other
lobby.

Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you . . . (Mt 5:44f)

I am a bad christian, I hate you... But at the same time, you personally
are lucky I am a Christian...