On 10/9/11 7:23 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/9/2011 6:59 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/9/11 6:54 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/9/2011 1:37 PM, Fred wrote:
Theres a lot more to the story other than presented. The story was
written as to portray anyone that owns a gun might become slightly
upset
and start shooting people.
The story is something extreme really got someone out of whack and he
killed some fellow Employees.

JPS works for the anti gun lobby. You can pretty much dismiss his
bull****, as that's what most of it is... Remember too, he has been
caught here several times, making it up as he goes along to support his
dishonest point of view...




Another fantasy of yours. JP doesn't work for the gun lobby or any other
lobby.

Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you . . . (Mt 5:44f)

I am a bad christian, I hate you... But at the same time, you personally
are lucky I am a Christian...


If you are a christian, it is in name only.

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

On 10/9/2011 7:35 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/9/11 7:23 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/9/2011 6:59 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/9/11 6:54 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/9/2011 1:37 PM, Fred wrote:
Theres a lot more to the story other than presented. The story was
written as to portray anyone that owns a gun might become slightly
upset
and start shooting people.
The story is something extreme really got someone out of whack and he
killed some fellow Employees.

JPS works for the anti gun lobby. You can pretty much dismiss his
bull****, as that's what most of it is... Remember too, he has been
caught here several times, making it up as he goes along to support his
dishonest point of view...




Another fantasy of yours. JP doesn't work for the gun lobby or any other
lobby.

Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you . . . (Mt 5:44f)

I am a bad christian, I hate you... But at the same time, you personally
are lucky I am a Christian...


If you are a christian, it is in name only.


The day I let a worthless parasite like you judge me, will be, well,
never...

"jps" wrote in message ...

On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 06:02:21 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 6, 10:07 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:22:13 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:









On 10/6/11 8:13 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:12:22 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:28:05 -0700, wrote:

Do you carry your sidearm at work? They were all at work in a quary.

Company policy prevents me from carrying a firearm at work. Since we
have a security force at work personal firearms are deemed not
necessary.

What? Your company doesn't think your safety is at the top of the list?
What would that security force do if a disgruntled worker got to your
floor, started shooting and killed 20 people before they could get to
him? Get body bags? And how would you be transporting that firearm in
Maryland? You know the rules here.

merican skull?

If someone was carrying a concealed weapon for their own protection
they
could have taken out the guy before he got to 2, 3 or 4 or more
peoples.

If, if, if, if. And you're assuming the guy with the firearm wouldn't be
the first one shot or would actually have the balls to shoot back or was
a good enough aim. If, if, if, if...

The guy who justifies carrying a weapon for self-defense is more
likely to use it in the commission of a crime, mistaken circumstances,
vigilante justice or domestic abuse.

Arming everybody in hopes of reducing violence is insane logic.

Mexico has some of the strictest gun laws in the world, I think we all
know how that is working out. Those who intend to do harm will always
find a way to get a gun. Restricting others from being able to protect
themselves is why Chicago has had to take another look at their strict
gun laws as they left innocent people too vulnerable. The old saying
that "guns don't kill people, people do" is true, the fork and spoon
didn't make oprah fat and the pen didn't misspell the word. It's
called being responsible for your actions.
Government needs respect the 2nd amendment and concentrate on learning
and following the constitution and bill of rights as they are sworn to
uphold when they take office. They are suppose to be working for us
not the other way around. Gun control is one of the last steps before
complete tyranny, check out history.

Mexico is run by drug cartels who are armed, nearly exclusively, by
the USA.


----------------------------------------------------
Prove they are armed via the USA! A few high end handguns, but most of the
guns are full auto weapons, and most come from the Eastern part of the
world. We sell very few full auto weapons to the public, and those take a
background check and a federal tax stamp. You think they are not going to
look at somebody buying 10,000 machine guns /machine pistols?

On Oct 9, 11:21*pm, "Califbill" wrote:
"jps" *wrote in messagenews:run197tpdjtret3lnpf4cvs4r68bljr7pf@4ax .com....

On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 06:02:21 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:









On Oct 6, 10:07 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:22:13 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 10/6/11 8:13 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:12:22 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:28:05 -0700, *wrote:

Do you carry your sidearm at work? *They were all at work in a quary.

Company policy prevents me from carrying a firearm at work. Since we
have a security force at work personal firearms are deemed not
necessary.

What? Your company doesn't think your safety is at the top of the list?
What would that security force do if a disgruntled worker got to your
floor, started shooting and killed 20 people before they could get to
him? Get body bags? And how would you be transporting that firearm in
Maryland? You know the rules here.

merican skull?

If someone was carrying a concealed weapon for their own protection
they
could have taken out the guy before he got to 2, 3 or 4 or more
peoples.

If, if, if, if. And you're assuming the guy with the firearm wouldn't be
the first one shot or would actually have the balls to shoot back or was
a good enough aim. If, if, if, if...

The guy who justifies carrying a weapon for self-defense is more
likely to use it in the commission of a crime, mistaken circumstances,
vigilante justice or domestic abuse.

Arming everybody in hopes of reducing violence is insane logic.

Mexico has some of the strictest gun laws in the world, I think we all
know how that is working out. Those who intend to do harm will always
find a way to get a gun. Restricting others from being able to protect
themselves is why Chicago has had to take another look at their strict
gun laws as they left innocent people too vulnerable. The old saying
that "guns don't kill people, people do" is true, the fork and spoon
didn't make oprah fat and the pen didn't misspell the word. It's
called being responsible for your actions.
Government needs respect the 2nd amendment and concentrate on learning
and following the constitution and bill of rights as they are sworn to
uphold when they take office. They are suppose to be working for us
not the other way around. Gun control is one of the last steps before
complete tyranny, check out history.

Mexico is run by drug cartels who are armed, nearly exclusively, by
the USA.

----------------------------------------------------
Prove they are armed via the USA! *A few high end handguns, but most of the
guns are full auto weapons, and most come from the Eastern part of the
world. *We sell very few full auto weapons to the public, and those take a
background check and a federal tax stamp. *You think they are not going to
look at somebody buying 10,000 machine guns /machine pistols?

Cuba sends a lot across the gulf as well.

On 10/10/2011 12:21 AM, Califbill wrote:
"jps" wrote in message ...

On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 06:02:21 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 6, 10:07 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:22:13 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:









On 10/6/11 8:13 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:12:22 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:28:05 -0700, wrote:

Do you carry your sidearm at work? They were all at work in a quary.

Company policy prevents me from carrying a firearm at work. Since we
have a security force at work personal firearms are deemed not
necessary.

What? Your company doesn't think your safety is at the top of the list?
What would that security force do if a disgruntled worker got to your
floor, started shooting and killed 20 people before they could get to
him? Get body bags? And how would you be transporting that firearm in
Maryland? You know the rules here.

merican skull?

If someone was carrying a concealed weapon for their own
protection they
could have taken out the guy before he got to 2, 3 or 4 or more
peoples.

If, if, if, if. And you're assuming the guy with the firearm
wouldn't be
the first one shot or would actually have the balls to shoot back or
was
a good enough aim. If, if, if, if...

The guy who justifies carrying a weapon for self-defense is more
likely to use it in the commission of a crime, mistaken circumstances,
vigilante justice or domestic abuse.

Arming everybody in hopes of reducing violence is insane logic.

Mexico has some of the strictest gun laws in the world, I think we all
know how that is working out. Those who intend to do harm will always
find a way to get a gun. Restricting others from being able to protect
themselves is why Chicago has had to take another look at their strict
gun laws as they left innocent people too vulnerable. The old saying
that "guns don't kill people, people do" is true, the fork and spoon
didn't make oprah fat and the pen didn't misspell the word. It's
called being responsible for your actions.
Government needs respect the 2nd amendment and concentrate on learning
and following the constitution and bill of rights as they are sworn to
uphold when they take office. They are suppose to be working for us
not the other way around. Gun control is one of the last steps before
complete tyranny, check out history.

Mexico is run by drug cartels who are armed, nearly exclusively, by
the USA.


----------------------------------------------------
Prove they are armed via the USA! A few high end handguns, but most of
the guns are full auto weapons, and most come from the Eastern part of
the world. We sell very few full auto weapons to the public, and those
take a background check and a federal tax stamp. You think they are not
going to look at somebody buying 10,000 machine guns /machine pistols?


He won't be able to prove it. Remember, JPS has been caught as many
times as Harry, making up stories to support his fantasy..

On 10/10/11 7:47 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/10/2011 12:21 AM, Califbill wrote:
"jps" wrote in message ...

On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 06:02:21 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 6, 10:07 am, jps wrote:
On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:22:13 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:









On 10/6/11 8:13 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:12:22 -0400, wrote:

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:28:05 -0700, wrote:

Do you carry your sidearm at work? They were all at work in a
quary.

Company policy prevents me from carrying a firearm at work. Since we
have a security force at work personal firearms are deemed not
necessary.

What? Your company doesn't think your safety is at the top of the
list?
What would that security force do if a disgruntled worker got to your
floor, started shooting and killed 20 people before they could get to
him? Get body bags? And how would you be transporting that firearm in
Maryland? You know the rules here.

merican skull?

If someone was carrying a concealed weapon for their own
protection they
could have taken out the guy before he got to 2, 3 or 4 or more
peoples.

If, if, if, if. And you're assuming the guy with the firearm
wouldn't be
the first one shot or would actually have the balls to shoot back or
was
a good enough aim. If, if, if, if...

The guy who justifies carrying a weapon for self-defense is more
likely to use it in the commission of a crime, mistaken circumstances,
vigilante justice or domestic abuse.

Arming everybody in hopes of reducing violence is insane logic.

Mexico has some of the strictest gun laws in the world, I think we all
know how that is working out. Those who intend to do harm will always
find a way to get a gun. Restricting others from being able to protect
themselves is why Chicago has had to take another look at their strict
gun laws as they left innocent people too vulnerable. The old saying
that "guns don't kill people, people do" is true, the fork and spoon
didn't make oprah fat and the pen didn't misspell the word. It's
called being responsible for your actions.
Government needs respect the 2nd amendment and concentrate on learning
and following the constitution and bill of rights as they are sworn to
uphold when they take office. They are suppose to be working for us
not the other way around. Gun control is one of the last steps before
complete tyranny, check out history.

Mexico is run by drug cartels who are armed, nearly exclusively, by
the USA.


----------------------------------------------------
Prove they are armed via the USA! A few high end handguns, but most of
the guns are full auto weapons, and most come from the Eastern part of
the world. We sell very few full auto weapons to the public, and those
take a background check and a federal tax stamp. You think they are not
going to look at somebody buying 10,000 machine guns /machine pistols?


He won't be able to prove it. Remember, JPS has been caught as many
times as Harry, making up stories to support his fantasy..


You should change the channel on those voices in your head.

--
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

On 10/8/2011 7:44 PM, jps wrote:

It's all about fear. You Pubs have were born with it. You're a bunch
of fraidy cats who scare easy.


I'm not afraid of guns, you are.

On 10/9/2011 1:42 PM, Fred wrote:

It seems a lot of you are or have adopted the socialist theme that
Citizens can't be trusted with anything even a rusty nail.
their propaganda fear mongering have Soccer Moms and a bunch of others
scared to death of even a picture of a gun. God forbid their children
play Cowboys and Indians and own a cap gun or air rifle or bb gun.
I think all the socialist need to move to California or Chicago or NY
where they are protected from themselves.

JPS is a soccer Dad.

On 10/9/2011 4:57 PM, jps wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 19:04:02 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:
hmmm, tie-ins with fast and furious?

Uh, it's been going on a long time. Do you remember hearing anything
about mass murders in Mexico before Obama was elected? Or are you
another who doesn't see blame all around?

The current president's regime is responsible for providing weapons to
Mexicans, which have then been used to kill innocents.

On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:23:09 -0400, Jimmy wrote:

On 10/9/2011 1:42 PM, Fred wrote:

It seems a lot of you are or have adopted the socialist theme that
Citizens can't be trusted with anything even a rusty nail.
their propaganda fear mongering have Soccer Moms and a bunch of others
scared to death of even a picture of a gun. God forbid their children
play Cowboys and Indians and own a cap gun or air rifle or bb gun.
I think all the socialist need to move to California or Chicago or NY
where they are protected from themselves.

JPS is a soccer Dad.

What are you, other than a government leech that hates the government?