On 11/10/2011 6:58 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/11/2011 8:36 AM, Jimmy wrote:
On 10/10/2011 5:33 PM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:30:25 -0400, wrote:

On 10/9/2011 4:56 PM, jps wrote:
You think wider distribution and availability of weapons is a good
development?

Not to criminals.

Why did the Obama administration send weapons to Mexican criminals?

Right, it was Biden, Jay Carney and Hilary that packed those guns up
for sale to Mexico. Not a bunch of yahoos at the ATF who are probably
selling drugs for the cartels, like Oliver North did.

Why did the Obama administration send weapons to Mexican criminals?

To support the destruction of Democracy they are pushing around the
world...

Take Egypt and the Obama supported toss out of elected Mumbarak.
September came and went, no elections and now the Islam dictatorship
isn't enforcing law on aggression against Christians. A little
cleansing going on, yet Obama be nice an quiet as he is all for a united
radical Islam.

Sure not many happy people with Obama-Bernanke abroad, USA policy right
now is just ****ing everyone off except for the Muslim Brotherhood.
--
Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. But
we have big huge government we can't afford...
-- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude

On 10/11/11 2:24 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 11/10/2011 6:58 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/11/2011 8:36 AM, Jimmy wrote:
On 10/10/2011 5:33 PM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:30:25 -0400, wrote:

On 10/9/2011 4:56 PM, jps wrote:
You think wider distribution and availability of weapons is a good
development?

Not to criminals.

Why did the Obama administration send weapons to Mexican criminals?

Right, it was Biden, Jay Carney and Hilary that packed those guns up
for sale to Mexico. Not a bunch of yahoos at the ATF who are probably
selling drugs for the cartels, like Oliver North did.

Why did the Obama administration send weapons to Mexican criminals?

To support the destruction of Democracy they are pushing around the
world...

Take Egypt and the Obama supported toss out of elected Mumbarak.
September came and went, no elections and now the Islam dictatorship
isn't enforcing law on aggression against Christians. A little cleansing
going on, yet Obama be nice an quiet as he is all for a united radical
Islam.

Sure not many happy people with Obama-Bernanke abroad, USA policy right
now is just ****ing everyone off except for the Muslim Brotherhood.

Please supply your list of "everyone," Mr. No-Knowledge or Understanding
of Econ or Geopolitics.

In article ,
says...

On 10/11/11 2:24 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 11/10/2011 6:58 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/11/2011 8:36 AM, Jimmy wrote:
On 10/10/2011 5:33 PM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:30:25 -0400, wrote:

On 10/9/2011 4:56 PM, jps wrote:
You think wider distribution and availability of weapons is a good
development?

Not to criminals.

Why did the Obama administration send weapons to Mexican criminals?

Right, it was Biden, Jay Carney and Hilary that packed those guns up
for sale to Mexico. Not a bunch of yahoos at the ATF who are probably
selling drugs for the cartels, like Oliver North did.

Why did the Obama administration send weapons to Mexican criminals?

To support the destruction of Democracy they are pushing around the
world...

Take Egypt and the Obama supported toss out of elected Mumbarak.
September came and went, no elections and now the Islam dictatorship
isn't enforcing law on aggression against Christians. A little cleansing
going on, yet Obama be nice an quiet as he is all for a united radical
Islam.

Sure not many happy people with Obama-Bernanke abroad, USA policy right
now is just ****ing everyone off except for the Muslim Brotherhood.

Please supply your list of "everyone," Mr. No-Knowledge or Understanding
of Econ or Geopolitics.

Harry learned a new word the other day when he was lying about writing
articles for someone's website!!!!

On 11/10/2011 12:26 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/11/11 2:24 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 11/10/2011 6:58 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/11/2011 8:36 AM, Jimmy wrote:
On 10/10/2011 5:33 PM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:30:25 -0400, wrote:

On 10/9/2011 4:56 PM, jps wrote:
You think wider distribution and availability of weapons is a good
development?

Not to criminals.

Why did the Obama administration send weapons to Mexican criminals?

Right, it was Biden, Jay Carney and Hilary that packed those guns up
for sale to Mexico. Not a bunch of yahoos at the ATF who are probably
selling drugs for the cartels, like Oliver North did.

Why did the Obama administration send weapons to Mexican criminals?

To support the destruction of Democracy they are pushing around the
world...

Take Egypt and the Obama supported toss out of elected Mumbarak.
September came and went, no elections and now the Islam dictatorship
isn't enforcing law on aggression against Christians. A little cleansing
going on, yet Obama be nice an quiet as he is all for a united radical
Islam.

Sure not many happy people with Obama-Bernanke abroad, USA policy right
now is just ****ing everyone off except for the Muslim Brotherhood.

Please supply your list of "everyone," Mr. No-Knowledge or Understanding
of Econ or Geopolitics.

Name me a non-Islam country that is as happy with the USA than they were
in say 2008.


--
Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. But
we have big huge government we can't afford...
-- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude

On 10/11/11 3:03 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 11/10/2011 12:26 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/11/11 2:24 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 11/10/2011 6:58 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/11/2011 8:36 AM, Jimmy wrote:
On 10/10/2011 5:33 PM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:30:25 -0400, wrote:

On 10/9/2011 4:56 PM, jps wrote:
You think wider distribution and availability of weapons is a good
development?

Not to criminals.

Why did the Obama administration send weapons to Mexican criminals?

Right, it was Biden, Jay Carney and Hilary that packed those guns up
for sale to Mexico. Not a bunch of yahoos at the ATF who are probably
selling drugs for the cartels, like Oliver North did.

Why did the Obama administration send weapons to Mexican criminals?

To support the destruction of Democracy they are pushing around the
world...

Take Egypt and the Obama supported toss out of elected Mumbarak.
September came and went, no elections and now the Islam dictatorship
isn't enforcing law on aggression against Christians. A little cleansing
going on, yet Obama be nice an quiet as he is all for a united radical
Islam.

Sure not many happy people with Obama-Bernanke abroad, USA policy right
now is just ****ing everyone off except for the Muslim Brotherhood.

Please supply your list of "everyone," Mr. No-Knowledge or Understanding
of Econ or Geopolitics.

Name me a non-Islam country that is as happy with the USA than they were
in say 2008.



Are you kidding? You really are in the dark.

On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 04:58:53 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 10, 11:48*pm, jps wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:11:58 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:









On Oct 10, 4:31 pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 22:35:45 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 9, 9:35 pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 18:16:50 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...=3598647ebfe79...

On Oct 9, 3:56 pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 19:05:03 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 8, 6:40 pm, jps wrote:

Let's get real, Tim. Guns are very good at what they're designed to
do, kill things.

I know, I use them around the farm for varmint control. They're very
efficient.

I'm assuming you wouldn't go out there to kill varmints with a sword,
a knife or a bludgeon as long as you have an efficient weapon like a
gun.

If it would be more to your satisfaction, I'll bag the next groundhog
with a compound bow. They work pretty good too!

That'd be cool, it'd give the varmint a fighting chance and several of
his brethren may have time to tackle you while you're reloading.

Ok, so now I'm getting the picture. You're wishing harm on me because
I don't fit your views.

Interesting.....

Hey, if those varmints can mount an attack on the guy who's trying to
kill 'em, I give 'em a lot of credit. I bet it'd supply the media
with a fantastic story to cover for however much time it'd take to
pick your bones clean.

Too bad the guy in Cupertino didn't bring his bow and arrow instead.

This Canadian did.

http://www.thestar.com/news/crime/ar...hot-dead-with-...

You're making my point for me, thanks.

1 person dead, not 2, not 3 and 7 are not wounded.

Reloading a crossbow is not equal to pulling a trigger however many
times a second your auto or semi-auto weapon can fire.

No I didn't make your point.

I did make a point that you dont' need a gun to prove someones
mortality. and if one isn't available, you run what you brung. But
then again, cross bows aren't illegal to own nor do they need special
licensing. And have proven to be quite stealth. Maybe a weapon of
choice by ganstahs and assassins, depending on circumstances.

But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are
herbivores.

That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their
family members or close friends.

Yeah, haven't heard about gangstahs using crossbows a whole lot but I
do hear about a crazy bunch of handguns being out there and available
cheap.

Probably pick up several handguns and a bunch of ammo for the price of
a decent crossbow.

keep dreaming

Really? How's the market for stolen crossbows? It's screaming
brilliant in stolen handguns and they're butt cheap.

No dreaming necessary.

On 11/10/2011 1:17 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/11/11 3:03 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 11/10/2011 12:26 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/11/11 2:24 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 11/10/2011 6:58 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/11/2011 8:36 AM, Jimmy wrote:
On 10/10/2011 5:33 PM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:30:25 -0400, wrote:

On 10/9/2011 4:56 PM, jps wrote:
You think wider distribution and availability of weapons is a good
development?

Not to criminals.

Why did the Obama administration send weapons to Mexican criminals?

Right, it was Biden, Jay Carney and Hilary that packed those guns up
for sale to Mexico. Not a bunch of yahoos at the ATF who are
probably
selling drugs for the cartels, like Oliver North did.

Why did the Obama administration send weapons to Mexican criminals?

To support the destruction of Democracy they are pushing around the
world...

Take Egypt and the Obama supported toss out of elected Mumbarak.
September came and went, no elections and now the Islam dictatorship
isn't enforcing law on aggression against Christians. A little
cleansing
going on, yet Obama be nice an quiet as he is all for a united radical
Islam.

Sure not many happy people with Obama-Bernanke abroad, USA policy right
now is just ****ing everyone off except for the Muslim Brotherhood.

Please supply your list of "everyone," Mr. No-Knowledge or Understanding
of Econ or Geopolitics.

Name me a non-Islam country that is as happy with the USA than they were
in say 2008.



Are you kidding? You really are in the dark.

Not at all, but from your response means you can't answer up.

But it is an Obamanation.
--
Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. But
we have big huge government we can't afford...
-- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude

On Oct 11, 2:54*pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 04:58:53 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:









On Oct 10, 11:48 pm, jps wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:11:58 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 10, 4:31 pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 22:35:45 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 9, 9:35 pm, jps wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 18:16:50 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...=3598647ebfe79...

On Oct 9, 3:56 pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 19:05:03 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Oct 8, 6:40 pm, jps wrote:

Let's get real, Tim. Guns are very good at what they're designed to
do, kill things.

I know, I use them around the farm for varmint control. They're very
efficient.

I'm assuming you wouldn't go out there to kill varmints with a sword,
a knife or a bludgeon as long as you have an efficient weapon like a
gun.

If it would be more to your satisfaction, I'll bag the next groundhog
with a compound bow. They work pretty good too!

That'd be cool, it'd give the varmint a fighting chance and several of
his brethren may have time to tackle you while you're reloading.

Ok, so now I'm getting the picture. You're wishing harm on me because
I don't fit your views.

Interesting.....

Hey, if those varmints can mount an attack on the guy who's trying to
kill 'em, I give 'em a lot of credit. I bet it'd supply the media
with a fantastic story to cover for however much time it'd take to
pick your bones clean.

Too bad the guy in Cupertino didn't bring his bow and arrow instead.

This Canadian did.

http://www.thestar.com/news/crime/ar...hot-dead-with-...

You're making my point for me, thanks.

1 person dead, not 2, not 3 and 7 are not wounded.

Reloading a crossbow is not equal to pulling a trigger however many
times a second your auto or semi-auto weapon can fire.

No I didn't make your point.

I did make a point that you dont' need a gun to prove someones
mortality. and if one isn't available, you run what you brung. But
then again, cross bows aren't illegal to own nor do they need special
licensing. And have proven to be quite stealth. Maybe a weapon of
choice by ganstahs and assassins, depending on circumstances.

But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are
herbivores.

That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their
family members or close friends.

Yeah, haven't heard about gangstahs using crossbows a whole lot but I
do hear about a crazy bunch of handguns being out there and available
cheap.

Probably pick up several handguns and a bunch of ammo for the price of
a decent crossbow.

keep dreaming

Really? *How's the market for stolen crossbows? *It's screaming
brilliant in stolen handguns and they're butt cheap.

No dreaming necessary.

A stolen .357 on the streets of NYC can be worth up to $2-500.00 +.
A44 mag can bring up to $1000.00

Crossbows? $150 will get you a new one.

On 10/11/11 8:42 PM, Tim wrote:
On Oct 11, 2:54 pm, wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 04:58:53 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:









On Oct 10, 11:48 pm, wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:11:58 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 10, 4:31 pm, wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 22:35:45 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 9, 9:35 pm, wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 18:16:50 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...=3598647ebfe79...

On Oct 9, 3:56 pm, wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 19:05:03 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 8, 6:40 pm, wrote:

Let's get real, Tim. Guns are very good at what they're designed to
do, kill things.

I know, I use them around the farm for varmint control. They're very
efficient.

I'm assuming you wouldn't go out there to kill varmints with a sword,
a knife or a bludgeon as long as you have an efficient weapon like a
gun.

If it would be more to your satisfaction, I'll bag the next groundhog
with a compound bow. They work pretty good too!

That'd be cool, it'd give the varmint a fighting chance and several of
his brethren may have time to tackle you while you're reloading.

Ok, so now I'm getting the picture. You're wishing harm on me because
I don't fit your views.

Interesting.....

Hey, if those varmints can mount an attack on the guy who's trying to
kill 'em, I give 'em a lot of credit. I bet it'd supply the media
with a fantastic story to cover for however much time it'd take to
pick your bones clean.

Too bad the guy in Cupertino didn't bring his bow and arrow instead.

This Canadian did.

http://www.thestar.com/news/crime/ar...hot-dead-with-...

You're making my point for me, thanks.

1 person dead, not 2, not 3 and 7 are not wounded.

Reloading a crossbow is not equal to pulling a trigger however many
times a second your auto or semi-auto weapon can fire.

No I didn't make your point.

I did make a point that you dont' need a gun to prove someones
mortality. and if one isn't available, you run what you brung. But
then again, cross bows aren't illegal to own nor do they need special
licensing. And have proven to be quite stealth. Maybe a weapon of
choice by ganstahs and assassins, depending on circumstances.

But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are
herbivores.

That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their
family members or close friends.

Yeah, haven't heard about gangstahs using crossbows a whole lot but I
do hear about a crazy bunch of handguns being out there and available
cheap.

Probably pick up several handguns and a bunch of ammo for the price of
a decent crossbow.

keep dreaming

Really? How's the market for stolen crossbows? It's screaming
brilliant in stolen handguns and they're butt cheap.

No dreaming necessary.

A stolen .357 on the streets of NYC can be worth up to $2-500.00 +.
A44 mag can bring up to $1000.00

Crossbows? $150 will get you a new one.


Wow...a junky .357 revolver fetches that kinda dough?

On Oct 11, 8:03*pm, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/11/11 8:42 PM, Tim wrote:









On Oct 11, 2:54 pm, *wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 04:58:53 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 10, 11:48 pm, *wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:11:58 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 10, 4:31 pm, *wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 22:35:45 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 9, 9:35 pm, *wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 18:16:50 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...=3598647ebfe79...

On Oct 9, 3:56 pm, *wrote:
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011 19:05:03 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Oct 8, 6:40 pm, *wrote:

Let's get real, Tim. Guns are very good at what they're designed to
do, kill things.

I know, I use them around the farm for varmint control. They're very
efficient.

I'm assuming you wouldn't go out there to kill varmints with a sword,
a knife or a bludgeon as long as you have an efficient weapon like a
gun.

If it would be more to your satisfaction, I'll bag the next groundhog
with a compound bow. They work pretty good too!

That'd be cool, it'd give the varmint a fighting chance and several of
his brethren may have time to tackle you while you're reloading.

Ok, so now I'm getting the picture. You're wishing harm on me because
I don't fit your views.

Interesting.....

Hey, if those varmints can mount an attack on the guy who's trying to
kill 'em, I give 'em a lot of credit. I bet it'd supply the media
with a fantastic story to cover for however much time it'd take to
pick your bones clean.

Too bad the guy in Cupertino didn't bring his bow and arrow instead.

This Canadian did.

http://www.thestar.com/news/crime/ar...hot-dead-with-...

You're making my point for me, thanks.

1 person dead, not 2, not 3 and 7 are not wounded.

Reloading a crossbow is not equal to pulling a trigger however many
times a second your auto or semi-auto weapon can fire.

No I didn't make your point.

I did make a point that you dont' need a gun to prove someones
mortality. and if one isn't available, you run what you brung. But
then again, cross bows aren't illegal to own nor do they need special
licensing. And have proven to be quite stealth. Maybe a weapon of
choice by ganstahs and assassins, depending on circumstances.

But anyhow, i do see that you still wish me harm. But Groundhogs are
herbivores.

That doesn't mean they don't get ****ed off when you blow away their
family members or close friends.

Yeah, haven't heard about gangstahs using crossbows a whole lot but I
do hear about a crazy bunch of handguns being out there and available
cheap.

Probably pick up several handguns and a bunch of ammo for the price of
a decent crossbow.

keep dreaming

Really? *How's the market for stolen crossbows? *It's screaming
brilliant in stolen handguns and they're butt cheap.

No dreaming necessary.

A stolen .357 on the streets of NYC can be worth up to $2-500.00 +.
A44 mag can bring up to $1000.00

Crossbows? $150 will get you a new one.

Wow...a junky .357 revolver fetches that kinda dough?

Hot on the NYC streets. Yep.