Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#131
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/19/11 11:19 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/19/2011 10:54 AM, X ` Man wrote: You know, I'm not aware of an organization dedicated to converting Christians into atheists. You don't either. Sure I do, we all do, look at any University.. I see. "Any university" (mean, of course, every university) is "dedicated" to converting Christians into atheists. That's way up there on the list of "The Dumbest Things Scott Ingersoll Has Ever Posted." You are an ignorant little fool, and your every post here demonstrates "Scotty doesn't know." |
#132
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/19/2011 11:39 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/19/11 11:36 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/19/2011 11:27 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/19/11 11:21 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/19/2011 11:09 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/19/11 10:52 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/19/2011 10:38 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/19/11 10:26 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/19/2011 10:22 AM, Danny wrote: On 10/19/2011 9:25 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/18/11 4:36 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 17/10/2011 5:56 PM, BAR wrote: Crap, he's posting from his iPhone now. Made non-union in China too. Unfortunately, most so-called "smart" phones, and most cell phones, are now assembled in the PRC, and many are manufactured there, too, even Nokias. In the last couple of years, nearly all cell phone assembly has been "outsourced" to the PRC. My rule against buying merchandise from the PRC is, "can I find a similar or better product manufactured elsewhere?" Since most "smart" phones are coming out of the PRC, the answer, sadly, is no. More hypocritical excuses. If you actually had a real conviction, you'd not use a cell phone. Your "rule" is very self accommodating. That is the progressive way, especially here in this group... "Danny" must be one of your brothers, because he's obviously as dumb as you are. What do you care, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Vyj1C8ogtE Be careful, Snotty...or I'll edit the song to change the name of fiona. :) Didn't listen, I would never click on a link from a known pedophile... Remember, you stated here that your targeted advertizing showed you dildoes and sex toys. I don't even want to know where a pedophile surfs, much less, click on a link he posted... Hehehe. You're projecting again. You don't see me putting up photos of underaged pubescent children on Facebook and directing my "buddies" in rec.boats to look at them. So, you think sex toys are strictly the province of pedophiles, eh? I'll bet your wife has a vibrator. Another lie by the coward of rec.boats.. This one is going directly to the university... Uh, last week you posted here that you put up on facebook photos of your kid and some of her friends "hanging out." So, what was the lie...that your wife doesn't have a vibrator? If you want to know, ask me to my face Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America. You are a sick bitch, What do you care, do you have something to add to the conversation or are you just trolling again Mr. Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America? Do you sit there all day long just waiting for someone you hate to post so you can make a one line comment or insult them? Wow, great life you have there... Does Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America, know you have spent the last ten years here insulting and trolling the group as HtheK, HKrause, HarryK, Paul, x-man, sometimes posting as many as 100 one line, insult/troll posts in one 24 hour period? Mr. Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America, you seem a lowlife parasite who spends his days and nights sharing your hate and misery here an all over then net. Anybody who has five minutes to look back at your posts over the last ten years will see that. I feel sorry for you, get out of the house man, step away from the keyboard... Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America |
#134
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/19/2011 11:48 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/19/11 11:19 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/19/2011 10:54 AM, X ` Man wrote: You know, I'm not aware of an organization dedicated to converting Christians into atheists. You don't either. Sure I do, we all do, look at any University.. I see. "Any university" (mean, of course, every university) is "dedicated" to converting Christians into atheists. That's way up there on the list of "The Dumbest Things Scott Ingersoll Has Ever Posted." You are an ignorant little fool, and your every post here demonstrates "Scotty doesn't know." What do you care, do you have something to add to the conversation or are you just trolling again Mr. Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America? Do you sit there all day long just waiting for someone you hate to post so you can make a one line comment or insult them? Wow, great life you have there... Does Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America, know you have spent the last ten years here insulting and trolling the group as HtheK, HKrause, HarryK, Paul, x-man, sometimes posting as many as 100 one line, insult/troll posts in one 24 hour period? Mr. Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America, you seem a lowlife parasite who spends his days and nights sharing your hate and misery here an all over then net. Anybody who has five minutes to look back at your posts over the last ten years will see that. I feel sorry for you, get out of the house man, step away from the keyboard... Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America |
#135
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
says... On 10/19/2011 11:27 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/19/11 11:21 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/19/2011 11:09 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/19/11 10:52 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/19/2011 10:38 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/19/11 10:26 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/19/2011 10:22 AM, Danny wrote: On 10/19/2011 9:25 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/18/11 4:36 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 17/10/2011 5:56 PM, BAR wrote: Crap, he's posting from his iPhone now. Made non-union in China too. Unfortunately, most so-called "smart" phones, and most cell phones, are now assembled in the PRC, and many are manufactured there, too, even Nokias. In the last couple of years, nearly all cell phone assembly has been "outsourced" to the PRC. My rule against buying merchandise from the PRC is, "can I find a similar or better product manufactured elsewhere?" Since most "smart" phones are coming out of the PRC, the answer, sadly, is no. More hypocritical excuses. If you actually had a real conviction, you'd not use a cell phone. Your "rule" is very self accommodating. That is the progressive way, especially here in this group... "Danny" must be one of your brothers, because he's obviously as dumb as you are. What do you care, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Vyj1C8ogtE Be careful, Snotty...or I'll edit the song to change the name of fiona. :) Didn't listen, I would never click on a link from a known pedophile... Remember, you stated here that your targeted advertizing showed you dildoes and sex toys. I don't even want to know where a pedophile surfs, much less, click on a link he posted... Hehehe. You're projecting again. You don't see me putting up photos of underaged pubescent children on Facebook and directing my "buddies" in rec.boats to look at them. So, you think sex toys are strictly the province of pedophiles, eh? I'll bet your wife has a vibrator. Another lie by the coward of rec.boats.. This one is going directly to the university... If you ever decide to end it all, come and say that to my face you nasty old ****er...What do you care, do you have something to add to the conversation or are you just trolling again Mr. Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America? Do you sit there all day long just waiting for someone you hate to post so you can make a one line comment or insult them? Wow, great life you have there... Does Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America, know you have spent the last ten years here insulting and trolling the group as HtheK, HKrause, HarryK, Paul, x-man, sometimes posting as many as 100 one line, insult/troll posts in one 24 hour period? Mr. Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America, you seem a lowlife parasite who spends his days and nights sharing your hate and misery here an all over then net. Anybody who has five minutes to look back at your posts over the last ten years will see that. I feel sorry for you, get out of the house man, step away from the keyboard... Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America It makes you wonder just how low and scum like that coward can go. |
#136
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
says... On 10/19/2011 11:39 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/19/11 11:36 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/19/2011 11:27 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/19/11 11:21 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/19/2011 11:09 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/19/11 10:52 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/19/2011 10:38 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/19/11 10:26 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/19/2011 10:22 AM, Danny wrote: On 10/19/2011 9:25 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/18/11 4:36 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 17/10/2011 5:56 PM, BAR wrote: Crap, he's posting from his iPhone now. Made non-union in China too. Unfortunately, most so-called "smart" phones, and most cell phones, are now assembled in the PRC, and many are manufactured there, too, even Nokias. In the last couple of years, nearly all cell phone assembly has been "outsourced" to the PRC. My rule against buying merchandise from the PRC is, "can I find a similar or better product manufactured elsewhere?" Since most "smart" phones are coming out of the PRC, the answer, sadly, is no. More hypocritical excuses. If you actually had a real conviction, you'd not use a cell phone. Your "rule" is very self accommodating. That is the progressive way, especially here in this group... "Danny" must be one of your brothers, because he's obviously as dumb as you are. What do you care, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Vyj1C8ogtE Be careful, Snotty...or I'll edit the song to change the name of fiona. :) Didn't listen, I would never click on a link from a known pedophile... Remember, you stated here that your targeted advertizing showed you dildoes and sex toys. I don't even want to know where a pedophile surfs, much less, click on a link he posted... Hehehe. You're projecting again. You don't see me putting up photos of underaged pubescent children on Facebook and directing my "buddies" in rec.boats to look at them. So, you think sex toys are strictly the province of pedophiles, eh? I'll bet your wife has a vibrator. Another lie by the coward of rec.boats.. This one is going directly to the university... Uh, last week you posted here that you put up on facebook photos of your kid and some of her friends "hanging out." So, what was the lie...that your wife doesn't have a vibrator? If you want to know, ask me to my face Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America. You are a sick bitch, What do you care, do you have something to add to the conversation or are you just trolling again Mr. Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America? Do you sit there all day long just waiting for someone you hate to post so you can make a one line comment or insult them? Wow, great life you have there... Does Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America, know you have spent the last ten years here insulting and trolling the group as HtheK, HKrause, HarryK, Paul, x-man, sometimes posting as many as 100 one line, insult/troll posts in one 24 hour period? Mr. Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America, you seem a lowlife parasite who spends his days and nights sharing your hate and misery here an all over then net. Anybody who has five minutes to look back at your posts over the last ten years will see that. I feel sorry for you, get out of the house man, step away from the keyboard... Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America At least your wife doesn't have four chins!!! |
#137
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/19/2011 10:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In articlef8idnfns9evGQwPTnZ2dnUVZ_t6dnZ2d@earthlink .com, says... On 10/19/11 10:16 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/19/2011 10:15 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/19/11 10:01 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/19/2011 8:05 AM, BAR wrote: In raweb.com, says... On 10/18/2011 7:53 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/18/11 6:54 AM, Tim wrote: On Oct 17, 7:52 am, X ` wrote: On 10/17/11 8:41 AM, Tim wrote: On Oct 17, 7:30 am, X ` wrote: On 10/17/11 8:22 AM, Tim wrote: On Oct 17, 5:30 am, X ` wrote: In 1358, according to historian and author Barbara Tuchman, a peasant revolution started in the Oise valley of France. The peasants attacked and looted a manor house, killed the knight who lived there and roasted him on a spit while his wife and children watched. A dozen of the serfs raped the lady of the manor while the children watched, and then they forced her to eat the cooked flesh of her husband. Then they killed her. Now that is serious class warfare. Discussing whether the top one percent of the wealthy in this country should pay a higher tax rate is not, though I think the "French" treatment of a few dozen Wall Street chiefs and industrial chiefs would provide quicker results. Wiki gives credit of the story to one Jean La Bel, but I thought this line was interesting: "The peasants involved in the rebellion seem to have lacked any real organization, instead rising up locally as an unstructured mass. It is speculated by Jean le Bel that evil governors and tax collectors spread the word of rebellion from village to village to inspire the peasants to rebel against the nobility. When asked as to the cause of their discontent they apparently replied that they were just doing what they had witnessed others doing. Additionally it seems that the rebellion contained some idea that it was possible to rid the world of nobles. Froissart's account portrays the rebels as mindless thugs bent on destruction, which they wreaked on over 150 noble houses and castles, murdering the families in horrendous ways." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacquerie#The_uprising In the 14th Century, the serfs had every reason to murder nobles. They still do. Harry, nobody has the right to 'murder' anyone... In the 14th Century, the nobility murdered just about anyone it pleased, and with impunity. Since the serfs had no justice whatsoever available to them, turnabout was seen as fair play. Even in this country and in this century, we have official murder. Some may say that those killed in wars or by the executioner are not murdered, but "the state" will say anything to justify its actions. Harry,. who do you have the right to murder, and who has the right to murder you? Murder simply defined is *illegal* homicide. The country and many states engage in homicide and justify it by saying it was *legal*. The state of course can make anything it likes legal, but that doesn't make it justified. Executions may be legal, but they are not justified. Killing of non-combatants in a war is murder. The situation is different in a case of self-defense. I don't have the right to murder anyone, but I do have the legal and I think moral right to defend myself or my wife from intruders who break into the house and intend bodily harm. If that means shooting the intruders, so be it. It's not the same as execution. The state has a choice. It can warehouse violent offenders until they die of old age. There are no such alternative when dealing with a home invader. You should know that all intruders are not murderers and rapists. You better make sure you are targeted for bodily harm before you pull the trigger. Your paranoia will work against you in defense of a shooting. Think about that, big boy. When you point a gun at someone, like an intruder in your home, your intention is to kill them not to interview them. If you are not aiming for center mass you are in idiot. Had a young guy walk into my house a few years back, at 1:30 in the morning.. I used a baseball bat to remove him, not a gun. Turns out he was a escaped patient from a home down the street, and didn't know where he was... If Harry had had the same, a innocent person would be dead instead of just having a broken rib... We're smart enough down here to tell the difference between a little **** intent on violence (like you) and someone suffering from a non-violent mental disorder. Bull****, when someone breaks down your door at 1:30 am, you don't take time to check their intent.. but of course you have to defend your cowardly ways, I get it... It's fairly easy to tell a non-violent, unarmed, confused mental patient from a hot-tempered, sawed-off little **** like you, Snotty. Even easier when the lady of the house is a psychotherapist who did a year-old internship at one of Florida's huge forensic mental hospitals, has worked at several psych facilities, has been a licensed, practicing psychotherapist for more than 15 years, and has been recognized by courts in this area and several distant states as an expert witness. Oh, so Dr. Fourchin is going to do a patient intake exam before you decide to shoot or not? Sure. That's standard practice at Krause house. Except for the Florida incident where Harry decided to break the guys legs with his F150. |
#138
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/19/2011 10:16 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/19/11 10:02 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/19/2011 8:10 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/19/11 8:06 AM, BAR wrote: In , says... On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:31:01 -0400, wrote: On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:45:32 -0400, wrote: In , says... CNN is a dripping wet liberal-socialism farce propaganda machine. Not nearly as bad as MSNBC, or PBS. CNN lies by omission, the other two just make it up as they go along... And Fox is fair and balanced and would never "lie by omission"....right? CNN may be the most balanced, based on the fact that both sides are ****ed at them. ;-) CNN is corporate news. They're anything but in the middle. PBS and BBC are closer to real news. PBS and BBC are left leaning at best and communist at worst. snerk You demonstrate the lack of formal edu-ma-ca-tion. I am sure he has more education than you Harry, and is probably more secure about his since he doesn't have to come here and lie about it. You said you graduated Yale here years ago, and it was proven to be a lie.... You are sure? Bertie joined the marines after high school and never continued his formal edu-ma-ca-tion. Bar's hitch in the marines made a man out of a boy. You became a man_______________________when? |
#139
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/19/2011 10:38 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/19/11 10:26 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/19/2011 10:22 AM, Danny wrote: On 10/19/2011 9:25 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/18/11 4:36 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 17/10/2011 5:56 PM, BAR wrote: Crap, he's posting from his iPhone now. Made non-union in China too. Unfortunately, most so-called "smart" phones, and most cell phones, are now assembled in the PRC, and many are manufactured there, too, even Nokias. In the last couple of years, nearly all cell phone assembly has been "outsourced" to the PRC. My rule against buying merchandise from the PRC is, "can I find a similar or better product manufactured elsewhere?" Since most "smart" phones are coming out of the PRC, the answer, sadly, is no. More hypocritical excuses. If you actually had a real conviction, you'd not use a cell phone. Your "rule" is very self accommodating. That is the progressive way, especially here in this group... "Danny" must be one of your brothers, because he's obviously as dumb as you are. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Vyj1C8ogtE Who knew Jason Bourne could sing? Why would you ever watch a C grade movie like that? |
#140
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/19/2011 12:50 PM, Drifter wrote:
On 10/19/2011 10:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In articlef8idnfns9evGQwPTnZ2dnUVZ_t6dnZ2d@earthlink .com, says... On 10/19/11 10:16 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/19/2011 10:15 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/19/11 10:01 AM, JustWait wrote: On 10/19/2011 8:05 AM, BAR wrote: In raweb.com, says... On 10/18/2011 7:53 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/18/11 6:54 AM, Tim wrote: On Oct 17, 7:52 am, X ` wrote: On 10/17/11 8:41 AM, Tim wrote: On Oct 17, 7:30 am, X ` wrote: On 10/17/11 8:22 AM, Tim wrote: On Oct 17, 5:30 am, X ` wrote: In 1358, according to historian and author Barbara Tuchman, a peasant revolution started in the Oise valley of France. The peasants attacked and looted a manor house, killed the knight who lived there and roasted him on a spit while his wife and children watched. A dozen of the serfs raped the lady of the manor while the children watched, and then they forced her to eat the cooked flesh of her husband. Then they killed her. Now that is serious class warfare. Discussing whether the top one percent of the wealthy in this country should pay a higher tax rate is not, though I think the "French" treatment of a few dozen Wall Street chiefs and industrial chiefs would provide quicker results. Wiki gives credit of the story to one Jean La Bel, but I thought this line was interesting: "The peasants involved in the rebellion seem to have lacked any real organization, instead rising up locally as an unstructured mass. It is speculated by Jean le Bel that evil governors and tax collectors spread the word of rebellion from village to village to inspire the peasants to rebel against the nobility. When asked as to the cause of their discontent they apparently replied that they were just doing what they had witnessed others doing. Additionally it seems that the rebellion contained some idea that it was possible to rid the world of nobles. Froissart's account portrays the rebels as mindless thugs bent on destruction, which they wreaked on over 150 noble houses and castles, murdering the families in horrendous ways." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacquerie#The_uprising In the 14th Century, the serfs had every reason to murder nobles. They still do. Harry, nobody has the right to 'murder' anyone... In the 14th Century, the nobility murdered just about anyone it pleased, and with impunity. Since the serfs had no justice whatsoever available to them, turnabout was seen as fair play. Even in this country and in this century, we have official murder. Some may say that those killed in wars or by the executioner are not murdered, but "the state" will say anything to justify its actions. Harry,. who do you have the right to murder, and who has the right to murder you? Murder simply defined is *illegal* homicide. The country and many states engage in homicide and justify it by saying it was *legal*. The state of course can make anything it likes legal, but that doesn't make it justified. Executions may be legal, but they are not justified. Killing of non-combatants in a war is murder. The situation is different in a case of self-defense. I don't have the right to murder anyone, but I do have the legal and I think moral right to defend myself or my wife from intruders who break into the house and intend bodily harm. If that means shooting the intruders, so be it. It's not the same as execution. The state has a choice. It can warehouse violent offenders until they die of old age. There are no such alternative when dealing with a home invader. You should know that all intruders are not murderers and rapists. You better make sure you are targeted for bodily harm before you pull the trigger. Your paranoia will work against you in defense of a shooting. Think about that, big boy. When you point a gun at someone, like an intruder in your home, your intention is to kill them not to interview them. If you are not aiming for center mass you are in idiot. Had a young guy walk into my house a few years back, at 1:30 in the morning.. I used a baseball bat to remove him, not a gun. Turns out he was a escaped patient from a home down the street, and didn't know where he was... If Harry had had the same, a innocent person would be dead instead of just having a broken rib... We're smart enough down here to tell the difference between a little **** intent on violence (like you) and someone suffering from a non-violent mental disorder. Bull****, when someone breaks down your door at 1:30 am, you don't take time to check their intent.. but of course you have to defend your cowardly ways, I get it... It's fairly easy to tell a non-violent, unarmed, confused mental patient from a hot-tempered, sawed-off little **** like you, Snotty. Even easier when the lady of the house is a psychotherapist who did a year-old internship at one of Florida's huge forensic mental hospitals, has worked at several psych facilities, has been a licensed, practicing psychotherapist for more than 15 years, and has been recognized by courts in this area and several distant states as an expert witness. Oh, so Dr. Fourchin is going to do a patient intake exam before you decide to shoot or not? Sure. That's standard practice at Krause house. Except for the Florida incident where Harry decided to break the guys legs with his F150. Yeah, the one where the guy came at him with a tire iron, but didn't see him coming all at the same time? snerk That was one of his better bull**** stories ![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
GOP class warfare | General | |||
class warfare in texas | General | |||
First-class quality, first-class service | Cruising | |||
Mass Immigration as Biological Warfare | General | |||
Vendee Globe virtual following in real time and real winds | General |