Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#112
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/20/11 5:34 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/20/2011 5:11 PM, X ` Man wrote: And, of course, your delusions about me are funny, too. So show us something productive you have done in the last, say, 30 years? An article with your by line, your Yale degree, your Zimmerman like Lobsta' boat maybe. No, you have been sitting in your basement making up stories and reliving your childhood and living off your sisters kindness... snerk Yep. You're delusional. So, you haven't produced anything in 30 years, we get that Harry... I'm still doing work for many of the clients I've been doing work for for years, little man. Since you and so many of your ill-tempered, moronic buddies here are out of control, I'm not about to give you something that produces part of a client list. |
#113
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/20/2011 5:49 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/20/11 5:34 PM, JustWait wrote: On 10/20/2011 5:11 PM, X ` Man wrote: And, of course, your delusions about me are funny, too. So show us something productive you have done in the last, say, 30 years? An article with your by line, your Yale degree, your Zimmerman like Lobsta' boat maybe. No, you have been sitting in your basement making up stories and reliving your childhood and living off your sisters kindness... snerk Yep. You're delusional. So, you haven't produced anything in 30 years, we get that Harry... I'm still doing work for many of the clients I've been doing work for for years, little man. Since you and so many of your ill-tempered, moronic buddies here are out of control, I'm not about to give you something that produces part of a client list. ....cough, bull****, cough... |
#114
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/20/11 6:00 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/20/2011 5:49 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/20/11 5:34 PM, JustWait wrote: On 10/20/2011 5:11 PM, X ` Man wrote: And, of course, your delusions about me are funny, too. So show us something productive you have done in the last, say, 30 years? An article with your by line, your Yale degree, your Zimmerman like Lobsta' boat maybe. No, you have been sitting in your basement making up stories and reliving your childhood and living off your sisters kindness... snerk Yep. You're delusional. So, you haven't produced anything in 30 years, we get that Harry... I'm still doing work for many of the clients I've been doing work for for years, little man. Since you and so many of your ill-tempered, moronic buddies here are out of control, I'm not about to give you something that produces part of a client list. ...cough, bull****, cough... That, in a word, is the entire value of your life...it's just bull****. Crikey, you can't even run a homebrew ISP reseller successfully. |
#115
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 20/10/2011 3:49 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/20/11 5:34 PM, JustWait wrote: On 10/20/2011 5:11 PM, X ` Man wrote: And, of course, your delusions about me are funny, too. So show us something productive you have done in the last, say, 30 years? An article with your by line, your Yale degree, your Zimmerman like Lobsta' boat maybe. No, you have been sitting in your basement making up stories and reliving your childhood and living off your sisters kindness... snerk Yep. You're delusional. So, you haven't produced anything in 30 years, we get that Harry... I'm still doing work for many of the clients I've been doing work for for years, little man. Since you and so many of your ill-tempered, moronic buddies here are out of control, I'm not about to give you something that produces part of a client list. Yep, you're self employed working at doing nothing all day. So has harryk's narcissist and self worth Google group had any meaningful activity? LMAO. Just more harryk chicken ****. -- Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. But we have big huge government we can't afford... -- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude |
#116
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 20, 1:14*pm, jps wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 03:39:49 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 20, 12:16*am, jps wrote: On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 06:07:33 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 19, 8:03*am, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 10/18/2011 5:16 PM, jps wrote: Santorum rarely disappoints... Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum said on a radio show last week that the GOP's strategy for reducing "the Democratic advantage" should be to marry off all the single mothers who "look to the government for help." "Look at the political base of the Democratic Party: It is single mothers who run a household," he told Tony Perkins, president of the Christian conservative think tank Family Research Council. "Why? Because it?s so tough economically that they look to the government for help and therefore they?re going to vote. So if you want to reduce the Democratic advantage, what you want to do is build two parent families, you eliminate that desire for government." The real Democratic advantage is women, because they care about others in greater percentages than men do. *Republicans have a tendency to care only for themselves and their closest allies. Santorum needs a real good punch in the nose by a single mother.. Boy, your part of the country (blue state heaven) seems to be quite violent this year. Someone cut off your welfare?? Hey, Scotty, did you see that new statistic that Obama has deported more illegal aliens than ANY other president? How are you all going to spin that into a negative? Hey I hope that's right and If so, I'm glad he's up on that, But has he deported his aunt and uncle.... yet? How compassionate of you. When you say things like this, it makes me want to group you in with the brainless evangelicals. Oh I'm sure you've already done that a few times. You make a good case for it. Thanks! |
#117
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:32:02 -0400, wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:24:35 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 19, 7:22*pm, X ` Man wrote: On 10/19/11 8:17 PM, Tim wrote: On Oct 19, 7:07 pm, X ` *wrote: On 10/19/11 7:53 PM, Tim wrote: After living in the US for several years, it looks like his aunt received some kind of amnesty a year ago for medical and political reasons. http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/kouri/100518 And his uncle was granted "backdoor amnesty' a *month ago. then disapeared from sight. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...airman-obama-u... Shocking! * snerk illegal residence+ drunk driving= amnesty? I really do think there's more to the story.... It should be thoroughly investigated after dick cheney is broght to justice. Why after? Not a bad question, but let's ask it this way. Why does Cheney get a pass, while we nail Obama to the wall? Personally, I think we should go after both of them, but if we don't do both, what will we use as a criteria to go after only one? Do you lack any sense of moral or ethical equivalence? Go after Obama for giving his relatives a free pass? You really think he had anything to do with it? This is just like trying to pin the inequalities on the 1%. They don't have to spend money protecting themselves, they've got minions who'll do their bidding for free, out of friendship, a sense of responsiblity to protect business partners, friends and family, etc. Very few put resources out there like the Koch brothers. Cheney, on the other hand, outed Valarie Plame and had a direct hand in manipulating information that got us involved in an inexcusable conflict that cost our country dearly. How about we use chronology for going after Cheney first. Would that offend your sense of fair play? |
#118
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:49:26 -0400, Jack "You know
wrote: On 10/20/2011 4:05 PM, JustWait wrote: On 10/20/2011 3:49 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/20/2011 3:36 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/20/2011 2:44 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/20/2011 12:58 PM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/20/2011 11:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/20/2011 9:33 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/20/2011 8:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In , says... On 10/19/2011 8:07 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/19/11 7:53 PM, Tim wrote: After living in the US for several years, it looks like his aunt received some kind of amnesty a year ago for medical and political reasons. http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/kouri/100518 And his uncle was granted "backdoor amnesty' a month ago. then disapeared from sight. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...kdoor-amnesty/ Shocking! snerk Not really, Obama's corruption doesn't shock anybody anymore... No republican was/is ever corrupt, huh? Never said that, try to keep up kid... Okay, are there corrupt republicans? Are there good decent democrats in office? Sure, I voted for several right here in town two years ago... Oh, so you're okay with corruption if it's a conservative doing it. I should have known!! What? I asked if there were corrupt republicans and you said you voted for some. whoo boy... What do you not understand? I asked: Okay, are there corrupt republicans? Are there good decent democrats in office? To which YOU answered: Sure, I voted for several right here in town two years ago. Whooo boy... Oh, ****, you STILL don't get it?? Yeah, I get it, you asked if there were any decent democrats, and I told you I voted for two, two years ago. You are just being a plum now.... Oh, ****, can you not see the first question?????? Sure, but I answered the second one... you just couldn't figure that out... you seem not too sharp. He/she doesn't know Jack He's definitely a she. Wears a pony tail. |
#119
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
says... On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:32:02 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:24:35 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Oct 19, 7:22*pm, X ` Man wrote: On 10/19/11 8:17 PM, Tim wrote: On Oct 19, 7:07 pm, X ` *wrote: On 10/19/11 7:53 PM, Tim wrote: After living in the US for several years, it looks like his aunt received some kind of amnesty a year ago for medical and political reasons. http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/kouri/100518 And his uncle was granted "backdoor amnesty' a *month ago. then disapeared from sight. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...airman-obama-u... Shocking! * snerk illegal residence+ drunk driving= amnesty? I really do think there's more to the story.... It should be thoroughly investigated after dick cheney is broght to justice. Why after? Not a bad question, but let's ask it this way. Why does Cheney get a pass, while we nail Obama to the wall? Personally, I think we should go after both of them, but if we don't do both, what will we use as a criteria to go after only one? Do you lack any sense of moral or ethical equivalence? Go after Obama for giving his relatives a free pass? You really think he had anything to do with it? This is just like trying to pin the inequalities on the 1%. They don't have to spend money protecting themselves, they've got minions who'll do their bidding for free, out of friendship, a sense of responsiblity to protect business partners, friends and family, etc. Very few put resources out there like the Koch brothers. Cheney, on the other hand, outed Valarie Plame and had a direct hand in manipulating information that got us involved in an inexcusable conflict that cost our country dearly. Richard Armitage outed Valarie Plame. He even admitted it. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/...n1981433.shtml How about we use chronology for going after Cheney first. Would that offend your sense of fair play? |
#120
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/21/2011 8:06 AM, BAR wrote:
In , says... On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:32:02 -0400, wrote: On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:24:35 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Oct 19, 7:22 pm, X ` wrote: On 10/19/11 8:17 PM, Tim wrote: On Oct 19, 7:07 pm, X ` wrote: On 10/19/11 7:53 PM, Tim wrote: After living in the US for several years, it looks like his aunt received some kind of amnesty a year ago for medical and political reasons. http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/kouri/100518 And his uncle was granted "backdoor amnesty' a month ago. then disapeared from sight. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...airman-obama-u... Shocking! snerk illegal residence+ drunk driving= amnesty? I really do think there's more to the story.... It should be thoroughly investigated after dick cheney is broght to justice. Why after? Not a bad question, but let's ask it this way. Why does Cheney get a pass, while we nail Obama to the wall? Personally, I think we should go after both of them, but if we don't do both, what will we use as a criteria to go after only one? Do you lack any sense of moral or ethical equivalence? Go after Obama for giving his relatives a free pass? You really think he had anything to do with it? This is just like trying to pin the inequalities on the 1%. They don't have to spend money protecting themselves, they've got minions who'll do their bidding for free, out of friendship, a sense of responsiblity to protect business partners, friends and family, etc. Very few put resources out there like the Koch brothers. Cheney, on the other hand, outed Valarie Plame and had a direct hand in manipulating information that got us involved in an inexcusable conflict that cost our country dearly. Richard Armitage outed Valarie Plame. He even admitted it. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/...n1981433.shtml Be careful Bar,facts don't do well here... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Another idiot... | General | |||
Not as simple as it seems | General | |||
idiot. | General | |||
Idiot #2 | ASA | |||
It's simple... | ASA |