Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Did you know...
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Did you know...
On 10/21/11 12:07 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 06:37:52 -0400, X ` wrote: http://tinyurl.com/3oepjxq Lots of things changed since 1789. So? I bet you don't really like that version of the Constitution that much in the first place.I bet you don't get through Article one Section two before you find something that ****es you off ;-) You just cherry picked out the parts that make your point To me, the points were that "religion" was not something uppermost in the minds of the founders, and that we ought not to be corralled by the fearmongering Republicans of today. Whether I "like" the entire Constitution or not is no more relevant a query as is whether I like the entire Obama presidency or not. I like Obama. He has done some good things for this country. He could be doing more if the GOP were more interested in progress and less interested in its agenda of "stopping" Obama. There are also some things Obama has done or not done I don't like. But I don't expect any politician to represent just my agenda. Which of the three "frontrunners" in the GOP race for the nomination represents your agenda? 1. Crazy Christian Rick Perry who singlehandedly has taken Texas further into the dumpster than Dubya, who gets off on executions and who brags about all the minimum wage jobs he has imported to his state by doing away with environmental and safety regulations? 2. Herman Cain, who proudly admits he doesn't know anything, and whose "economic proposals" would further shift the tax burden away from the wealthy? 3. Mitt Romney, who is not half the man his father was, who is really nothing more than a corporate raider who has fired tens of thousands of people, and whose positions on the issues depend upon which way the wind is blowing. |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Did you know...
On Oct 21, 11:29*am, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/21/11 12:07 PM, wrote: On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 06:37:52 -0400, X ` wrote: http://tinyurl.com/3oepjxq Lots of things changed since 1789. So? I bet you don't really like that version of the Constitution that much in the first place.I bet you don't get through Article one Section two before you find something that ****es you off ;-) You just cherry picked out the parts that make your point To me, the points were that "religion" was not something uppermost in the minds of the founders, and that we ought not to be corralled by the fearmongering Republicans of today. Evidently Krause, they were no more against it either, but that isn't something you would know, let alone understand |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Did you know...
On 10/21/2011 9:24 PM, TopBassDog wrote:
On Oct 21, 11:29 am, X ` wrote: On 10/21/11 12:07 PM, wrote: On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 06:37:52 -0400, X ` wrote: http://tinyurl.com/3oepjxq Lots of things changed since 1789. So? I bet you don't really like that version of the Constitution that much in the first place.I bet you don't get through Article one Section two before you find something that ****es you off ;-) You just cherry picked out the parts that make your point To me, the points were that "religion" was not something uppermost in the minds of the founders, and that we ought not to be corralled by the fearmongering Republicans of today. Evidently Krause, they were no more against it either, but that isn't something you would know, let alone understand Fearmongering. That's funny coming from a democrat after the absolute bull**** Biden (racist slug) has been spewing in the last few days. What a ****ing asshole... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
New York City is defined in the Federal Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph Guiliani stated on C-Span that "New York City is the capital of the World". For once, he told the truth. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|