Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#102
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/23/2011 6:12 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/23/11 5:34 PM, JustWait wrote: On 10/23/2011 5:10 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 23/10/2011 10:07 AM, wrote: On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 09:28:13 -0400, wrote: In , says... I guess I could point out it was the president from Little Rock, a couple miles from Bentonville, who signed the trade deals that took Walmart from being a small regional store to being the biggest retailer in the world ... selling chinese crap. Clinton was all about selling to the Chinese. That's how they got the technology to shoot down that satellite? It was our technology and they wanted to rub it in our face that they had it after Alemeda incident with the Hard Drives... Think of how much money Wal Mart has added to the U.S. Jobs, money, taxes, etc. They are a big part of our economy, but fools think that all the money goes to China! Walmart's profits came at the expense of the small mom and pop stores they displace so, at best it was a zero sum game. The reality is it was worse. Those "savings" come at the cost of other American businesses. Couldn't compete, evolve or die. Walmart started that way but evolved. Result is 100's of millions live better having more stuff they want for less money. McDonald's did the same to burger joints. Kentucky fried did it to chicken joints. So did Exxon and other big companies. Even Miller and Budweiser. Don't see local businesses making beer like they used too. So your point? It's all about the unions.. If the fat cats can't sit back, do nothing but stand between the management and labor to keep them fighting, and suck their own living off the backs of the laborers, they are not happy... It's clear you have a complete understanding of trade unionism from the short period of time you spent loading and moving crates in a warehouse. More than you have from sitting in your basement with your guns and google.... |
#103
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/23/2011 6:12 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/23/11 5:34 PM, JustWait wrote: On 10/23/2011 5:10 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 23/10/2011 10:07 AM, wrote: On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 09:28:13 -0400, wrote: In , says... I guess I could point out it was the president from Little Rock, a couple miles from Bentonville, who signed the trade deals that took Walmart from being a small regional store to being the biggest retailer in the world ... selling chinese crap. Clinton was all about selling to the Chinese. That's how they got the technology to shoot down that satellite? It was our technology and they wanted to rub it in our face that they had it after Alemeda incident with the Hard Drives... Think of how much money Wal Mart has added to the U.S. Jobs, money, taxes, etc. They are a big part of our economy, but fools think that all the money goes to China! Walmart's profits came at the expense of the small mom and pop stores they displace so, at best it was a zero sum game. The reality is it was worse. Those "savings" come at the cost of other American businesses. Couldn't compete, evolve or die. Walmart started that way but evolved. Result is 100's of millions live better having more stuff they want for less money. McDonald's did the same to burger joints. Kentucky fried did it to chicken joints. So did Exxon and other big companies. Even Miller and Budweiser. Don't see local businesses making beer like they used too. So your point? It's all about the unions.. If the fat cats can't sit back, do nothing but stand between the management and labor to keep them fighting, and suck their own living off the backs of the laborers, they are not happy... It's clear you have a complete understanding of trade unionism from the short period of time you spent loading and moving crates in a warehouse. Hey, you think you are smart because your sister finally got her doctorate in her mid 60's from a diploma mill, I think I am smart because my dad worked (unlike you, on the labor side) for the union for almost 50 years... |
#104
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 18:12:13 -0400, X ` Man
wrote: On 10/23/11 5:34 PM, JustWait wrote: On 10/23/2011 5:10 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 23/10/2011 10:07 AM, wrote: On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 09:28:13 -0400, wrote: In , says... I guess I could point out it was the president from Little Rock, a couple miles from Bentonville, who signed the trade deals that took Walmart from being a small regional store to being the biggest retailer in the world ... selling chinese crap. Clinton was all about selling to the Chinese. That's how they got the technology to shoot down that satellite? It was our technology and they wanted to rub it in our face that they had it after Alemeda incident with the Hard Drives... Think of how much money Wal Mart has added to the U.S. Jobs, money, taxes, etc. They are a big part of our economy, but fools think that all the money goes to China! Walmart's profits came at the expense of the small mom and pop stores they displace so, at best it was a zero sum game. The reality is it was worse. Those "savings" come at the cost of other American businesses. Couldn't compete, evolve or die. Walmart started that way but evolved. Result is 100's of millions live better having more stuff they want for less money. McDonald's did the same to burger joints. Kentucky fried did it to chicken joints. So did Exxon and other big companies. Even Miller and Budweiser. Don't see local businesses making beer like they used too. So your point? It's all about the unions.. If the fat cats can't sit back, do nothing but stand between the management and labor to keep them fighting, and suck their own living off the backs of the laborers, they are not happy... It's clear you have a complete understanding of trade unionism from the short period of time you spent loading and moving crates in a warehouse. Snotty's doctorial thesis was on the dynamics of the union-employer relationship and how the libs have ****ed it all up. |
#105
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/23/2011 7:16 PM, jps wrote:
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 18:12:13 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 10/23/11 5:34 PM, JustWait wrote: On 10/23/2011 5:10 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 23/10/2011 10:07 AM, wrote: On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 09:28:13 -0400, wrote: In , says... I guess I could point out it was the president from Little Rock, a couple miles from Bentonville, who signed the trade deals that took Walmart from being a small regional store to being the biggest retailer in the world ... selling chinese crap. Clinton was all about selling to the Chinese. That's how they got the technology to shoot down that satellite? It was our technology and they wanted to rub it in our face that they had it after Alemeda incident with the Hard Drives... Think of how much money Wal Mart has added to the U.S. Jobs, money, taxes, etc. They are a big part of our economy, but fools think that all the money goes to China! Walmart's profits came at the expense of the small mom and pop stores they displace so, at best it was a zero sum game. The reality is it was worse. Those "savings" come at the cost of other American businesses. Couldn't compete, evolve or die. Walmart started that way but evolved. Result is 100's of millions live better having more stuff they want for less money. McDonald's did the same to burger joints. Kentucky fried did it to chicken joints. So did Exxon and other big companies. Even Miller and Budweiser. Don't see local businesses making beer like they used too. So your point? It's all about the unions.. If the fat cats can't sit back, do nothing but stand between the management and labor to keep them fighting, and suck their own living off the backs of the laborers, they are not happy... It's clear you have a complete understanding of trade unionism from the short period of time you spent loading and moving crates in a warehouse. Snotty's doctorial thesis was on the dynamics of the union-employer relationship and how the libs have ****ed it all up. Heavy topic. Did you read the whole dissertation? Better than the one on "Why drunks and addicts won't seek help" |
#106
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/23/11 7:02 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/23/2011 6:12 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/23/11 5:34 PM, JustWait wrote: On 10/23/2011 5:10 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 23/10/2011 10:07 AM, wrote: On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 09:28:13 -0400, wrote: In , says... I guess I could point out it was the president from Little Rock, a couple miles from Bentonville, who signed the trade deals that took Walmart from being a small regional store to being the biggest retailer in the world ... selling chinese crap. Clinton was all about selling to the Chinese. That's how they got the technology to shoot down that satellite? It was our technology and they wanted to rub it in our face that they had it after Alemeda incident with the Hard Drives... Think of how much money Wal Mart has added to the U.S. Jobs, money, taxes, etc. They are a big part of our economy, but fools think that all the money goes to China! Walmart's profits came at the expense of the small mom and pop stores they displace so, at best it was a zero sum game. The reality is it was worse. Those "savings" come at the cost of other American businesses. Couldn't compete, evolve or die. Walmart started that way but evolved. Result is 100's of millions live better having more stuff they want for less money. McDonald's did the same to burger joints. Kentucky fried did it to chicken joints. So did Exxon and other big companies. Even Miller and Budweiser. Don't see local businesses making beer like they used too. So your point? It's all about the unions.. If the fat cats can't sit back, do nothing but stand between the management and labor to keep them fighting, and suck their own living off the backs of the laborers, they are not happy... It's clear you have a complete understanding of trade unionism from the short period of time you spent loading and moving crates in a warehouse. Hey, you think you are smart because your sister finally got her doctorate in her mid 60's from a diploma mill, I think I am smart because my dad worked (unlike you, on the labor side) for the union for almost 50 years... Your father didn't work for "the union," moron. He worked for Finast. |
#107
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#108
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article d97c6945-ed61-4295-9d89-fa2d4a64f8fc@
13g2000prp.googlegroups.com, says... On Oct 23, 3:01*pm, iBoaterer wrote: In article 5465a043-1a0f-42ca-8eea-cd26e2b69429 @v8g2000vbe.googlegroups.com, says... On Oct 23, 11:15*am, JustWait wrote: On 10/23/2011 5:44 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/23/11 1:12 AM, jps wrote: On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 21:29:52 -0400, X ` wrote: On 10/22/11 9:19 PM, JustWait wrote: On 10/22/2011 9:13 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/22/11 9:10 PM, jps wrote: On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:45:01 -0400, X ` wrote: On 10/22/11 5:14 PM, John H wrote: On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:05:52 -0400, wrote: On 10/22/2011 3:29 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 10/22/11 3:21 PM, John H wrote: On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 11:17:14 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 00:47:39 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:03:37 -0700, wrote: Citing rising costs, Wal-Mart, the nation?s largest private employer, told its employees this week that all future part-time employees who work less than 24 hours a week on average will no longer qualify for any of the company?s health insurance plans. In addition, any new employees who average 24 hours to 33 hours a week will no longer be able to include a spouse as part of their health care plan, although children can still be covered. This is a big shift from just a few years ago when Wal-Mart expanded coverage for employees and their families after facing criticism because so many of its 1.4 million workers could not afford or did not qualify for coverage ? rendering many of them eligible for Medicaid. Sweet. Send your employees to emergency rooms and medicaid so the taxpayers can cover it. Excellent strategy to bolster net profits for the company that imports more Communist Chinese goods to America than any other. Hey all you wingers, make sure to patronize Walmart cuz they believe in Jesus. I thought Obama care was going to fix all if this. Don't they have to provide coverage now? 2014? I don't know. I do know Obama care was going to raise costs and this is the excuse Walmart cites. They're low-wage employers. Getting the cheapest crap to sell at the highest margin using cheap labor is their business model. They're retailers for the Communist Chinese. It's nice that China has rising wages and rapidly expanding infrastructure. And the Heartland of America is funding it. Meanwhile, Walmart doesn't give a **** if its employees have to go to emergency rooms and medicare, cuz the tab gets picked up by Mr. and Mrs. America. Excellent. Have you checked out the 'Made in China' items at Home Depot lately? Your 'German' screwdrivers probably came from China originally - then repackaged in German containers. Amazing how you righties seem to "get off" on the proliferation of communist-made goods in our stores. One might think you prefer it to U.S.-made goods produced by American workers earning a decent wage. The unions, together with government's lack of aggressive trade policies ruined any chance for American made products being competitive on the free market Poor Harry. Reading comprehension not one of his strong points. What you meant to say is that "Harry is not an America-hating piece of trash whose only motivation is to loot the futures of the middle class so the outrageously wealthy can continue to enjoy their prolifigate lifestyles. Of course, I, John Herring, am not part of that wealthy crowd, but I've been brainwashed into thinking I might be, someday, but...I'll probably die of old age first. "Oh, and I, John Herring, hate blacks and Latinos, and think only a fetus has a right to life." http://tinyurl.com/3k43q4j Every hayseed yahoo like Herring thinks they're going to avoid getting taxed when they get rich. Herring isn't going to get rich unless he buys a winning lottery ticket. The funny thing is, he and his wife have always lived off the taxpayer, in the army, as teachers and as federal workers. How is that different than you living off of your landlord, she is a taxpayer, right? Last calendar year, *my* income from work was about 2-1/2 times that of my wife, and probably 10 times what yours was. This year is a little better for me. Of course, I'm not the magnate of an boatbuilding company and an internet reselling service. Snotty can't stand the thought of all these liberals making real money while his wife outstrips his own income by orders of magnitude. Snotty's world is upside down but he's smarter than all of us. Unless it involved pushing a broom, Snotty couldn't hold down a minimum wage job. Funny, your best friend here (bonnie the pig) pushed a broom for years, then cleaned a bar stool after work instead of raising his kids.. We all know the kind, they think they deserve to get souced every night and have the "old lady" stay home with the mutts... Harry, well he hasn't worked since high school, living off his families fortune, and now his sister Karen Grear... So sad...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I think you should be forced to submit to a drug test.... for the sake of Terry and the kids. I think you should clean up that filthy pig sty you live in, Suckling Don.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Why.. are you coming to visit? I wouldn't step foot in that **** hole you live in. |
#109
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#110
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
says... On 10/23/2011 5:32 PM, John H wrote: On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 11:58:09 -0400, wrote: On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 09:17:19 -0400, wrote: In articlemeadnSEc7dEzhD7TnZ2dnUVZ_tGdnZ2d@earthlink .com, says... On 10/22/11 3:21 PM, John H wrote: On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 11:17:14 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 00:47:39 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:03:37 -0700, wrote: Citing rising costs, Wal-Mart, the nation?s largest private employer, told its employees this week that all future part-time employees who work less than 24 hours a week on average will no longer qualify for any of the company?s health insurance plans. In addition, any new employees who average 24 hours to 33 hours a week will no longer be able to include a spouse as part of their health care plan, although children can still be covered. This is a big shift from just a few years ago when Wal-Mart expanded coverage for employees and their families after facing criticism because so many of its 1.4 million workers could not afford or did not qualify for coverage ? rendering many of them eligible for Medicaid. Sweet. Send your employees to emergency rooms and medicaid so the taxpayers can cover it. Excellent strategy to bolster net profits for the company that imports more Communist Chinese goods to America than any other. Hey all you wingers, make sure to patronize Walmart cuz they believe in Jesus. I thought Obama care was going to fix all if this. Don't they have to provide coverage now? 2014? I don't know. I do know Obama care was going to raise costs and this is the excuse Walmart cites. They're low-wage employers. Getting the cheapest crap to sell at the highest margin using cheap labor is their business model. They're retailers for the Communist Chinese. It's nice that China has rising wages and rapidly expanding infrastructure. And the Heartland of America is funding it. Meanwhile, Walmart doesn't give a **** if its employees have to go to emergency rooms and medicare, cuz the tab gets picked up by Mr. and Mrs. America. Excellent. Have you checked out the 'Made in China' items at Home Depot lately? Your 'German' screwdrivers probably came from China originally - then repackaged in German containers. Amazing how you righties seem to "get off" on the proliferation of communist-made goods in our stores. One might think you prefer it to U.S.-made goods produced by American workers earning a decent wage. IF the US made goods could compete price-wise, people would buy them. They can't. It's getting better, but they still are more expensive. The average US worker is being coddled so much that it just costs too much to manufacture here. Add to that that the heads of the companies need to rake in millions upon millions of dollars you end up with a ****ty economy where people can't afford those goods. That is the gist of what the wall street occupiers are rightfully protesting about. We will never be able to compete on price with slave labor. BTW I always hear about wage disparity but it is nothing here compared to China. One of those writers who spent a lot of tome in China was on Charley Rose the other night and described China a few miles out of the big city as a "Ming Dynasty" lifestyle. Under socialism, which the liberals are praying for, the rulers will live the same way. The poor class will be much larger, but they don't know that. They do, they just think they are all gonna' be on the inside cause "Obama is gonna' pay all our bills for us"... It amazes me how some of you conservatives are so narrow minded that you think everyone who's even slightly liberal is a complete socialist, and stupid enough to think that Obama is going to pay bills for someone. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Against medicaid except when she isn't. | General | |||
Walmart is Doomed | General | |||
WalMart for President! | ASA | |||
Olympic Coverage | General | |||
$89 WalMart charger | Electronics |