On 10/26/11 1:43 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/26/2011 1:16 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/26/11 11:55 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to
talk
them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our
military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the
get
go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing
congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing....

It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting
anybody do anything about our jobs problems.

Oh, and the quote I made about Libya and Oil you called bull****, uh
turned out to be more informed and accurate that you suggest?? Bad day
for those who really don't try to hear both sides today, huh?

Uh, we've been importers of Libyan oil for some time. We stopped very
recently when the sanctions were put on Qaddafi, but it isn't as if
Libya is or will be a new source of oil for the United States. We didn't
help depose Qaddafi because of Libya's oil.

You should find something you know something about, Ingersoll, and stick
with that. There must be something you know.

as usual your whole dissertation is based on a false premise... My
statement was that the oil is for France and Germany... always the liar
this Krause guy...



Your theory is that the French and Germans are going to invade Libya and
take it over? A rebirth of the Foreign Legion in North Africa and the
Afrika Corps? Where's Rommel?

On 10/26/11 2:07 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:16:35 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 10/26/11 11:55 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk
them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our
military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get
go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing
congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing....

It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting
anybody do anything about our jobs problems.

Oh, and the quote I made about Libya and Oil you called bull****, uh
turned out to be more informed and accurate that you suggest?? Bad day
for those who really don't try to hear both sides today, huh?

Uh, we've been importers of Libyan oil for some time. We stopped very
recently when the sanctions were put on Qaddafi, but it isn't as if
Libya is or will be a new source of oil for the United States. We didn't
help depose Qaddafi because of Libya's oil.

You should find something you know something about, Ingersoll, and stick
with that. There must be something you know.

He knows how to live off his wife's industry, work on motorcycles with
Chinese tools and camp.


I thought his wife was the "brains" behind the internet reselling company.

On 10/26/2011 2:36 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/26/11 2:07 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:16:35 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 10/26/11 11:55 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,

says...

The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems
to talk
them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our
military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from
the get
go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing
congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing....

It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting
anybody do anything about our jobs problems.

Oh, and the quote I made about Libya and Oil you called bull****, uh
turned out to be more informed and accurate that you suggest?? Bad day
for those who really don't try to hear both sides today, huh?

Uh, we've been importers of Libyan oil for some time. We stopped very
recently when the sanctions were put on Qaddafi, but it isn't as if
Libya is or will be a new source of oil for the United States. We didn't
help depose Qaddafi because of Libya's oil.

You should find something you know something about, Ingersoll, and stick
with that. There must be something you know.

He knows how to live off his wife's industry, work on motorcycles with
Chinese tools and camp.


I thought his wife was the "brains" behind the internet reselling company.

she is

On Oct 26, 2:02*pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 10/26/11 11:53 AM, JustWait wrote:





On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk
them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our
military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get
go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing
congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing....

It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting
anybody do anything about our jobs problems.

You do know there is a total of 15 republican sponsored jobs bills not
being allowed to be discussed or voted on in the Senate, right? Or did
Jon Stewart leave out that little tidbit? Remember, your interpretation
of the "mission accomplished" was proven to be miserably uninformed this
morning by a Navy Veteran? Just wondering, if you knew about who really
is holding up the jobs bills???

Those "job bills" are nothing more than GOP attempts to remove even more
societal safeguards against pollution, workplace safety, consumer
safety, and so forth. In other words, more bills aimed at transferring
more wealth to the wealthy.

You're quite the Fox News viewer...you have no money, you'll never have
any, and yet you side with the wealthy against your own economic interests.

Idiot.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

BINGO!

In article 063ecfe6-a263-4aaf-95d3-fe0ec5a41279
@r21g2000yqi.googlegroups.com, says...

On Oct 26, 2:02*pm, X ` Man dump-on-conservati...@anywhere-you-
can.com wrote:
On 10/26/11 11:53 AM, JustWait wrote:





On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk
them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our
military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get
go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing
congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing....

It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting
anybody do anything about our jobs problems.

You do know there is a total of 15 republican sponsored jobs bills not
being allowed to be discussed or voted on in the Senate, right? Or did
Jon Stewart leave out that little tidbit? Remember, your interpretation
of the "mission accomplished" was proven to be miserably uninformed this
morning by a Navy Veteran? Just wondering, if you knew about who really
is holding up the jobs bills???

Those "job bills" are nothing more than GOP attempts to remove even more
societal safeguards against pollution, workplace safety, consumer
safety, and so forth. In other words, more bills aimed at transferring
more wealth to the wealthy.

You're quite the Fox News viewer...you have no money, you'll never have
any, and yet you side with the wealthy against your own economic interests.

Idiot.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

BINGO!

Look, it's Suckling Don, once again acting as Harry's personal butt
plug.

On 26/10/2011 9:40 AM, JustWait wrote:
The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk
them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our
military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get
go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing
congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing....

Destroy the military? DC already spends more than the other 25 top
nations in the world combined!!! As if USA is at war with the entire
world. Fact is the military is more than 5 times the size that is needed.

Good place to save serious is to hack $500 billion from the $800 billion
military budget.

No setup, fact is USA no longer pays its bills with real money and
Monopoly Bernanke can't keep printing 0bama's debt spend forver.
Zimbawe tried that, and now a $100 trillion note is toilet paper.
Germany, Argentina, all who tried the money print ended up the same way,
even the Roman Empire going to tin coin replacing silver and gold.

Fact is DC is broke and overspending. 50% of what DC spends is
debt-money-print spend.

Do you or your your wife continuously spend twice as much as comes in?
It eventually leads to assured bankruptcy.

Too big to fail? Tell that to the countries that have tried this
before. Including the Roman Empire. Fact is USA is gong to see third
world status as the banking and currency system no longer have any
integrity. Once Europe has crashed, USA will not be far behind.
--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is
the problem.

On 26/10/2011 9:53 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk
them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our
military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get
go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing
congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing....

It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting
anybody do anything about our jobs problems.

You do know there is a total of 15 republican sponsored jobs bills not
being allowed to be discussed or voted on in the Senate, right? Or did
Jon Stewart leave out that little tidbit? Remember, your interpretation
of the "mission accomplished" was proven to be miserably uninformed this
morning by a Navy Veteran? Just wondering, if you knew about who really
is holding up the jobs bills???

Need more Tea Party in th senate to fix things so they move again. Too
many old time senators have long time ties with special interests to get
anything meaningful done.

Trouble witht he old farts int he senate, is they all want back room
deals and port for doing the right things. Time to clean up the senate
in 2012. Get new faces that are not so corrupt.
--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is
the problem.

On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:36:28 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 10/26/11 2:07 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:16:35 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 10/26/11 11:55 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to talk
them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our
military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the get
go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing
congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing....

It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting
anybody do anything about our jobs problems.

Oh, and the quote I made about Libya and Oil you called bull****, uh
turned out to be more informed and accurate that you suggest?? Bad day
for those who really don't try to hear both sides today, huh?

Uh, we've been importers of Libyan oil for some time. We stopped very
recently when the sanctions were put on Qaddafi, but it isn't as if
Libya is or will be a new source of oil for the United States. We didn't
help depose Qaddafi because of Libya's oil.

You should find something you know something about, Ingersoll, and stick
with that. There must be something you know.

He knows how to live off his wife's industry, work on motorcycles with
Chinese tools and camp.


I thought his wife was the "brains" behind the internet reselling company.

I don't think there's another brain in the family, unless the kids
were lucky enough to get a larger share of their mother's dna.

On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:34:13 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 10/26/11 1:43 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/26/2011 1:16 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/26/11 11:55 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to
talk
them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our
military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the
get
go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing
congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing....

It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting
anybody do anything about our jobs problems.

Oh, and the quote I made about Libya and Oil you called bull****, uh
turned out to be more informed and accurate that you suggest?? Bad day
for those who really don't try to hear both sides today, huh?

Uh, we've been importers of Libyan oil for some time. We stopped very
recently when the sanctions were put on Qaddafi, but it isn't as if
Libya is or will be a new source of oil for the United States. We didn't
help depose Qaddafi because of Libya's oil.

You should find something you know something about, Ingersoll, and stick
with that. There must be something you know.

as usual your whole dissertation is based on a false premise... My
statement was that the oil is for France and Germany... always the liar
this Krause guy...



Your theory is that the French and Germans are going to invade Libya and
take it over? A rebirth of the Foreign Legion in North Africa and the
Afrika Corps? Where's Rommel?


To Snotty, a dissertation is anything more than one complete sentence.

On 10/26/11 4:18 PM, jps wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:34:13 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 10/26/11 1:43 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/26/2011 1:16 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 10/26/11 11:55 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 10/26/2011 11:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

The "supercomittee" the republicans so stupidly allowed the dems to
talk
them into, was nothing but a way to stall, and eventually destroy our
military and the economy by doing nothing... It was a setup from the
get
go, I don't know why even after years of a democratic "do nothing
congress", they fell for this "sharing" thing....

It's just another day of the Republican obstructionists not letting
anybody do anything about our jobs problems.

Oh, and the quote I made about Libya and Oil you called bull****, uh
turned out to be more informed and accurate that you suggest?? Bad day
for those who really don't try to hear both sides today, huh?

Uh, we've been importers of Libyan oil for some time. We stopped very
recently when the sanctions were put on Qaddafi, but it isn't as if
Libya is or will be a new source of oil for the United States. We didn't
help depose Qaddafi because of Libya's oil.

You should find something you know something about, Ingersoll, and stick
with that. There must be something you know.

as usual your whole dissertation is based on a false premise... My
statement was that the oil is for France and Germany... always the liar
this Krause guy...



Your theory is that the French and Germans are going to invade Libya and
take it over? A rebirth of the Foreign Legion in North Africa and the
Afrika Corps? Where's Rommel?


To Snotty, a dissertation is anything more than one complete sentence.


Oh, dear.

Libya will sell its oil to anyone it wants, at market prices.