On 04/11/2011 9:01 AM, John H wrote:
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 19:44:25 -0700, wrote:

wrote in message ...

On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 08:38:45 -0400, wrote:

On 11/2/2011 7:55 AM, X ` Man wrote:
Report: Herman Cain's accuser got year's salary

By Catalina Camia, USA TODAY

Updated 7:48 a.m. ET

GOP presidential hopeful Herman Cain will be on the hot seat for the
third straight day as he deals with the controversy surrounding
allegations of sexual harassment when he led the National Restaurant
Association.

The New York Times today reports one of Cain's accusers received
$35,000, a year's salary, in severance pay after an incident with Cain
that made her uncomfortable. The story said the incident came "in the
context of a work outing during which there had been heavy drinking."

Joel Bennett, the attorney for another Cain accuser, said last night
that he plans to ask the National Restaurant Association to release his
client from a confidentiality agreement so she can tell her story.

"She's been very upset about this since the story broke...because Mr.
Cain has been giving the impression she came out and made false
allegations," Bennett said on CNN. "That's certainly not true."

Cain, who has maintained he was "falsely accused" of sexual harassment,
told Fox News on Tuesday night that he's not sure if he'll ask the
association to comply with Bennett's request. He suggested there could
be "legal implications," and said he would consult with his lawyers.

This story stinks. If the woman really got a settlement, she would have
had to sign a non disclosure agreement. I think she should have to give
the money back AND face breech of contract charges AND face defamation
of character charges. The sleazy DNC is probably paying her lawyers fees.

At least Joel Bennett has the brains to do it correctly.

What bull****. You apparently don't care that Cain is a perv. Not only
that, but your whole position is wrong. The woman hasn't made any
statements, although Cain has publicly called her a liar.

So, in rebuttal, please post what the woman said:


--------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds like your idol, Bill Clinton. You do remember he lied about Monica
in a deposition for a Sexual Harassment suit by Paula Jones. You said it
was nobody else's business then. At least be consistent.


I think the woman has decided to say nothing. She doesn't want to become another 'Anita Hill'. She's
letting her lawyer do the talking, i.e., saying nothing.

Probably waiting for liberal media to come up with $$$ for her story.
--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is
the problem.

On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:32:59 -0400, X ` Man wrote:

On 11/4/11 11:01 AM, John H wrote:
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 19:44:25 -0700, wrote:

wrote in message ...

On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 08:38:45 -0400, wrote:

On 11/2/2011 7:55 AM, X ` Man wrote:
Report: Herman Cain's accuser got year's salary

By Catalina Camia, USA TODAY

Updated 7:48 a.m. ET

GOP presidential hopeful Herman Cain will be on the hot seat for the
third straight day as he deals with the controversy surrounding
allegations of sexual harassment when he led the National Restaurant
Association.

The New York Times today reports one of Cain's accusers received
$35,000, a year's salary, in severance pay after an incident with Cain
that made her uncomfortable. The story said the incident came "in the
context of a work outing during which there had been heavy drinking."

Joel Bennett, the attorney for another Cain accuser, said last night
that he plans to ask the National Restaurant Association to release his
client from a confidentiality agreement so she can tell her story.

"She's been very upset about this since the story broke...because Mr.
Cain has been giving the impression she came out and made false
allegations," Bennett said on CNN. "That's certainly not true."

Cain, who has maintained he was "falsely accused" of sexual harassment,
told Fox News on Tuesday night that he's not sure if he'll ask the
association to comply with Bennett's request. He suggested there could
be "legal implications," and said he would consult with his lawyers.

This story stinks. If the woman really got a settlement, she would have
had to sign a non disclosure agreement. I think she should have to give
the money back AND face breech of contract charges AND face defamation
of character charges. The sleazy DNC is probably paying her lawyers fees.

At least Joel Bennett has the brains to do it correctly.

What bull****. You apparently don't care that Cain is a perv. Not only
that, but your whole position is wrong. The woman hasn't made any
statements, although Cain has publicly called her a liar.

So, in rebuttal, please post what the woman said:


--------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds like your idol, Bill Clinton. You do remember he lied about Monica
in a deposition for a Sexual Harassment suit by Paula Jones. You said it
was nobody else's business then. At least be consistent.


I think the woman has decided to say nothing. She doesn't want to become another 'Anita Hill'. She's
letting her lawyer do the talking, i.e., saying nothing.


One or perhaps both of the woman are not saying anything because of the
confidentiality agreement(s). I heard a report that a lawyer might
release a statement today in her behalf, but not reveal her name.

Meanwhile, Cain's campaign is claiming it might file a lawsuit against
Politico. If it does, it'll be even more embarrassing for Cain.

It's interesting that of all the GOP wannabes making the debate circuit
presentations, the only classy guy in there, Huntsman, is bringing up
the rear in the polls. The rest of the GOP'ers have more flies on them
than an Ozarkian outhouse in August.

She said she didn't want to be another Anita Hill after being released.

In other words, it's more liberal bull****.

On 11/4/11 1:52 PM, John H wrote:
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:32:59 -0400, X ` wrote:

On 11/4/11 11:01 AM, John H wrote:
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 19:44:25 -0700, wrote:

wrote in message ...

On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 08:38:45 -0400, wrote:

On 11/2/2011 7:55 AM, X ` Man wrote:
Report: Herman Cain's accuser got year's salary

By Catalina Camia, USA TODAY

Updated 7:48 a.m. ET

GOP presidential hopeful Herman Cain will be on the hot seat for the
third straight day as he deals with the controversy surrounding
allegations of sexual harassment when he led the National Restaurant
Association.

The New York Times today reports one of Cain's accusers received
$35,000, a year's salary, in severance pay after an incident with Cain
that made her uncomfortable. The story said the incident came "in the
context of a work outing during which there had been heavy drinking."

Joel Bennett, the attorney for another Cain accuser, said last night
that he plans to ask the National Restaurant Association to release his
client from a confidentiality agreement so she can tell her story.

"She's been very upset about this since the story broke...because Mr.
Cain has been giving the impression she came out and made false
allegations," Bennett said on CNN. "That's certainly not true."

Cain, who has maintained he was "falsely accused" of sexual harassment,
told Fox News on Tuesday night that he's not sure if he'll ask the
association to comply with Bennett's request. He suggested there could
be "legal implications," and said he would consult with his lawyers.

This story stinks. If the woman really got a settlement, she would have
had to sign a non disclosure agreement. I think she should have to give
the money back AND face breech of contract charges AND face defamation
of character charges. The sleazy DNC is probably paying her lawyers fees.

At least Joel Bennett has the brains to do it correctly.

What bull****. You apparently don't care that Cain is a perv. Not only
that, but your whole position is wrong. The woman hasn't made any
statements, although Cain has publicly called her a liar.

So, in rebuttal, please post what the woman said:


--------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds like your idol, Bill Clinton. You do remember he lied about Monica
in a deposition for a Sexual Harassment suit by Paula Jones. You said it
was nobody else's business then. At least be consistent.


I think the woman has decided to say nothing. She doesn't want to become another 'Anita Hill'. She's
letting her lawyer do the talking, i.e., saying nothing.


One or perhaps both of the woman are not saying anything because of the
confidentiality agreement(s). I heard a report that a lawyer might
release a statement today in her behalf, but not reveal her name.

Meanwhile, Cain's campaign is claiming it might file a lawsuit against
Politico. If it does, it'll be even more embarrassing for Cain.

It's interesting that of all the GOP wannabes making the debate circuit
presentations, the only classy guy in there, Huntsman, is bringing up
the rear in the polls. The rest of the GOP'ers have more flies on them
than an Ozarkian outhouse in August.

She said she didn't want to be another Anita Hill after being released.

In other words, it's more liberal bull****.


It's amazing how badly your burned-out brain processes. Too much Agent
Orange in the swill you drank while killing civilians in Vietnam?

On 11/4/11 3:32 PM, John H wrote:
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:58:33 -0400, X ` wrote:

On 11/4/11 1:52 PM, John H wrote:
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:32:59 -0400, X ` wrote:

On 11/4/11 11:01 AM, John H wrote:
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 19:44:25 -0700, wrote:

wrote in message ...

On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 08:38:45 -0400, wrote:

On 11/2/2011 7:55 AM, X ` Man wrote:
Report: Herman Cain's accuser got year's salary

By Catalina Camia, USA TODAY

Updated 7:48 a.m. ET

GOP presidential hopeful Herman Cain will be on the hot seat for the
third straight day as he deals with the controversy surrounding
allegations of sexual harassment when he led the National Restaurant
Association.

The New York Times today reports one of Cain's accusers received
$35,000, a year's salary, in severance pay after an incident with Cain
that made her uncomfortable. The story said the incident came "in the
context of a work outing during which there had been heavy drinking."

Joel Bennett, the attorney for another Cain accuser, said last night
that he plans to ask the National Restaurant Association to release his
client from a confidentiality agreement so she can tell her story.

"She's been very upset about this since the story broke...because Mr.
Cain has been giving the impression she came out and made false
allegations," Bennett said on CNN. "That's certainly not true."

Cain, who has maintained he was "falsely accused" of sexual harassment,
told Fox News on Tuesday night that he's not sure if he'll ask the
association to comply with Bennett's request. He suggested there could
be "legal implications," and said he would consult with his lawyers.

This story stinks. If the woman really got a settlement, she would have
had to sign a non disclosure agreement. I think she should have to give
the money back AND face breech of contract charges AND face defamation
of character charges. The sleazy DNC is probably paying her lawyers fees.

At least Joel Bennett has the brains to do it correctly.

What bull****. You apparently don't care that Cain is a perv. Not only
that, but your whole position is wrong. The woman hasn't made any
statements, although Cain has publicly called her a liar.

So, in rebuttal, please post what the woman said:


--------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds like your idol, Bill Clinton. You do remember he lied about Monica
in a deposition for a Sexual Harassment suit by Paula Jones. You said it
was nobody else's business then. At least be consistent.


I think the woman has decided to say nothing. She doesn't want to become another 'Anita Hill'. She's
letting her lawyer do the talking, i.e., saying nothing.


One or perhaps both of the woman are not saying anything because of the
confidentiality agreement(s). I heard a report that a lawyer might
release a statement today in her behalf, but not reveal her name.

Meanwhile, Cain's campaign is claiming it might file a lawsuit against
Politico. If it does, it'll be even more embarrassing for Cain.

It's interesting that of all the GOP wannabes making the debate circuit
presentations, the only classy guy in there, Huntsman, is bringing up
the rear in the polls. The rest of the GOP'ers have more flies on them
than an Ozarkian outhouse in August.

She said she didn't want to be another Anita Hill after being released.

In other words, it's more liberal bull****.


It's amazing how badly your burned-out brain processes. Too much Agent
Orange in the swill you drank while killing civilians in Vietnam?

Lame insults and grade-school name-calling - the trademarks of a true liberal.


Hey, you were over there. How many non-combatant civilians did you kill?

On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:58:33 -0400, X ` Man wrote:

On 11/4/11 1:52 PM, John H wrote:
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:32:59 -0400, X ` wrote:

On 11/4/11 11:01 AM, John H wrote:
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 19:44:25 -0700, wrote:

wrote in message ...

On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 08:38:45 -0400, wrote:

On 11/2/2011 7:55 AM, X ` Man wrote:
Report: Herman Cain's accuser got year's salary

By Catalina Camia, USA TODAY

Updated 7:48 a.m. ET

GOP presidential hopeful Herman Cain will be on the hot seat for the
third straight day as he deals with the controversy surrounding
allegations of sexual harassment when he led the National Restaurant
Association.

The New York Times today reports one of Cain's accusers received
$35,000, a year's salary, in severance pay after an incident with Cain
that made her uncomfortable. The story said the incident came "in the
context of a work outing during which there had been heavy drinking."

Joel Bennett, the attorney for another Cain accuser, said last night
that he plans to ask the National Restaurant Association to release his
client from a confidentiality agreement so she can tell her story.

"She's been very upset about this since the story broke...because Mr.
Cain has been giving the impression she came out and made false
allegations," Bennett said on CNN. "That's certainly not true."

Cain, who has maintained he was "falsely accused" of sexual harassment,
told Fox News on Tuesday night that he's not sure if he'll ask the
association to comply with Bennett's request. He suggested there could
be "legal implications," and said he would consult with his lawyers.

This story stinks. If the woman really got a settlement, she would have
had to sign a non disclosure agreement. I think she should have to give
the money back AND face breech of contract charges AND face defamation
of character charges. The sleazy DNC is probably paying her lawyers fees.

At least Joel Bennett has the brains to do it correctly.

What bull****. You apparently don't care that Cain is a perv. Not only
that, but your whole position is wrong. The woman hasn't made any
statements, although Cain has publicly called her a liar.

So, in rebuttal, please post what the woman said:


--------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds like your idol, Bill Clinton. You do remember he lied about Monica
in a deposition for a Sexual Harassment suit by Paula Jones. You said it
was nobody else's business then. At least be consistent.


I think the woman has decided to say nothing. She doesn't want to become another 'Anita Hill'. She's
letting her lawyer do the talking, i.e., saying nothing.


One or perhaps both of the woman are not saying anything because of the
confidentiality agreement(s). I heard a report that a lawyer might
release a statement today in her behalf, but not reveal her name.

Meanwhile, Cain's campaign is claiming it might file a lawsuit against
Politico. If it does, it'll be even more embarrassing for Cain.

It's interesting that of all the GOP wannabes making the debate circuit
presentations, the only classy guy in there, Huntsman, is bringing up
the rear in the polls. The rest of the GOP'ers have more flies on them
than an Ozarkian outhouse in August.

She said she didn't want to be another Anita Hill after being released.

In other words, it's more liberal bull****.


It's amazing how badly your burned-out brain processes. Too much Agent
Orange in the swill you drank while killing civilians in Vietnam?

Lame insults and grade-school name-calling - the trademarks of a true liberal.

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:58:33 -0400, X ` Man wrote:

On 11/4/11 1:52 PM, John H wrote:
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:32:59 -0400, X ` wrote:

On 11/4/11 11:01 AM, John H wrote:
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 19:44:25 -0700, wrote:

wrote in message ...

On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 08:38:45 -0400, wrote:

On 11/2/2011 7:55 AM, X ` Man wrote:
Report: Herman Cain's accuser got year's salary

By Catalina Camia, USA TODAY

Updated 7:48 a.m. ET

GOP presidential hopeful Herman Cain will be on the hot seat for the
third straight day as he deals with the controversy surrounding
allegations of sexual harassment when he led the National Restaurant
Association.

The New York Times today reports one of Cain's accusers received
$35,000, a year's salary, in severance pay after an incident with Cain
that made her uncomfortable. The story said the incident came "in the
context of a work outing during which there had been heavy drinking."

Joel Bennett, the attorney for another Cain accuser, said last night
that he plans to ask the National Restaurant Association to release his
client from a confidentiality agreement so she can tell her story.

"She's been very upset about this since the story broke...because Mr.
Cain has been giving the impression she came out and made false
allegations," Bennett said on CNN. "That's certainly not true."

Cain, who has maintained he was "falsely accused" of sexual harassment,
told Fox News on Tuesday night that he's not sure if he'll ask the
association to comply with Bennett's request. He suggested there could
be "legal implications," and said he would consult with his lawyers.

This story stinks. If the woman really got a settlement, she would have
had to sign a non disclosure agreement. I think she should have to give
the money back AND face breech of contract charges AND face defamation
of character charges. The sleazy DNC is probably paying her lawyers fees.

At least Joel Bennett has the brains to do it correctly.

What bull****. You apparently don't care that Cain is a perv. Not only
that, but your whole position is wrong. The woman hasn't made any
statements, although Cain has publicly called her a liar.

So, in rebuttal, please post what the woman said:


--------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds like your idol, Bill Clinton. You do remember he lied about Monica
in a deposition for a Sexual Harassment suit by Paula Jones. You said it
was nobody else's business then. At least be consistent.


I think the woman has decided to say nothing. She doesn't want to become another 'Anita Hill'. She's
letting her lawyer do the talking, i.e., saying nothing.


One or perhaps both of the woman are not saying anything because of the
confidentiality agreement(s). I heard a report that a lawyer might
release a statement today in her behalf, but not reveal her name.

Meanwhile, Cain's campaign is claiming it might file a lawsuit against
Politico. If it does, it'll be even more embarrassing for Cain.

It's interesting that of all the GOP wannabes making the debate circuit
presentations, the only classy guy in there, Huntsman, is bringing up
the rear in the polls. The rest of the GOP'ers have more flies on them
than an Ozarkian outhouse in August.

She said she didn't want to be another Anita Hill after being released.

In other words, it's more liberal bull****.


It's amazing how badly your burned-out brain processes. Too much Agent
Orange in the swill you drank while killing civilians in Vietnam?

Lame insults and grade-school name-calling - the trademarks of a true liberal.

Lumping everyone into one small narrow minded corner again, I see.

On 11/4/2011 11:32 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/4/11 11:01 AM, John H wrote:
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 19:44:25 -0700,
wrote:

wrote in message ...

On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 08:38:45 -0400, wrote:

On 11/2/2011 7:55 AM, X ` Man wrote:
Report: Herman Cain's accuser got year's salary

By Catalina Camia, USA TODAY

Updated 7:48 a.m. ET

GOP presidential hopeful Herman Cain will be on the hot seat for the
third straight day as he deals with the controversy surrounding
allegations of sexual harassment when he led the National Restaurant
Association.

The New York Times today reports one of Cain's accusers received
$35,000, a year's salary, in severance pay after an incident with Cain
that made her uncomfortable. The story said the incident came "in the
context of a work outing during which there had been heavy drinking."

Joel Bennett, the attorney for another Cain accuser, said last night
that he plans to ask the National Restaurant Association to release
his
client from a confidentiality agreement so she can tell her story.

"She's been very upset about this since the story broke...because Mr.
Cain has been giving the impression she came out and made false
allegations," Bennett said on CNN. "That's certainly not true."

Cain, who has maintained he was "falsely accused" of sexual
harassment,
told Fox News on Tuesday night that he's not sure if he'll ask the
association to comply with Bennett's request. He suggested there could
be "legal implications," and said he would consult with his lawyers.

This story stinks. If the woman really got a settlement, she would have
had to sign a non disclosure agreement. I think she should have to give
the money back AND face breech of contract charges AND face defamation
of character charges. The sleazy DNC is probably paying her lawyers
fees.

At least Joel Bennett has the brains to do it correctly.

What bull****. You apparently don't care that Cain is a perv. Not only
that, but your whole position is wrong. The woman hasn't made any
statements, although Cain has publicly called her a liar.

So, in rebuttal, please post what the woman said:


--------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds like your idol, Bill Clinton. You do remember he lied about
Monica
in a deposition for a Sexual Harassment suit by Paula Jones. You said it
was nobody else's business then. At least be consistent.


I think the woman has decided to say nothing. She doesn't want to
become another 'Anita Hill'. She's
letting her lawyer do the talking, i.e., saying nothing.


One or perhaps both of the woman are not saying anything because of the
confidentiality agreement(s). I heard a report that a lawyer might
release a statement today in her behalf, but not reveal her name.

Meanwhile, Cain's campaign is claiming it might file a lawsuit against
Politico. If it does, it'll be even more embarrassing for Cain.

It's interesting that of all the GOP wannabes making the debate circuit
presentations, the only classy guy in there, Huntsman, is bringing up
the rear in the polls. The rest of the GOP'ers have more flies on them
than an Ozarkian outhouse in August.

Think hard now Mr. Pufferfish. Who was the last classy president you
supported?

--
1-20-13 The end of an error