Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/8/11 10:12 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 11/8/2011 8:32 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 11/7/11 11:05 PM, Eisboch wrote: . BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend with. Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off the wall to convince me he's POTUS material anyway. Cain is just plain creepy, but so is Perry. Gingrich is morally compromised in many ways. There are too many important issues Ron Paul cares nothing about. Huntsman and Johnson aren't far right enough to get traction in the GOP. That leaves Romney. I think he's a rational guy and compared to the other GOP frontrunners, is a gold standard, but I don't see him beating Obama. Blah, blah, blah.. you are not capable of anything else... I know, I know...we "progressives" are capable of thinking and then putting our thoughts down in complete sentences, and that really ****es off you teabaggers. Instead of blah, blah, blah, you boys go grunt, grunt, grunt. |
#32
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 23:05:48 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
"jps" wrote in message ... On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 22:32:06 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 20:08:45 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: 62 doesn't make you old, unless your interaction with the world has stopped evolving. --------------------------------------------------- In many ways I think our society has become carried away with "political correctness". 42 years ago I often told a young, very attractive woman how beautiful she was. She didn't sue me. She married me. Eisboch Was your wife someone else's girlfriend at the time, standing right there? I totally understand the sentiment but doing that in the presence of your friend/her boyfriend seems out of place, even if it happened in the era of free love. Telling a woman she's beautiful is one of the best pickup lines there are!!! It's also a good way to soften the wife. -------------------------------------------------------- I don't know your age, but I know that 42 years ago it wasn't a "pickup" line. It was considered a compliment and it was sincere. Yeah, maybe I have stopped my social evolution ..... thankfully. Tip-Toeing through the tulips isn't exactly my style. BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend with. Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off the wall to convince me he's POTUS material anyway. The guy is in love with the platitude. Bumper stickers, 999, whatever it takes to motivate people is what Herman likes. He's a simp. A darker, slightly more male Sarah Palin. |
#33
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:34:37 -0500, X ` Man
wrote: On 11/8/11 10:12 AM, JustWait wrote: On 11/8/2011 8:32 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 11/7/11 11:05 PM, Eisboch wrote: . BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend with. Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off the wall to convince me he's POTUS material anyway. Cain is just plain creepy, but so is Perry. Gingrich is morally compromised in many ways. There are too many important issues Ron Paul cares nothing about. Huntsman and Johnson aren't far right enough to get traction in the GOP. That leaves Romney. I think he's a rational guy and compared to the other GOP frontrunners, is a gold standard, but I don't see him beating Obama. Blah, blah, blah.. you are not capable of anything else... I know, I know...we "progressives" are capable of thinking and then putting our thoughts down in complete sentences, and that really ****es off you teabaggers. Instead of blah, blah, blah, you boys go grunt, grunt, grunt. Clever thoughts always seem liberal to Snotty. |
#34
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/8/2011 3:31 PM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:34:37 -0500, X ` wrote: On 11/8/11 10:12 AM, JustWait wrote: On 11/8/2011 8:32 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 11/7/11 11:05 PM, Eisboch wrote: . BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend with. Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off the wall to convince me he's POTUS material anyway. Cain is just plain creepy, but so is Perry. Gingrich is morally compromised in many ways. There are too many important issues Ron Paul cares nothing about. Huntsman and Johnson aren't far right enough to get traction in the GOP. That leaves Romney. I think he's a rational guy and compared to the other GOP frontrunners, is a gold standard, but I don't see him beating Obama. Blah, blah, blah.. you are not capable of anything else... I know, I know...we "progressives" are capable of thinking and then putting our thoughts down in complete sentences, and that really ****es off you teabaggers. Instead of blah, blah, blah, you boys go grunt, grunt, grunt. Clever thoughts always seem liberal to Snotty. Clever? You consider the same old dried up fourth grade bigotry and one liners from Harry, clever? LOL! |
#35
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/8/11 5:14 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 11/8/2011 3:31 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:34:37 -0500, X ` wrote: On 11/8/11 10:12 AM, JustWait wrote: On 11/8/2011 8:32 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 11/7/11 11:05 PM, Eisboch wrote: . BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend with. Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off the wall to convince me he's POTUS material anyway. Cain is just plain creepy, but so is Perry. Gingrich is morally compromised in many ways. There are too many important issues Ron Paul cares nothing about. Huntsman and Johnson aren't far right enough to get traction in the GOP. That leaves Romney. I think he's a rational guy and compared to the other GOP frontrunners, is a gold standard, but I don't see him beating Obama. Blah, blah, blah.. you are not capable of anything else... I know, I know...we "progressives" are capable of thinking and then putting our thoughts down in complete sentences, and that really ****es off you teabaggers. Instead of blah, blah, blah, you boys go grunt, grunt, grunt. Clever thoughts always seem liberal to Snotty. Clever? You consider the same old dried up fourth grade bigotry and one liners from Harry, clever? LOL! Bigotry? I voted for the black guy in the last presidential election. |
#36
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 17:20:40 -0500, X ` Man
wrote: On 11/8/11 5:14 PM, JustWait wrote: On 11/8/2011 3:31 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:34:37 -0500, X ` wrote: On 11/8/11 10:12 AM, JustWait wrote: On 11/8/2011 8:32 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 11/7/11 11:05 PM, Eisboch wrote: . BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend with. Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off the wall to convince me he's POTUS material anyway. Cain is just plain creepy, but so is Perry. Gingrich is morally compromised in many ways. There are too many important issues Ron Paul cares nothing about. Huntsman and Johnson aren't far right enough to get traction in the GOP. That leaves Romney. I think he's a rational guy and compared to the other GOP frontrunners, is a gold standard, but I don't see him beating Obama. Blah, blah, blah.. you are not capable of anything else... I know, I know...we "progressives" are capable of thinking and then putting our thoughts down in complete sentences, and that really ****es off you teabaggers. Instead of blah, blah, blah, you boys go grunt, grunt, grunt. Clever thoughts always seem liberal to Snotty. Clever? You consider the same old dried up fourth grade bigotry and one liners from Harry, clever? LOL! Bigotry? I voted for the black guy in the last presidential election. You voted for the black guy because you knew he was the better choice, regardless of color. Among candidates presently announced, he's still the better choice. If anyone with a brain and some integrity showed up on the Republican side, they wouldn't give 'em a second look, just like Huntsman. He's the only guy on their side with a good chance of beating Obama and they haven't a clue. The collective consciousness on the right hovers just about Snotty's intellectual elevation. They're not about to back someone who can win when they can rally around a platitude flinging pig like Cain. |
#37
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
X ` Man wrote:
On 11/8/11 5:14 PM, JustWait wrote: On 11/8/2011 3:31 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:34:37 -0500, X ` wrote: On 11/8/11 10:12 AM, JustWait wrote: On 11/8/2011 8:32 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 11/7/11 11:05 PM, Eisboch wrote: . BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend with. Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off the wall to convince me he's POTUS material anyway. Cain is just plain creepy, but so is Perry. Gingrich is morally compromised in many ways. There are too many important issues Ron Paul cares nothing about. Huntsman and Johnson aren't far right enough to get traction in the GOP. That leaves Romney. I think he's a rational guy and compared to the other GOP frontrunners, is a gold standard, but I don't see him beating Obama. Blah, blah, blah.. you are not capable of anything else... I know, I know...we "progressives" are capable of thinking and then putting our thoughts down in complete sentences, and that really ****es off you teabaggers. Instead of blah, blah, blah, you boys go grunt, grunt, grunt. Clever thoughts always seem liberal to Snotty. Clever? You consider the same old dried up fourth grade bigotry and one liners from Harry, clever? LOL! Bigotry? I voted for the black guy in the last presidential election. There weren't any black candidates on that ballot. You voted for a guy who is 1/2 black, silly. -HB |
#38
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/8/2011 7:41 PM, Honey Badger wrote:
X ` Man wrote: On 11/8/11 5:14 PM, JustWait wrote: On 11/8/2011 3:31 PM, jps wrote: On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 10:34:37 -0500, X ` wrote: On 11/8/11 10:12 AM, JustWait wrote: On 11/8/2011 8:32 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 11/7/11 11:05 PM, Eisboch wrote: . BTW ... it sure appears Cain has some serious problems to contend with. Really doesn't matter to me. Guilty or not, the guy is too far off the wall to convince me he's POTUS material anyway. Cain is just plain creepy, but so is Perry. Gingrich is morally compromised in many ways. There are too many important issues Ron Paul cares nothing about. Huntsman and Johnson aren't far right enough to get traction in the GOP. That leaves Romney. I think he's a rational guy and compared to the other GOP frontrunners, is a gold standard, but I don't see him beating Obama. Blah, blah, blah.. you are not capable of anything else... I know, I know...we "progressives" are capable of thinking and then putting our thoughts down in complete sentences, and that really ****es off you teabaggers. Instead of blah, blah, blah, you boys go grunt, grunt, grunt. Clever thoughts always seem liberal to Snotty. Clever? You consider the same old dried up fourth grade bigotry and one liners from Harry, clever? LOL! Bigotry? I voted for the black guy in the last presidential election. There weren't any black candidates on that ballot. You voted for a guy who is 1/2 black, silly. -HB snerk racists always crack me up, next he will be telling us about all his black friends ![]() |
#39
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#40
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
It just gets better and better for Herman Cain | General | |||
Third Shoe Drops on Cain | General | |||
Cain, a different direction | General | |||
Top Ten Reasons to support Herman Cain. | General |