In article , dump-on-
says...

On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.


I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.


And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent? Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

You are wrong again, dumb ****. They are very reliable and fully
admissible in a court of law.

On Nov 13, 10:10*am, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...







On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.

I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.

And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent? Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

You are wrong again, dumb ****. They are very reliable and fully
admissible in a court of law.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Huh? Maybe down in RedNeck land.

In article 7ddf5f62-f4ef-4009-bdcf-5876c97e8663
@o5g2000yqa.googlegroups.com, says...

On Nov 13, 10:10*am, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...







On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.

I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.

And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent? Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

You are wrong again, dumb ****. They are very reliable and fully
admissible in a court of law.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Huh? Maybe down in RedNeck land.

Oh, Suckling Don, stop, you're just making yourself look stupid(er). So
are you backing out of that $500 bet you proposed, coward? You know, the
one where you wanted to bet $500 that John is right in that I am Kevin?
It's fun when you yourself prove to everyone what a coward you are!

On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 20:07:47 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

On 11/12/11 7:58 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 4:11 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election,
according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more
important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.


I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with
you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.


And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent? Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

While I don't believe they are foolproof, properly applied in an
unbiased way is often more reliable than the options of biased self
serving people.

For example if Cain took a polygraph and passed, and the women refused,
I would then say the woman were likely lying.

While not absolute, it is better than politically motivated accusations
with little substance that can be proven. Hey, Cain (and the public) has
the right to also have the accusers be known and make a statement. I
believe in truth before legal bull**** like pleading the 5th.

Yet main stream propaganda media almost ignores Solyndra and other 0bama
indiscretions. Pretty obvious the masses are a managed herd.


Polygraphs are bull****, no matter what you believe.

Canook builds a straw man out of bull****. The first woman to come
forward that could speak openly is a life long Republican who is a tea
party supporter.

No one has accused her of being a Bachmann plant to cut into Cain's
tea party support (which is significantly more plausible given the
woman's political leanings) but they've accused the "Democrat
machine."

Delusions are a favorite past time for these people, including Canook.

On 11/13/11 1:52 PM, North Star wrote:
On Nov 13, 10:10 am, wrote:
In articleytudnZJGiIaiYCPTnZ2dnUVZ_qyXn...@earthlink .com, dump-on-
says...







On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.

I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.

And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent? Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

You are wrong again, dumb ****. They are very reliable and fully
admissible in a court of law.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Huh? Maybe down in RedNeck land.


In the majority of states in the US, it isn't admissible. It's
pseudoscientific bull****.

On 11/13/11 2:31 PM, jps wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 20:07:47 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

On 11/12/11 7:58 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 4:11 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election,
according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more
important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.


I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with
you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.


And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent? Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

While I don't believe they are foolproof, properly applied in an
unbiased way is often more reliable than the options of biased self
serving people.

For example if Cain took a polygraph and passed, and the women refused,
I would then say the woman were likely lying.

While not absolute, it is better than politically motivated accusations
with little substance that can be proven. Hey, Cain (and the public) has
the right to also have the accusers be known and make a statement. I
believe in truth before legal bull**** like pleading the 5th.

Yet main stream propaganda media almost ignores Solyndra and other 0bama
indiscretions. Pretty obvious the masses are a managed herd.


Polygraphs are bull****, no matter what you believe.

Canook builds a straw man out of bull****. The first woman to come
forward that could speak openly is a life long Republican who is a tea
party supporter.

No one has accused her of being a Bachmann plant to cut into Cain's
tea party support (which is significantly more plausible given the
woman's political leanings) but they've accused the "Democrat
machine."

Delusions are a favorite past time for these people, including Canook.


The majority of righties here are living in a parallel world of hate and
self-deception.

On 13/11/2011 12:31 PM, jps wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 20:07:47 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

On 11/12/11 7:58 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 4:11 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election,
according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more
important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.


I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with
you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.


And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent? Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

While I don't believe they are foolproof, properly applied in an
unbiased way is often more reliable than the options of biased self
serving people.

For example if Cain took a polygraph and passed, and the women refused,
I would then say the woman were likely lying.

While not absolute, it is better than politically motivated accusations
with little substance that can be proven. Hey, Cain (and the public) has
the right to also have the accusers be known and make a statement. I
believe in truth before legal bull**** like pleading the 5th.

Yet main stream propaganda media almost ignores Solyndra and other 0bama
indiscretions. Pretty obvious the masses are a managed herd.


Polygraphs are bull****, no matter what you believe.

Canook builds a straw man out of bull****. The first woman to come
forward that could speak openly is a life long Republican who is a tea
party supporter.

What? You think Rep is supposed to be pure and Dem Clinton gets a bye?

No one has accused her of being a Bachmann plant to cut into Cain's
tea party support (which is significantly more plausible given the
woman's political leanings) but they've accused the "Democrat
machine."

I figure Bachmann is keeping low, let the dirt bags destroy each other
and come up the middle. Good strategy if that is what her campaign is
up too.

Delusions are a favorite past time for these people, including Canook.

Including us all. Just fleabaggers are more delusional than others.
--
The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is
the problem.

On 11/13/2011 2:58 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/13/11 2:31 PM, jps wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 20:07:47 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

On 11/12/11 7:58 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 4:11 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election,
according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by
Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen
percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most
likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more
important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one
who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.


I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with
you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who
has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.


And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent?
Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

While I don't believe they are foolproof, properly applied in an
unbiased way is often more reliable than the options of biased self
serving people.

For example if Cain took a polygraph and passed, and the women refused,
I would then say the woman were likely lying.

While not absolute, it is better than politically motivated accusations
with little substance that can be proven. Hey, Cain (and the public)
has
the right to also have the accusers be known and make a statement. I
believe in truth before legal bull**** like pleading the 5th.

Yet main stream propaganda media almost ignores Solyndra and other
0bama
indiscretions. Pretty obvious the masses are a managed herd.


Polygraphs are bull****, no matter what you believe.

Canook builds a straw man out of bull****. The first woman to come
forward that could speak openly is a life long Republican who is a tea
party supporter.

No one has accused her of being a Bachmann plant to cut into Cain's
tea party support (which is significantly more plausible given the
woman's political leanings) but they've accused the "Democrat
machine."

Delusions are a favorite past time for these people, including Canook.


The majority of righties here are living in a parallel world of hate and
self-deception.

Are you ****ing crazy. We have been out living life all day while you
have been her crying and whining about your miserable life all day long.
Jess took down another pro national rider today... Next year is gonna'
be a good year

On 11/13/11 5:36 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 11/13/2011 2:58 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/13/11 2:31 PM, jps wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 20:07:47 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

On 11/12/11 7:58 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 4:11 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah
Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election,
according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since
the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by
Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen
percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most
likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority
when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more
important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one
who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.


I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees
with
you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who
has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to
nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.


And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent?
Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

While I don't believe they are foolproof, properly applied in an
unbiased way is often more reliable than the options of biased self
serving people.

For example if Cain took a polygraph and passed, and the women
refused,
I would then say the woman were likely lying.

While not absolute, it is better than politically motivated
accusations
with little substance that can be proven. Hey, Cain (and the public)
has
the right to also have the accusers be known and make a statement. I
believe in truth before legal bull**** like pleading the 5th.

Yet main stream propaganda media almost ignores Solyndra and other
0bama
indiscretions. Pretty obvious the masses are a managed herd.


Polygraphs are bull****, no matter what you believe.

Canook builds a straw man out of bull****. The first woman to come
forward that could speak openly is a life long Republican who is a tea
party supporter.

No one has accused her of being a Bachmann plant to cut into Cain's
tea party support (which is significantly more plausible given the
woman's political leanings) but they've accused the "Democrat
machine."

Delusions are a favorite past time for these people, including Canook.


The majority of righties here are living in a parallel world of hate and
self-deception.

Are you ****ing crazy. We have been out living life all day while you
have been her crying and whining about your miserable life all day long.
Jess took down another pro national rider today... Next year is gonna'
be a good year


Yawn.

On 11/13/2011 5:42 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/13/11 5:36 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 11/13/2011 2:58 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/13/11 2:31 PM, jps wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 20:07:47 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

On 11/12/11 7:58 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 4:11 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah
Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto.

Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the
most
likely
candidate to beat President Obama in the general election,
according to
a new CBS News poll.

Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since
the
beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT
by a
2-to-1
margin with 40 percent support.

Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by
Newt
Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen
percent of
respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most
likely to
beat Mr. Obama.

Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority
when
selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more
important
to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one
who can
beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite.
- - -

Love it.

Game, set, match.


I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees
with
you
on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who
has a
chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to
nominate a
loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me.


And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent?
Could
turn this race real quick.

Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****.

While I don't believe they are foolproof, properly applied in an
unbiased way is often more reliable than the options of biased self
serving people.

For example if Cain took a polygraph and passed, and the women
refused,
I would then say the woman were likely lying.

While not absolute, it is better than politically motivated
accusations
with little substance that can be proven. Hey, Cain (and the public)
has
the right to also have the accusers be known and make a statement. I
believe in truth before legal bull**** like pleading the 5th.

Yet main stream propaganda media almost ignores Solyndra and other
0bama
indiscretions. Pretty obvious the masses are a managed herd.


Polygraphs are bull****, no matter what you believe.

Canook builds a straw man out of bull****. The first woman to come
forward that could speak openly is a life long Republican who is a tea
party supporter.

No one has accused her of being a Bachmann plant to cut into Cain's
tea party support (which is significantly more plausible given the
woman's political leanings) but they've accused the "Democrat
machine."

Delusions are a favorite past time for these people, including Canook.


The majority of righties here are living in a parallel world of hate and
self-deception.

Are you ****ing crazy. We have been out living life all day while you
have been her crying and whining about your miserable life all day long.
Jess took down another pro national rider today... Next year is gonna'
be a good year


Yawn.

Best you stay in your basement and yawn. If you come out, it might be
your last venture... Remember that girl you called a slut? He daddy is
down in your area for a few months working and he does have your info