Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Electabiilty not important
CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton,
Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto. Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most likely candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to a new CBS News poll. Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a 2-to-1 margin with 40 percent support. Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to beat Mr. Obama. Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite. - - - Love it. |
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Electabiilty not important
On 11/11/2011 5:07 PM, X ` Man wrote:
CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton, Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto. Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most likely candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to a new CBS News poll. Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a 2-to-1 margin with 40 percent support. Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to beat Mr. Obama. Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite. - - - Love it. It is called democracy. -- The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is the problem. |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Electabiilty not important
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man
wrote: CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton, Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto. Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most likely candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to a new CBS News poll. Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a 2-to-1 margin with 40 percent support. Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to beat Mr. Obama. Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite. - - - Love it. Game, set, match. |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Electabiilty not important
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote:
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man wrote: CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton, Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto. Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most likely candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to a new CBS News poll. Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a 2-to-1 margin with 40 percent support. Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to beat Mr. Obama. Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite. - - - Love it. Game, set, match. I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with you on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me. |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Electabiilty not important
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote: On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man wrote: CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton, Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto. Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most likely candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to a new CBS News poll. Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a 2-to-1 margin with 40 percent support. Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to beat Mr. Obama. Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite. - - - Love it. Game, set, match. I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with you on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me. And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent? Could turn this race real quick. Gingrich is part of the DC inner circle of corruption. Tea Party should just beak off and form their own right now. Perry is just another clown from the old boys network. Only two viable left are Cain and Bachmann. And Cain needs to fight these accusations or he is out. Sad state is shaping up in the next election. You can choose any pony you want from the ponies presented to you from the corrupt back room boys club. DC needs fresh faces. -- The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is the problem. |
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Electabiilty not important
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote: On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man wrote: CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton, Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto. Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most likely candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to a new CBS News poll. Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a 2-to-1 margin with 40 percent support. Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to beat Mr. Obama. Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite. - - - Love it. Game, set, match. I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with you on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me. And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent? Could turn this race real quick. Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****. |
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Electabiilty not important
On 12/11/2011 4:11 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote: On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man wrote: CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton, Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto. Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most likely candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to a new CBS News poll. Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a 2-to-1 margin with 40 percent support. Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to beat Mr. Obama. Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite. - - - Love it. Game, set, match. I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with you on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me. And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent? Could turn this race real quick. Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****. While I don't believe they are foolproof, properly applied in an unbiased way is often more reliable than the options of biased self serving people. For example if Cain took a polygraph and passed, and the women refused, I would then say the woman were likely lying. While not absolute, it is better than politically motivated accusations with little substance that can be proven. Hey, Cain (and the public) has the right to also have the accusers be known and make a statement. I believe in truth before legal bull**** like pleading the 5th. Yet main stream propaganda media almost ignores Solyndra and other 0bama indiscretions. Pretty obvious the masses are a managed herd. -- The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is the problem. |
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Electabiilty not important
On 11/12/11 7:58 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 12/11/2011 4:11 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote: On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man wrote: CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton, Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto. Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most likely candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to a new CBS News poll. Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a 2-to-1 margin with 40 percent support. Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to beat Mr. Obama. Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite. - - - Love it. Game, set, match. I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with you on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me. And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent? Could turn this race real quick. Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****. While I don't believe they are foolproof, properly applied in an unbiased way is often more reliable than the options of biased self serving people. For example if Cain took a polygraph and passed, and the women refused, I would then say the woman were likely lying. While not absolute, it is better than politically motivated accusations with little substance that can be proven. Hey, Cain (and the public) has the right to also have the accusers be known and make a statement. I believe in truth before legal bull**** like pleading the 5th. Yet main stream propaganda media almost ignores Solyndra and other 0bama indiscretions. Pretty obvious the masses are a managed herd. Polygraphs are bull****, no matter what you believe. |
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Electabiilty not important
On 12/11/2011 6:07 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/12/11 7:58 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 12/11/2011 4:11 PM, X ` Man wrote: On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote: On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man wrote: CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton, Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto. Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most likely candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to a new CBS News poll. Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a 2-to-1 margin with 40 percent support. Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to beat Mr. Obama. Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite. - - - Love it. Game, set, match. I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with you on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me. And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent? Could turn this race real quick. Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****. While I don't believe they are foolproof, properly applied in an unbiased way is often more reliable than the options of biased self serving people. For example if Cain took a polygraph and passed, and the women refused, I would then say the woman were likely lying. While not absolute, it is better than politically motivated accusations with little substance that can be proven. Hey, Cain (and the public) has the right to also have the accusers be known and make a statement. I believe in truth before legal bull**** like pleading the 5th. Yet main stream propaganda media almost ignores Solyndra and other 0bama indiscretions. Pretty obvious the masses are a managed herd. Polygraphs are bull****, no matter what you believe. Less bull**** than a fleabagger like you. -- The reason government can't fix the economic problems is government is the problem. |
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Electabiilty not important
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:11:59 -0500, X ` Man
wrote: On 11/12/11 4:01 PM, Canuck57 wrote: On 12/11/2011 5:37 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 11/12/11 4:43 AM, jps wrote: On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:25 -0500, X ` Man wrote: CBS News Poll analysis by the CBS News Polling Unit: Sarah Dutton, Jennifer De Pinto, Fred Backus and Anthony Salvanto. Four out of ten Republicans believe Mitt Romney would be the most likely candidate to beat President Obama in the general election, according to a new CBS News poll. Romney, who has lingered at or near the top of the polls since the beginning of the 2012 presidential race, led Herman Cain CUT by a 2-to-1 margin with 40 percent support. Cain trailed in the category with just 20 percent, followed by Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry, each with six percent. Thirteen percent of respondents said they didn't know which candidate was most likely to beat Mr. Obama. Electability, however, was not most Republicans' top priority when selecting a candidate: 58 percent said they believe it's more important to have a nominee who agrees with them on the issues than one who can beat Mr. Obama next year. Thirty-nine percent said the opposite. - - - Love it. Game, set, match. I'm not sure what the point is of having a candidate who agrees with you on all the issues rather than one who disagrees on some but who has a chance of getting elected but, hey, if the Repubs want to nominate a loser like Gingrich, Cain, or Perry, it's fine with me. And you base your opinion on what? And what if Cain comes through with the polygraph and is innocent? Could turn this race real quick. Don't know much about polygraphs, eh? They're bull****. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
*THIS* is important... | General | |||
The most important food to take is... | General | |||
Important Information | General | |||
Important... | ASA |