On 11/29/2011 4:03 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 11/29/11 4:04 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:15:45 -0500, X `
wrote:

On 11/29/11 2:27 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:16:20 -0800, wrote:

On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:46:20 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:


So how long have you been subscribing to that ****. It didn't look
very safe, but the title probably
rings your chimes.

Be careful. Could be some bad virus stuff there!


Scratch around all you want, Herring. There's no doubt you're a racist
p.o.s.

Gosh, Harry, being called a name by the likes of you is almost an honor.

Talk to ya next year. Hold your breath!


As if I give a tinker's dam about what you think or feel.
You're a dirtbag. I feel sorry for your family, which seems nice. Must
be your wife's influence.



Get a handle on that negativity and sour disposition.

--
1-20-13 The end of an error

On 11/29/2011 1:42 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:03:12 -0500, wrote:

On 11/29/2011 10:01 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:55:42 -0500, wrote:

On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 22:40:01 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 22:00:53 -0500, wrote:

And you piling on pieces of **** that "will BELIEVE" until proven
wrong? Here it is. And you a

JustWait
Drifter
Wayne B.

===

I found the same obit from Feb 8, 2004:

"Father Of
Larmondo, Jr., Christian, Kwan, Deidra, Larmonshell, Larmonshea,
Larmomdriel, Larmonja, Darriell And Koreyell.'

I count 10 children.

Where is the error? Is there possiblly a very legitmate question of
responsibility when a 25 y/o fathers 10 children?

http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg...&GRid=47809085

Different question. Is there any legitimate responsibility involved in
the birth of what is likely 10 illegitimate children? Does it take two
to tango?

Personally, I don't find any problem with sterilizing people with this
obviously absolute lack of social responsibility. However, there is no
court in the land that would agree with me.

Wow, talk about a racist post!

Racist? From DePlume? Are you kidding?

Well, she's the one talking about sterilizing blacks.

Surprising! Wasn't long ago she was singing Obama's praises and
apologizing for his lack of presidential leadership.

--
1-20-13 The end of an error

On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 17:46:42 -0500, Drifter wrote:

On 11/29/2011 1:42 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:03:12 -0500, wrote:

On 11/29/2011 10:01 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:55:42 -0500, wrote:

On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 22:40:01 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 22:00:53 -0500, wrote:

And you piling on pieces of **** that "will BELIEVE" until proven
wrong? Here it is. And you a

JustWait
Drifter
Wayne B.

===

I found the same obit from Feb 8, 2004:

"Father Of
Larmondo, Jr., Christian, Kwan, Deidra, Larmonshell, Larmonshea,
Larmomdriel, Larmonja, Darriell And Koreyell.'

I count 10 children.

Where is the error? Is there possiblly a very legitmate question of
responsibility when a 25 y/o fathers 10 children?

http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg...&GRid=47809085

Different question. Is there any legitimate responsibility involved in
the birth of what is likely 10 illegitimate children? Does it take two
to tango?

Personally, I don't find any problem with sterilizing people with this
obviously absolute lack of social responsibility. However, there is no
court in the land that would agree with me.

Wow, talk about a racist post!

Racist? From DePlume? Are you kidding?

Well, she's the one talking about sterilizing blacks.

Surprising! Wasn't long ago she was singing Obama's praises and
apologizing for his lack of presidential leadership.

I'm surprised Krause hasn't jumped all over her for her racist ****. And, you're right...with regard
to all his hatred, he needs to cry a river, build a bridge, and get over it.

"Drifter" wrote in message
b.com...

On 11/29/2011 9:56 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:14:10 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:35:14 -0700,
wrote:


Funny, while I agree being black in a dysfunctional culture is more
likely for welfare, plenty of white trash are too.

None racist, kick them all off and replace it with drug tests and
workfare. Can't show up, then no welfare. No more free lay on your
back making babies for government money.

we should be giving drug tests to hedgefund managers. they take much
more of our money and are more dangerous than some punk would ever be

I agree with that post. Anyone using illegal drugs should suffer the
threat of losing a job. Perhaps
that would lower demand somewhat.

What can you threaten the many unemployed drug users with?

--
1-20-13 The end of an error


------------------------------------

loss of welfare payments.

On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:43:31 -0800, "Califbill" wrote:

"Drifter" wrote in message
eb.com...

On 11/29/2011 9:56 AM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:14:10 -0500, wrote:

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:35:14 -0700,
wrote:


Funny, while I agree being black in a dysfunctional culture is more
likely for welfare, plenty of white trash are too.

None racist, kick them all off and replace it with drug tests and
workfare. Can't show up, then no welfare. No more free lay on your
back making babies for government money.

we should be giving drug tests to hedgefund managers. they take much
more of our money and are more dangerous than some punk would ever be

I agree with that post. Anyone using illegal drugs should suffer the
threat of losing a job. Perhaps
that would lower demand somewhat.

What can you threaten the many unemployed drug users with?

And they should be taking drug tests also.

On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:43:31 -0800, "Califbill"
wrote:

What can you threaten the many unemployed drug users with?

===

If they consent to being sent off to an island somewhere, we should
give them all the free drugs they want. If they don't consent, jail.

Is it constitutional, ethical or practical? Don't know.

Is there an island big enough? Don't know that either.

Maybe we could annex the city of Detroit and build a wall around it.
Just about everyone left there is using drugs anyway.

Someone just came out with a study that shows that the crime rate in
an area drops when the price of cocaine drops. If the price dropped
to zero, would drug crime go to zero also? Interesting experiment.
Maybe we should pick a city like Detroit and do a test. Some people
would move there on their own, wouldn't have to be sent.

Some European countries do something similar with a registered addict
program. We need some creative thinking about the drug issue because
what we're doing now certainly isn't working.

On 11/30/11 2:02 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:43:31 -0800, "Califbill"
wrote:

What can you threaten the many unemployed drug users with?

===

If they consent to being sent off to an island somewhere, we should
give them all the free drugs they want. If they don't consent, jail.


Good solution for the corporation execs, banks, and wall street whores
who have robbed this country of its future. You could ferry them to the
island. Herring could prepare their meals. iSnotty could be Nick Nack,
the dwarf manservant.

On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 15:15:03 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

On 11/30/11 2:02 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:43:31 -0800, "Califbill"
wrote:

What can you threaten the many unemployed drug users with?

===

If they consent to being sent off to an island somewhere, we should
give them all the free drugs they want. If they don't consent, jail.


Good solution for the corporation execs

===

Too bad you never achieved any success in the corporate world Harry.
Maybe you should have worked a little harder and chucked some of your
personality issues?

On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 22:56:59 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 15:15:03 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

On 11/30/11 2:02 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:43:31 -0800, "Califbill"
wrote:

What can you threaten the many unemployed drug users with?

===

If they consent to being sent off to an island somewhere, we should
give them all the free drugs they want. If they don't consent, jail.


Good solution for the corporation execs

===

Too bad you never achieved any success in the corporate world Harry.
Maybe you should have worked a little harder and chucked some of your
personality issues?

"the corporate world" is a world most of the participants can't wait
to escape. What happens there has little to do with business and lots
to do with manipulation, maneuvering, keeping one's head below the
horizon and getting out with something to speak of.

Entrepreneurship is where people with balls, perseverance and the will
to succeed end up.

On 11/30/11 10:56 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 15:15:03 -0500, X `
wrote:

On 11/30/11 2:02 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:43:31 -0800, "Califbill"
wrote:

What can you threaten the many unemployed drug users with?

===

If they consent to being sent off to an island somewhere, we should
give them all the free drugs they want. If they don't consent, jail.


Good solution for the corporation execs

=== c
Too bad you never achieved any success in the corporate world Harry.
Maybe you should have worked a little harder and chucked some of your
personality issues?


D'oh. I was a "successful" employee at several corporations, whine.
About halfway through my career days, after more than a decade of
dealing with corporate pukes like you, I decided to give up the security
blanket of "corporate life" and strike out on my own.
I guess you never had the balls to do that, eh? And you're still a herd
animal.



http://flickr.com/gp/hakr/8272ug