On 12/18/11 12:29 PM, Happy JH wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 10:58:35 -0500, X ` wrote:

On 12/18/11 10:56 AM, Happy JH wrote:


It's a shame lead weights don't kill mute swans.

http://www.chesapeakebay.net/muteswa...menuitem=16930

The same could be said for you and yours.

Pretty sick, Harry.

I guess you're in favor of a strong mute swan population in the bay? Do you read anything at all
about the bay? Here, learn something. I'd sign you up, but then you'd probably accuse me of
'stalking' you.


I've never been a "mankind uber alles" kind of guy, herring. It's too
bad the swans were introduced here but, after all, it was man that did
it, by importing them, and now you want to kill them all because it
didn't work out the way your ancestors here intended?



--
http://flickr.com/gp/hakr/oR82kN

On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:49:35 -0500, X ` Man wrote:

On 12/18/11 12:29 PM, Happy JH wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 10:58:35 -0500, X ` wrote:

On 12/18/11 10:56 AM, Happy JH wrote:


It's a shame lead weights don't kill mute swans.

http://www.chesapeakebay.net/muteswa...menuitem=16930

The same could be said for you and yours.

Pretty sick, Harry.

I guess you're in favor of a strong mute swan population in the bay? Do you read anything at all
about the bay? Here, learn something. I'd sign you up, but then you'd probably accuse me of
'stalking' you.


I've never been a "mankind uber alles" kind of guy, herring. It's too
bad the swans were introduced here but, after all, it was man that did
it, by importing them, and now you want to kill them all because it
didn't work out the way your ancestors here intended?

Kill them because they're causing the death of many of the species native to the bay. Has nothing to
do with my ancestors.

Do some more reading.

On 12/18/11 1:04 PM, Happy JH wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:49:35 -0500, X ` wrote:

On 12/18/11 12:29 PM, Happy JH wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 10:58:35 -0500, X ` wrote:

On 12/18/11 10:56 AM, Happy JH wrote:


It's a shame lead weights don't kill mute swans.

http://www.chesapeakebay.net/muteswa...menuitem=16930

The same could be said for you and yours.

Pretty sick, Harry.

I guess you're in favor of a strong mute swan population in the bay? Do you read anything at all
about the bay? Here, learn something. I'd sign you up, but then you'd probably accuse me of
'stalking' you.


I've never been a "mankind uber alles" kind of guy, herring. It's too
bad the swans were introduced here but, after all, it was man that did
it, by importing them, and now you want to kill them all because it
didn't work out the way your ancestors here intended?

Kill them because they're causing the death of many of the species native to the bay. Has nothing to
do with my ancestors.

Do some more reading.

You do realize the native Americans can say the same about you, right?

--
http://flickr.com/gp/hakr/oR82kN

On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 13:06:41 -0500, X ` Man wrote:

On 12/18/11 1:04 PM, Happy JH wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:49:35 -0500, X ` wrote:

On 12/18/11 12:29 PM, Happy JH wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 10:58:35 -0500, X ` wrote:

On 12/18/11 10:56 AM, Happy JH wrote:


It's a shame lead weights don't kill mute swans.

http://www.chesapeakebay.net/muteswa...menuitem=16930

The same could be said for you and yours.

Pretty sick, Harry.

I guess you're in favor of a strong mute swan population in the bay? Do you read anything at all
about the bay? Here, learn something. I'd sign you up, but then you'd probably accuse me of
'stalking' you.


I've never been a "mankind uber alles" kind of guy, herring. It's too
bad the swans were introduced here but, after all, it was man that did
it, by importing them, and now you want to kill them all because it
didn't work out the way your ancestors here intended?

Kill them because they're causing the death of many of the species native to the bay. Has nothing to
do with my ancestors.

Do some more reading.

You do realize the native Americans can say the same about you, right?

Actually, I'm not doing much damage to species in the bay. And, what native Americans do or say has
little to do with the damage caused by mute swans in the Chesapeake Bay.

On 12/18/11 1:36 PM, Happy JH wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 13:06:41 -0500, X ` wrote:

On 12/18/11 1:04 PM, Happy JH wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:49:35 -0500, X ` wrote:

On 12/18/11 12:29 PM, Happy JH wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 10:58:35 -0500, X ` wrote:

On 12/18/11 10:56 AM, Happy JH wrote:


It's a shame lead weights don't kill mute swans.

http://www.chesapeakebay.net/muteswa...menuitem=16930

The same could be said for you and yours.

Pretty sick, Harry.

I guess you're in favor of a strong mute swan population in the bay? Do you read anything at all
about the bay? Here, learn something. I'd sign you up, but then you'd probably accuse me of
'stalking' you.


I've never been a "mankind uber alles" kind of guy, herring. It's too
bad the swans were introduced here but, after all, it was man that did
it, by importing them, and now you want to kill them all because it
didn't work out the way your ancestors here intended?

Kill them because they're causing the death of many of the species native to the bay. Has nothing to
do with my ancestors.

Do some more reading.

You do realize the native Americans can say the same about you, right?

Actually, I'm not doing much damage to species in the bay. And, what native Americans do or say has
little to do with the damage caused by mute swans in the Chesapeake Bay.









Whoosh.

--
http://flickr.com/gp/hakr/oR82kN

On Dec 17, 10:45*pm, Bob Crachet wrote:
http://outdoornews.com/massachusetts...8c3-11e1-8d54-...

Hilarious...like thats gonna be enforced. Too funny. Cross-posting
asswipe.

On Dec 18, 11:21*am, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...







On 12/18/11 11:07 AM, Drifter wrote:
On 12/18/2011 10:58 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 12/18/11 10:56 AM, Happy JH wrote:

It's a shame lead weights don't kill mute swans.

http://www.chesapeakebay.net/muteswa...menuitem=16930

The same could be said for you and yours.

Now you're extending your death wishes to "you and yours". When it comes
to being an asshole, you never disappoint.

Swans mate for life, ****-for-brains...herring would like nothing more
than to wipe them out. I know the swans are pests but, in the scheme of
things, they contribute their beauty and certainly have as much right to
life as herrings.

Uh, they are an invasive species. If you really cared about ecology
you'd know that they are destructive.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

On 12/17/2011 10:45 PM, Bob Crachet wrote:
http://outdoornews.com/massachusetts...871e3ce6c.html


I notice they let the buzz bait and fly manufacturers off the hook
(pardon the pun) as it were...

On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 19:51:26 -0500, JustWait wrote:

On 12/17/2011 10:45 PM, Bob Crachet wrote:
http://outdoornews.com/massachusetts...871e3ce6c.html


I notice they let the buzz bait and fly manufacturers off the hook
(pardon the pun) as it were...

Don't recall the use of much lead in flies or buzz baits.

On 12/18/11 8:20 PM, Happy JH wrote:
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 19:51:26 -0500, wrote:

On 12/17/2011 10:45 PM, Bob Crachet wrote:
http://outdoornews.com/massachusetts...871e3ce6c.html


I notice they let the buzz bait and fly manufacturers off the hook
(pardon the pun) as it were...

Don't recall the use of much lead in flies or buzz baits.


Many who tie their own flies use lead wire to give the end product a bit
of weight. There are wire products that can be used in place of lead. If
memory serves, and it's been a long time since I fished lakes with buzz
baits...some of them use lead heads.



--
http://flickr.com/gp/hakr/oR82kN