On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 20:53:25 -0500, X ` Man wrote:

On 3/2/12 8:31 PM, Happy John wrote:
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:20:22 -0500, X ` wrote:

On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote:
I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention that it be political. I
received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary.

http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933


From CBN and it's not political?

Hehehe.

Right.

I had no idea what CBN was until your comment. Is the article I posted political? I think not. Is
this political: http://www.cbn.com/finance/calculato...geSavings.aspx
I think not.

I don't think every article in the Washington Post or the NY Times is political either. Why do you
imply that the source of news makes the news 'political'?


CBN is nothing but right-wing political. Period.

Just as much as the Washington Post is nothing but left-wing political. Period.

On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 20:55:44 -0500, X ` Man wrote:

On 3/2/12 8:33 PM, Happy John wrote:
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:59:59 -0500, X ` wrote:

On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote:
I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention
that it be political. I
received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary.

http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933


From CBN and it's not political?

Hehehe.

Right.

It has already started he

http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html



We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious
attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ
from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have
Muslims here.

Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie.




Harry, do you agree with the activities of the Muslims in Paris and the failure of the police to
stop it?

I'm concerned about the crazy christian conservatives who want to turn
the united states into a theocracy. I'll let the french handle their own
problems.

Question unanswered. Can you not simply carry on a conversation? The post had nothing to do with
conservatives versus Muslims. I respect beliefs of Muslims as much as those of Christians, Jews,
Buddhists, etc. The post had to do with the violations of rights by folks exercising a belief.

On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 21:13:43 -0500, JustWait wrote:

On 3/2/2012 8:55 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/2/12 8:33 PM, Happy John wrote:
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:59:59 -0500, X `
wrote:

On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote:
I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention
that it be political. I
received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary.

http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933


From CBN and it's not political?

Hehehe.

Right.

It has already started he

http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html




We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious
attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ
from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have
Muslims here.

Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie.




Harry, do you agree with the activities of the Muslims in Paris and
the failure of the police to
stop it?

I'm concerned about the crazy christian conservatives who want to turn
the united states into a theocracy. I'll let the french handle their own
problems.

Can you name one of those Crazy Conservatives... Cause the Muslims are
really making changes over there, taking land, occupying and subverting
the laws... I will wait for you to show me the CC doing that here?

Don't let Harry make it a Christian versus Muslim issue. It's not. It's a rights issue.

On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 08:20:04 -0500, X ` Man wrote:

On 3/3/12 8:15 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On 3/2/12 9:14 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 3/2/2012 8:53 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/2/12 8:31 PM, Happy John wrote:
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:20:22 -0500, X `
wrote:

On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote:
I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no
intention that it be political. I
received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary.

http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933


From CBN and it's not political?

Hehehe.

Right.

I had no idea what CBN was until your comment. Is the article I posted
political? I think not. Is
this political:
http://www.cbn.com/finance/calculato...geSavings.aspx
I think not.

I don't think every article in the Washington Post or the NY Times is
political either. Why do you
imply that the source of news makes the news 'political'?


CBN is nothing but right-wing political. Period.

Do you think the events shown on the video are not real because of the
source?


Are you asking me if they've been..."Breitbarted..." ? On CBN? The odds
are pretty good they have. CBN, after all, is Pat Robertson's scam
broadcasting operation.

When was the 1st amendment repealed?



The question, mr. undereducated, was whether the scammy pat robertson
christian broadcasting network had credibility, not whether it could
broadcast the crap it does. Go back to school and learn how to read for
content.

The question had to do with a clear violation of the rights of citizens to enter their own property.

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote:
I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention
that it be political. I
received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary.

http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933


From CBN and it's not political?

Hehehe.

Right.

It has already started he

http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html



We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious
attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ
from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have
Muslims here.

Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie.

What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind
and those with a political axe to grind.

Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy
just like that.

Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy?

Neither. And neither did our founding fathers.

Read the declaration of independence again. We were founded with an
acknowledgment of God's grace and that everyone could practice their
religion without interference by others. Contrary to popular belief
there is not separation of church and state.

On 3/3/2012 9:00 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,
says...

In ,
says...

On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote:
I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention
that it be political. I
received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary.

http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933


From CBN and it's not political?

Hehehe.

Right.

It has already started he

http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html



We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious
attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ
from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have
Muslims here.

Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie.

What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind
and those with a political axe to grind.

Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy
just like that.

Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy?

That suggestion about Santorm is just more DNC hyper-bull**** spread by
the MSM...

On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 09:10:23 -0500, X ` Man wrote:

On 3/3/12 9:03 AM, BAR wrote:
In b.com,
says...

On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 08:20:04 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:
On 3/3/12 8:15 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,

says...

On 3/2/12 9:14 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 3/2/2012 8:53 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/2/12 8:31 PM, Happy John wrote:
On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 17:20:22 -0500, X `
wrote:

On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote:
I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no
intention that it be political. I
received the link in an email and thought it was pretty
scary.


http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933


From CBN and it's not political?

Hehehe.

Right.

I had no idea what CBN was until your comment. Is the article
I posted
political? I think not. Is
this political:
http://www.cbn.com/finance/calculato...geSavings.aspx
I think not.

I don't think every article in the Washington Post or the NY
Times is
political either. Why do you
imply that the source of news makes the news 'political'?


CBN is nothing but right-wing political. Period.

Do you think the events shown on the video are not real because
of the
source?


Are you asking me if they've been..."Breitbarted..." ? On CBN?
The odds
are pretty good they have. CBN, after all, is Pat Robertson's
scam
broadcasting operation.

When was the 1st amendment repealed?




The question, mr. undereducated, was whether the scammy pat
robertson
christian broadcasting network had credibility, not whether it
could
broadcast the crap it does. Go back to school and learn how to read
for
content.

I see Harry is back in his personal attack and insult mode. He
doesn't seem to have any self restraint

Harry is too easy.


Harry thinks that you don't understand what you read and therefore often
jump in with an "argument" that has nothing to do with the subject under
discussion.


Harry, if you'll go back and look at this thread, you'll see that you've just described yourself to
a 'T'.

Congratulations.

On 3/3/2012 9:02 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/3/12 9:00 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,
says...

In ,
says...

On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote:
I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no
intention
that it be political. I
received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary.

http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933


From CBN and it's not political?

Hehehe.

Right.

It has already started he

http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html




We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious
attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ
from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have
Muslims here.

Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie.

What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind
and those with a political axe to grind.

Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy
just like that.

Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy?


What's the difference?

Try telling a joke about Catholics, then tell the same one about Muslims
here and you will see...

On 3/3/2012 9:05 AM, BAR wrote:
In article5sydnaa0EsQUuc_SnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on-
says...

On 3/3/12 9:00 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

In ,
says...

In ,
says...

On 3/2/12 5:49 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 3/2/2012 5:20 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 3/2/12 4:32 PM, Happy John wrote:
I hope this is not taken as a 'political' post. There is no intention
that it be political. I
received the link in an email and thought it was pretty scary.

http://downloads.cbn.com/cbnnewsplay....swf?aid=17933


From CBN and it's not political?

Hehehe.

Right.

It has already started he

http://news.yahoo.com/judge-dismisse...204051912.html



We have a long history in this country of the self-described religious
attacking/isolating/discriminating against those whose beliefs differ
from theirs, a history that began long before anyone noticed we have
Muslims here.

Such religious bigotry is as American as apple pie.

What is the difference between those who have a religious axe to grind
and those with a political axe to grind.

Exactly! When the Ayatollah Santorum has his way, we'll be a theocracy
just like that.

Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy?


What's the difference?

The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked
all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you
freak out.



It's raw fear...

On 3/3/12 9:54 AM, BAR wrote:
In articleyKadnQGdHZuEt8_SnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink .com, dump-on-
says...


Do you want to be a Catholic theocracy or a Muslim theocracy?


What's the difference?

The problem is that you lefties are willing to lay down and be walked
all over by the Muslims but, when it is any form of Christianity you
freak out.




Really? I don't recall saying or implying that I am "willing to lay down
and be walked all over by Muslims." You should cut back on those magic
'shrooms.

Don't start projecting your recreational activities onto me or others.

As a student of history (actual history, not the "conservative" view of
history), I don't see the difference between being slaughtered by
christian zealots or by muslim zealots, the two religious groups under
discussion in this thread. Both religions have a long and bloody history
of slaughter in the name of the faith.

Actions speak louder than words Harry. Your actions and your fellow
lefty's action's belie your words.


My actions? What actions of mine in preferring to being slaughtered
by christian or muslim zealots? I don't see the difference. If you are
killed by a religious fanatic, you are just as dead, whether that
fanatic be christian or muslim. Or are you trying to contend that
muslims kill in the name of religion and christians don't? That's nonsense.



I also don't "freak out" about christianity. To me, it's just another
superstition-based collection of beliefs. My objections arise when its
practitioners attempt to force their religious beliefs onto my secular
society. I'm having many good laughs these days watching the "christian"
political zealots fall on their swords over womens' reproductive health
issues.

We don't have a secular society. Never have and never will.

Yeah, we do. You just don't understand what the word means.



Women's reproductive health? This is a joke and most people can see
right through the "issue." The poor student Ms. Fluke is a 30 year old
woman who is going to Georgetown Law on a "public interest"
(http://www.law.georgetown.edu/pils/) scholarship. Her whole "beef" is
that someone else isn't paying for her birth control pills. Her argument
falls apart when it comes down to the low cost of condoms.

When a 30 year old woman stands up and says I want someone else to pay
for my birth control pills while I attend law school on a scholarship,
she doesn't garner sympathy from the majority of the country.


Ahh. You read Limbaugh's explanation of her testimony, not her
testimony. Lights out. Good night.