| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Those small transfers
On 6/18/2012 3:27 PM, wrote:
On Saturday, June 16, 2012 5:46:06 PM UTC-4, (unknown) wrote: On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 12:43:51 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 11:16:21 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:14:51 -0700, wrote: On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:25:27 -0400, wrote: And does that forgive people from following the law? That is what the romans said about crucifixion. That's why they say if you don't like a law, change it. You equate crucifixion and by extension persecution to lying under oath and being granted bail? Seems hysterical. It's the law, and very well-settled at that. Yet you don't care if people lie on voter registrations and jury summonses. Strange. You're now putting words in my mouth. Have you debate skills left you completely? We should indeed apply the law to people who we catch falsifying legal documents but to disenfranchise 182,000 voters because you suspect some of them are illegal voters is a complete ruse. The only reason they're doing it is to keep the wrong people from voting. With wrong meaning people who'd vote for the wrong party. It's astounding that you have such a hard time admitting this bull**** and continue to defend this bull**** as if it was something other than bull****. Jesus, Greg, wtf? The original inquiry was about people who voted and refused jury duty because they were not citizens. That was a pretty big number. I am not sure how that got to 182,000 tho. All I said was to prosecute THOSE people for perjury. Perhaps you are putting words in my mouth. The state actually only had 2600 on the list. The officials said that there could be as many as 182,000, but that number never seemed to make it to a list. Makes for a good talking point, though. They wanted to check against a federal list, but the feds stonewalled that, last I heard. Funny thing is, the list is just for illegals that aren't supposed to vote. Why would anyone have an issue with getting rid of invalid, illegal voters? It's not targeting a list of DNC members, it's going after ILLEGAL VOTERS! Funnier still that the left wants the votes they think these illegal voters will give them so badly that they'll ignore the law and file lawsuits just to keep these tainted votes. Do they have no shame? None at all, no national pride, no moral code. That's Americas Left! |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Those small transfers
On 6/18/12 4:53 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 6/18/2012 3:27 PM, wrote: On Saturday, June 16, 2012 5:46:06 PM UTC-4, (unknown) wrote: On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 12:43:51 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 11:16:21 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:14:51 -0700, wrote: On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:25:27 -0400, wrote: And does that forgive people from following the law? That is what the romans said about crucifixion. That's why they say if you don't like a law, change it. You equate crucifixion and by extension persecution to lying under oath and being granted bail? Seems hysterical. It's the law, and very well-settled at that. Yet you don't care if people lie on voter registrations and jury summonses. Strange. You're now putting words in my mouth. Have you debate skills left you completely? We should indeed apply the law to people who we catch falsifying legal documents but to disenfranchise 182,000 voters because you suspect some of them are illegal voters is a complete ruse. The only reason they're doing it is to keep the wrong people from voting. With wrong meaning people who'd vote for the wrong party. It's astounding that you have such a hard time admitting this bull**** and continue to defend this bull**** as if it was something other than bull****. Jesus, Greg, wtf? The original inquiry was about people who voted and refused jury duty because they were not citizens. That was a pretty big number. I am not sure how that got to 182,000 tho. All I said was to prosecute THOSE people for perjury. Perhaps you are putting words in my mouth. The state actually only had 2600 on the list. The officials said that there could be as many as 182,000, but that number never seemed to make it to a list. Makes for a good talking point, though. They wanted to check against a federal list, but the feds stonewalled that, last I heard. Funny thing is, the list is just for illegals that aren't supposed to vote. Why would anyone have an issue with getting rid of invalid, illegal voters? It's not targeting a list of DNC members, it's going after ILLEGAL VOTERS! Funnier still that the left wants the votes they think these illegal voters will give them so badly that they'll ignore the law and file lawsuits just to keep these tainted votes. Do they have no shame? None at all, no national pride, no moral code. That's Americas Left! One of my pet cats earns more each year than you do. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Those small transfers
|
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Those small transfers
In article , says...
On 6/18/2012 3:27 PM, wrote: On Saturday, June 16, 2012 5:46:06 PM UTC-4, (unknown) wrote: On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 12:43:51 -0700, wrote: On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 11:16:21 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:14:51 -0700, wrote: On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:25:27 -0400, wrote: And does that forgive people from following the law? That is what the romans said about crucifixion. That's why they say if you don't like a law, change it. You equate crucifixion and by extension persecution to lying under oath and being granted bail? Seems hysterical. It's the law, and very well-settled at that. Yet you don't care if people lie on voter registrations and jury summonses. Strange. You're now putting words in my mouth. Have you debate skills left you completely? We should indeed apply the law to people who we catch falsifying legal documents but to disenfranchise 182,000 voters because you suspect some of them are illegal voters is a complete ruse. The only reason they're doing it is to keep the wrong people from voting. With wrong meaning people who'd vote for the wrong party. It's astounding that you have such a hard time admitting this bull**** and continue to defend this bull**** as if it was something other than bull****. Jesus, Greg, wtf? The original inquiry was about people who voted and refused jury duty because they were not citizens. That was a pretty big number. I am not sure how that got to 182,000 tho. All I said was to prosecute THOSE people for perjury. Perhaps you are putting words in my mouth. The state actually only had 2600 on the list. The officials said that there could be as many as 182,000, but that number never seemed to make it to a list. Makes for a good talking point, though. They wanted to check against a federal list, but the feds stonewalled that, last I heard. Funny thing is, the list is just for illegals that aren't supposed to vote. Why would anyone have an issue with getting rid of invalid, illegal voters? It's not targeting a list of DNC members, it's going after ILLEGAL VOTERS! Funnier still that the left wants the votes they think these illegal voters will give them so badly that they'll ignore the law and file lawsuits just to keep these tainted votes. Do they have no shame? None at all, no national pride, no moral code. That's Americas Left! Bigot. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Those small transfers | General | |||
| stock market huckster are running out of carefully cultivated myths(that transfers your wealth to them)that are falling to reality, buy and hold, invest for the long term, stocks are cheap right now, and now the biggie:Diversification | General | |||
| How Small a Boat for a Small Number of People? -- FollowUp | General | |||
| How Small a Boat for a Small Number of People? | General | |||
| trailerable small sailboat for small family | General | |||
Linear Mode
