Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/10/12 10:31 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/10/2012 10:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/10/12 10:05 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/10/12 9:01 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/10/12 8:19 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/10/12 8:02 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 1870c41e-f4c1-4b16-a5e1- , says... Man, wish I had some money in this local company... http://thechronicleherald.ca/busines...rtup-goinstant What's a "young-uns" spelling guru? Posters whose writing skills suck shouldn't be pointing out what they believe to be the writing errors of others, Mr. Comma Fault. Oh. "Young-uns" happens to be in several dictionaries. Cite? And yes, I wholeheartedly agree that Don shouldn't be pointing out what they believe to be the writing errors of others, Mr. Fat Ass. Cite? Google it, moron. Yeah, that's a typical Scotty answer. You can't even "google" a word? young-uns isn't a word. It appears in several of the popular dictionaries you can check on line. It is by definition a word. Maybe the dictionaries liberals use to look up the word, "is", but not in Websters... The "Dictionary" of choice for the discerning wordsmith. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/young-uns?s=t The free, "popular" on-line dictionaries usually are not the dictionaries of choice for wordsmiths, PsychoScotty. My dictionary of choice is the full OED, but it doesn't include many "Americanisms," as it were. But, then, I don't use many. There are many free on-line dictionaries, and most of them are suitable for their intended purposes. It's funny to read an item in which you claim some "intellectuality," since you prove every day you are dumber than the proverbial wood post. |
#22
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/10/2012 10:57 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/10/12 10:31 AM, JustWait wrote: On 7/10/2012 10:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/10/12 10:05 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/10/12 9:01 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/10/12 8:19 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/10/12 8:02 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 1870c41e-f4c1-4b16-a5e1- , says... Man, wish I had some money in this local company... http://thechronicleherald.ca/busines...rtup-goinstant What's a "young-uns" spelling guru? Posters whose writing skills suck shouldn't be pointing out what they believe to be the writing errors of others, Mr. Comma Fault. Oh. "Young-uns" happens to be in several dictionaries. Cite? And yes, I wholeheartedly agree that Don shouldn't be pointing out what they believe to be the writing errors of others, Mr. Fat Ass. Cite? Google it, moron. Yeah, that's a typical Scotty answer. You can't even "google" a word? young-uns isn't a word. It appears in several of the popular dictionaries you can check on line. It is by definition a word. Maybe the dictionaries liberals use to look up the word, "is", but not in Websters... The "Dictionary" of choice for the discerning wordsmith. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/young-uns?s=t The free, "popular" on-line dictionaries usually are not the dictionaries of choice for wordsmiths, PsychoScotty. My dictionary of choice is the full OED, but it doesn't include many "Americanisms," as it were. But, then, I don't use many. There are many free on-line dictionaries, and most of them are suitable for their intended purposes. It's funny to read an item in which you claim some "intellectuality," since you prove every day you are dumber than the proverbial wood post. As it were, you are again full of ****e. None of the word authorities recognize the word, including your OED. So stop trying to move home plate around. |
#24
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , dump-on-
says... On 7/10/12 10:31 AM, JustWait wrote: On 7/10/2012 10:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/10/12 10:05 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/10/12 9:01 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/10/12 8:19 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/10/12 8:02 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 1870c41e-f4c1-4b16-a5e1- , says... Man, wish I had some money in this local company... http://thechronicleherald.ca/busines...rtup-goinstant What's a "young-uns" spelling guru? Posters whose writing skills suck shouldn't be pointing out what they believe to be the writing errors of others, Mr. Comma Fault. Oh. "Young-uns" happens to be in several dictionaries. Cite? And yes, I wholeheartedly agree that Don shouldn't be pointing out what they believe to be the writing errors of others, Mr. Fat Ass. Cite? Google it, moron. Yeah, that's a typical Scotty answer. You can't even "google" a word? young-uns isn't a word. It appears in several of the popular dictionaries you can check on line. It is by definition a word. Maybe the dictionaries liberals use to look up the word, "is", but not in Websters... The "Dictionary" of choice for the discerning wordsmith. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/young-uns?s=t The free, "popular" on-line dictionaries usually are not the dictionaries of choice for wordsmiths, PsychoScotty. My dictionary of choice is the full OED, but it doesn't include many "Americanisms," as it were. But, then, I don't use many. There are many free on-line dictionaries, and most of them are suitable for their intended purposes. It's funny to read an item in which you claim some "intellectuality," since you prove every day you are dumber than the proverbial wood post. And young-uns isn't a word. |
#25
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , says...
On 7/10/2012 10:43 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/10/2012 10:32 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/10/2012 10:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/10/12 10:05 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/10/12 9:01 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/10/12 8:19 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/10/12 8:02 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 1870c41e-f4c1-4b16-a5e1- , says... Man, wish I had some money in this local company... http://thechronicleherald.ca/busines...rtup-goinstant What's a "young-uns" spelling guru? Posters whose writing skills suck shouldn't be pointing out what they believe to be the writing errors of others, Mr. Comma Fault. Oh. "Young-uns" happens to be in several dictionaries. Cite? And yes, I wholeheartedly agree that Don shouldn't be pointing out what they believe to be the writing errors of others, Mr. Fat Ass. Cite? Google it, moron. Yeah, that's a typical Scotty answer. You can't even "google" a word? young-uns isn't a word. It appears in several of the popular dictionaries you can check on line. It is by definition a word. What kind of dictionarys are you looking at. I couldn't find it in Websters or Oxford. It's a loogieism... They make something up, then go and develop the evidence to support it ![]() You are too stupid to even follow a post. Harry is the one who said it was a word and no one else. Doesn't make it any less of a "loogieism", loogie... Now I'm loogie?? Man you are crazy. |
#26
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/10/2012 11:26 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on- says... On 7/10/12 10:31 AM, JustWait wrote: On 7/10/2012 10:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/10/12 10:05 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/10/12 9:01 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/10/12 8:19 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/10/12 8:02 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 1870c41e-f4c1-4b16-a5e1- , says... Man, wish I had some money in this local company... http://thechronicleherald.ca/busines...rtup-goinstant What's a "young-uns" spelling guru? Posters whose writing skills suck shouldn't be pointing out what they believe to be the writing errors of others, Mr. Comma Fault. Oh. "Young-uns" happens to be in several dictionaries. Cite? And yes, I wholeheartedly agree that Don shouldn't be pointing out what they believe to be the writing errors of others, Mr. Fat Ass. Cite? Google it, moron. Yeah, that's a typical Scotty answer. You can't even "google" a word? young-uns isn't a word. It appears in several of the popular dictionaries you can check on line. It is by definition a word. Maybe the dictionaries liberals use to look up the word, "is", but not in Websters... The "Dictionary" of choice for the discerning wordsmith. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/young-uns?s=t The free, "popular" on-line dictionaries usually are not the dictionaries of choice for wordsmiths, PsychoScotty. My dictionary of choice is the full OED, but it doesn't include many "Americanisms," as it were. But, then, I don't use many. There are many free on-line dictionaries, and most of them are suitable for their intended purposes. It's funny to read an item in which you claim some "intellectuality," since you prove every day you are dumber than the proverbial wood post. And young-uns isn't a word. According to any of the recognzed standard or comprehensive dictionaries. Mr. nineteen consecutive years of English training cannot argue that point. |
#27
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/10/2012 11:13 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/10/2012 10:57 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/10/12 10:31 AM, JustWait wrote: On 7/10/2012 10:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/10/12 10:05 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/10/12 9:01 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/10/12 8:19 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/10/12 8:02 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 1870c41e-f4c1-4b16-a5e1- , says... Man, wish I had some money in this local company... http://thechronicleherald.ca/busines...rtup-goinstant What's a "young-uns" spelling guru? Posters whose writing skills suck shouldn't be pointing out what they believe to be the writing errors of others, Mr. Comma Fault. Oh. "Young-uns" happens to be in several dictionaries. Cite? And yes, I wholeheartedly agree that Don shouldn't be pointing out what they believe to be the writing errors of others, Mr. Fat Ass. Cite? Google it, moron. Yeah, that's a typical Scotty answer. You can't even "google" a word? young-uns isn't a word. It appears in several of the popular dictionaries you can check on line. It is by definition a word. Maybe the dictionaries liberals use to look up the word, "is", but not in Websters... The "Dictionary" of choice for the discerning wordsmith. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/young-uns?s=t The free, "popular" on-line dictionaries usually are not the dictionaries of choice for wordsmiths, PsychoScotty. My dictionary of choice is the full OED, but it doesn't include many "Americanisms," as it were. But, then, I don't use many. There are many free on-line dictionaries, and most of them are suitable for their intended purposes. It's funny to read an item in which you claim some "intellectuality," since you prove every day you are dumber than the proverbial wood post. As it were, you are again full of ****e. None of the word authorities recognize the word, including your OED. So stop trying to move home plate around. Did the dork ever show us a dictionary that recognizes the word? I have been gone all day... |
#28
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/10/2012 10:44 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/10/2012 11:13 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/10/2012 10:57 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/10/12 10:31 AM, JustWait wrote: On 7/10/2012 10:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/10/12 10:05 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/10/12 9:01 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/10/12 8:19 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/10/12 8:02 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 1870c41e-f4c1-4b16-a5e1- , says... Man, wish I had some money in this local company... http://thechronicleherald.ca/busines...rtup-goinstant What's a "young-uns" spelling guru? Posters whose writing skills suck shouldn't be pointing out what they believe to be the writing errors of others, Mr. Comma Fault. Oh. "Young-uns" happens to be in several dictionaries. Cite? And yes, I wholeheartedly agree that Don shouldn't be pointing out what they believe to be the writing errors of others, Mr. Fat Ass. Cite? Google it, moron. Yeah, that's a typical Scotty answer. You can't even "google" a word? young-uns isn't a word. It appears in several of the popular dictionaries you can check on line. It is by definition a word. Maybe the dictionaries liberals use to look up the word, "is", but not in Websters... The "Dictionary" of choice for the discerning wordsmith. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/young-uns?s=t The free, "popular" on-line dictionaries usually are not the dictionaries of choice for wordsmiths, PsychoScotty. My dictionary of choice is the full OED, but it doesn't include many "Americanisms," as it were. But, then, I don't use many. There are many free on-line dictionaries, and most of them are suitable for their intended purposes. It's funny to read an item in which you claim some "intellectuality," since you prove every day you are dumber than the proverbial wood post. As it were, you are again full of ****e. None of the word authorities recognize the word, including your OED. So stop trying to move home plate around. Did the dork ever show us a dictionary that recognizes the word? I have been gone all day... Nope. |
#29
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/10/2012 11:01 PM, Meyer wrote:
On 7/10/2012 10:44 PM, JustWait wrote: On 7/10/2012 11:13 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/10/2012 10:57 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/10/12 10:31 AM, JustWait wrote: On 7/10/2012 10:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/10/12 10:05 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/10/12 9:01 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/10/12 8:19 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/10/12 8:02 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 1870c41e-f4c1-4b16-a5e1- , says... Man, wish I had some money in this local company... http://thechronicleherald.ca/busines...rtup-goinstant What's a "young-uns" spelling guru? Posters whose writing skills suck shouldn't be pointing out what they believe to be the writing errors of others, Mr. Comma Fault. Oh. "Young-uns" happens to be in several dictionaries. Cite? And yes, I wholeheartedly agree that Don shouldn't be pointing out what they believe to be the writing errors of others, Mr. Fat Ass. Cite? Google it, moron. Yeah, that's a typical Scotty answer. You can't even "google" a word? young-uns isn't a word. It appears in several of the popular dictionaries you can check on line. It is by definition a word. Maybe the dictionaries liberals use to look up the word, "is", but not in Websters... The "Dictionary" of choice for the discerning wordsmith. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/young-uns?s=t The free, "popular" on-line dictionaries usually are not the dictionaries of choice for wordsmiths, PsychoScotty. My dictionary of choice is the full OED, but it doesn't include many "Americanisms," as it were. But, then, I don't use many. There are many free on-line dictionaries, and most of them are suitable for their intended purposes. It's funny to read an item in which you claim some "intellectuality," since you prove every day you are dumber than the proverbial wood post. As it were, you are again full of ****e. None of the word authorities recognize the word, including your OED. So stop trying to move home plate around. Did the dork ever show us a dictionary that recognizes the word? I have been gone all day... Nope. I see he is still calling names.. He must have seen Hancock recently, thinks being called names by a disgusting pedophile creeper means something to me... He is in a fantasy world.. |
#30
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , says...
On 7/10/2012 11:13 AM, Meyer wrote: On 7/10/2012 10:57 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/10/12 10:31 AM, JustWait wrote: On 7/10/2012 10:11 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/10/12 10:05 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/10/12 9:01 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/10/12 8:19 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/10/12 8:02 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article 1870c41e-f4c1-4b16-a5e1- , says... Man, wish I had some money in this local company... http://thechronicleherald.ca/busines...rtup-goinstant What's a "young-uns" spelling guru? Posters whose writing skills suck shouldn't be pointing out what they believe to be the writing errors of others, Mr. Comma Fault. Oh. "Young-uns" happens to be in several dictionaries. Cite? And yes, I wholeheartedly agree that Don shouldn't be pointing out what they believe to be the writing errors of others, Mr. Fat Ass. Cite? Google it, moron. Yeah, that's a typical Scotty answer. You can't even "google" a word? young-uns isn't a word. It appears in several of the popular dictionaries you can check on line. It is by definition a word. Maybe the dictionaries liberals use to look up the word, "is", but not in Websters... The "Dictionary" of choice for the discerning wordsmith. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/young-uns?s=t The free, "popular" on-line dictionaries usually are not the dictionaries of choice for wordsmiths, PsychoScotty. My dictionary of choice is the full OED, but it doesn't include many "Americanisms," as it were. But, then, I don't use many. There are many free on-line dictionaries, and most of them are suitable for their intended purposes. It's funny to read an item in which you claim some "intellectuality," since you prove every day you are dumber than the proverbial wood post. As it were, you are again full of ****e. None of the word authorities recognize the word, including your OED. So stop trying to move home plate around. Did the dork ever show us a dictionary that recognizes the word? I have been gone all day... Nope. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Local Authorities Shut Down Boat Manufacturing at Local Repair Yard. | Cruising | |||
Snotty teachin' the young'uns to bike... | General | |||
A rousing good sea story for young readers... | Tall Ships | |||
Local boy does good...again! | General | |||
Another local 'good news' story | General |