On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 3:30:57 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:


It's funny, but your newsreader didn't used to do that, I wonder why it
does now? And this post doesn't seem to have it in it, and it has the >
to quote you. Also, when I read your posts, your word wrap is WAY long

Nope, no upgrades to my machine. I use Google Groups to read and post. The garbage isn't there until I click reply, then the window that opens has changed all the existing to the HTML version. The new ones added by the reply are , just the existing ones get changed. Does it with both IE and Chrome. As I had posted earlier, I'll investigate it more later.

In article ,
says...

On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 3:30:57 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:


It's funny, but your newsreader didn't used to do that, I wonder why it
does now? And this post doesn't seem to have it in it, and it has the >
to quote you. Also, when I read your posts, your word wrap is WAY long

Nope, no upgrades to my machine. I use Google Groups to read and post. The garbage isn't there until I click reply, then the window that opens has changed all the existing to the HTML version. The new ones added by the reply are , just the existing ones get changed. Does it with both IE and Chrome. As I had posted earlier, I'll investigate it more later.

And Google just changed their format, so I guess that's the problem.

On 25 Jul 2012 00:25:10 GMT, x'man wrote:

wrote:


Maryland has had more than it's share of corrupt leaders too.
Agnew ran on a reform ticket, replacing a Baltimore crook who was
worse than him.

Agnew was a piker compared to Scott.

I raise you Marvin Mandel.

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 08:17:00 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

You've not seen all of the physical evidence yet. No one has.


We have seen most, if not all of it. Florida is a sunshine state and
when it was "discovered" by the defense, it was public information. If
the prosecution is withholding evidence, Zimmerman walks and Corey
probably gets disbarred.

But what you don't understand is that lots of evidence isn't
"discovered" until trial.

That is not true at all, you have been watching too much TV.

The prosecution will not start a trial thinking they will get
something in direct testimony that they don't already have.
For the most part, they will shoot their whole wad at the grand jury.

In this case, they will need everything they can come up with to
survive the immunity hearing where this whole witch hunt may end.

I thought iBoater was a lawyer?

On 7/25/12 6:09 PM, BAR wrote:
On 25 Jul 2012 00:25:10 GMT, x'man wrote:

wrote:


Maryland has had more than it's share of corrupt leaders too.
Agnew ran on a reform ticket, replacing a Baltimore crook who was
worse than him.

Agnew was a piker compared to Scott.

I raise you Marvin Mandel.


Mandel and Agnew together were pikers compared to the amount of
corruption and theft of taxpayer dollars Scott's corporation committed.
He should be in federal prison.

On 7/25/2012 6:10 PM, BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 08:17:00 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

You've not seen all of the physical evidence yet. No one has.


We have seen most, if not all of it. Florida is a sunshine state and
when it was "discovered" by the defense, it was public information. If
the prosecution is withholding evidence, Zimmerman walks and Corey
probably gets disbarred.

But what you don't understand is that lots of evidence isn't
"discovered" until trial.

That is not true at all, you have been watching too much TV.

The prosecution will not start a trial thinking they will get
something in direct testimony that they don't already have.
For the most part, they will shoot their whole wad at the grand jury.

In this case, they will need everything they can come up with to
survive the immunity hearing where this whole witch hunt may end.

I thought iBoater was a lawyer?


No, not that smart, just good at math...

On 7/25/2012 2:51 PM, wrote:
On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 12:41:51 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
What is that &gt crap that accompanies your posts? Can't you stop it?

It's > and that's HTML for a . I have no control over it, it seems to be something that google groups is doing. I may fire up chrome or firefox to see if it's browser related.

BTW, this post contains none of that (except what you and I intentionally wrote) as I'm about to click the "post" button. We'll see if any shows up.


None of it showed up except the ones you typed intentionally.

On 7/25/2012 4:19 PM, wrote:
On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 3:30:57 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:


It's funny, but your newsreader didn't used to do that, I wonder why it
does now? And this post doesn't seem to have it in it, and it has the >
to quote you. Also, when I read your posts, your word wrap is WAY long

Nope, no upgrades to my machine. I use Google Groups to read and post. The garbage isn't there until I click reply, then the window that opens has changed all the existing to the HTML version. The new ones added by the reply are , just the existing ones get changed. Does it with both IE and Chrome. As I had posted earlier, I'll investigate it more later.


That's a setting in your reader I think.

On Jul 25, 11:13*pm, JustWait wrote:
On 7/25/2012 4:19 PM, wrote:

On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 3:30:57 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:

It's funny, but your newsreader didn't used to do that, I wonder why it
does now? And this post doesn't seem to have it in it, and it has the >
to quote you. Also, when I read your posts, your word wrap is WAY long

Nope, no upgrades to my machine. *I use Google Groups to read and post. *The garbage isn't there until I click reply, then the window that opens has changed all the existing to the HTML version. *The new ones added by the reply are , just the existing ones get changed. *Does it with both IE and Chrome. *As I had posted earlier, I'll investigate it more later.

That's a setting in your reader I think.

The new google groups does that Scott.

On 7/26/12 7:12 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 12:57:17 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 7/25/12 12:52 PM, wrote:
On 25 Jul 2012 00:25:10 GMT, x'man wrote:

wrote:


Maryland has had more than it's share of corrupt leaders too.
Agnew ran on a reform ticket, replacing a Baltimore crook who was
worse than him.

Agnew was a piker compared to Scott.

Short memory I guess


Scott's company was *fined* a half billion dollars. No one knows
precisely how many billions his companies stole. Agnew was a piker
compared to Scott.

It depends on whether you consider political corruption worse than
shady business practices.
Nixon wasn't accused of taking anything of any real monetary value yet
I bet you think he was a criminal.


Nixon engaged in some activities that were against the law, and that
makes him a "criminal," but I think those activities were more related
to his personality defects than any desire to be a lawbreaker. Nixon was
a strange man in many regards, but all in all, I think he was a better
president than, say, Reagan or Bush II, both of whom engaged in far more
serious criminal activities and did the country far more harm. I'm
referring, of course, to Reagan's "unproven" role in the Iran-Contra
affair and his fiscal irresponsibility, and Bush's lying us into two
unnecessary wars.