In article ,
says...

On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 06:20:24 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 8:15:49 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:

You said that a person's statements are hearsay. Isn't Zimmerman a
person?

I never said that, either. I *did* say that the article you referenced was full of hearsay and conjecture, both of which are true.

Clue: Look up "hearsay". Only some of a person's statements are hearsay.

Hearsay is repeating something you heard a 3d party say.

Like Martin's girlfriend says she heard Martin say "yada yada"

Oh, so any of the so called "witnesses" that said they heard Zimmerman
screaming, heard thuds, etc. is all hearsay? Thanks!

On 7/25/12 2:25 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/25/12 12:14 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/25/12 11:16 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/25/12 10:32 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/25/12 9:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote:


How come you're not married?

I choose not to be.


Probably a good choice for you. Keeps you out of the gene pool, as it were.

So, please show me where you got this notion that I have no girlfriend
and that I have a live in boyfriend, you lying piece of ****......



As I said, you're easy.

I'm easy because you are a lying piece of ****?



It's easy because you are a cowardly little asshole whose behavior here
is simple to control. Tweak, tweak, tweak.

Now, what makes you think I'm a coward, fat ass? And what makes you
think I'm little? And you are a liar and you lied about me above. That's
why you can't show me where you got the idea that I have no girlfriend
and that I have a live in boyfriend, because it was you lying, yet
again.


Please...every time you post one of these diatribes, and every time you
try to split hairs with other posters here, you are the fool. Grow up.

On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 12:41:51 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
What is that &gt crap that accompanies your posts? Can't you stop it?

It's > and that's HTML for a . I have no control over it, it seems to be something that google groups is doing. I may fire up chrome or firefox to see if it's browser related.

BTW, this post contains none of that (except what you and I intentionally wrote) as I'm about to click the "post" button. We'll see if any shows up.

On 7/25/12 2:51 PM, wrote:
On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 12:41:51 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
What is that &gt crap that accompanies your posts? Can't you stop it?

It's > and that's HTML for a . I have no control over it, it seems to be something that google groups is doing. I may fire up chrome or firefox to see if it's browser related.

BTW, this post contains none of that (except what you and I intentionally wrote) as I'm about to click the "post" button. We'll see if any shows up.


Nope...this one is "clean."

On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 2:23:02 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
BIGOT - intolerant person: somebody with strong opinions, especially on
politics, religion, or ethnicity, who refuses to accept different views


You're one of the most bigoted people in this NG.

Nope, I don't see things as always right or always left.

Cool, then you are open to the possibility that there's a God? That's a big change from your earlier, bigoted stance of no how, no way.

Meanwhile, I've said nothing bigoted in this thread. The word "hearsay"
has a definition which is not subjective, I've applied it properly, and you have not. Pointing that out is not bigotry, as there is no alternate view possible.

Sorry, but you are bigoted. You refuse to accept a different view about
Zimmerman, by your own definition!

Sigh... another lie. I simply pointed out that the cite you provide as some sort of proof is filled with hearsay and conjecture. I made no proclamation about Zimmerman.

Seriously, you must be ADD, with your needle stuck in a groove.

On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 2:56:24 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/25/12 2:51 PM, wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 12:41:51 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
>> What is that &gt crap that accompanies your posts? Can't you stop it?
>
> It's > and that's HTML for a >. I have no control over it, it seems to be something that google groups is doing. I may fire up chrome or firefox to see if it's browser related.
>
> BTW, this post contains none of that (except what you and I intentionally wrote) as I'm about to click the "post" button. We'll see if any shows up.
>

Nope...this one is "clean."

Yes it was... until I opened it to reply. It did it with IE, and now this is with Chrome. I'll poke around to see if I can find out more.

In article ,
says...

On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 12:41:51 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
What is that &gt crap that accompanies your posts? Can't you stop it?

It's > and that's HTML for a . I have no control over it, it seems to be something that google groups is doing. I may fire up chrome or firefox to see if it's browser related.

BTW, this post contains none of that (except what you and I intentionally wrote) as I'm about to click the "post" button. We'll see if any shows up.

It's funny, but your newsreader didn't used to do that, I wonder why it
does now? And this post doesn't seem to have it in it, and it has the
to quote you. Also, when I read your posts, your word wrap is WAY long

In article ,
says...

On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 2:23:02 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
BIGOT - intolerant person: somebody with strong opinions, especially on
politics, religion, or ethnicity, who refuses to accept different views


You're one of the most bigoted people in this NG.

Nope, I don't see things as always right or always left.

Cool, then you are open to the possibility that there's a God? That's a big change from your earlier, bigoted stance of no how, no way.

Meanwhile, I've said nothing bigoted in this thread. The word "hearsay"
has a definition which is not subjective, I've applied it properly, and you have not. Pointing that out is not bigotry, as there is no alternate view possible.

Sorry, but you are bigoted. You refuse to accept a different view about
Zimmerman, by your own definition!

Sigh... another lie. I simply pointed out that the cite you provide as some sort of proof is filled with hearsay and conjecture. I made no proclamation about Zimmerman.

Seriously, you must be ADD, with your needle stuck in a groove.

Man, you are dumb.

In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/25/12 2:25 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/25/12 12:14 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/25/12 11:16 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/25/12 10:32 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/25/12 9:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote:


How come you're not married?

I choose not to be.


Probably a good choice for you. Keeps you out of the gene pool, as it were.

So, please show me where you got this notion that I have no girlfriend
and that I have a live in boyfriend, you lying piece of ****......



As I said, you're easy.

I'm easy because you are a lying piece of ****?



It's easy because you are a cowardly little asshole whose behavior here
is simple to control. Tweak, tweak, tweak.

Now, what makes you think I'm a coward, fat ass? And what makes you
think I'm little? And you are a liar and you lied about me above. That's
why you can't show me where you got the idea that I have no girlfriend
and that I have a live in boyfriend, because it was you lying, yet
again.


Please...every time you post one of these diatribes, and every time you
try to split hairs with other posters here, you are the fool. Grow up.

Oh, really? I guess you can't answer any of the above, eh liar? Grow up?
I'm not the one that comes here and lies on a daily basis. YOU lied
about me, how is that "splitting hairs"??

In article ,
says...

On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 2:56:24 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/25/12 2:51 PM, wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 12:41:51 PM UTC-4, X ` Man wrote:
>> What is that &gt crap that accompanies your posts? Can't you stop it?
>
> It's > and that's HTML for a >. I have no control over it, it seems to be something that google groups is doing. I may fire up chrome or firefox to see if it's browser related.
>
> BTW, this post contains none of that (except what you and I intentionally wrote) as I'm about to click the "post" button. We'll see if any shows up.
>

Nope...this one is "clean."

Yes it was... until I opened it to reply. It did it with IE, and now this is with Chrome. I'll poke around to see if I can find out more.

Yep, it's back now, that's for sure! Did you just upgrade or anything?