Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#82
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , says...
On 7/25/2012 6:10 PM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 08:17:00 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... You've not seen all of the physical evidence yet. No one has. We have seen most, if not all of it. Florida is a sunshine state and when it was "discovered" by the defense, it was public information. If the prosecution is withholding evidence, Zimmerman walks and Corey probably gets disbarred. But what you don't understand is that lots of evidence isn't "discovered" until trial. That is not true at all, you have been watching too much TV. The prosecution will not start a trial thinking they will get something in direct testimony that they don't already have. For the most part, they will shoot their whole wad at the grand jury. In this case, they will need everything they can come up with to survive the immunity hearing where this whole witch hunt may end. I thought iBoater was a lawyer? No, not that smart, just good at math... At least I'm good enough at things to keep myself employed. |
#83
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
says... In article , says... On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 08:17:00 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... You've not seen all of the physical evidence yet. No one has. We have seen most, if not all of it. Florida is a sunshine state and when it was "discovered" by the defense, it was public information. If the prosecution is withholding evidence, Zimmerman walks and Corey probably gets disbarred. But what you don't understand is that lots of evidence isn't "discovered" until trial. That is not true at all, you have been watching too much TV. The prosecution will not start a trial thinking they will get something in direct testimony that they don't already have. For the most part, they will shoot their whole wad at the grand jury. In this case, they will need everything they can come up with to survive the immunity hearing where this whole witch hunt may end. I thought iBoater was a lawyer? What on earth made you think that? I hope you're not getting delusionally insane like Scotty! |
#84
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
says... On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:27:14 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 06:20:24 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 8:15:49 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: You said that a person's statements are hearsay. Isn't Zimmerman a person? I never said that, either. I *did* say that the article you referenced was full of hearsay and conjecture, both of which are true. Clue: Look up "hearsay". Only some of a person's statements are hearsay. Hearsay is repeating something you heard a 3d party say. Like Martin's girlfriend says she heard Martin say "yada yada" Oh, so any of the so called "witnesses" that said they heard Zimmerman screaming, heard thuds, etc. is all hearsay? Thanks! If they actually saw it, that is direct testimony. Of course, notice I said the witnesses that said the HEARD Zimmerman screaming..... |
#85
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#86
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/26/2012 8:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:26:14 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 08:17:00 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... You've not seen all of the physical evidence yet. No one has. We have seen most, if not all of it. Florida is a sunshine state and when it was "discovered" by the defense, it was public information. If the prosecution is withholding evidence, Zimmerman walks and Corey probably gets disbarred. But what you don't understand is that lots of evidence isn't "discovered" until trial. That is not true at all, you have been watching too much TV. The prosecution will not start a trial thinking they will get something in direct testimony that they don't already have. For the most part, they will shoot their whole wad at the grand jury. In this case, they will need everything they can come up with to survive the immunity hearing where this whole witch hunt may end. Really? Are you serious that no evidence can be brought in after the trial has begun? Really?? It is unusual Bull****! cite ;-) |
#87
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/26/12 8:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:26:14 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 08:17:00 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... You've not seen all of the physical evidence yet. No one has. We have seen most, if not all of it. Florida is a sunshine state and when it was "discovered" by the defense, it was public information. If the prosecution is withholding evidence, Zimmerman walks and Corey probably gets disbarred. But what you don't understand is that lots of evidence isn't "discovered" until trial. That is not true at all, you have been watching too much TV. The prosecution will not start a trial thinking they will get something in direct testimony that they don't already have. For the most part, they will shoot their whole wad at the grand jury. In this case, they will need everything they can come up with to survive the immunity hearing where this whole witch hunt may end. Really? Are you serious that no evidence can be brought in after the trial has begun? Really?? It is unusual Bull****! Typically, in a criminal trial, all the hard evidence and all the witness examinations are made available by both sides to the other side so that the lawyers can prepare their questions and bring in rebuttal witnesses. While it is possible to introduce evidence previously unknown at a trial, it is not easy to do so because the defense will object and the judge probably will grant the objection. Of course, while questioning witnesses on the stand, new information might be forthcoming. If it conflicts with previous sworn statements of a witness, that information can be challenged. If you think otherwise, iLoogy, you've watched too much courtroom drama on TV. |
#88
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/26/2012 7:17 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:10:20 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 08:17:00 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... You've not seen all of the physical evidence yet. No one has. We have seen most, if not all of it. Florida is a sunshine state and when it was "discovered" by the defense, it was public information. If the prosecution is withholding evidence, Zimmerman walks and Corey probably gets disbarred. But what you don't understand is that lots of evidence isn't "discovered" until trial. That is not true at all, you have been watching too much TV. The prosecution will not start a trial thinking they will get something in direct testimony that they don't already have. For the most part, they will shoot their whole wad at the grand jury. In this case, they will need everything they can come up with to survive the immunity hearing where this whole witch hunt may end. I thought iBoater was a lawyer? I never even believed Plume was a lawyer Engineer... or draftsman maybe.. |
#89
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/26/12 9:17 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/26/2012 7:17 AM, wrote: On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:10:20 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 08:17:00 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... You've not seen all of the physical evidence yet. No one has. We have seen most, if not all of it. Florida is a sunshine state and when it was "discovered" by the defense, it was public information. If the prosecution is withholding evidence, Zimmerman walks and Corey probably gets disbarred. But what you don't understand is that lots of evidence isn't "discovered" until trial. That is not true at all, you have been watching too much TV. The prosecution will not start a trial thinking they will get something in direct testimony that they don't already have. For the most part, they will shoot their whole wad at the grand jury. In this case, they will need everything they can come up with to survive the immunity hearing where this whole witch hunt may end. I thought iBoater was a lawyer? I never even believed Plume was a lawyer Engineer... or draftsman maybe.. Whatever it was, it was higher up on the occupational ladder than you ever got. |
#90
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article m,
says... On 7/26/2012 8:38 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:26:14 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 08:17:00 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... You've not seen all of the physical evidence yet. No one has. We have seen most, if not all of it. Florida is a sunshine state and when it was "discovered" by the defense, it was public information. If the prosecution is withholding evidence, Zimmerman walks and Corey probably gets disbarred. But what you don't understand is that lots of evidence isn't "discovered" until trial. That is not true at all, you have been watching too much TV. The prosecution will not start a trial thinking they will get something in direct testimony that they don't already have. For the most part, they will shoot their whole wad at the grand jury. In this case, they will need everything they can come up with to survive the immunity hearing where this whole witch hunt may end. Really? Are you serious that no evidence can be brought in after the trial has begun? Really?? It is unusual Bull****! cite ;-) Sure thing! http://www.law.northwestern.edu/journals/jihr/v8/n1/4/ http://www.benchmarkinstitute.org/t_...ntroducing.htm http://www.houston-opinions.com/law-...w-trial-newly- discovered-evidence.html |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More about that great stand your ground law..... | General | |||
Here's what the blinders on people don't understand about stand your ground | General | |||
The utter stupidity of the stand your ground law | General | |||
'Bama Justice Department Protects Romney Attacker | General | |||
NMEA diff. signal ground vs. DC ground | Electronics |