Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#23
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
says... On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 15:18:17 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 11:29:03 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: Seems as if there are a lot more dumb Democrats than Republicans. They do seem to have more trouble navigating a complex ballot, finding their polling place and having a good enough job to have an ID with a picture on it. You talking about the folks who've experience 200 years of institutionalized racism who are easily identified as different from white? You do know that slavery is still practiced widely around the world. I would hope that you use your "intelligence" and "energy" to do something about it. Or, are you one of the NIMBY's? |
#24
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#25
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/6/12 7:50 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 19:16:48 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... A high IQ has nothing to do with what a person is. A high IQ is nothing to be particularly proud or boastful about. It' a gift at birth. It's what you do with the IQ that you have that qualifies and classifies you as a person. Who would have thought I was in Bill Clintons class of smart? Bill Clinton may have had a high IQ but he was pretty stupid. Did he really think any of his lies would hold? For that matter how smart are you if you are sticking your pecker in girls around the office? Still obsessed with Bill's sex life, eh? -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. |
#26
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/6/2012 7:46 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 19:07:16 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 8/6/12 6:58 PM, wrote: On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 14:40:57 -0700, jps wrote: On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 15:18:17 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 11:29:03 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: Seems as if there are a lot more dumb Democrats than Republicans. They do seem to have more trouble navigating a complex ballot, finding their polling place and having a good enough job to have an ID with a picture on it. You talking about the folks who've experience 200 years of institutionalized racism who are easily identified as different from white? Why is everything racial with you and Harry. Who is the racist here? Are you really saying this lack of cognitive skill is racially based? It just seems to be Democrats. In Palm Beach County the butterfly ballot baffled old white people. The butterfly ballot baffled a lot of people, from voters to vote counters, and it was easy to see why. Those being disenfranchised by white Republicans tend to be older, poorer, and minorities. The butterfly ballot was much ado about nothing. They gave it to a class of second graders and they figured it out with no problems. (using fictional candidates) It is even questionable that anyone was actually confused. 3200 people punched Buchanan, about a third of the number of people who voted for him in the primary, with far fewer people voting in the primary and a single page ballot. There was absolutely zero difference for the counter. That 3505 card reader just read it like any other punch card and when they held it up to manually count it, they were just looking at the hole. The people are allegedly being disenfranchised by complicated procedures. It would be less intelligent people baffled by that wouldn't it? BTW that evil plot to steal Gore votes was perpetrated by a Democratically run election board. (Palm Beach is a very "blue" county) Were they scheming or just dumb? They were trying to cheat any way they could. I am sure Ohio will be ripe with cheating this time around.. Look for more vote buying and Mickey Mouse living on every block.. |
#27
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/6/12 8:56 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 8/6/2012 7:46 PM, wrote: On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 19:07:16 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 8/6/12 6:58 PM, wrote: On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 14:40:57 -0700, jps wrote: On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 15:18:17 -0400, wrote: On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 11:29:03 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: Seems as if there are a lot more dumb Democrats than Republicans. They do seem to have more trouble navigating a complex ballot, finding their polling place and having a good enough job to have an ID with a picture on it. You talking about the folks who've experience 200 years of institutionalized racism who are easily identified as different from white? Why is everything racial with you and Harry. Who is the racist here? Are you really saying this lack of cognitive skill is racially based? It just seems to be Democrats. In Palm Beach County the butterfly ballot baffled old white people. The butterfly ballot baffled a lot of people, from voters to vote counters, and it was easy to see why. Those being disenfranchised by white Republicans tend to be older, poorer, and minorities. The butterfly ballot was much ado about nothing. They gave it to a class of second graders and they figured it out with no problems. (using fictional candidates) It is even questionable that anyone was actually confused. 3200 people punched Buchanan, about a third of the number of people who voted for him in the primary, with far fewer people voting in the primary and a single page ballot. There was absolutely zero difference for the counter. That 3505 card reader just read it like any other punch card and when they held it up to manually count it, they were just looking at the hole. The people are allegedly being disenfranchised by complicated procedures. It would be less intelligent people baffled by that wouldn't it? BTW that evil plot to steal Gore votes was perpetrated by a Democratically run election board. (Palm Beach is a very "blue" county) Were they scheming or just dumb? They were trying to cheat any way they could. I am sure Ohio will be ripe with cheating this time around.. Look for more vote buying and Mickey Mouse living on every block.. You're sure? What the hell do you know about election procedures in Ohio? Answer? Nothing. -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. |
#28
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/6/12 9:34 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 19:55:20 -0400, X ` Man wrote: On 8/6/12 7:50 PM, wrote: On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 19:16:48 -0400, BAR wrote: In article , says... A high IQ has nothing to do with what a person is. A high IQ is nothing to be particularly proud or boastful about. It' a gift at birth. It's what you do with the IQ that you have that qualifies and classifies you as a person. Who would have thought I was in Bill Clintons class of smart? Bill Clinton may have had a high IQ but he was pretty stupid. Did he really think any of his lies would hold? For that matter how smart are you if you are sticking your pecker in girls around the office? Still obsessed with Bill's sex life, eh? The issue was how smart he was supposed to be. That was dumb. It will also be his legacy That must be why he is so popular today, eh? -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. |
#29
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"X ` Man" wrote in message ...
On 8/6/12 2:29 PM, Califbill wrote: =============================== Seems as if there are a lot more dumb Democrats than Republicans. Just from the number of Dems register vs. Repubs. And you look at the reverse racism of cities like Detroit and Chicago who are probably 95% Democrat it seems as if low IQ is not a requirement for right wing racism. As someone who supported Crazy Zell Miller, Bilious Bill, you are permanently disqualified from discussions about intellect. Sorry. -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. ------------------- Must have hit a sore point with you. right to the personal sneers. Zell could not have screwed up the country as much as the last 2 Presidents have managed to screw the pooch. |
#30
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"jps" wrote in message ...
On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 11:29:03 -0700, "Califbill" wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 12:25:57 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "X ` Man" wrote in message news:ZqednT4424qqVoLNnZ2dnUVZ_rednZ2d@earthlink. com... On 8/6/12 8:43 AM, Eisboch wrote: "X ` Man" wrote in message news ![]() Perhaps such a study wasn't needed, since we already knew the answer, eh? Intelligence Study Links Low I.Q. To Prejudice, Racism, Conservatism Are racists dumb? Do conservatives tend to be less intelligent than liberals? A provocative new study from Brock University in Ontario suggests the answer to both questions may be a qualified yes. The study, published in Psychological Science, showed that people who score low on I.Q. tests in childhood are more likely to develop prejudiced beliefs and socially conservative politics in adulthood. I.Q., or intelligence quotient, is a score determined by standardized tests, but whether the tests truly reveal intelligence remains a topic of hot debate among psychologists. Dr. Gordon Hodson, a professor of psychology at the university and the study's lead author, said the finding represented evidence of a vicious cycle: *People of low intelligence gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies, which stress resistance to change and, in turn, prejudice,* he told LiveScience. Why might less intelligent people be drawn to conservative ideologies? Because such ideologies feature "structure and order" that make it easier to comprehend a complicated world, Dodson said. "Unfortunately, many of these features can also contribute to prejudice," he added. Dr. Brian Nosek, a University of Virginia psychologist, echoed those sentiments. "Reality is complicated and messy," he told The Huffington Post in an email. "Ideologies get rid of the messiness and impose a simpler solution. So, it may not be surprising that people with less cognitive capacity will be attracted to simplifying ideologies." --------------------------------------------------------- John F. Kennedy had an IQ of 117 .... above average, but no Einstein who had an IQ of 160. Abraham Lincoln had an estimated IQ of 128. Bill Clinton has an IQ of 137 George W. Bush has an IQ of 125 Adolph Hitler had an IQ of 141. A high IQ has nothing to do with what a person is. A high IQ is nothing to be particularly proud or boastful about. It' a gift at birth. It's what you do with the IQ that you have that qualifies and classifies you as a person. The study wasn't about "high" or "low" IQ tests but a correlation between "people who score low on I.Q. tests in childhood are more likely to develop prejudiced beliefs and socially conservative politics in adulthood." -------------------------------------------- I understand that. I was not commenting on the study you cited. I was commenting on those who think they are superior in some way because they were gifted with a higher than average IQ. First of all, they didn't earn it and second of all not all put it to productive use. It's no wonder the conservative movement can appeal to the six-pack and fundy communities, who gravitate towards simple lifestyles and simple answers. Bumper sticker logic brings comfort to those who are uncomfortable wrestling with complex issues. =============================== Seems as if there are a lot more dumb Democrats than Republicans. Just from the number of Dems register vs. Repubs. And you look at the reverse racism of cities like Detroit and Chicago who are probably 95% Democrat it seems as if low IQ is not a requirement for right wing racism. "Seems as if...." I'm sure you've got plenty of stats to support your assertion. Not. Given the institutional racism that's existed in this country for hundreds of years, you think that would be trumped by people's tendency toward conservatism, assuming a low IQ? ------------------------ Huh? As to institutional racism. there has been discrimination against, Blacks, Irish, Mormon's were officially allowed to be killed with no penalty. Only religion so done in the history of the USA. We now have reverse racism. Can not get a job if white, college educated, but a lesser qualified person of black color will be advanced ahead of time. Mexicans have been discriminated against and they seem to hold a majority of the jobs these days, without the governmental support other people have. Maybe because they can add and subtract and do not have a 50-73% dropout rate from school. Why do I have to show an ID to get on an airplane, but not to vote? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|