|
Uh Oh...
|
Uh Oh...
On 9/21/2012 3:01 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:21:50 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:04:49 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: Whether or not Zimmerman is guilty of a crime is something the courts will have to decide. It has become pretty clear however that he is not exactly a model citizen or a paragon of good judgement. In addition to that he has cast a lot of unwanted attention onto the stand your ground law. It also increased the number of people who simply do not want to be involved. Why would you want to take the chance of paying too much attention to a thug who can beat you senseless and you can't defend yourself. It is better to just look the other way. And that's what Martin tried to do! Bull**** He confronted Zimmerman. "why are you following me" remember? It is ludicrous to assume that a teenaged football star could not outrun an old fat guy if he was trying to get away. Seems like the gun malfunctioned and went off on it's own, at just the right time. There was no human DNA on it. Case closed. |
Uh Oh...
In article ,
says... On Friday, September 21, 2012 4:22:59 PM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:21:50 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:04:49 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: Whether or not Zimmerman is guilty of a crime is something the courts will have to decide. It has become pretty clear however that he is not exactly a model citizen or a paragon of good judgement. In addition to that he has cast a lot of unwanted attention onto the stand your ground law. It also increased the number of people who simply do not want to be involved. Why would you want to take the chance of paying too much attention to a thug who can beat you senseless and you can't defend yourself. It is better to just look the other way. And that's what Martin tried to do! Bull**** He confronted Zimmerman. "why are you following me" remember? After Zimmerman confronted him, he asked why. Oh, you were there? The phone conversation, dip****. |
Uh Oh...
|
Uh Oh...
In article m,
says... On 9/21/2012 3:01 PM, wrote: On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:21:50 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:04:49 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: Whether or not Zimmerman is guilty of a crime is something the courts will have to decide. It has become pretty clear however that he is not exactly a model citizen or a paragon of good judgement. In addition to that he has cast a lot of unwanted attention onto the stand your ground law. It also increased the number of people who simply do not want to be involved. Why would you want to take the chance of paying too much attention to a thug who can beat you senseless and you can't defend yourself. It is better to just look the other way. And that's what Martin tried to do! Bull**** He confronted Zimmerman. "why are you following me" remember? It is ludicrous to assume that a teenaged football star could not outrun an old fat guy if he was trying to get away. Seems like the gun malfunctioned and went off on it's own, at just the right time. There was no human DNA on it. Case closed. Moron. |
Uh Oh...
In article ,
says... On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 20:54:11 -0400, Meyer wrote: On 9/21/2012 3:01 PM, wrote: On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:21:50 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:04:49 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: Whether or not Zimmerman is guilty of a crime is something the courts will have to decide. It has become pretty clear however that he is not exactly a model citizen or a paragon of good judgement. In addition to that he has cast a lot of unwanted attention onto the stand your ground law. It also increased the number of people who simply do not want to be involved. Why would you want to take the chance of paying too much attention to a thug who can beat you senseless and you can't defend yourself. It is better to just look the other way. And that's what Martin tried to do! Bull**** He confronted Zimmerman. "why are you following me" remember? It is ludicrous to assume that a teenaged football star could not outrun an old fat guy if he was trying to get away. Seems like the gun malfunctioned and went off on it's own, at just the right time. There was no human DNA on it. Case closed. No, they recovered some "male DNA" but it was not enough to be tied to any particular person. Maybe Martin shot himself. It certainly could have been Martin's, blowing the hell out of JP's assertion.. For that matter it was probably from the cop who put the gun in the evidence bag but since it didn't match Martin or Zimmerman they said it was unidentified just to avoid that controversy in an already controversial case. If the evidence was contaminated, it won't help Angie's case. Couldn't be that Zimmerman cleaned up the gun after the cops let him go, eh? Nah...... |
Uh Oh...
On 9/22/2012 7:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 20:54:11 -0400, Meyer wrote: On 9/21/2012 3:01 PM, wrote: On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:21:50 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:04:49 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: Whether or not Zimmerman is guilty of a crime is something the courts will have to decide. It has become pretty clear however that he is not exactly a model citizen or a paragon of good judgement. In addition to that he has cast a lot of unwanted attention onto the stand your ground law. It also increased the number of people who simply do not want to be involved. Why would you want to take the chance of paying too much attention to a thug who can beat you senseless and you can't defend yourself. It is better to just look the other way. And that's what Martin tried to do! Bull**** He confronted Zimmerman. "why are you following me" remember? It is ludicrous to assume that a teenaged football star could not outrun an old fat guy if he was trying to get away. Seems like the gun malfunctioned and went off on it's own, at just the right time. There was no human DNA on it. Case closed. No, they recovered some "male DNA" but it was not enough to be tied to any particular person. Maybe Martin shot himself. It certainly could have been Martin's, blowing the hell out of JP's assertion.. For that matter it was probably from the cop who put the gun in the evidence bag but since it didn't match Martin or Zimmerman they said it was unidentified just to avoid that controversy in an already controversial case. If the evidence was contaminated, it won't help Angie's case. Couldn't be that Zimmerman cleaned up the gun after the cops let him go, eh? Nah...... Would have been a brilliant move, but I don't think he did. |
Uh Oh...
|
Uh Oh...
In article ,
says... On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 07:49:52 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... And you are taking the word of a KNOWN liar! Sherrie was the one who was accused of lying not George Really? Are you that blind by FOX telling you he's innocent?? http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...osecutors-say- zimmerman-hid-second-passport-lied-about-money.html http://blogs.chicagotribune.com/news.../06/zimmerman- back-behind-bars-for-lying-about-money.html Who was CHARGED? Whoa, YOU were the one who said that Zimmerman was not "accused of lying".... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com